Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADMINISTRATORS IN ZIMBABWE
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
MAY 2017
b = 1 231
a = ∑ 𝑦/𝑛 -b∑ 𝑥/𝑛 = (890/5) − (1 231 x 129/5) = 146
= (360/370) x 100
= 97.3%
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 2 of 11
(d) (i) Sales margin volume variance (Marginal costing):
(Actual volume – Budgeted volume) x Standard contribution per unit
(9 500 – 10 000) x Standard margin (SM) = $7 500A
500 SM = 7 500
Standard margin = $15
(ii) Cost drivers are used to apportion activity costs to output. A cost
driver is a factor that causes a change in the cost of an activity. Examples
of cost drivers, which show the causal relationship between cost pools
and costs, include:
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 3 of 11
(iii) ABB (Activity based budgeting) is a method of budgeting based on an
activity framework and utilizing cost-driven data in the budget setting and
variance feedback process. At its simplest, ABB involves the use of costs
determined using ABC in budgets.
QUESTION 2
Proposal (a) will increase the sales revenue but the increase in costs will be
greater:
$000
Sales 150,000 X $7 1,050
Variable costs 750
300
Fixed costs plus advertising 164
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 4 of 11
Net Profit 136
Proposal (b)
Reduces variable costs by $60,000
But increases fixed costs by $72,000
It is therefore not to be recommended unless the total volume increases
as a result of the policy (e.g. if the supply of the components were
previously a limiting factor)
The increase in sales needed to maintain profit at $150,000 (assuming the
price remains at $8) would be as follows:
Reduced profits at 100,000 units $12,000
(20 marks)
QUESTION 3
Company as a
Division A Division B whole
$000 $000 $000
External sales 0 350 350
Inter-divisional
transfers 200 0 0
200 350 350
Costs
Inter-divisional
transfers 0 200 0
Other material costs 80 20 100
Other variable costs 20 30 50
Fixed costs 60 30 90
Total costs 160 280 240
Profit 40 70 110
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 5 of 11
b) If the transfer is $25
Company as a
Division A Division B whole
$000 $000 $000
External sales 0 350 350
Inter-divisional
transfers 250 0 0
200 350 350
Costs
Inter-divisional
transfers 0 250 0
Other material costs 80 20 100
Other variable costs 20 30 50
Fixed costs 60 30 90
Total costs 160 280 240
Profit 90 20 110
Conclusions
The choice of transfer price does not affect the profit of the organization
as a whole, provided that there is agreement on the quantity of transfer.
However, the choice of transfer price affects the profitability of the
individual profit centres.
d) If Division A can sell the part finished product in the external market any
transfer price below this level would have to be imposed by head office.
This would remove divisional autonomy and affect managerial motivation.
An external market price is fair for the purposes of performance
evaluation and will result in goal congruence. Division B may argue that
certain savings can be made by trading internally rather than externally,
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 6 of 11
for example, there may be savings in packaging costs and in after sales
service. An adjusted market price may therefore be agreed.
[Total: 20 marks]
QUESTION 4
a) Initial order
If there is no guarantee of a follow-up order, the setting-up costs must be
recovered on the initial order. Costs are, therefore, as follows:
$
Material (10 X $30) 300
Labour and variable overhead (100 x$3) 300
Setting-up cost 1,000
Total 1,600
Minimum price each ($1,600 / 10) 160
b) Follow-on order
The setting-up costs have been recovered on the initial order. Output is
doubled; therefore, average time for each group of 10 machines is
reduced to 100 X 0.8 = 80 hours.
i.e. cumulative time for 20 machines = 160 hours / Time for second group
of 10 = time for first 20 – time for first 10 = 160 -100 = 60 hours
$
Material (10 X $30) 300
Labour and variable overhead (60 x$3) 180
Total 480
Minimum price each ($480 / 10) 48
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 7 of 11
This is, of course, the mean of the two previous prices: cumulative costs
are the same but they are recorded evenly over 20 units instead of most
of the cost being ‘loaded’ onto the first 10 units.
d) Mass production
The time spent on the first 140 mass production models is calculated as
follows:
If a ‘unit’ is a batch of 10 machines, YX = a X b where
A = 100
B = log 2 / log (0.8) = -0.3219
Average time / unit for first 2 units (i.e. first 20 machines)
= 100 X 2 -0.3210 = 80 hours
Total time for first 2 units = 80 X 2 = 160 (as before)
Average time per unit for first 16 units (i.e. first 160 machines)
= 100 X 16 – 0.3129 = 40.96 hours
Total time for first 16 units = 40.96 X 16 = 655.36 hours
Hence total time for units 3 to 16 i.e. the 140 mass-produced units
= (655.36 – 160) hours = 495.36 hours
Cost of first 140 mass-production models
$
Material (140 X $30) 4,200
Labour and variable overhead (100 x$3) 1,486
Setting-up cost __250
Total 5,936
Revenue 6,300
Profit __364
[Total: 20 marks]
QUESTION 4
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 8 of 11
example, the contribution approach can be applied to one time only
special orders where the company has a temporary excess supply of spare
capacity. In this situation a short-term approach can be adopted by
focusing only on the sales revenues and variable costs. The contribution
approach is also advocated for pricing off-peak business and ranking
products where limiting factors apply. In the latter situation a company
may be faced with short-term capacity constraints and profit is maximized
by ranking products by their contributions per limiting factor.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 9 of 11
(viii) Supplier innovation being encouraged
(i) It involves measuring and examining all costs that are quality
related.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 10 of 11
(ii) It requires awareness by all personnel of the quality requirements
involved in supplying the customer with products that meet the
agreed specification.
(iii) It is a philosophy that involves all parts of the organization and
everyone working in it.
(iv) It aims at the elimination of waste, where waste is defined as
anything other than the minimum essential amount of equipment,
materials, space and worker’s time.
(v) It must embrace all aspects of operations from pre-production to
post-production.
(vi) It involves an emphasis on supply chain thinking.
(vii) It works toward a continuous process of improvement.
Implementing TQM
(i) Adopt the philosophy of zero errors / defects to change the culture
to right first time.
(ii) Train people to understand the customer-supplier relationships.
(iii) Do not buy products and services on price alone – look at the total
cost.
(iv) Recognize that improvement in the systems must be managed.
(v) Adopt modern methods of supervision and training – eliminate
fear.
(vi) Eliminate barriers between departments by managing the process
– improve communications and teamwork.
(vii) Eliminate: arbitrary goals without methods; all standards based on
numbers; barriers to pride of workmanship; fiction – get to the
facts by using the appropriate tools.
(viii) Constantly educate and retrain – develop the ‘experts’ in the
business.
(ix) Develop a systematic approach to manage the implementation of
TQM
[Total: 20 marks]
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cost & Management Accounting Suggested Solutions: May 2017 Page 11 of 11