Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethics May 2016 Revised03 - After SCH 1 Part 1 Till CGG
Ethics May 2016 Revised03 - After SCH 1 Part 1 Till CGG
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS - 3
By: All India CA Ranker – CA. Sarthak Jain
SCHEDULE I – PART II
CAiS
Professional Misconduct
SI.PII SHARING OF FEES
does not supply the information called for, or does not comply with
CLAUSE 2 the requirements asked for, by the Institute, Council or any of its
Committees, Director (Discipline), Board of Discipline, Disciplinary
Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate Authority
IGNORE
S2-P2-C2
SII.PI CONFIDENTIALITY...DIAGNOSIS
discloses
information acquired in the course of
professional engagement
DIAGNOSIS to any person
without the consent of his client or
otherwise than as required by any law for the
time being in force
CONFIDENTIALITY – Rate Urself!
1. Clause applies to information which is already publicly known?
2. Clause applies on information obtained during the current course of
audit or even in past years?
3. Clause applies to financial or non-financial info?
4. Clause attracts even if staff makes an unauthorised disclosure?
5. If information not disclosed but used for personal benefit?
6. Whether applies on previous auditor communication with incoming
auditor?
7. If client refuses but law demands information, whether to disclose?
Confidentiality – Client Frauds!
Duty of CA relating to Tax Frauds of a Client?
IF FRAUD RELATES TO PAST YEAR(S)
The member may, continue in respect of current matters and report only if it affects current year or of if he
was auditor in previous year
FRAUD RELATES TO THE ACCOUNTS OR TAX ASSESSMENT
Examined by the member client should be advised to make a complete disclosure.
IF FRAUDS RELATES TO ACCOUNTS OR RETURNS CURRENTLY BEING PREPARED
Member should advise the client to make full disclosure and should the client refuse, auditor should make full
reservation in his report, and should not associate himself with the return.
ON REMOVAL OF AUDITOR BEFORE COMPLETION OF TERM
No further duty regarding disclosure etc. rests on the member.
IF THERE’S FRAUD IN ‘RELATED RETURNS’
E.g. personal income/income from investment other than business investments. Member may still continue, but
is under no obligation so to do.
Whether protection u/s 126 of Evidence Act
available to CA?
Immunity from disclosure afforded by Section 126 of the
Evidence Act, and the extent involve niceties of law and expert
legal advice
Employee
SII.PI CERTIFIES / REPORTS WITHOUT EXAMINATION
A CA may So long as he
participate in does not
the vouch for the
preparation accuracy of
of forecasts or the forecasts /
review projections
DIAGNOSIS
Indicates clearly
in report:
SAE 3400
• sources of info, prescribes the
• basis of forecast
• & major
guidelines
assumptions;
SII.PI SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST
Opinion FS Substantial
Interest
DIAGNOSIS
Only Includes all CA /
assurance Financial Partner /
assignments Information Firm
SII.PI SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST - OPINION
Includes Excludes
SII.PI SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST - DEFINITION
a member shall be deemed to have a “substantial
interest‟ in a COMPANY:
PARTNERS OF A FIRM
Hold 20%
or more
SII.PI SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST - INCLUSIONS
• Liquidator of a company
• Internal Auditor
• Person maintaining books or internal controls
SUBSTANTIAL Disqual • PT / FT Faculty
INTEREST
DEFINED
-fied to • Trustee
• Director in that company
provide • Disqualified under S. 141 of Co13
opinion • Clarified, Director in Holding company to
disqualify in Subsidiary company as well
• On partner disqualified – Then complete firm
disqualified
SII.PI NO SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST
Teaser
Whether auditor of a Subsidiary Company can
be a Director of its Holding Company?
