Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 November 2004
Objectives. The aims of the present study were to clarify the anatomy of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to
surrounding structures and to investigate the pathway of infection originating from pericoronitis of this tooth.
Study design. Computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated in 87 patients with uninfected mandibular third molar
impaction and in 12 patients with infection originating from an impacted mandibular third molar. In uninfected patients, bony
features around the impacted crown were investigated together with the relationship between the crown and surrounding
muscles. In infected patients, involvements of bony and soft tissue structures were evaluated according to the disappearance of
cortices and lateral asymmetry of density and shape in the spaces and muscles.
Results. In uninfected patients, the disappearance of the lingual cortical plate was observed in 48 (35.3%) impacted molars,
while only in 11 (8.1%) teeth for buccal cortices. The cortical thickness was thinner on the lingual side than the buccal side.
Sixty-five percent of the masseter muscle horizontally overlapped the crown, while almost all of the medial pterygoid muscle
was posteriorly situated apart from the crown. The mylohyoid muscle horizontally overlapped the crown at below or
intermediate vertical positions. In infected patients, the involvement of lingual structures was more frequently observed than
that of buccal structures. The mylohyoid muscle was involved in 10 (83.3%) of 12 patients. Among them, 8 showed
submandibular space involvement.
Conclusion. CT findings supported the clinical observations of infection spread in patients with pericoronitis of the impacted
mandibular third molar. CT appeared to be an effective tool for investigating the pathway of infection originating from the
pericoronitis of impacted mandibular third molars.
(Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:589-97)
a
Research Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery II, The anatomy of maxillofacial structures can influence the
Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry. spread of odontogenic infection. Since an impacted
b
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiol-
mandibular third molar is one of the most frequent causes
ogy, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry.
c
Instructor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Aichi- of odontogenic infection,1,2 it is important to understand
Gakuin University School of Dentistry. the anatomy of this tooth impaction. To accomplish this,
d
Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiol- many studies have been carried out using conventional
ogy, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry.
e
radiography.3,4 The prevalence of infection spread
Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial depends on the vertical position on panoramic radio-
Surgery I, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry.
f
Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial graph.3-5 An incompletely impacted third molar results in
Surgery II, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry. odontogenic infection more frequently than fully erupted
g
Professor and Chairman, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial or completely impacted molars do.3-6
Radiology, Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry. Based on the anatomical observations, mandibular
Received for publication Apr 3, 2004; returned for revision May 23, molars are situated lingually in the mandible.7 This
2004; accepted for publication Jul 15, 2004.
1079-2104/$ - see front matter
supports the clinical observation that the spread of
Ó 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. odontogenic infection arising from mandibular teeth is
doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.012 more likely to occur on the lingual side than the buccal
589
OOOOE
590 Ohshima et al November 2004
side. The bucco-lingual characteristics of impacted third under the gingival mucosa but not completely impacted in
molars can be assessed by computed tomography (CT), the mandibular bone on panoramic radiograph were
and many authors have investigated the relationship classified as ‘‘submucosal impaction.’’ A tooth completely
between the tooth apex and the mandibular canal to embedded in the mandibular bone on panoramic radio-
provide guidance on how to avoid accidental injury of graph was defined as ‘‘complete impaction.’’ The vertical
the mandibular nerve during removal of this tooth.8,9 position of the crown was also assessed on panoramic
However, there are no CT studies on bucco-lingual bony radiograph and was classified into 3 levels (positions A, B,
anatomy that take the spread of infection into account, and C) according to a report by Pell and Gregory.11 In
and the anatomical relationship between the crown of an position A, the occlusal plane of the impacted third molar
impacted mandibular third molar and surrounding soft was situated at the same level as that of the second molar.
tissue structures has not been completely elucidated. Position B showed the occlusal plane of the impacted tooth
CT examinations are frequently used and are effective between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the
for examining various maxillofacial lesions, especially second molar. In position C, the impacted tooth was below
in patients with trismus caused by the spread of infection the cervical line of the second molar.
