You are on page 1of 5

Calcium, Phosphorus, and Sodium Concentrations

in Cheddar Cheese

P. S. K I N D S T E D T 1 and F. V. KOSIKOWSKI
Department of Food Science
Cornell University
Ithaca 14853

ABSTRACT during industrial cheese making; therefore, no


Commercial Cheddar cheese from 26 direct attempt is made to control their levels.
cheese plants in 7 midwestern states were Theoretically, the NaC1 level in Cheddar
analyzed for their Ca, P, and Na levels. cheese is achieved by adjusting the salting rate.
Thirty-five cheese gave mean values for In practice, m a n y factors make it difficult to
Ca of .715% with a range of .606 to control NaC] at optimum industrial concentra-
.830%; for P .501% and a range of .442 tion, including uniformity of NaC1 application,
to .556%; and for Na .65% (NaC1 1.64%) temperature, pH, moisture, size dimensions
with a range of .48 to .85% (NaC1 1.22 to and surface area to mass ratio of milled curd
particles, time and amount of stirring between
2.16%).
The correlation coefficient for Ca and salting and pressing, and slow equilibration
between regions of unequal salt concentration
P was r=.90, but as Ca concentration de-
in the finished cheese (6, 7, 8, 20, 27).
creased from the norm by 3 mmol/kg,
P concentration decreased only 2 mmol/ Lack of control over such critical variables
kg. Sodium variation among cheeses indi- result in variation of cheese NaC1 concentra-
cated a lack of uniformity in industrial tion. Wilster (31) observed that NaC1 concentra-
salting practices. tions of commercial Cheddar cheese ranged
from .8 to 2.0%. Large variations existed among
INTRODUCTION commercial Cheddar cheeses manufactured
from a single vat of milk (4, 5, 21) and even
Between 30 and 40 mineral elements are within individual blocks of cheese (4).
measurable in cow's milk (9). Most are present It is difficult to assign values or even ranges
in trace amounts and have little significance for of values for Ca, P, Na, and NaC1 that typify
cheese making. Calcium and P, two of the most commercial Cheddar cheese. Quantitative infor-
abundant mineral elements in milk, become mation on Cheddar, particularly those made in
concentrated in Cheddar cheese and play a the United States, is limited. Data compiled
fundamental role in quality and identity (10, from comparatively recent published reports
16, 17). are presented (Table 1).
Cheddar cheese also contains considerable
Growing concern over excess Na (30) and
Na and chloride. Their principal source is
Ca deficiency (26) in the American diet and
NaC1, which is added directly to curd during
renewed interest in the role of CaPO4 in cheese
manufacture. quality and identity (3, 10, 16, 17) underscore
Calcium, P, and NaC1 concentrations may be the need for up-to-date data on cheese mineral
controlled within limits in Cheddar cheese. In content. In view of this, an analysis during
industrial practice, cheese Ca and P concentra- 1985 of Ca, P, Na, and NaC1 in commercial
tions are regulated indirectly through control of Cheddar cheese was undertaken.
acidity. Normally, Ca and P are not measured

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Collection
Received March 12, 1987.
Accepted September 18, 1987. Sample collection was carried out in co-
1University of Vermont, Department of Animal operation with the Dairy Division, Agricultural
Science, Burlington 05405. Marketing Service of the USDA. Cheese samples

1988 J Dairy Sci 71:285-289 285


286 KINDSTEDT AND KOSIKOWSKI

T A B L E 1. S u m m a r y o f r e s u l t s f r o m p u b l i s h e d s u r v e y s o f m i n e r a l c o m p o s i t i o n in c o m m e r c i a l C h e d d a r c h e e s e .

Refer- Loca- No. Concentration


Mineral ence tion Year samples Range "X SD

(%)
Na 3 UK 1984 15 .385--.973 .673 .181
23 USA 1976 24 NA l .620 .021

NaC1 3 UK 1984 15 1.10--2.40 1.80 .40


8 Canada 1955 386 _92--2.95 NA
5 UK 1975 123 1.20--2.86 NA

Ca 3 UK 1984 15 .540--.950 .736 .130


23 USA 1976 33 NA .721 .011

p 3 UK 1984 15 .370--.505 .454 .038


23 USA 1976 23 NA .512 .018

1NA = Not available.

