Table 4.

2 Sieve analysis for sample location 1

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 3.20 3.63 3.63 4.71 4.71

1.70 0–1 0.20 0.63 4.26 0.81 5.52

1.40 1–2 2.10 2.53 6.79 3.28 8.80

1.00 2–3 0.90 1.33 8.12 1.72 10.52

0.60 3–4 1.20 1.63 9.75 2.11 12.63

0.30 4–5 0.50 0.93 10.68 1.22 13.85

0.15 5–6 8.80 9.23 19.91 11.99 25.84

0.75 ¿6 59.60 57.03 76.94 74.12 99.96

72.69 76.94 99.96

Sample Location 1
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.1 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 1

Mean = 7.0 (coarse silt), Sorting = 2.4 (poorly sorted), Skewness = 0.30 (very positively
skewed), Kurtosis = 2.1 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.3 Sieve analysis for sample location 2

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 3.30 4.02 4.02 10.03 10.03

1.70 0–1 0.60 1.32 5.34 3.29 13.32

1.40 1–2 2.60 3.32 8.66 8.28 21.60

1.00 2–3 0.90 1.62 4.28 4.04 25.64

0.60 3–4 1.30 2.02 12.30 5.04 30.68

0.30 4–5 0.40 1.12 13.42 2.79 33.47

0.15 5–6 4.10 4.82 18.24 12.03 43.50

0.75 ¿6 21.10 21.82 40.06 54.46 99.96

34.30 40.06 99.96

Sample Location 2
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.2 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 2

Mean = 5.3 (coarse silt), Sorting = 3.6 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.04 (nearly symmetrical),
Kurtosis = 0.49 (very platykurtic)
Table 4.4 Sieve analysis for sample location 3

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 11.00 11.36 11.36 13.59 13.59

1.70 0–1 1.00 1.36 12.72 1.62 15.21

1.40 1–2 2.60 2.96 15.68 3.54 18.75

1.00 2–3 0.70 1.06 16.74 1.26 20.01

0.60 3–4 1.10 1.46 18.20 1.74 21.75

0.30 4–5 0.30 0.66 18.86 0.78 22.53

0.15 5–6 3.70 4.06 22.92 4.85 27.38

0.75 ¿6 56.60 60.66 83.58 72.57 99.95

78.00 83.58 99.95

Sample Location 3
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.3 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 3

Mean = 5.8 (coarse silt), Sorting = 3.7 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.63 (very coarsely
skewed), Kurtosis = 2.02 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.5 Sieve analysis for sample location 4

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 23.60 24.17 24.17 47.42 47.42

1.70 0–1 0.80 1.37 25.54 2.68 50.10

1.40 1–2 5.40 5.97 31.51 11.71 61.81

1.00 2–3 1.80 2.37 33.88 4.65 66.46

0.60 3–4 1.60 2.17 36.05 4.25 70.71

0.30 4–5 0.80 1.37 37.42 2.68 73.39

0.15 5–6 4.40 4.97 42.39 9.75 83.14

0.75 ¿6 8.00 8.57 89.57 16.81 99.95

46.40 50.96 99.95

Sample Location 4
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.4 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 4

Mean = 2.03 (medium sand), Sorting = 2.64 (poorly sorted), Skewness = 1.00 (very positively
skewed), Kurtosis = 0.38 (very platykurtic)
Table 4.6 Sieve analysis for sample location 5

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 0.20 1.01 1.01 3.40 3.40

1.70 0–1 0.10 0.91 1.92 3.06 6.46

1.40 1–2 0.20 1.01 2.93 3.40 9.86

1.00 2–3 0.10 0.91 3.84 3.06 12.92

0.60 3–4 0.10 0.91 4.75 3.06 15.98

0.30 4–5 0.10 0.91 5.66 3.06 19.04

0.15 5–6 0.40 1.21 6.87 4.07 23.11

0.75 ¿6 22.00 22.81 26.68 76.85 99.96

23.20 26.68 99.96

SAMPLE LOCATION 5
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.5 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 5

Mean = 6.96 (coarse silt), Sorting = 2.12 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.42 (very coarsely
skewed), Kurtosis = 1.88 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.7 Sieve analysis for sample location 6

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 2.30 2.71 2.71 3.68 3.68

1.70 0–1 0.20 0.61 3.32 0.82 4.50

1.40 1–2 1.60 2.01 5.44 2.73 7.23

1.00 2–3 0.70 1.11 6.44 1.50 8.73

0.60 3–4 1.10 1.51 7.95 2.05 10.78

0.30 4–5 0.50 0.91 8.86 1.23 12.01

0.15 5–6 5.40 5.81 14.67 7.89 19.90

0.75 ¿6 58.50 58.91 73.58 80.06 99.96

70.30 73.58 99.96

SAMPLE LOCATION 6
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.6 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 6

Mean = 7.6 (coarse silt), Sorting = 7.5 (Extremely poorly sorted), Skewness = 1.00 (very
coarsely skewed), Kurtosis = 8.2 (Extremely platykurtic)
Table 4.8 Sieve analysis for sample location 7

