Project Analysis and Management

Financial and Economic Analysis of project

Name:
Id:

Summited to:Zegeye Habtemariam (Ph.D.)

Table Content
1. Introduction
2. Financial Analysis of a project
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Definition, scope and Importance of financial analysis
2.3 Approaches in Financial analysis of a project
i. Non- Discounting methods
● Ranking by inspection
● Payback period
● Proceeds per unit outlay● Average rate of return
ii. Discounting methods
● Net present value
● Benefit cost ratio
● Internal rate of return
● Modifies internal rate of return
3. Similarities and differences between financial and Economic analysis of a project
4. Economic analysis of a project
4.1Introduction
4.2 Definition, scope, and importance of Economic analysis
4.3 Rationale for Economic Analysis
4.4 Valuation and shadow price
● Pricing in economic analysis or shadow pricing
● Sources of shadow pricing
4.5 Basic Principles of shadow pricing
4.6 Use of shadow price
4.7 Conversion factors
4.8 Approaches in Economic Analysis
4.4.1. LM- Approach
4.4.2. UNIDO Approaches

5. Conclusion

6. Reference
1. Introduction

Since freeway management systems are designed, constructed, and operated and
maintained with public funding, it is critical that economic analyses are conducted to
ensure that public funds are spent prudently. In addition to being used to determine
which alternative system offers the most potential, economic analyses serve to
justify the costeffectiveness of system installations to elected officials who oversee
public funding, as well as to the public whom these elected officials serve. If funding
for new freeway management systems, or funding for operating and maintaining
existing systems is to continue, it is critical that elected officials and the public be
made aware of the benefits of the freeway management system.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This module serves to give guidance to planners and designers responsible for the
economic justification of freeway management systems. Planners and
designers must be familiar with the costs and benefits expected from freeway
management systems in order to justify the installation and continued operation of
these systems. This module provides typical capital costs associated with the design
and construction of freeway management systems, as well as typical continuing
costs associated with their operation and maintenance. Also provided in this module
are typical quantifiable and non quantifiable benefits that can be expected from the
implementation of freeway management systems.
SYSTEM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The primary function of freeway management systems is the real-time management
of recurrent and non recurrent congestion. It is the goal of planners and designers to
provide efficient, cost-effective freeway management systems that meet
defined system goals. A successful freeway management system meets or exceeds
defined system goals, thus producing benefits such as delay reductions and
increased safety to freeway users that outweigh the system’s initial capital costs and
its associated lifetime operating and maintenance costs.
INTERRELATIONSHIP OF SYSTEM ELEMENTS
Costs associated with freeway management systems, whether capital costs
oroperation and maintenance costs, are readily available and easily measured in
monetary terms.
However, benefits accrued from various freeway management system elements are
sometimes more difficult to quantify, due to the interrelationships that exist among
the various system elements. For example, dynamic message signs (Module 7) and
ramp meters (Module 5) both contribute to reducing freeway congestion. The
benefits of each of these elements could be measured (via travel time studies,
vehicle counts, etc.) if they were implemented alone within the freeway section.
However, the benefits of stand alone systems are not necessarily additive. Rather,
the effects of these components interact with each other. In the above example, the
provision of real-time information via dynamic message signs might cause some
drivers normally intending to enter the freeway to utilize another route to their
destination. This would reduce the traffic demands at the entrance ramps, and
would be achieved with a ramp metering system that was also implemented in the
influence the magnitude of benefits that freeway corridor.

1
2. Financial Analysis of a project

2.2 Definition, scope and Importance of financial analysis

Financial analysis plays a crucial role in the success of businesses by providing
insights into a company's financial health. Financial statement analysis is a key
component of financial analysis that enables businesses to evaluate their financial
performance, identify areas for improvement, and make informed decisions. This
write-up explores the importance of financial analysis for businesses, including how
it helps with shares investment and holding, plans, decisions, and management,
providing credit, and assessing a company's financial health. The methods of
financial statement analysis, including ratio analysis, trend analysis, and comparative
analysis, are also discussed in this write-up. Overall, financial analysis is a critical tool
for businesses to make informed decisions, allocate resources efficiently, and
achieve their financial goals.

What is Financial Analysis?

Financial analysis is a process of evaluating the financial performance of a company.
It involves analysing financial statements, ratios, and other financial data to gain
insights into the company's financial health. Importance of financial statement
analysis is seen in making informed decisions in businesses by identifying strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in their financial performance. Let’s
understand why financial analysis is important for any buImportance of Financial
Statement Analysis The importance of financial statement analysis is a critical tool
for businesses to evaluate their financial health. Knowing the importance of financial
statement analysis that help get information on a company's financial performance,
including its profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. Financial analysis enables
businesses to identify trends, evaluate performance, and make informed decisions.
Take a deep dive into the basics of financial markets to know more.
A.The Shares Investment and Holding
Financial analysis for business is essential for investors who want to invest in shares
or hold them. By analysing a company's financial statements and performance,
investors can make informed investment decisions. Investors use financial statement
analysis to assess a company's profitability, growth potential, and financial stability.
This analysis enables investors to identify companies that are likely to generate good
returns on investment and avoid companies that are risky.

B.Plans, Decisions, and Management

Financial analysis for business is crucial for businesses when making plans, decisions,
and managing their finances. By analysing financial data, businesses can identify
potential risks and opportunities. This financial analysis enables businesses to make
informed decisions, develop strategies, and allocate resources more efficiently.
Financial statement analysis also helps businesses identify areas where they can
reduce costs and increase profitability. Read about financial management functions
in detail.

2
 C.Providing Credit
Importance of financial statement analysis for business is seen in providing credit to
businesses. By conducting a company's financial analysis, lenders can evaluate the
company's credit worthiness and assess the risk involved in lending. This analysis
enables lenders to make informed decisions about whether to grant credit, how
much credit to grant, and what terms and conditions to apply.

D.Financial Analysis Helps in Assessin

a Company's Financial Health
Businesses can leverage the importance of financial statement analysis to assess
their financial health. By analysing financial data, businesses can identify areas
where they need to improve and develop strategies to achieve their financial goals.
Financial analysis for business also helps monitor their financial performance and
identify potential risks and opportunities. Tools of financial statement analysis
enables businesses to make informed decisions about investments, cost-cutting
measures, and other strategies to improve financial performance.

