Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sameer Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants prays for and is permitted to correct the name of opposite party no.2 in the cause title of the instant application, during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that applicant no.1 is husband, applicant no.2 is mother-in-law and applicant no.3 is brother-in-law of opposite party no.2, whereas applicant nos.4 & 5 of his relatives and the matrimonial dispute is in the genesis of this case and there are chances of amicable settlement between the parties. He has strenuously urged that this case may be referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court so that the litigants may have a chance to settle their dispute on their own terms through mediation. The Court is satisfied on the basis of record and the submissions made before it that the nature of litigation is such that the chances to resolve the matter through process of conciliation and an attempt ought to be made to explore that possibility. Accordingly, the matter is being referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court. The applicant no.1 shall deposit Rs.30,000/- within four weeks at the Mediation Centre. Out of the same, Rs.25,000/- will be paid to the opposite party no.2 for subsistence and to meet out the expenses. In case, the amount is deposited, the Mediation Centre will issue notices to both the parties returnable within a period of two weeks. The mediator is allowed two months' time to find out possible solution of the dispute between the parties and send his report to the Court regarding outcome of mediation. List this case before the appropriate Bench along with report of the mediator on 24.08.2023. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in Criminal Case No. 000156 of 2023 (State Vs. Shakib and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 0412 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354(Kha) I.P.C., Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 3/4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, Police Station Garh Mukteshwar, District Hapur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Garh Mukteshwar, Hapur, provided the applicants file the receipt of deposit of amount as directed above along with the present order. It is made clear that in case of default in depositing the amount as ordered above or on non-participation of the applicants in the mediation proceedings, interim stay order shall stand automatically vacated. This case shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench. Order Date :- 23.5.2023 Nadim
Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Robert L. McCollar Administrator of the Estate of Harry E. McCollar A/K/A Harry Edward McCollar v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Jack Waller, Jr., a Minor, by His Guardian Robert Lewis McCollar v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Nancy Lee Waller, a Minor, by Her Guardian Robert Lewis McCollar v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Pamela Lou Waller, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Robert Lewis McCollar v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Robert L. McCollar Administrator of the Estate of Jack Waller, Deceased v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Robert L. McCollar Administrator of the Estate of Peggy Lou Waller, Deceased v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corporation, a Corporation, Robert L. McCollar Administrator of the Estate of Carol Ann Waller, Deceased v. William C. Euler and Elco Metal Products Corpo