were obtained by USDA cheese graders from sity. Upon receipt, samples were inspected for
surplus cheese warehouse storage facilities of possible temperature abuse and moisture loss
the USDA C o m m o d i t y Credit Corporation. during shipping, then placed in refrigerated
Each USDA grader received a sampling kit storage.
by mail consisting of a small insulated shipping
container, a reusable ice pack, plastic wrapping Sample Analyses
film, masking tape, 170-ml Whirl-Pac bags
(NASCO) with permanently attached and Homogeneous samples were prepared by
labeled identification tags, and instructions. grinding cores at high speed in a Waring blen-
Whirl-Pac bag identification tags contained der. Ground samples were placed in tightly
a questionnaire which was completed by sealed 170-ml Whirl-Pac bags and stored at 4°C
the USDA grader at the time of sample until analysis. Samples were analyzed for Na,
collection. NaC1, Ca, and P by sodium ion electrode and
Graders were instructed to collect 2 "cores" complexometric methods (11, 12, 13, 14).
using a standard 12.7-cm cheese trier from each
RESULTS
block of cheese. Each core was wrapped tightly
in a plastic film and secured with masking tape. Thirty-five commercial Cheddar cheeses
The two wrapped cores were placed into a were collected and analyzed. Samples were
170-ml Whirl-Pac bag and sealed tightly. The from 26 cheese plants located in 7 midwestern
questionnaire on the identification tag was states. Numbers of plants sampled from each
completed with the following information: state were as follows: Wisconsin 13, Minnesota
cheese plant identification; cheese plant loca- 7, South Dakota 2, Indiana 1, Iowa 1, Michi-
tion; date of manufacture; date of sampling; gan 1, Missouri 1. All samples were from 16.8-
grade of cheese; and name of grader. kg blocks and ranged in age from 2 wk to 30
Graders were instructed to collect samples mo.
from widely dispersed geographical regions. None of the samples showed evidence of
Labeled Whirl-Pac bags, containing wrapped temperature abuse during shipping. All samples
core samples, were placed in the insulated were wrapped tightly in plastic film, and no
shipping container along with a frozen ice pack moisture droplets were visible at the core sur-
for shipping. The insulated container was face-plastic film interface.
shipped via overnight express mail to the Mineral analyses of 35 cheeses are sum-
Department of F o o d Science, Cornell Univer- marized in Table 2. Mean Na value was .65 +

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71, No. 2, 1988


CALCIUM, PHOSPHORUS, AND SODIUM IN CHEESE 287

TABLE 2. Selected minerals in 35 commercial Ched-


W
dar cheeses manufactured in the United States. 1 ..I
a.8
Concentration
Mineral Range X SD ~.4
0
(%) d2
z
Na .48-.85 .65 .08
NaC1 1.22--2.16 1.64 .21 .600 .sso .7o0 .7so .soo
Ca .606--.830 .715 .046 % CALCIUM
P .442-.556 .501 .022
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of Ca in 35 com-
11985. mercial Cheddar cheeses.

.08% w i t h a r a n g e o f .48 t o .85%. E x p r e s s e d as decrease of 3 mmol/kg f o r each 2 m m o l / k g


NaC1, t h e m e a n value was 1.64 + .21% w i t h a d e c r e a s e in P.
r a n g e o f 1.22 t o 2.16%. T h e m e a n Ca c o n c e n -
t r a t i o n o f 35 samples was .715 + .046% w i t h DISCUSSION
i n d i v i d u a l s a m p l e s ranging f r o m .606 to .830%. Van S l y k e a n d Price (28) a n d Wilster ( 3 1 )
M e a n P level was .501 + .022%, t h e r a n g e b e i n g r e p o r t e d t h a t C h e d d a r cheese is g e n e r a l l y salted
.442 t o .556%. b e t w e e n 1.50 to 1.75% NaC1, w h i c h agrees
F r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n s of Na, Ca, a n d P closely w i t h t h e m e a n o f t h e p r e s e n t s u r v e y a n d
are s h o w n ( F i g u r e s 1 t o 3). D i s t r i b u t i o n s o f o f 2 4 cheeses r e p o r t e d a d e c a d e ago (23). How-
Na a n d Ca w e r e a p p r o x i m a t e l y s y m m e t r i c a l . ever, e n o u g h v a r i a t i o n exists t o i n d i c a t e pres-
D i s t r i b u t i o n of P was s k e w e d to t h e right. e n t l y a lack o f u n i f o r m i t y in s o m e i n d u s t r i a l
A l t h o u g h i n d i v i d u a l samples varied w i d e l y in
element concentration, most were clustered
w i t h i n relatively n a r r o w ranges. F o r e x a m p l e , 20
77% fell b e t w e e n .55 t o .75% Na, 77% b e t w e e n
.65 t o .75% Ca, a n d 83% b e t w e e n .48 t o .53%
P. Calcium a n d P levels were h i g h l y c o r r e l a t e d
( r = . 9 0 ) (Figure 4), b u t d i f f e r e n c e s a m o n g
cheeses did n o t o c c u r o n a 1:1 m o l a r basis. m
I.U 1 5
R e c a l c u l a t e d as millimoles c a l c i u m per kilo- --I
eL
gram cheese t h e slope o f t h e regression equa-
t i o n (slope = 1.43) s h o w e d an a p p r o x i m a t e Ca
:E
,<
~1o
I,a.
0
laJ
-a
D. 8
O"
z 5