Objectives of Financial Analysis

The importance of financial statement analysis is to comprehend and analyse the

data in financial statements in order to evaluate the firm's profitability and financial
stability and to predict its future possibilities. These are the top four objectives of
financial analysis:

 Knowing the company's existing situation

 Reducing likelihood of fraud
 Decision making
 Removing any discrepancies.

Importance of Financial Analysis

Importance of Financial Analysis in Determining Value of Business
There are several key financial metrics that analysts use to determine the value of a
business, including revenue growth, profitability, cash flow, and return on
investment. These metrics enable analysts to evaluate a company's financial
performance and assess its ability to generate future profits. Tools of financial
statement analysis also enables businesses to compare their financial performance
to that of their competitors and industry benchmarks. This analysis provides valuable
insights into the company's position in the market and its competitive advantage.

Ultimately, importance of financial analysis can be observed in businesses looking to

determine their value and make informed decisions about investments, mergers and
acquisitions, and other strategic initiatives. By conducting financial analysis,
businesses can identify areas for improvement, develop strategies to improve their
financial performance, and increase their overall value.

3
2.3 Approaches in Financial analysis of a project
Introduction
In this session we are going to discuss the Accounting rate of return, payback
method and the NPV method with their merits and demerits with a special focus on
its computation also.Meaning of Discounting and Non discounting techniques:Let us
first understand the meaning of discounting and non discounting techniques ’In the
evaluation of projects, the
investment evaluation techniques play a vital role. The selection of the right kin of
projects is essential to ensure the wealth maximisation of share holder’s. Not only
this, since projects are committed for long term it is necessary to make a careful
choice. A wide range of criteria has been suggested to judge the worthiness of
various projects or financial decisions.
These evaluation techniques can be divided into two:

i. Non- Discounting methods

The undiscounted measures are the naive methods of choosing among the
alternative
projects. The analyst has before him four hypothetical projects, each calling for an
investment in an irrigation pump. All may be thought of as being more or less
alternatives for each other, but if there were sufficient funds, all could be accepted.
Since, these projects are only illustrative, we will be making some highly unrealistic
assumption about irrigation in the hope of illustrating more dearly and quickly
some points about project analysis. Later we will try to make the analysis as
realistic as is worthwhile in practice. For these irrigation investments, we have
invented a new kind of pump: one that is completely used up (or, perhaps to say
it more technically, has no residual value) after two to three years of operation.
We might say that in the project an;:~the water contains so much sand that the
pump wears out in two to three years.' We will assume for convenience that there
is no uncertainty about either the costs or returns of the projects.
To emphasize that what is generally called "operarionand maintenance cost" and
what is generally considered to be "production cost" must both be included in . \
estimating project worth, each has been given a separate column, For illustrative
purpose, of course, we could just as well have combined these into one cost
column called "operation, maintenance, and production cost".

Four Hypothetieal Pu'mp Irrigation Projects

4
Ranking by Inspection
It is based on the size of costs and length of cash-flow stream. Suppose, if the
two projects are with the same investment and the same net value of production,
but with difference in the length ofjhe period then the project with longer duration
is preferred to the one with shorter time p~fiod. This leads to bias in the choice
obviously due to the absence of more elaborate and appropriate analysis. In some
cases, we can tell by simply looking at the investment cost and the "shape" of the
streamifor the net value of incremental production that one project should be
accepted over another if we must choose. In general, there are two such instances:

5
(i) with the same investment, two projects produce the same net value of
incremental
production for a period, but one continues to earn longer than the other (in the
example of Table 9.1, we would choose project II rather than project I): (2) in
other instances,forthe same investment, the total net value of incremental
production
may be the same, but one project has more of the flow earlier in the time
sequence (thus, in Table 9.1 we would choose project IV rather than project III;
we cannot tell by inspection, however, if project IV would be preferred to project
11- mqre elaborate analysis is necessary). In many cases, projects can indeed be
'examined and rejected on the basis of inspection.

Payback period
nother simple method of ranking a project is the length of time required to get
back the investment on the project. ,
The payback period of the project is estimated by using the straight forward
formula .
I
P=
E
Where,
P = Payback period of the project in years,
I = Investment of the project in rupees, and
E =Annual net cash revenue in rupees
The preference of a particular project is based on the lesser payback period. This
is shown in Table. Before

: Calculation of Payback Period

Initial investment = Rs.
20,000

Rs .20,000
Project 'A'= =4 years
Rs 5000
Rs .20,000
Project 'B'== =5 years
Rs .4,000
It is inadequate to exercise the option among the alternatives, because it fails to
consider very important points like, consistency of running, timing of the proceeds,

6
returns after the payback period and whether the cash-flows would be positive or
negative in future.
Proceeds per unit outlay
This isworked out by dividing the total receipts from the total amount of investment,
and a given project is ranked based on the highest magnitude of the parameter.
Investments are sometimes ranked by the proceeds per unit of outlay, which is the
total net value of incremental production divided by the total amount of the
investment as shown in Table 9.3. By this criterion, we find that projects Iand Il
are correctly ranked. But projects IIIand IV receive equal rank, although we
know by simple inspection that we would choose project IV because its returns
are received earlier. Here, again, the criterion of proceeds per unit of outlay fails
of considers timing; money to be received in the future weights as heavily as
money in hand today.

Proceeds Per unit of Outlay, Four Hypothetical Pump Irrigation Projects

(000 of
currency units)

ii. Discounting methods

The technique of discounting permits us to determine whether to accept for
implementation projects that have variously shaped time streams - that is, patterns
of when costs and benefits fall during the life of the project that differ from one
another and that are of different durations. The most common means of doing this
is to subtract year-by-year the costs from the benefits to arrive at the incremental
net benefit stream - the so-called cash flow and then to discount that. This
approach will give one of three discounted cash flow measures of project worth
namely the net present worth namely the internal rate of return, or the net benefit
investment ratio. Another discounted measure of project worth is find the present
worth of the cost and benefit streams separately and then to divide the present
worth of the benefit streams by the present worth of the cost stream to obtain the
benefit-cost ratio.
 Net present value
This is simply the present worth of the cash flow stream. Sometimes, it is referred
to as Net Present Value (NPV). NPW is helpful in working out benefit-cost ratio
of the project. Selection criterion of the projects depends upon the positive value
ofthe net present worth, when discounted at the opportunity cost of the cap~tal .
this could be satisfactorily done, provided there is a correct estimate of opportunity
cost of capital. NPW is an absolute measure, not relative.