to the masticatory muscles. If the infection spreads to CT examination was performed by Somatom ART
deep spaces such as the parapharyngeal space, rapid (Siemens AG; Erlangen, Germany) or Hi speed NX-I
airway obstruction may occur, resulting in a life- Pro (GE Yokogawa Medical Systems; Tokyo, Japan)
threatening condition. Therefore, the spread of infection with patients in the supine position. Axial scans were
should be evaluated by imaging at the early stage. contiguously obtained, with a section thickness of 2 to 3
Although the spread of infection originating in the mm and the scan plane parallel to the inferior margin of
mandibular third molar frequently causes deep fascial the mandible.
space infection, most of imaging studies also focus on
periapical infection of the first and second molars. Analyses of CT images
Infection spread from the pericoronitis of mandibular The minimum length between the surface of the
third molar should be separately investigated from those impacted third molar and the outer surface of the
originating from other teeth and lesions. cortical plate was measured and defined as the bony
The first aim of the present study was to clarify the width (Fig 1). This measurement was performed on
anatomy of impacted mandibular third molars on CT a line perpendicular to a line tangential to the outer
image with emphasis on the bucco-lingual aspects and surface of the cortex passing through the nearest point to
their relation to surrounding muscles. We investigated the cortex on the surface of the crown. Cortical thick-
the CT images of uninfected patients who were referred ness was also measured on the same line. These measure-
to our hospital for extraction of impacted mandibular ments were performed by an observer (A.O.) on the
third molars. The second aim was to investigate the buccal and lingual sides at the slice where the maximal
infection pathway on CT images in patients with crown area was observed. To verify the reproducibility
odontogenic infection originating from the pericoronitis of the measurement, 10 impacted third molars were
of the mandibular third molar. randomly selected and the bony width and cortical
thickness were measured twice. The measurement error
MATERIALS AND METHODS (Se) was calculated by Dahlberg’s formula:
Uninfected patients qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
Eighty-eight patients underwent CT examination Se ¼ Sðd1 d2Þ =2n
before extraction of their mandibular third molars ðd1; d2 : measured values; n : sample sizeÞ
between 1996 and 2003 at the Department of Radiology
and Diagnostic Imaging, Aichi-Gakuin University Dental where d1 and d2 are measured values and n is the sample
Hospital. For all patients, CT was performed to examine size.
the relationship between the root and mandibular canal. The values for the bony width were 0.26 mm and 0.16
With the exception of 2 normally erupted teeth, 136 mm for the buccal and lingual sides, respectively. For
impacted third molars without definitive infection in 87 cortical thickness, values were 0.24 mm and 0.11 mm
patients (43 females and 44 males, mean age of 32.8 for the buccal and lingual sides, respectively. These
years) were enrolled in this study. were sufficiently small compared to the variance of the
The state of impaction was classified into 3 types on the measured values.
basis of physical and panoramic x-ray examination as The positions of the masseter muscle (MM), medial
suggested by Hugoson and Kugelberg.10 When a part of the pterygoid muscle (MPM), and mylohyoid muscle (MhM)
crown could be observed in the oral cavity, it was defined as were determined on CT image in relation to the crowns
‘‘partial impaction.’’ Third molars that were embedded of impacted third molars (Fig 2). The horizontal
OOOOE
Volume 98, Number 5 Ohshima et al 591
BS, buccal space; MM: masseter muscle; TM, temporal muscle; MPM, medial pterygoid muscle; MhM, mylohyoid muscle; SMS. submandibular space; PPS,
parapharyngeal space; SLS, sublingual space; PS, parotid space.
Table II. State of impaction and vertical position of In 48 (35.3%) of 136 impacted third molars, the
the mandibular third molar in uninfected patients (n=136 lingual cortical plate could not be observed in the slice
teeth) where the crown area was maximal (Fig 3), while only
State of impaction Partial impaction 52 (38.2%) 11 were observed on the buccal side (Table III). The
Submucosal impaction 70 (51.5%) bony width was thicker on the buccal side than the
Complete impaction 14 (10.3%) lingual side. This difference was statistically significant
Vertical position on Position A 35 (25.7%)
with a P value less than .001. The thickness of the buccal
panoramic radiography
Position B 74 (54.4%) cortical plate was more than twice that of the lingual
Position C 27 (19.9%) side, and this difference was significant (P \.001).