._4

°.2
O
Z
.45 .5s .65 .75 .85 .425 475 525 .STS
% 50DIUM % PHOSPHORUS
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of Na in 35 com- Figure 3. Frequency distribution of P in 35 com-
mercial Cheddar cheeses. mercial Cheddar cheeses.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71, No. 2, 1988


288 KINDSTEDT AND KOSIKOWSKI

cheese that Ca losses to whey at drainage in-


creased by approximately 2 mmol/kg of whey
for each 1 mmol/kg increase in P loss. Whey
.800 pH at drainage varied from 6.55 to 5.65, in
this experiment, whereas other manufacturing
parameters were held constant. Calcium is more
mobile than P under high acid conditions. As a
•O ~O •
..i result, P relative to Ca tends to increase as

0.700 5.t: overall cheese mineral content decreases.


Recently, a test utilizing this principle to detect
•..,I; adulteration in graded cheese was reported
(22).
The relatively slow rate of P loss with in-
creasing whey acidity probably is due to the
high proportion of covalently bonded phos-
600 ° I ! I I I I
425 475 ~2S ~7S phate in the casein micelle. Almost 40% of
PHOSPHORUS phosphate in casein micelles is esterified to a s l -
caseins (8 phosphate residues per molecule),
Figure 4. Relationship between Ca and P levels in as2-caseins (11 phosphate residues per mole-
35 commercial Cheddar cheeses. cule), 3-caseins (5 phosphate residues per
molecule), and K-caseins (1 phosphate residue
per molecule), and thus, is not solubilized with
decreasing whey pH (29). In contrast, Ca in
cheese making. For example, two cheeses casein micelles exists completely in ionic com-
manufactured on the same day at one plant bination with charged residues of casein,
contained 1.57 and 1.92% NaC1. At another, citrate, and esterified and nonesterified phos-
two cheeses made within 2 d of each other phate (29). Therefore, Ca is much more sus-
contained 1.27 and 2.15% NaC1. ceptible to solubilization than P as whey pH
This situation underscores the difficulty that decreases, hence, its greater mobility. The high
Cheddar cheese could encounter with quantita- molecular weight of phosphate ion relative to
tive Na declaration on labels. The US FDA Ca also may contribute to lower P mobility.
compliance policy stipulates that product Na Excessive CaPO4 loss during Cheddar cheese
content must not exceed the Na value on the manufacture results in significant product
label by more than 20% (25). deterioration (1, 2, 15). Thus, a strong incen-
Sodium surveillance under FDA regulations tive should exist to maintain cheese CaPO4
must be conducted using a direct method of above quality loss levels. According to Law-
analysis such as atomic absorption or atomic rence and Gilles (15), Ca in Cheddar cheese
emission (24), but these methods are impracti- below approximately .68% generally resulted in
cal for all but the largest industrial cheese pro- quality loss. Of our samples, 14% fell below
ducers. The sodium ion electrode method used .68%, indicating excessive acid production.
in the present study provides an accurate alter-
native for direct Na measurement in cheese as ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
results agree with atomic absorption (11, 14).
Appreciation is expressed to R. Simerad and
The high ratio of P to Ca in cheese contain-
his staff of graders, USDA, for obtaining the
ing reduced levels of these two elements ap-
necessary samples.
pears to be a direct consequence of their rela-
tive losses to whey with increasing acid. Such
REFERENCES
acid development, particularly before drainage,
is the principal factor determining cheese 1 Czulak, J., J. Conochie, B. J. Sutherland, and
mineral composition. Several investigators (1, H.J.M. Van Leeuwen. 1969. Lactose, lactic acid
and mineral equilibria in Cheddar cheese manufac-
18, 19) reported that in cheeses, Ca was more ture. J. Dairy Res. 36:93.
rapidly lost to the whey than P as whey pH 2 Dolby, R. M., F. H. McDowall, and A.K.R. Mc-
decreased. Kindstedt (10) found in Mozzarella Dowall. 1937. Studies on the chemistry of Ched-

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71, No. 2, 1988


CALCIUM, PHOSPHORUS, A N D SODIUM IN CHEESE 289

dar cheesemaking. V. Factors influencing the Sci. 6 7 : 1 6 3 2 .


