Assistant Professor Department of Banking and Insurance Faculty of Business Studies University of Dhaka Agenda Principle of Utmost Good Faith Principle of Insurable Interest Principle of Indemnity Principle of Subrogation Principle of Contribution Principle of Proximate Cause/ Causa Proxima Requirements of an Insurance Contract Distinct Legal Characteristics of Insurance Contracts Law and the Insurance Agent Principle of Utmost Good Faith A higher degree of honesty is imposed on both parties to an insurance contract than is imposed on parties to other contracts Supported by three legal doctrines: Representations Concealment Warranty Principle of Utmost Good Faith Representations are statements made by the applicant for insurance A contract is voidable if the representation is material, false, and relied on by the insurer Material means that if the insurer knew the true facts, the policy would not have been issued, or would have been issued on different terms An innocent misrepresentation of a material fact, if relied on by the insurer, makes the contract voidable Principle of Insurable Interest The insured must be in a position to lose financially if a covered loss occurs Purposes: To prevent gambling To reduce moral hazard To measure the amount of the insured’s loss An insurable interest can be supported by: Ownership of property Potential legal liability Serving as a secured creditor Contractual rights Principle of Insurable Interest When must insurable interest exist? Property insurance: at the time of the loss Life insurance: only at inception of the policy The question of insurable interest does not arise when you purchase life insurance on your own life Insurable interest in another person’s life can be shown by close family ties, marriage, or a pecuniary (financial) interest Principle of Indemnity The insurer agrees to pay no more than the actual amount of the loss Purpose: To prevent the insured from profiting from a loss To reduce moral hazard Principle of Indemnity In property insurance, indemnification is based on the actual cash value (ACV) of the property at the time of loss There are three main methods to determine actual cash value: Replacement cost less depreciation Fair market value is the price a willing buyer would pay a willing seller in a free market Broad evidence rule means that the determination of ACV should include all relevant factors an expert would use to determine the value of the property Principle of Indemnity For example, Sarah has a favorite couch that burns in a fire. Assume she bought the couch five years ago, the couch is 50 percent depreciated, and a similar couch today would cost $1000. Under the actual cash value rule, Sarah will collect $500 for the loss because the replacement cost is $1000, and depreciation is $500, or 50 percent. If she were paid the full replacement value of $1000, the principle of indemnity would be violated. She would be receiving the value of a new couch instead of one that was five years old. In short, the $500 payment represents indemnification for the loss of a five- year-old couch. Replacement cost = $1000 Depreciation = $500 (couch is 50 percent depreciated) Replacement cost - Depreciation = Actual cash value $1000 - $500 = $500 Principle of Indemnity There are some exceptions to the principle of indemnity: Valued policy Valued policy laws Replacement cost insurance Life insurance A valued policy pays the face amount of insurance if a total loss occurs. Some states have a valued policy law that requires payment of the face amount of insurance to the insured if a total loss to real property occurs from a peril specified in the law. Replacement cost insurance means there is no deduction for depreciation in determining the amount paid for a loss. A life insurance contract is a valued policy that pays a stated sum to the beneficiary upon the insured’s death. Principle of Indemnity Valued Policy: For example, you may have a valuable antique clock that was owned by your great-grandmother. You may feel that the clock is worth $10,000 and have it insured for that amount. If the clock is totally destroyed in a fire, you would be paid $10,000 regardless of the actual cash value of the clock at the time of loss Principle of Subrogation Substitution of the insurer in place of the insured for the purpose of claiming indemnity from a third party for a loss covered by insurance. Purpose: To prevent the insured from collecting twice for the same loss To hold the negligent person responsible for the loss To hold down insurance rates Principle of Subrogation The insurer is entitled only to the amount it has paid under the policy The insured cannot impair the insurer’s subrogation rights Subrogation does not apply to life insurance contracts The insurer cannot subrogate against its own insureds Principle of Contribution Contribution establishes a corollary among all the insurance contracts involved in an incident or with the same subject. Contribution allows for the insured to claim indemnity to the extent of actual loss from all the insurance contracts involved in his or her claim. Principle of Contribution For instance, imagine that you have taken out two insurance contracts on your used Lamborghini. Let’s say you have a policy with A that covers $30,000 in property damage and a policy with B that cover $50,000 in property damage. If you end up in a wreck that causes $50,000 worth of damage to your vehicle. Then about $18,750 will be covered by A and $31,250 by B. Each policy you have on the same subject matter pays their proportion of the loss incurred by the policyholder. It’s an extension of the principle of indemnity that allows proportional responsibility for all insurance coverage on the same subject matter. Principle of Proximate Cause The loss of insured property can be caused by more than one incident even in succession to each other. Property may be insured against some but not all causes of loss. When a property is not insured against all causes, the nearest cause is to be found out. If the proximate cause is one in which the property is insured against, then the insurer must pay compensation. If it is not a cause the property is insured against, then the insurer doesn’t have to pay. Principle of Proximate Cause The perils relevant to an insurance claim can be classified under three headings: Insured perils: Insured perils are specifically mentioned and covered under the policy as the possible cause of the loss or damage to the subject matter of the insurance. For example, a policy can be taken to insure the subject matter from perils, such as fire, lightning, storm and theft. Excepted or excluded perils: Practically all insurance policies are excluded from coverage and certain perils arising from factors that can cause losses. Normally, a separate section of the contract lists and describes all the excluded perils, e.g. riot, strike, earthquake or war. Uninsured or other perils: Those perils are not mentioned in the policy at all. Smoke and water may not be excluded nor mentioned as insured in a fire policy. Requirements of an Insurance Contract To be legally enforceable, an insurance contract must meet four requirements: Offer and acceptance of the terms of the contract Consideration – the value that each party gives to the other Competent parties, with legal capacity to enter into a binding contract The contract must exist for a legal purpose Distinct Legal Characteristics of Insurance Contracts An insurance contracts is: Aleatory: values exchanged are not equal Unilateral: only the insurer makes a legally enforceable promise Conditional: policy owner must comply with all policy provisions to collect for a covered loss Personal: property insurance policy cannot be validly assigned to another party without the insurer's consent A contract of adhesion: the insured must accept the entire contract with all of its terms and conditions Distinct Legal Characteristics of Insurance Contracts Courts have ruled that any ambiguities or uncertainties in the contract are construed against the insurer. The principle of reasonable expectations states that an insured is entitled to coverage under a policy that he or she reasonably expects it to provide, and that to be effective, exclusions or qualifications must be conspicuous, plain, and clear. Law and the Insurance Agent An agent is someone who has the authority to act on behalf of a principal (the insurer) Several laws govern the actions of agents and their relationship to insureds There is no presumption of an agency relationship An agent must be authorized to represent the principal A principal is responsible for the acts of agents acting within the scope of their authority Limitations can be placed on the powers of agents Law and the Insurance Agent An agent’s authority comes from three sources Express authority Implied authority Apparent authority Knowledge of the agent is presumed to be knowledge of the principal with respect to matters within the scope of the agency relationship Insurers can place limitations on the power of agents by adding a non-waiver clause to the application or policy Law and the Insurance Agent Waiver is defined as the voluntary relinquishment of a known legal right Estoppel occurs when a representation of fact made by one person to another person is reasonably relied on by that person to such an extent that it would be inequitable to allow the first person to deny the truth of the representation Thank You……
Chester Hollman v. Harry E. Wilson, Superintendent, Retreat The District Attorney of The County of Philadelphia The Attorney General of The State of Pennsylvania, 158 F.3d 177, 3rd Cir. (1998)