The MM and crown horizontally overlapped (anterior
Position A, the occlusal plane of the impacted third molar was at the same level
to those of the second molar; Position B, the occlusal plane of impacted third
or intermediate group) in 89 (65.4%) of 136 impacted
molar situated between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the second third molar areas, while 129 (94.8%) of the MPM were
molar; Position C, the occlusal plane of impacted third molar was below the situated posteriorly apart from the impacted crowns
cervical line of the second molar.
(posterior group) (Table IV). Almost all posterior
borders of the MhM were situated at the intermediate
All images were evaluated by 2 observers (A.O. and or posterior position of the impacted crowns. Moreover,
Y.A.). Bony involvement was assessed for the disappear- the muscle was vertically positioned equivalent or
ance or interruption of continuity of cortical plates and the inferior to the crowns.
presence of periosteal reaction. The spread of infection to There were no relationships between the bucco-
the soft tissues was determined with reference to bilateral lingual aspects on CT image and the state of impaction
asymmetry of shape and density. A final assessment was or the vertical positions determined by panoramic x-ray
reached by consensus after discussion when the evalua- examination.
tion was different between the observers.
Infected patients
RESULTS There were no complete impactions of the mandibular
Uninfected patients third molars in the infected patients (Table I). For the
The states of impaction and vertical positions are vertical position, no impacted third molars were found
summarized in Table II. Approximately one half of the in position C.
impacted molars were classified as ‘‘submucosal impac- Eight (66.7%) of 12 patients showed the absence of
tion,’’ while complete impaction was seen in only 14 the lingual cortical plate around the crown of the
(10.3%) patients. For the vertical position, 74 teeth infected mandibular third molar (Fig 4, A), while only 4
belonged to position B; that is, the occlusal plane of the patients exhibited this on the buccal side (Fig 5, A). In 3
impacted molar was situated between the occlusal plane of these 4 patients, the MM was involved (Fig 5, B). Two
and cervical line of the second molar. The lowest position patients (Patient Nos. 11 and 12) showed widespread
(position C) was observed in 20% of the patients. mandibular bony changes with periosteal reaction,
OOOOE
Volume 98, Number 5 Ohshima et al 593
Fig 4. A CT image expressed by bony windows (A) shows the disappearance of the left lingual cortical plate (arrow) adjacent to the
crown of the impacted mandibular third molar in a 25-year-old male (Patient No. 5). Parapharyngeal space involvement can be
clearly observed (*), but the fat line adjacent to the medial pterygoid muscle is preserved (arrow heads) (B). At the inferior slice,
displacement of the fatty midline of the tongue is visible (arrow) and swelling of the mylohyoid muscle (arrow heads) and
submandibular space involvement (*) can also be observed (C).
third molar region.7 The present study supports this more frequently in lingual structures (lingual cortical
observation through cortical thickness measurement. plate, MPM, and MhM) than in buccal structures
The uninfected cortical thickness was more than twice (buccal cortical plate, buccal space, and MM). For the
that found on the buccal side compared with the lingual cortical disappearance, the frequencies in infected
side. A difference between the bony width and cortical patients were higher than those in uninfected patients
thickness indicates the thickness of cancerous bone for the lingual and buccal sides. Although some patients
around the crown. The present results show that with preexisting cortical disappearance were included,
cancerous bone thickness was approximately equal this result suggests that the disappearance was caused by
between the buccal and lingual sides. Therefore, the infection. Taken together, the anatomical features of
cortical thickness mainly contributes to the bony width bony structures support the hypothesis that pericoronitis
and may influence the bucco-lingual spread of infection of the third mandibular molars is more likely to spread to
originating from an impacted mandibular third molar. In the lingual side than the buccal side.
uninfected patients, 48 (35.3%) cortices disappeared on The MM is frequently involved in odontogenic
the lingual side, whereas only 11 (8.1%) disappeared on infection originating from mandibular teeth,12-15 and
the buccal side. This observation supports the hypoth- various incidences of this muscle involvement have
esis that pericoronitis of the mandibular third molar is been reported.14,15 Most of reports include infections
more likely to spread to the lingual side than the buccal originating from areas other than the third molar or
side. In infected patients, involvement was observed infections occurring after the extraction of an impacted
OOOOE
Volume 98, Number 5 Ohshima et al 595
Fig 5. In an 18-year-old male (Patient No. 1), a CT image shows a disappearance of the right buccal cortical plate (arrow) of the
mandibular third molar (A). This appearance can be recognized when compared to that of the left side where the third molar was
extracted. A CT image expressed by soft tissue windows depicts an enlarged MM (white arrow heads) together with buccal space
involvement (*) (B).