acidity and mineral c o n t e n t of cheese. J. Dairy 18 McDowall, F. H., and R. M. Dolby. 1935. Studies
Res. 8:74. on the chemistry of Cheddar cheese making. I. T h e
3 Florence, E., D. F. Milner, a n d W . M. Harris. 1984. mineral c o n t e n t of cheese and whey. J. Dairy Res.
Nutrient composition o f dairy products. I. Cheeses. 6:218.
J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 37:13. 19 Moir, G. M. 1931. Pasteurized milk for Cheddar
4 Fox, P. F. 1974. Salt distribution in Cheddar cheese making. Ii. The mineral c o n t e n t of Cheddar
cheese. Ir. J. Agric. Res. 13:129. cheese. J. Dairy Res. 2:176.
5 Fox, P. F. 1975. Influence of cheese c o m p o s i t i o n 20 Morris, H. A., T. P. Guinee, and P. F. Fox. 1985.
on quality. Ir. J. Agric. Res. 14:33. Salt diffusion in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 68:
6 Gilbert, R. W. 1979. Mechanism of salt absorption 1851.
into Cheddar cheese. Proc. 1st Bienn. Marschall 21 O ' C o n n o r , C. B. 1974. T h e quality and composi-
Int. Cheese Conf., Madison, WI. tion o f Cheddar cheese. Effect o f various rates of
7 Gilles, J. 1976. Control of salt in moisture levels in salt addition. Part I. Ir. Agric. Creamery Rev. 26
Cheddar cheese. N.Z~ J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 11: (10):5.
219. 22 Pollman, R. M. 1984. Detection of adulteration in
8 Irvine, O. R. 1955. Salting Cheddar cheese. Can. grated cheese b y using calcium, phosphorus, mag-
Dairy Ice Cream J. 34(3):38. nesium and lactose indices. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal.
9 Johnson, A. H. 1974. The composition of milk. Chem. 67:1062.
Page 1 in F u n d a m e n t a l s of dairy chemistry. 2nd 23 Posati, L. P., and M. L. Orr. 1976. C o m p o s i t i o n
ed. B. H. Webb, A. H. J o h n s o n , and J. A. Alford, o f foods. Agric. H a n d b o o k 8-1. US Dep. Agric.,
ed. AVI Publ. Co., Inc., Westport, CT. Washington, DC.
10 Kindstedt, P. S. 1985. Mineral composition and 24 Rothschild, L. 1982. Sodium labeling proposal
Mozzarella cheese quality. Proc. 22nd A n n u . includes link to nutrition labeling regulation. F o o d
Marschall Invitational Ital. Cheese Sem., Madison, C h e m . News (June 21):3.
Wl. 25 Rothschild, L. 1984. Salt designations revised in
11 Kindstedt, P. S., and F. V. Kosikowski. 1984. Mea- final sodium labeling regulations. F o o d Chem.
surement of s o d i u m chloride in cheese by a simple News (April 23):3.
s o d i u m ion electrode m e t h o d . J. Dairy Sci. 67: 26 Schaafsma, I. G. 1983. The significance of milk as
879. a source of dietary calcium. Int. Dairy Fed. Bull.
12 Kindstedt, P. S., and F. V. Kosikowski. 1984. Doc. 166:19.
Alternative test for p h o s p h o r u s in cheese. J. Dairy 27 Sutherland, B. J. 1974. Control of salt absorption
Sci. 68:1859. and w h e y drainage in Cheddar cheese m a n u f a c t u r e .
13 Kindstedt, P. S., and F. V. Kosikowski. 1985. Im- A u s t . J. Dairy Technol. 29:86.
proved c o m p l e x o m e t r i c determination of calcium 28 Van Slyke, L. L., and W. V. Price. 1949. Cheese.
in cheese. J. Dairy Sci~ 68:806. Orange Judd Publ. Co., Inc., New York, NY.
14 Kindstedt, P. S., L. R. Mattick, and F. V. Kosikow- 29 Walstra, P., and R. Jenness. 1984. Dairy c h e m i s t r y
ski. 1983. Simple selective sodium ion electrode and physics. J o h n Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,
measure o f s o d i u m in cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 6 6 : 9 8 8 . NY.
15 Lawrence, R. C., and J. Giles. 1980. T h e assess- 30 White, P. L., and S. C. Srocco. 1980. Hyperten-
m e n t of the potential quality o f y o u n g Cheddar sion: a sodium-related problem? Page 1 in Sodium
cheese. N . Z . J . Dairy Sci. Technol. 15:1. and potassium f o o d s and drugs. Conf. Proc. P. L.
16 Lawrence, R. C., J. Gilles, and L. K. Creamer. White and S. C. Crocco, ed. A m . Med. Assoc.,
1983. The relationship between cheese texture and Chicago, IL.
flavor. N . Z . J . Dairy Sci. Technol. 18:175. 31 Wilster, G. H. 1977. Practical cheesemaking. 12th
17 Lawrence, R. C., H. A. Heap, and J. Gilles. 1984. A ed. Oregon State Univ., Bookstores, Inc., Cor-
controlled approach to cheese technology. J. Dairy vallis, OR.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71, No. 2, 1988

You might also like