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 2.50 2.92 2.92 3.90 3.90

1.70 0–1 0.30 0.72 3.64 0.96 4.86

1.40 1–2 1.00 1.42 5.06 1.89 6.75

1.00 2–3 0.60 1.02 6.08 1.36 8.11

0.60 3–4 0.30 0.72 6.80 0.96 9.07

0.30 4–5 0.80 1.22 8.02 1.62 10.69

0.15 5–6 4.50 4.92 12.94 6.57 17.26

0.75 ¿6 61.50 61.92 74.86 82.71 99.97

71.50 74.86 99.97

SAMPLE LOCATION 7
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.7 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 7

Mean = 7.4 (coarse silt), Sorting = 1.87 (poorly sorted), Skewness = 0.48 (very coarsely
skewed), Kurtosis = 1.84 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.9 Sieve analysis for sample location 8

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 0.30 0.74 0.74 1.11 1.11

1.70 0–1 0.08 0.44 1.18 0.66 1.77

1.40 1–2 0.20 0.64 1.82 0.96 2.73

1.00 2–3 0.10 0.54 2.36 0.81 3.54

0.60 3–4 0.10 0.54 2.90 0.81 4.35

0.30 4–5 0.00 0.44 3.34 0.66 5.01

0.15 5–6 1.10 0.54 3.88 0.81 5.82

0.75 ¿6 61.90 62.34 66.22 94.14 99.97

63.70 66.22 99.96

SAMPLE LOCATION 8
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.8 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 8

Mean = 8.5 (coarse silt), Sorting = 1.20 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.34 (negatively skewed),
Kurtosis = 1.31 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.10 Sieve analysis for sample location 9

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 1.50 2.17 2.17 4.09 4.09

1.70 0–1 0.40 1.07 3.24 2.02 6.11

1.40 1–2 1.40 2.07 5.31 3.90 10.01

1.00 2–3 0.50 1.17 6.48 2.20 12.21

0.60 3–4 1.20 1.87 8.35 3.53 15.74

0.30 4–5 0.10 0.77 9.12 1.45 17.19

0.15 5–6 1.90 2.57 11.69 4.85 22.04

0.75 ¿6 40.60 41.27 52.96 77.92 99.96

47.60 52.96 99.96

SAMPLE LOCATION 9
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.9 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 9

Mean = 6.96 (coarse silt), Sorting = 2.55 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.57 (very coarsely
skewed), Kurtosis = 1.79 (very leptokurtic)
Table 4.11 Sieve analysis for sample location 10

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 11.50 11.88 11.88 16.45 16.45

1.70 0–1 2.30 2.68 14.56 3.70 20.15

1.40 1–2 10.20 10.58 25.14 14.65 34.80

1.00 2–3 3.90 4.28 29.42 5.92 40.72

0.60 3–4 3.30 3.68 33.10 5.09 45.81

0.30 4–5 1.50 1.88 34.98 2.60 48.41

0.15 5–6 6.20 6.58 41.56 9.11 57.52

0.75 ¿6 30.30 30.68 72.21 42.48 100.00

69.20 72.21 100.00

SAMPLE LOCATION 10
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.10 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 10

Mean = 4.2 (coarse silt), Sorting = 3.68 (poorly sorted), Skewness = -0.42 (very well sorted),
Kurtosis = 0.49 (mesokurtic)
Table 4.12 Sieve analysis for sample location 11

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 22.40 22.90 22.90 34.28 34.28

1.70 0–1 2.40 2.90 25.80 4.34 38.62

1.40 1–2 9.90 10.40 36.20 15.56 54.18

1.00 2–3 3.60 4.10 40.30 6.13 60.31

0.60 3–4 1.80 2.30 42.60 3.44 63.75

0.30 4–5 2.50 3.00 45.60 4.49 68.24

0.15 5–6 7.00 7.50 53.10 11.22 79.46

0.75 ¿6 13.20 13.70 66.80 20.50 99.96

62.80 66.80 99.96

SAMPLE LOCATION 11
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.11 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 11

Mean = 2.36 (fine sand), Sorting = 2.49 (Extremely poorly sorted), Skewness = 0.53 (very
positively skewed), Kurtosis = 0.68 (platykurtic)
Table 4.13 Sieve analysis for sample location 12

Class interval Weight Corrected Cumulate Corrected Cumulative

Retained weight (g) weight (g) weight % weight %
Sieve Phi (φ ) (g)

2.00 -1 – 0 22.40 20.86 20.86 31.76 31.76

1.70 0–1 3.40 3.86 24.72 5.87 37.63

1.40 1–2 9190 9.56 34.28 14.55 52.18

1.00 2–3 3.66 4.06 38.34 6.18 58.36

0.60 3–4 3.10 3.56 41.90 5.42 63.78

0.30 4–5 1.70 2.16 44.06 3.28 67.06

0.15 5–6 6.50 6.96 51.02 10.59 77.65

0.75 ¿6 14.20 14.66 65.68 22.32 99.97

62.00 65.68 99.97

SAMPLE LOCATION 12
120

100
Cumulative weight %

80

60

40

20

0
-1 – 0 0–1 1–2 2–3 3–4 4–5 5–6 6
Phi (𝝋)

Figure 4.12 A plot of phi vs Cumulative weight % for location 12

Mean = 2.54 (fine sand), Sorting = 2.53 (poorly sorted), Skewness = 0.47 (well skewed),
Kurtosis = 1.91 (very leptokurtic)