Fig 6. A soft tissue CT image shows swelling of the left masseter muscle (*) and medial pterygoid muscle (arrow) in a 27-year-pld
male (Patient No. 12) (A). The inferior slice expressed by bony windows clearly depicts cortical resorption (arrows) and periosteal
reactions (arrow heads) of the left ramus (B).
third molar. Therefore, these incidences are not specific infected patients that exhibited changes in their buccal
to infection originating in the pericoronitis of an cortices, which was a proof of buccal spread, showed
impacted mandibular third molar. In the present study, MM involvement.
6 (50%) of 12 infected patients showed involvement of An uninfected MPM was situated posterior to and apart
the MM. In 65.4% of uninfected patients, the MM from the crown. In infected patients, however, involve-
horizontally overlapped the crown of impacted third ment occurred at a relatively high rate (58.3%) in the
molars. This indicates that infection frequently involves MPM. This discrepancy indicates the existences of
the MM when it spreads to the buccal side. Indeed, all 4 pathways of infection to the MPM from the pericoronitis
OOOOE
596 Ohshima et al November 2004
4. Venta I, Turtola L, Murtomaa H, Ylipaavalniemi P. Third molars 14. Kim HJ, Park ED, Kim JH, Hwang EG, Chung SH. Odontogenic
as an acute problem in Finnish university students. Oral Surg versus nonodontogenic deep neck space infections: CT mani-
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:135-40. festations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:202-8.
5. Halverson BA, Anderson WH 3rd. The mandibular third molar 15. Yonetsu K, Izumi M, Nakamura T. Deep facial infections of
position as a predictive criteria for risk for pericoronitis: a retro- odontogenic origin: CT assessment of pathways of space
spective study. Mil Med 1992;157:142-5. involvement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:123-8.
6. Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Pathoses associated 16. Kimura Y, Sumi M, Sumi T, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Nakamura T. Deep
with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg extension from carcinoma arising from the gingiva: CT and MR
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:10-7. imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:468-72.
7. Shicher H, Dubrul EL. Oral anatomy. 6th ed. St Louis: C.V. 17. Ariji Y, Gotoh M, Kimura Y, Naitoh M, Kurita K, Natsume N,
Mosby; 1975. p. 426. et al. Odontogenic infection pathway to the submandibular space:
8. Feifel H, Riediger D, Gustorf-Aeckerle R. High resolution imaging assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:165-9.
computed tomography of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. 18. Hardin CW, Harnsberger HR, Osborn AG, Doxey GP, Davis RK,
Neuroradiology 1994;36:236-8. Nyberg DA. Infection and tumor of the masticator space: CT
9. Pawelzik J, Cohnen M, Willers R, Becker J. A comparison of evaluation. Radiology 1985;157:413-7.
conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed 19. Schuman NJ, Owens BM. Ludwig’s angina following dental
tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted treatment of a five-year-old male patient: report of a case. J Clin
mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60: Pediatr Dent 1992;16:263-5.
979-84. 20. Peterson LJ. Contemporary management of deep infections of
10. Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF. The prevalence of third molars in the neck. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:226-31.
a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community
Dent Health 1988;5:121-38.
11. Pell GJ, Gregory TG. Report on a ten-year study of a tooth
division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1942;28:660-6. Reprint requests:
12. Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Eiichiro Ariji, DDS, PhD
Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 2000;38:585-7. Aichi-Gakuin University School of Dentistry
13. Ariji E, Moriguchi S, Kuroki T, Kanda S. Computed tomography 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku
of maxillofacial infection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20: Nagoya 464-8651, Japan
147-51. ariji@dpc.aichi-gakuin.ac.jp