Answer:
Committee on Ethical Standards (CES) of the Institute has via a clarification,
decided that the auditor of a Subsidiary Company can’t be a Director of its
Holding Company, as it will affect the independence of an auditor
SII.PI FAILS TO DISCLOSE A MATERIAL FACT KNOWN TO HIM
Covers all
Known to Assignme
CA nts on FS
DIAGNOSIS not just
audit
5&6
Clause 5 Clause 6
on Failure on Failure
to to REPORT
DISCLOSE
SII.PI DUE DILIGENCE / GROSSLY NEGLIGENT
Due Negligence
diligence
SII.PI FAILS TO OBTAIN SUFFICIENT INFO
DIAGNOSIS
7
Tip – If question is about auditor making a wrong
opinion, then this clause may be relevant
SII.PI SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST - DIAGNOSIS
Knowingly
• Without Checking Wrong Opinion
– Clause 2
• Grossly Negligent • Fails to Disclose
DIAGNOSIS Checking – Clause 7 – Clause 5
8 • Inadequate Checking • Fails to Report
– Clause 8 – Clause 6
Incorrect
Opinion
TYPES OF OPINION
UNMODIFIED MODIFIED
OPINION OPINION
DIAGNOSIS
9 Tip – Since SAs compliance is mandatory for auditor, any
non-compliance to attract this clause. Further Co.13 S.
143(9&10) also requires auditor to comply with SAs
SII.PI FAILS TO KEEP MONEY OF CLIENT SEPARATE IN BANK
money to be
expended
Teaser
An advance received by a Chartered
Accountant against services to be rendered
whether fall under Clause (10) of Part I of
the Second Schedule?
Answer:
No
Teaser
Moneys received for expenses to be incurred,
for example, payment of prescribed statutory
fees, purchase of stamp paper etc., which are
intended to be spent whether to be deposited
in separate bank account?
Answer:
No except if the money is not intended to be spend in short time
Teaser
Moneys received by a CA, in his capacity as
a liquidator must be put in a separate bank
account immediately. Comment
Answer:
Yes as the clause applies to client money irrespective of nature of assignment
whether audit or else.
Teaser
Can a CA adjust client’s money meant to be
spent for paying taxes against his outstanding
fees?
Answer:
No, this will be using money for other than intended purpose and Clause 10, P1,
S2 will get attracted
Teaser
Client paid advance for Out of Pocket
expenses to auditor, for which auditor
misappropriated the amount by inflating expense
vouchers. Under which clause the CA will be
held guilty?
Answer:
Clause 10 will be attracted as the client’s money is being used for other than
intended purpose.
SCHEDULE II – PART II
All Members
Professional Misconduct
SII.PII CONTRAVENES PROVISION OF THE ACT, ETC.
CA REGULATIONS PARTICULARS
1988
ARTICLES RELATED
CLAUSE 10 –
• Client money defalcation by a CAiP will
PART 1 – be covered under Clause 10, P1, S2
SCHEDULE 2
Chapter III
Appointment of a Member as Cost Auditor
(Not relevant anymore)
CGG
Chapter IV
Opinion on Financial Statements when there is Substantial interest
Substantial Interest as defined in the CA Act and Relatives as per AS18
Chapter V
Maintenance of Books of Accounts
Maintain Cash Book and Ledger
Chapter VI
Tax Audit Assignments u/s 44AB of income Tax Act
Maximum 60 audits per AY per partner who is a CAiP. Including Branch audit.
CGG
Chapter VII
Appointment of an Auditor in case of Non Payment of Undisputed fees
(Not permitted except in Sick units i.e. where Liabilities > Assets)
Chapter VIII
Specified Number of Audit Assignments
Max 30 Company Audit assignments at any point of time per partner who is CAiP. Branch
Audit included
Chapter IX
Appointment as Statutory Auditor
Not to accept if fees > audit fees
Covers CA firm as well as network firms
Applies on audit of Listed Cos, PSU, Cos with turnover > =50 Crores
CGG
Chapter X
Appointment of Auditor when he is indebted to a Concern
Limit > 10,000 unless other limit prescribed under law
Covers debt as well as guarantees given
Chapter XI
Directions in case of Unjustified Removal of Auditors
Not to accept Audit
Chapter XII
Minimum Audit Fee in respect of Audit (Deleted Now)