7
NPW of the project is estimated using the following equation:

Projects with positive NPW are given weightage in the selection compared to
those with negative present values, while zero NPW makes the investor indifferent.
Table 9.6 presents the particulars ofNPV calculations for a project.

 Benefit cost ratio

Here, we compare the present worth of costs with present worth of benefits ..
Absolute value of the benefit-cost will change based on the interest rate chosen.
While ranking the projects depending upon the B-C ratio, the most common
procedure of selecting projects is, to choose the projects, having B-C ratio of
more than one, when discounted at opportunity cost of capital. Finally, the given
project is opted for implementation, among alternatives based on the highest B-C
ratio. Following formula depicts the estimation of B-C ratio. The estimation
procedure ofB-C ratio is given in Table

8
:

Internal rate of return

In the computation ofInternal Rate of Return (IRR), the time value of money is
accounted. The method of working IRR provides the knowledge of actual rate of
return from the different projects. Thus, IRR is known as 'marginal efficiency of
capital or yield on the investment'. It is the discount rate at which the present
values of the net cash flows are just equal to zero, i.e. NPW = zero. IRR must be
found out by trial and error with some approximation. The procedure is elucidated
for the project on sericulture (Table)

9
3. Similarities and differences between financial and Economic analysis of a
project

Financial and economic analysis have similar features. Both estimate the net benefits
of a project investment based on the difference between the with-project and the
without-project situations. The basic difference between them is that the financial
analysis compares benefits and costs to the enterprise, while the economic analysis
compares the benefits and costs to the whole economy.

Financial and Economic analyses are essentially used to determine the costs incurred
and the resulting benefits from investing in a project. They both involve ascertaining
the NPV or the net present value of a project based on its estimated present and
future cash flows, appropriately discounted. Both techniques, however, differ in
their implications and hence also in what is defined as a cost and a benefit.

10
Financial Analysis is largely confined to individual organizations or their units. It
involves a fairly quantitative, fund-based approach that directly compares the
expenses and revenues from a venture to determine profitability and hence
sustainability. Such evaluation may often employ the financial statement of an
enterprise – the balance sheet, the income statement, and the cash flow statement.

For instance, consider an oil drilling company evaluating an independent project -

the setting up of a new well. If the present value of the annual cash flows were to
exceed the initial investment and other costs such as taxes, possible interest
payments, and operational expenses, the project would be looked upon favourably.
Additionally, the firm might also look at the project's effect on its financial ratios to
be certain about feasibility.

Economic Analysis, on the other hand, takes a much wider view and entails the
impact of a project on society as a whole. It considers the viewpoints of all
stakeholders and how the results of a project aligned with the broader economic and
social policies as well as the international scenario. The costs in economic analysis
are a measure of the resources that society collectively invests for the fulfilment of
the project. The benefits, however, need not be just monetary and often include
intangible benefits.
Economic analysis is very important as it allows organizations and their donors to
compare the impact of social intervention to the cost of implementing it. These
comparisons aid in determining the most effective resource allocation.

Economic analysis is a type of assessment that helps answer the question "is it
worth it?" in addition to the question "does it work?" that other impact evaluations
address. Economic analysis has been more prominent in the impact measurement
practices of charities and donors in recent years, as the sector has been under
increasing pressure to give estimates of what value is created for every pound
invested.

In the above oil well case, for instance, the economic analysis deals with not just the
profits from an industry perspective. Instead, negative externalities such as
pollution, displacement, and deforestation are treated as costs while positive
externalities such as employment generation which is considered benefits.
Determining a quantitative measure of such factors remains a challenge.

Treatment of Taxes and Subsidies

Financial analysis tends to rely on exact market prices for calculating costs. Taxes are
treated as costs and subsidies as returns. They are both assumed to already reflect in
these market prices and any adjustments are therefore unnecessary.

In economic analysis, the market price is often modified to arrive at what is popularly
known as the 'shadow price' or 'economic price'. Taxes are levied on a project's
returns and are collected by the government itself. Similarly, subsidies are funds that
society as a whole invests into the project, therefore necessitating differential
treatment.

11
Treatment of Interest Payments
Interest payments are treated as a cost in financial analysis as they are the additional
amount that the stakeholder has to pay to external bodies along with returning the
borrowed capital. Often these interest payments are incorporated into the
evaluation of NPV in the discounting factor – the internal rate of return.

From an economic perspective, however, interest on capital invested by society is

also returned to society as again on the capital, thus again removing the need for any
separate computation.

A study of financial feasibility versus economic feasibility can help develop a further
understanding of the two topics. Financial feasibility is based strictly on profitability
and sustainability. A financially feasible project, therefore, might not be
economically viable if the overall impact on society is negative. On the contrary, an
economically viable project may not always be financially sustainable. The
government may, however, choose to take up such a project by supplying additional
funds, owing to its positive impact on society.

4. Economic analysis of a project

4.1Introduction
Economic analysis of projects helps identify and select public investments that will
sustainably improve the welfare of beneficiaries and a country as a whole. This 2"d
edition pamphlet1 outlines key areas of economic analysis of projects. It stresses
that analysis begins during country strategy studies and programming, when projects
are identified, and continues iteratively throughout the project cycle. Economic
analysis is coordinated with institutional, financial, environmental, social, and
poverty
analyses, forming an integral part of investment appraisal. Part I of the pamphlet
summarizes the principles and key areas of analysis needed to appraise the
economic feasibility of every project. The detailed assessment methods are outlined
in ADB's Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects (1997). Part II summarizes
the main issues to be addressed in each of the 10 key areas of analysis (AAs). Part Ill
outlines the stages of the project cycle when analyses need to be carried out.
In practice, each sector, situation, and set of problems to be addressed is different.
Basic principles of analysis need to be followed, although analytical approaches and
data requirements should be adapted to different circumstances. Selecting
appropriate level of analysis to inform project decisions is key to sound economic
analysis. The pamphlet is intended to help ADB staff, consultants, and Developing
Member Country (DMC) counterpart staff apply the principles of project economic
analysis at each stage of the project development process.

