IELTS WRITING TASK 2 - DẠNG 2: DISCUSSION

SAMPLE 1:

Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others,
however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss
both views and give your opinion.

Some people argue that zoos help to preserve wild creatures, while others say that
they are inhumane and should be abolished. While the development of breeding
programmes contributes to the preservation of endangered species, I believe that
the poor conditions that many animals held in captivity are kept in make the
existence of zoos unacceptable.

On the one hand, there are many projects in existence in zoological parks around
the world where species facing extinction have been successfully bred in captivity
and their numbers increased substantially. This is important for ensuring the
survival of animals under threat from poaching and the destruction of their natural
environments. A good example of this is the golden lion tamarin from Brazil
which nearly died out because of logging and mining activities that are destroying
its habitat. Today, a third of wild golden lion tamarins were raised in captivity.

On the other hand, a significant percentage of zoos house their animals in

cramped cages with very little space to move around or behave naturally. This
can lead to them becoming distressed and depressed as well as suffering
physically through lack of exercise. A friend of mine recently visited a wildlife
park while on holiday abroad and was very upset to see the lions pacing up and
down in a narrow, bare pen and eagles in enclosures so small that they were
unable to fly.

In conclusion, although zoos do help to safeguard dwindling populations of

particular species, the suffering experienced by many captive creatures due to
unsuitable living conditions amounts to cruelty and they should not be allowed to
exist.

source: IELTS Jacky

 SAMPLE 2:

It is commonly believed that nowadays the main factors that affect a child's
development are media, pop culture and friends. A different point of view is
that family plays the most significant role. Discuss both views and give your
opinion.

It is often held that teachers, peers and the media have a significant influence on
the life of children. While some people argue that these factors are predominant
in shaping a child's future, others believe that parents impact their offspring in
more critical ways. This essay will discuss both these points of view and argue in
favour of the latter.

On the one hand, the books children read and the music they listen to form their
belief system. In other words, children tend to copy the behaviour of their
favourite personality or fictional character. Moreover, when little ones work and
play in groups, they are influenced by their peers. Finally, other factors, like the
media, prompt children to want things regarded as fashionable. For instance,
children demand toys that they see on television.

On the other hand, a child's personality is malleable at a very young age, and
parents are always present in their life at this stage. Also, very young children
love to imitate. For example, children who come from a dysfunctional family
often exhibit behavioural problems at school. An emotionally secure environment
at home is critical for the child's confidence. Moreover, parents also teach
children about setting boundaries.

In my opinion, children's choice of friends, books or music depends on the values

instilled in them by their parents. Therefore, parents hold more substantial sway
over their offspring than media, pop culture and friends circle.

In conclusion, the outside world influences the intellectual and social

development of children. However, I believe that it is parents who set the stage
for these developments by laying a strong foundation from a very young age.

source: IELTS-up
 SAMPLE 3:

Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that
this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative
consequences.

Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion.

There is an ever increasing use of technology, such as tablets and laptops, in the
classroom. It is often argued that this is a positive development, whilst others
disagree and think it will lead to adverse ramifications. This essay agrees that an
increase in technology is beneficial to students and teachers.

It is clear that the internet has provided students with access to more information
than ever before. Moreover, learners have the ability to research and learn about
any subject at the touch of a button. It is therefore agreed that technology is a very
worthwhile tool for education. Wikipedia is a prime example, where students can
simply type in any keyword and gain access to in-depth knowledge quickly and
easily.

However, many disagree and feel that technology deprives people of real human
interaction. Human interaction teaches people valuable skills such as discourse,
debate and empathy. Despite this, human interaction is still possible through the
internet and this essay disagrees that technology should be dismissed for this
reason. For instance, Skype and Facebook make it possible for people to interact
in ways that were never before possible.

In conclusion, while the benefits of technology, particularly the internet, allow

students to tap into limitless sources of information, some still feel that people
should be wary of this new phenomenon and not allow it to curb face to face
interaction. However, as long as we are careful to keep in mind the importance of
human interaction in education, the educational benefits are clearly positive.

source: IELTSAdvantage
 SAMPLE 4:

Some people seek a lot of advice from family and friends when choosing their
careers. Others feel it is better to choose a career more independently. Discuss
both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include
any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Choosing a career can be a challenging process. It can be difficult to say whether

this decision should be made alone, or made with input from loved ones. In my
opinion, it is best to find one’s career independently, with no more than a small
amount of advice from family or friends. Below, I will explain why I feel that we
must ultimately face career decisions on our own.

Getting career guidance input from loved ones can be confusing rather than
useful. Family and friends likely have different careers, and thus give different,
conflicting advice. Suppose, for instance, that your father is a teacher, your
mother is an accountant, and your best friend is a nurse. They have all made very
different career decisions, and only have knowledge on their respective careers.
Different people will likely only steer you to their careers, without giving good
advice on your own best path.

In contrast, focusing on one’s own preferences and skills provides a clearer path
to the right career. After all, individuals have the best knowledge of their own
abilities and interests. As an example, if someone has gone to university to study
biology, they will know more about biology careers than a family member or
friend who does not have that same kind of training. Ultimately, your career must
be built on your own training and experience, not the training and experience of
others.

For the reasons I’ve outlined above, I really do believe that career decisions are a
matter of personal knowledge. Other people, even trusted family and friends,
simply cannot understand your career the way you can. To select your field of
work wisely, you must face this important decision alone.

source: Magoosh Blog

 SAMPLE 5:

Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a
successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after
school.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or
continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight
after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.
The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons.
Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way,
they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or
start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work,
rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the
chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen
profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their
studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For
example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having
the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and
better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with
fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly
competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in
a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or
college will not be able to compete.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to
be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.
source: IELTS Simon