Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Schematic Networks
Schematic Networks
Polysemy
Derived from the Greek poly – ‘many’ and sem – ‘sense’ or ‘meaning’
Aristotle was against polysemy: “words of ambiguous meanings are chiefly useful to enable the
sophist to mislead his learners”
Several linguists explored polysemy focusing on the differences between polysemy and
homonymy
POLYSEMY HOMONYMY
When a word is written and read the same When words sound and /or have the same
way but it is used to express different spelling, or both, but do not have related
related meanings meanings
e.g. NEWSPAPER e.g. DOWN
A. The newspaper got wet in the rain A. Sarah climbed down the ladder
B. The newspaper fired some of its B. Sarah bought a down carpet
editing staff
The senses of a word are related to one other by means of general cognitive principles like:
Metaphor
Metonymy
Generalization
Specialization
Image schema transformations
o Speakers: aware that meanings of polysemous words are related to one another
o Some senses are central and others more peripheral – PROTOTYPE THEORY
o Contextually unrelated senses remain active for quite some time after the word has
been encountered
“Speakers might be activating a network of relating senses when they hear polysemous words,
part of which remain active even when the contextually appropriate sense of a word has been
determined” (Williams, 1992 in Gibbs & Matlock, 2001).
Ambiguity – Fuzzy area – Vagueness
Ambiguity (homonymy) – involve two lexemes – two different words & senses
“Polysemy seems somehow to straddle the border between identity and distinctness” (Deane
1988: 327 – 345)