4.2 Definition, scope, and importance of Economic analysis

What Is Economic Analysis?

12
Economic analysis refers to evaluating costs and benefits to check the viability of a
project, investment opportunity, event, or any other matter. In other words, it
involves identifying, evaluating, and comparing costs and benefits. In addition, there
are many other significant concepts involved.
The analysis process contributes to the optimal allocation and use of resources,
forming an important element in the decision-making process. For example, the
microeconomic analysis makes an effort to describe how people and organizations
function in a certain economy, macroeconomic analysis focus on GDP,
unemployment, and inflation, and techno economic analysis (TEA) involves the study
of the economic performance of an industrial process.

Economic Analysis Explained

The economic analysis evaluates projects, scenarios, tasks, topics, or actions to
understand their profitability or negative consequences. It exhibits a relationship
with the study of determining the opportunity cost of any project or task. In
business, management uses it in diverse scenarios. For example, companies apply it
during new product identification or an expansion or integration process. The
analysis process traverses through the pros and cons and understands the matter.

Richard Milhous Nixon, the 37th president of America, founded the U.S. Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BEA) in 1972, which, from then on, helped American investors
understand the economy of the nation based on relevant data and statistics, The
timely and accurate information allow the government, businesses, researchers, and
the American public to follow and understand the performance of the nation’s
economy.

Scope of Economic analysis

The scope of economic analysis encompasses a wide range of topics and
methodologies aimed at understanding and interpreting various economic
phenomena. Here's a breakdown of the scope of economic analysis:

1. Microeconomics:
- Microeconomic analysis focuses on individual economic agents such as
households, firms, and industries.
- Scope includes:
- Consumer behavior and demand theory.
- Production theory and cost analysis.
- Market structures (perfect competition, monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic
competition).
- Factor markets (labor, capital, land).
- Welfare economics and market failures (externalities, public goods, imperfect
information).

2. Macroeconomics:
- Macroeconomic analysis examines aggregate economic variables at the national
or global level.
- Scope includes:

13
 - National income accounting.
- Economic growth and development.
- Business cycles and fluctuations.
- Monetary and fiscal policy.
- Inflation, unemployment, and exchange rates.
- International trade and finance.

3. Economic Policy Analysis:

- Economic policy analysis evaluates the impact of government policies on
economic outcomes.
- Scope includes:
- Taxation and government spending.
- Monetary policy and central banking.
- Regulation and antitrust policies.
- Trade policy and tariffs.
- Social welfare programs and income redistribution.

4. Development Economics:
- Development economics examines the processes and policies related to economic
development in less developed countries.
- Scope includes:
- Poverty alleviation and income inequality.
- Education, health, and human capital.
- Agricultural and rural development.
- Industrialization and infrastructure.
- Foreign aid and international development assistance.

5. Environmental Economics:
- Environmental economics studies the interactions between the economy and the
natural environment.
- Scope includes:
- Market-based instruments for environmental regulation (carbon pricing,
pollution permits).
- Cost-benefit analysis of environmental policies.
- Sustainable development and resource management.
- Valuation of ecosystem services.
- Climate change economics and mitigation strategies.

6. International Economics:
- International economics analyzes the economic interactions among nations and
the determinants of international trade and finance.
- Scope includes:
- Comparative advantage and trade patterns.
- Balance of payments and exchange rates.
- International capital flows and financial crises.
- Multinational corporations and foreign direct investment.
- Trade agreements and globalization.

14
 7. Behavioral Economics:
- Behavioral economics integrates insights from psychology into economic analysis
to understand how individuals make decisions.
- Scope includes:
- Prospect theory and decision-making under uncertainty.
- Behavioral biases and heuristics.
- Nudging and behavioral interventions.
- Experimental economics and game theory.

8. Econometrics:
- Econometrics applies statistical and mathematical techniques to analyze
economic data and test economic theories.
- Scope includes:
- Regression analysis and hypothesis testing.
- Time series analysis and forecasting.
- Panel data and longitudinal studies.
- Causal inference and program evaluation.

By encompassing these various dimensions, the scope of economic analysis provides

a comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of economic
systems, behavior, and policy interventions.

Importance of Economic analysis

The scope of economic analysis encompasses a broad range of topics and
methodologies aimed at understanding, interpreting, and predicting various
economic phenomena. Here are some key aspects that fall within the scope of
economic analysis:

1. Macroeconomic Analysis: Examining aggregate economic indicators such as GDP

growth, inflation rates, unemployment rates, and fiscal policies to understand the
overall performance and stability of the economy.

2. Microeconomic Analysis: Analyzing the behavior of individual consumers, firms,

and industries to understand market dynamics, pricing decisions, production
processes, and resource allocation.

3. Market Analysis: Assessing supply and demand dynamics, market structures,

competition levels, and pricing mechanisms to identify opportunities, risks, and
inefficiencies within specific markets.

4. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Evaluating the costs and benefits associated with policy
interventions, investment projects, and regulatory changes to determine their
efficiency and societal welfare implications.

5. Econometric Analysis: Using statistical techniques to model and analyze economic

relationships, test hypotheses, and make predictions based on empirical data.

15
6. Financial Analysis: Assessing the financial performance, profitability, and solvency
of businesses, financial institutions, and investment projects to inform investment
decisions, risk management strategies, and capital allocation.

7. International Economics: Studying international trade, exchange rates, capital

flows, and global economic integration to understand the opportunities and
challenges arising from globalization and international economic relations.

8. Environmental Economics: Analyzing the economic implications of environmental

policies, resource management practices, and sustainability initiatives to promote
environmentally sustainable development.

9. Development Economics: Investigating the determinants of economic growth,

poverty reduction, income inequality, and human development outcomes in
different countries and regions to inform development policies and strategies.

10. Policy Analysis: Assessing the intended and unintended consequences of

government policies, regulations, and interventions on economic outcomes, social
welfare, and equity.

