Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary
_Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary
2231142610
ENV107.25
Introduction
Bangladesh has a rich and diverse ecosystem with vast flora and fauna owing to its climate
conditions due to its unique geophysical location. However, environmental issues are
omnipresent globally, and this does not exclude the regions where civilization has not started.
Loss of forest land and biodiversity has become ubiquitous due to the impacts of climate change,
land use, and environmental effects caused by human beings. To preserve these regions,
Bangladesh has announced several areas as protected forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks,
ecologically critical areas, eco-parks, safari parks, and botanical gardens. Among these areas is
the Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary, a tropical evergreen and semi-evergreen forest
The purpose of this paper is to dive into the environmental issues in the area and provide
strategies to implement and gain a positive outcome. The paper used resources from journals,
1
Location and Geography
The Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary is an evergreen and dry reserve forest and wildlife
sanctuary in Chunarughat of the Habiganj district in Bangladesh. The sanctuary is within an area
of 1795 ha and is 80 km southwest of Sylhet (Sobuj, N. A., & Rahman, M. , 2011). According to
an article published by Hossain, G. M., & Hossain, A. E. (2014), “In 1982, this area was declared
the Government under the Bangladesh Wildlife (Preservation) Order, 1973 (Amendment Act
1974) to provide for the preservation, conservation and management of wildlife in Bangladesh”.
Location and impact area map of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Source: CREL Project, personal communication.
2
The forest is said to be the second largest forest after the Sundarbans. It covers an area with low
and medium-high hills made from soft sandstones and, therefore, is a mixed tropical evergreen
forest (Champion, 1936). The area has numerous hills with different elevations and low-lying
valleys, with its highest at 67 m from sea level. (Rizvi, 1970). The forest’s soil ranges from clay
to sandy; it is immensely fertile and has a low pH. The sanctuary has a tropical climate with high
precipitation from April through September and a comparatively dry period from November to
3
Biodiversity
Biodiversity is the different species of flora and fauna found within a community. In 1997,
BCAS held a survey and recorded 72 species of vascular plants in the Rema Kalenga Wildlife
Sanctuary (Sobuj, N. A., & Rahman, M., 2011). According to a study released by Sohel, S.,
Rana, M. P., & Akhter, S. (2009), the sanctuary also has “7 species of amphibians, 18 species of
reptiles, 167 species of birds, 37 species of mammals…”. The sanctuary is also home to eight
indigenous groups- Bunargi, Goala, Kharia, Kurmi, Munda, Santal, Tripura and Urang. In a
study conducted by Sobuj, N. A., & Rahman, M. (2011) on plant diversity, they produced a list
of trees (Table 1), shrub species (Table 2), and herb species(Table 3) within the area.
Table 1
4
Table 2
Table 3
5
Environmental Challenge
According to a study done by Rahman, M. H., & Miah, M. D. (2017), they state “Collection of
fuelwood, bamboo, house building materials, and other NTFPs were the top drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation in RKWS…”. People local to the region also set fire to
bushes to drive out wild animals and clear ground for logging. All of these actions lead to the
burning of seeds, barks, undergrowth vegetation, and regeneration dynamics of trees promote
deforestation and forest degradation (Rahman, M. H., & Miah, M. D, (2017). Over the past few
decades, Bangladesh has lost significant natural resources and biodiversity, and a big reason for
this is leaving local people out of the conservation process (Sohel, S., Rana, M. P., & Akhter, S.,
2009).
Discussion
Forests and people are interrelated and, therefore, to conserve forests, active participation from
local people is necessary (Sohel, S., Rana, M. P., & Akhter, S., 2009). However, due to the
awareness from local people of the long-term benefits of conserving these regions, people
continue to cut and burn down trees and hunt animals in wildlife sanctuaries. (Rahman, M. H.,
& Miah, M. D, (2017). The natural forest of Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary is negatively
affected by illegal felling and cattle grassing (Sobuj, N. A., & Rahman, M., 2011). The Nishorgo
Project (NSP) initiated opportunities for the local people in selected protected areas, such as the
This initiative would not only preserve protected areas but also help improve the quality of
livelihood of the locals (Sohel, S., Rana, M. P., & Akhter, S., 2009).
6
Conclusion
The Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary is a large forest with a rich biodiversity; it has a wide
variety of species of trees, shrubs, herbs, and animals. It is home to multiple ethnic groups who
earn a living from working in the wildlife sanctuary. Although, previously, some actions of the
locals and non-locals affected the area, through more awareness of the importance of protected
areas, it can get back to its original state. Moreover, active participation from the locals can be of
great benefit to the preservation. Furthermore, the NSP initiative helps workers and the wildlife
sanctuary alike. The NSP preserves the protected areas by providing opportunities for the locals
7
Citations
Champion, H.G. (1936). A Preliminary Survey of the Forest Types of India and Burma. Indian
Forest Records. 1: 1.
Hossain, G. M., & Hossain, A. E. (2014). Effect of exotic tree plantation on floristic composition
Mountfort, G., Poore. D. (1968) Report on the second World Wildlife Fund Expedition to
Rahman, M. H., & Miah, M. D. (2017). Are protected forests of Bangladesh prepared for the
Rizvi, S.N.H. (1970) East Pakistan District Gazetteers for Sylhet. Government of East Pakistan
Sobuj, N. A., & Rahman, M. (2011). Comparison of plant diversity of natural forest and
8
Sohel, S., Rana, M. P., & Akhter, S. (2009). Evaluation of Co-Management Impact in Protected
Area: Field Experience from Rema-Kalenga Wildlife. Journal of Forest Science, 25(1), 43-48.