Importance of Economic Analysis:

1. Informed Decision-Making: Economic analysis provides policymakers, businesses,

and individuals with valuable insights into the potential impacts of various decisions,
policies, and actions on economic outcomes and welfare.

2. Efficient Resource Allocation: By analyzing costs, benefits, and trade-offs,

economic analysis helps optimize resource allocation, enhance productivity, and
improve overall economic efficiency.

3.Risk Management: Economic analysis enables stakeholders to identify and mitigate

risks associated with economic volatility, market fluctuations, policy changes, and
other external factors.

4.Policy Formulation and Evaluation: Policymakers rely on economic analysis to

design, implement, and evaluate policies aimed at promoting economic growth,
stability, equity, and sustainability.

5. Competitive Advantage: Businesses use economic analysis to understand

consumer behavior, market trends, and competitive forces, enabling them to make
informed strategic decisions and gain a competitive edge.

6. Social Welfare Enhancement: Economic analysis helps identify opportunities to

enhance social welfare, reduce poverty, improve living standards, and address socio-
economic disparities.

16
7. Long-Term Planning: By forecasting future trends and assessing long-term
implications, economic analysis facilitates strategic planning and decision-making for
sustainable development and growth.

Overall, economic analysis plays a vital role in informing public policy, guiding
business strategies, and promoting economic prosperity and welfare at both the
micro and macro levels.
Fundamental analysis is often employed in valuation, although several other
methods may be employed such as the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) or the
dividend discount model (DDM).
Understanding Valuation
A valuation can be useful when trying to determine the fair value of a security, which
is determined by what a buyer is willing to pay a seller, assuming both parties enter
the transaction willingly. When a security trades on an exchange, buyers and sellers
determine the market value of a stock or bond.

The concept of intrinsic value, however, refers to the perceived value of a security
based on future earnings or some other company attribute unrelated to the market
price of a security. That's where valuation comes into play. Analysts do a valuation to
determine whether a company or asset is overvalued or undervalued by the market.

Types of Valuation Models

Absolute valuation models attempt to find the intrinsic or "true" value of an
investment based only on fundamentals. Looking at fundamentals simply means you
would only focus on such things as dividends, cash flow, and the growth rate for a
single company, and not worry about any other companies. Valuation models that
fall into this category include the dividend discount model, discounted cash flow
model, residual income model, and asset-based model.
Relative valuation models, in contrast, operate by comparing the company in
question to other similar companies. These methods involve calculating multiples
and ratios, such as the price-to-earnings multiple, and comparing them to the
multiples of similar companies.
Types of Valuation Methods
There are various ways to do a valuation.

Comparables Method
The comparable company analysis is a method that looks at similar companies, in
size and industry, and how they trade to determine a fair value for a company or
asset. The past transaction method looks at past transactions of similar companies to
determine an appropriate value. There's also the asset-based valuation method,
which adds up all the company's asset values, assuming they were sold at fair market
value, to get the intrinsic value.

Sometimes doing all of these and then weighing each is appropriate to calculate
intrinsic value. Meanwhile, some methods are more appropriate for certain
industries and not others. For example, you wouldn't use an asset-based valuation

17
approach to valuing a consulting company that has few assets; instead, an earnings-
based approach like the DCF would be more appropriate.

Discounted Cash Flow Method

Analysts also place a value on an asset or investment using the cash inflows and
outflows generated by the asset, called a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. These
cash flows are discounted into a current value using a discount rate, which is an
assumption about interest rates or a minimum rate of return assumed by the
investor.
If a company is buying a piece of machinery, the firm analyzes the cash outflow for
the purchase and the additional cash inflows generated by the new asset. All the
cash flows are discounted to a present value, and the business determines the net
present value (NPV). If the NPV is a positive number, the company should make the
investment and buy the asset.

Precedent Transactions Method

The precedent transaction method compares the company being valued to other
similar companies that have recently been sold. The comparison works best if the
companies are in the same industry. The precedent transaction method is often
employed in mergers and acquisition transactions.

4.4 Valuation and shadow price

What Is Valuation?
Valuation is the analytical process of determining the current (or projected) worth of
an asset or a company. There are many techniques used for doing a valuation. An
analyst placing a value on a company looks at the business's management, the
composition of its capital structure, the prospect of future earnings, and the market
value of its assets, among other metrics.

What is shadow price?

Shadow price, or shadow pricing, is the real economic price of projects, activities,
goods, and services that have no market price. It also includes projects, etc. for
which prices are difficult to estimate. The shadow price is the opportunity cost, i.e.,
what somebody had to give up when they made a choice.

The shadow price is the proxy value of a good or project. We often define it by what
somebody has to give up to gain an extra unit of that good.

However, the impact resulting from a project or the value of a good when measured
using the shadow price may differ from its value when measured using market
prices.

This is because the market has not properly priced it in the first place.

The shadow price can also mean the highest price that a company would be willing
to pay. Specifically, the highest price it would pay for one extra unit of something.

18
Shadow pricing involves determining whether doing something will bring in greater
benefits than the costs incurred. When we have estimated the shadow price, we
subsequently decide whether to go ahead with a plan. If we decide to go ahead, we
also decide how much we are willing to spend on it.
For example, let suppose we’re calculating whether it’s worth paying workers for an
extra hour’s overtime. If the shadow price is greater than the cost of one hour’s
overtime, we decide to go ahead.

In other words, we go ahead if the benefit is greater than the cost.

In this case, the shadow price is how much the company would lose if it didn’t
continue producing for another hour.

Shadow price – some examples

Labor 1
The shadow wage is lower than the market wage when there is unemployment. This
is because there is no loss in output elsewhere when a worker gains employment.
Therefore, the marginal social cost of hiring the worker is lower than the market
wage.
Labor 2
A company is considering paying one of its delivery workers overtime to transport a
shipment to a customer early.
If it does this, it has a good chance of getting much more business from the
customer.
The company assigns a shadow price of $10,000. In other words, that is the benefit
of having an improved business relationship with the buyer.

19
Therefore, management will pay up to $10,000 to the dispatcher to make the
delivery.
Steel
The shadow price is higher than the market price. This is because the producer has
not accounted for the marginal social cost of pollution in steel’s production costs.
Capital
The shadow interest rate exceeds the market interest rate when rationing exists in
capital markets.
This is because the expected return is higher than the interest rate as companies
wish to borrow more at a given interest rate than they can. The opportunity cost of
funds is larger than the interest rate.

Pricing in economic analysis or shadow pricing

Shadow pricing is an incredibly useful tool when evaluating a project. Even though
shadow pricing only provides a rough estimate, it helps management assess the
value of certain operations and attempts to place a monetary value on the different
tasks associated with the project. Furthermore, when a company wants to run a
cost-benefit analysis, it must use shadow pricing to assign values to intangible items.

Shadow pricing is also frequently used in public policy in order to designate the value
of various public infrastructure projects such as public transportation, parks, and
bike lanes. Economists seeking the societal value of projects like public parks will use
shadow pricing to demonstrate the benefits of certain infrastructure projects that
are not typically assigned a monetary value.
Example of Shadow Pricing
An example of shadow pricing as applied to a proposed business plan to renovate a
company's office facilities might be the assignment of a dollar value to the expected
benefits of doing the renovation. While the cost of the renovation can easily be
assigned a dollar value, there are elements of the project's expected benefit that
must be assigned a shadow price because they are not as easy to quantify.

The possible benefits of the project include the following:

 Improved employee morale

 Lower staff recruiting costs

A lower employee turnover rate and increased productivity

Since it is impossible to assign a precise dollar value to such potential benefits, an
estimated shadow price is assigned to set a dollar figure to compare with the cost
figure.

Sources of shadow pricing

Shadow pricing refers to the assignment of a monetary value to goods and services
that are not traded in conventional markets. This concept is often used in economic

20
analysis, particularly in cost-benefit analysis and environmental economics, to assess
the true economic value of resources or externalities. Here are some common
sources of shadow pricing:

1. Market Equivalents: One approach to shadow pricing involves finding market

equivalents for non-market goods or services. For instance, if a project involves
environmental conservation, the shadow price of ecosystem services like clean air or
water might be estimated based on the costs incurred to replace or restore these
services if they were lost.

2. Revealed Preference Methods: These methods infer the value of non-market

goods by observing individuals' behavior in related market transactions. For instance,
the travel cost method estimates the value of recreational sites by analyzing the
costs individuals incur to travel to them.

3. Stated Preference Methods: These methods involve directly asking individuals

about their preferences and willingness to pay for non-market goods through
surveys and contingent valuation techniques. By analyzing responses, researchers
can estimate the shadow price of the goods or services in question.

4. Hedonic Pricing: In this approach, the value of specific characteristics of a good or

service is estimated by examining the prices of similar goods or services that differ
only in the characteristic of interest. For example, the value of clean air might be
estimated by analyzing property prices in areas with varying levels of air pollution.

5. Cost of Illness and Avoidance Costs: The shadow price of health-related

externalities or negative environmental impacts can be estimated by evaluating the
costs associated with illnesses or the costs incurred to avoid or mitigate
environmental damage.

6.Opportunity Costs: In economic analysis, opportunity cost represents the value of

the next best alternative foregone when a choice is made. Shadow pricing often
involves considering the opportunity costs associated with resource use or
environmental degradation.

7. Social Discount Rates: In cost-benefit analysis, the social discount rate represents
the rate at which future costs and benefits are discounted to their present value. The
choice of discount rate can significantly impact shadow pricing in long-term projects
or policies with intergenerational effects.

8. International Pricing Standards: For certain goods or services with international

standards, shadow pricing may be based on global pricing benchmarks or standards
set by international organizations.

These sources of shadow pricing provide methods for estimating the economic value
of non-market goods and services, helping policymakers, businesses, and

21
researchers make more informed decisions regarding resource allocation,
environmental protection, and policy formulation.

4.5 Basic Principles of shadow pricing

Shadow pricing involves assigning a monetary value to goods or services that do not
have explicit market prices. It is a fundamental concept used in economic analysis,
particularly in cost-benefit analysis and environmental economics. The basic
principles of shadow pricing include:

1. Opportunity Cost: Shadow prices reflect the opportunity cost of allocating

resources to one use rather than another. In other words, they represent the value
of the next best alternative foregone when a decision is made.

2. Efficiency: Shadow pricing helps ensure efficient resource allocation by accounting

for the full social costs and benefits associated with different economic activities. By
incorporating externalities and non-market goods into economic analysis, shadow
pricing promotes the efficient use of resources.

3.Market Equivalents: Shadow prices are often derived from market equivalents or
proxies for non-market goods and services. This may involve estimating the value of
environmental amenities, public goods, or social benefits based on observed market
behavior, such as willingness to pay or cost of replacement.

4. Welfare Maximization: The goal of shadow pricing is to maximize social welfare by

accurately reflecting the true economic value of goods and services, including those
not traded in conventional markets. By incorporating shadow prices into decision-
making processes, policymakers seek to achieve outcomes that enhance overall
societal well-being.

5. Interdisciplinary Approach: Shadow pricing requires an interdisciplinary approach

that draws on economics, environmental science, public policy, and other fields. It
involves combining economic theory, empirical methods, and qualitative
assessments to estimate the value of non-market goods and externalities.

6.Sensitivity Analysis: Given the inherent uncertainty and subjectivity involved in

estimating shadow prices, sensitivity analysis is often conducted to assess the
robustness of results to variations in key assumptions and parameters. Sensitivity
analysis helps identify sources of uncertainty and potential biases in shadow price
estimates.

7. Dynamic Considerations: Shadow pricing may also take into account dynamic
considerations, such as changes in technology, consumer preferences, and
environmental conditions over time. This requires accounting for discount rates,
time horizons, and intergenerational equity in the valuation of future costs and
benefits.

22
8. Transparency and Accountability: Transparent methodologies and clear
assumptions are essential for credible shadow pricing exercises. Stakeholders should
be informed about the methods used, data sources, and limitations of shadow price
estimates to ensure accountability and facilitate informed decision-making.

By adhering to these basic principles, shadow pricing can contribute to more

informed policy decisions, better resource management, and improved
environmental stewardship in both public and private sectors.
4.6 Use of shadow price
Shadow pricing serves various purposes across different fields and applications,
particularly in economics, environmental management, and policy analysis. Here are
some of the key uses of shadow pricing:

1. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA):

- Shadow pricing is integral to CBA, where it helps estimate the economic value of
goods and services that do not have market prices.
- It allows decision-makers to compare the costs and benefits of projects or
policies, even when some of the benefits are non-market goods like environmental
quality or public health.

2. Environmental Valuation:
- In environmental economics, shadow pricing is used to estimate the economic
value of ecosystem services, such as clean air, water purification, and biodiversity.
- This valuation helps in the design and implementation of environmental policies,
such as pollution control regulations and natural resource management strategies.

3. Public Goods and Services:

- Shadow pricing is employed to assess the value of public goods and services,
including parks, public transportation, and cultural heritage.
- It aids in determining optimal levels of provision and funding for public goods by
quantifying their societal benefits.

4. Resource Allocation:
- In sectors where resources are scarce or where there are competing demands,
shadow pricing helps prioritize resource allocation.
- For instance, in healthcare, it can be used to determine the allocation of medical
resources or the value of health outcomes in cost-effectiveness analysis.

5. Project Evaluation:
- Shadow pricing assists in evaluating the economic feasibility and viability of
investment projects by considering both market and non-market factors.
- It helps identify the net benefits and externalities associated with projects,
guiding decision-making regarding project selection and implementation.

6. Policy Analysis:
- Shadow pricing informs the design and evaluation of public policies by quantifying
their economic impacts and trade-offs.

23
 - It helps policymakers understand the full costs and benefits of policy
interventions and consider alternative approaches to achieve desired outcomes.

7. Sustainability Assessment:
- Shadow pricing contributes to sustainability assessments by accounting for the
long-term economic, environmental, and social impacts of decisions and activities.
- It supports the integration of sustainability considerations into decision-making
processes across various sectors and industries.

Overall, shadow pricing is a valuable tool for addressing market failures, improving
resource allocation, and promoting more informed decision-making in economic and
environmental management. It facilitates the recognition and incorporation of non-
market values into economic analysis, leading to more comprehensive and balanced
policy outcomes.

4.7 Conversion factors

Conversion factors are numerical values used to convert one unit of measurement
into another. They are essential in various fields, including science, engineering,
finance, and everyday life. Here are some common examples of conversion factors
across different measurement categories:

Length:
- 1 meter (m) = 100 centimeters (cm)
- 1 meter (m) = 1000 millimeters (mm)
- 1 kilometer (km) = 1000 meters (m)
- 1 inch (in) = 2.54 centimeters (cm)
- 1 foot (ft) = 12 inches (in)

Area:
- 1 square meter (m²) = 10,000 square centimeters (cm²)
- 1 hectare (ha) = 10,000 square meters (m²)
- 1 acre = 43,560 square feet (ft²)

Volume:
- 1 liter (L) = 1000 milliliters (mL)
- 1 cubic meter (m³) = 1000 liters (L)
- 1 gallon (gal) = 3.78541 liters (L)
- 1 cubic foot (ft³) = 28.3168 liters (L)

Mass/Weight:
- 1 kilogram (kg) = 1000 grams (g)
- 1 tonne (t) = 1000 kilograms (kg)
- 1 pound (lb) = 0.453592 kilograms (kg)
- 1 ounce (oz) = 28.3495 grams (g)

Time:
- 1 minute (min) = 60 seconds (s)

24
- 1 hour (hr) = 60 minutes (min)
- 1 day = 24 hours (hr)
- 1 year = 365.25 days (approx.)

Temperature:
- Fahrenheit to Celsius: \( C = (F - 32) \times \frac{5}{9} \)
- Celsius to Fahrenheit: \( F = (C \times \frac{9}{5}) + 32 \)

Energy:
- 1 joule (J) = 1 newton-meter (N·m)
- 1 calorie (cal) = 4.184 joules (J)
- 1 kilocalorie (kcal) = 4184 joules (J)
- 1 British thermal unit (BTU) = 1055.06 joules (J)

Currency:
- Conversion rates between different currencies, which vary based on exchange rates
in the foreign exchange market.

These are just a few examples of conversion factors. Depending on the specific
context and the units involved, conversion factors may vary widely. It's important to
use accurate and appropriate conversion factors to ensure precise measurements
and calculations.

4.8 Approaches in Economic Analysis

Economic analysis involves various approaches and methodologies to understand,

interpret, and evaluate economic phenomena. Here are some of the key approaches
in economic analysis:

1. Descriptive Analysis:
- Descriptive analysis involves summarizing and presenting economic data and
trends in a systematic and informative manner.
- It includes techniques such as graphical representation, tables, and summary
statistics to describe economic variables and their relationships over time or across
different groups.

2. Theoretical Analysis:
- Theoretical analysis involves the development and application of economic
theories and models to explain and predict economic behavior and outcomes.
- It relies on formal frameworks, such as microeconomic and macroeconomic
theories, to analyze how individuals, firms, and governments make decisions and
interact in markets.

3. Empirical Analysis:
- Empirical analysis involves the use of real-world data to test economic theories,
estimate relationships among variables, and evaluate policy interventions.

25
 - It employs econometric techniques, statistical methods, and experimental designs
to analyze data and draw conclusions about economic phenomena.

4. Normative Analysis:
- Normative analysis involves assessing economic policies, decisions, and outcomes
based on ethical, moral, or social welfare criteria.
- It focuses on evaluating whether economic outcomes are desirable or optimal
from a normative perspective and identifying potential areas for policy intervention
or improvement.

5. Positive Analysis:
- Positive analysis focuses on explaining and understanding economic phenomena
as they are, without making value judgments or normative statements.
- It seeks to describe and analyze economic behavior and outcomes objectively,
based on empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks.
6. Comparative Analysi:
- Comparative analysis involves comparing economic outcomes, policies, or
institutions across different countries, regions, or time periods.
- It helps identify similarities, differences, and patterns in economic performance
and policy effectiveness, offering insights into the factors driving economic
development and growth.

7. Interdisciplinary Analysis:
- Interdisciplinary analysis integrates insights and methods from other disciplines,
such as sociology, psychology, political science, and environmental science, into
economic analysis.
- It recognizes the interconnectedness of economic phenomena with social,
political, and environmental factors and seeks to provide more comprehensive and
nuanced explanations of economic behavior and outcomes.

8. Dynamic Analysis:
- Dynamic analysis examines economic processes and phenomena over time,
considering how they evolve, interact, and change in response to internal and
external factors.
- It explores issues such as economic growth, technological change, business cycles,
and structural transformation, highlighting the dynamics and complexity of
economic systems.

These approaches in economic analysis provide economists and policymakers with

valuable tools and perspectives for understanding, interpreting, and addressing the
challenges and opportunities facing economies and societies.

4.4.1. LM- Approach

In the realm of economic analysis, "LM-Approach" typically refers to the Liquidity
Preference-Money Supply (LM) model. This model is an integral part of the IS-LM
framework, which is a basic macroeconomic model used to illustrate the relationship
between real output (Y) and the interest rate (r).

26
Here's a brief overview of the LM-Approach within economic analysis:

1. Liquidity Preference-Money Supply (LM) Curve: The LM curve shows the

combinations of interest rates and levels of income (or output) at which the money
market is in equilibrium. It represents the relationship between the interest rate and
the quantity of money demanded by households and firms. The demand for money
is influenced by the level of income and the interest rate.

2. Equilibrium in the Money Market: The LM curve is derived from the Keynesian
theory of liquidity preference, which states that the demand for money depends on
transactions, precautionary, and speculative motives. At any given level of income,
higher interest rates reduce the quantity of money demanded, leading to a
downward-sloping LM curve.

3. Integration with the IS Curve: In the IS-LM framework, the IS curve represents the
equilibrium in the goods market, showing the combinations of interest rates and
levels of income where total spending (aggregate demand) equals total output
(aggregate supply). The LM curve and the IS curve intersect to determine the
equilibrium interest rate and level of income in the economy.

4. Monetary Policy Analysis: The LM-Approach is instrumental in analyzing the

effects of monetary policy on output and interest rates. For instance, if the central
bank increases the money supply, it shifts the LM curve to the right, leading to lower
interest rates and higher output. Conversely, a decrease in the money supply shifts
the LM curve to the left, resulting in higher interest rates and lower output.

5. Aggregate Demand Management: By understanding the dynamics of the LM

curve, policymakers can use monetary policy to stabilize the economy. Adjustments
in the money supply can help address fluctuations in output, inflation, and
unemployment, aiming to achieve macroeconomic stability and full employment.

Overall, the LM-Approach is a fundamental component of macroeconomic analysis,

providing insights into the interaction between the money market, interest rates,
and real output in an economy.

4.4.2. UNIDO Approaches

In the context of economic analysis, "LM-Approach" could refer to the LM Curve
approach, which is a fundamental concept in macroeconomics. The LM curve
represents the equilibrium in the money market. It shows the combinations of
interest rates and real GDP where the money market is in equilibrium, given the
supply of money and the demand for money.

Here's a brief overview of the LM curve and its role in economic analysis:

1. LM Curve: The LM curve represents the combinations of interest rates and real
GDP where the money market is in equilibrium. It shows the relationship between

27
the interest rate and the level of real income at which the demand for money equals
the supply of money. The LM curve is typically upward sloping, indicating that as real
income increases, the demand for money also increases.

2. Money Market Equilibrium: The LM curve intersects with the IS (Investment-

Saving) curve to determine the equilibrium interest rate and level of real income in
the economy. The IS curve represents the combinations of interest rates and real
GDP where the goods market is in equilibrium.

3. Monetary Policy Analysis: The LM curve is used by policymakers and

economists to analyze the effects of monetary policy on interest rates, output, and
employment. For example, if the central bank increases the money supply, it will
shift the LM curve to the right, leading to lower interest rates and higher output in
the short run.

4. Aggregate Demand Management: The LM curve is also a key component of

aggregate demand management in macroeconomic policy. By understanding the
relationship between interest rates, money supply, and output, policymakers can use
monetary policy to stabilize the economy and achieve macroeconomic objectives
such as price stability and full employment.

In summary, the LM curve approach is an essential tool in economic analysis,

particularly in macroeconomics, for understanding the relationship between interest
rates, money supply, and real output in the economy.

4. Conclusion
In conclusion, the financial and economic analysis conducted sheds light on various
aspects of the subject under examination. Through the exploration of financial
statements, economic indicators, and market trends, several important insights have
been gleaned.

Firstly, the analysis of financial statements revealed the financial health and
performance of the entity or market in question. Key metrics such as profitability,
liquidity, solvency, and efficiency were evaluated to assess the organization's
financial standing and operational efficiency.

Furthermore, the examination of economic indicators provided valuable context for

understanding the broader economic environment in which the entity operates.
Factors such as GDP growth, inflation rates, employment levels, and consumer
spending patterns offer insights into the overall health of the economy and its
potential impact on the entity's performance.

The analysis also considered market dynamics, including industry trends, competitive
landscape, regulatory environment, and technological advancements. Understanding
these factors is crucial for assessing the entity's competitive positioning, market
opportunities, and potential risks.

28
Based on the findings of the analysis, several key implications emerge. It is evident
that the entity faces both opportunities and challenges in the current economic and
market environment. While favorable economic conditions may present growth
prospects, they also bring forth competitive pressures and regulatory uncertainties
that need to be navigated effectively.

In light of these insights, it is recommended that the entity takes proactive measures
to capitalize on emerging opportunities while mitigating potential risks. This may
involve strategic investments in innovation, expansion into new markets,
enhancement of operational efficiency, and proactive risk management practices.

Furthermore, collaboration with stakeholders, including investors, customers,

suppliers, and regulatory authorities, is essential for fostering trust, transparency,
and sustainability in the long term.

In conclusion, the financial and economic analysis provides a comprehensive

understanding of the entity's performance, challenges, and opportunities. By
leveraging insights gleaned from the analysis and adopting a strategic and adaptive
approach, the entity can position itself for sustainable growth and success in the
dynamic and competitive landscape of today's economy.

5. Reference
Unacademy.com
www.imf.com
Core.ac.uk
www.scribd.com
www.bu.com
Wikipedia

29
.

30