Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UrbanDynamicsofGurugramCity
UrbanDynamicsofGurugramCity
net/publication/373602946
CITATIONS READS
0 275
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Suman Chauhan on 02 September 2023.
Abstract
As a response to the challenges of the rapid pace of urbanization and lack of reliable
data for environmental and urban planning, especially in the developing countries, this
paper evaluates Land Use / Land Cover change (LULCC) and urban spatial change, from
1990 to 2017, in the Gurugram city, Haryana, using Landsat satellite images and field
observations. This study applied supervised classification-maximum likelihood algorithm
in ERDAS imagine 15.0 to detect Land Use / Land Cover changes and urban growth
observed in Gurugram city, using multispectral satellite data obtained from Landsat 5,
Landsat 7, Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 for the years 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017 respectively.
The results reveal that dramatic growth of built-up areas has led to a significant decrease
in agricultural lands, from 1990 to 2017. The relative entropy values have shown that
the Gurugram city has experienced increasing urban growth.
1. INTRODUCTION
Most of the Indian cities have developed through expansion of the earliest
urban cores encroaching into the adjoining rural or suburban areas. With
one third of the country’s population already living in the expanded urban
areas, the trend of urban growth is haphazard along urban-rural fringe areas
or suburban areas in most Indian cities (Farooq and Ahmad, 2008). The outer
spread of cities is accompanied by many environmental problems, for example,
changes in land use patterns, fragmentation of wildlife habitats, discharge of
polluted runoff water into streams and surface water bodies and pollution
of groundwater resources, etc. Increase in urban growth results increases in
land consumption, often agricultural, for housing construction and multi-story
buildings for industries.
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
Several studies use remote sensing methods to study expansion of certain Indian
cities. Examples include Farooq and Ahmad (2008) for Aligarh, Sudhira and
Ramchandra (2009) for Bengaluru city, Chatterjee et al. (2016) for Bhubaneswar,
Sokhi et.al. (1989) for Delhi, Amarawickrama et al (2015) for the Colombo
Metropolitan region, Sri Lanka, Mosammam et al (2016) for Qom City. While
these studies may provide valuable planning information to local officials, their
specificity and their use of diverse methods make it difficult to compare results
and avoid systematic study of the determinants of urban expansion and growth
of the city. The major difficulty with this existing city level literature for India
is that it presents a somewhat negative view of the costs of urban expansion
without considering the potential benefits. For example, according to Bhatta
(2009) ‘‘Rapid urban growth in the world is alarming, especially in developing
countries like India”. Similarly, Sudhira et al (2004) talk about the ‘‘alarming
rate of urbanization and the extent of sprawl that could take place” and note
that ‘‘urban Growth is taking its toll on the natural resources at an alarming
pace”.
This study pursues two objectives. First, to examine the land use / land cover of
the Gurugram city from 1990 to 2017 and second, to measure the urban growth
of the Gurugram city by using Shannon entropy approach.
3. METHODOLOGY
Gurugram is located on the intersection of 28045’ North latitude and 77002’
East longitude at a distance of 30 km to the south of Delhi, the national
capital and 282 km to the south of the Chandigarh, capital city of Haryana
(Fig. 1). Gurugram is the administrative headquarters of a district and a
tehsil of the same name.
We have followed few methodological steps for the delineation of the study area.
For example, we have used a topographical sheet from the Survey of India for the
delineation of the study area (Fig. 2). After this process we used Landsat satellite
imagery data (Table - 1) for extracting the land use / land cover of the study
area which was obtained from the https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov. Some erdas
15.0 and ArcGIS 10.4 Tools are used to prepare these maps. We also did land
transformation work on these maps. The vector map of Gurugram city (Municipal
Commission area) was used for sub-setting the satellite images. Other ancillary
data such as topographical maps of Survey of India is used. The images were
obtained as standard products, i.e. geometrically and radio-metrically corrected.
Images from different sensors have differences in their spatial resolution e.g.
Landsat TM, ETM+ and OLI. One approach to encounter a problem is to re-sample
the higher resolution images so they match the resolution of the lowest spatial
resolution image.
Path /
Data Description Resolution Source
Row
USGS / Earth Explorer
05-12-1990 146/40
Landsat 05 TM 30 Meter (United State Geological
12-12-1990 147/40
Survey)
USGS / Earth Explorer
08-10-2000 146/40 30 Meter/15
Landsat 07 ETM+ (United State Geological
15-10-2000 147/40 Meter Pan
Survey)
USGS / Earth Explorer
03-10-2010 146/40
Landsat 05 TM 30 Meter (United State Geological
12-10-2010 147/40
Survey)
USGS / Earth Explorer
15-10-2017 146/40 30 Meter/15
Landsat 08 OLI (United State Geological
12-10-2017 147/40 Meter Pan
Survey)
Scale
Topo sheet 1967 ----------- Survey of India
1:50000
n
Hn =⅀ Pi log (1/Pi)
I
Table 2: Land Use / Land Cover Statistics of the Gurugram City; in 1990, 2000,
2010, and 2017
Table 2 and Fig. 3 gives above constraints, and details out about six categories
during the year 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017 pertaining to the Gurugram City.
The six categories of land use / land cover comprising agricultural land,
city area, suburban area, vegetation, water bodies and others are spread
over 20,612 ha land of study area. In 1990, agricultural land had a cover of
18,887.8 hectare (91.63 percent) of the total area but reduced to 11,526.5
ha (55.92 percent) in 2017.
Fig. 3: Gurugram City Land Use / Land Cover and Land Use Classes
1990 2000
Agricultural Land
0 5 10
City Area
0 5 10
Kilometers Kilometers
Suburban Area
2010 2017
Others
Vegetation
Waterbodies
0 12.5 25
Kilometers
0 5 10
0 5 10
Kilometers
Kilometers
This change shows a drastic decline in the agricultural land in Gurugram city
because multinational and international industries have taken this land as a
built-up area, on the contrary the city area and suburban area increased from
586.64 hectare (2.85 percent) to 4000.03 ha (19.41%) and 535.45 ha (2.60%)
the table, there is maximum change in city area class and neighboring built up
class. 586 hectare land is under the city area in 1990 and 246 hectare land under
neighboring built up area but in 2017 city area have 4001 ha and neighboring built
up area 4832 ha land in built up category because of the huge agricultural land
converted into both categories due to rapid urbanization and industrialization
in Gurugram. In 1990 there was 19,084.8 hectare land under agriculture but in
2017 it is only 11,512.9 hectare land under this class. Near about 2,997 hectare
agricultural land got converted into city area and 4,564 hectare agricultural land
was converted into neighboring built up area in the span of 27 years. Figure - 6
Fig. 6: Land Transformation Gurugram City 1990-2017
Table 5 indicates that Shannon entropy valued four zones of Gurugram city in
1990. In 1990 only the second zone showing some concentration of built up area
in 1990. The overall entropy value, is 0.21 i.e. less concentration of built up area
in overall selected zones of Gurugram city. The value of entropy ranges from
zero to log (n1. If the distribution is maximally concentrated in one zone, the
lowest value, zero, will be obtained. Conversely, an evenly dispersed distribution
among the zones will give a maximum value of log (n) (Yeh and Li, 2001). In
1990 there was less urban area in Gurugram city because primary activity was
there. Maximum area fell under the agricultural land in 1990 because that time
agriculture activity is the basic need of the people of these area but after
the globalization and economic revolution maximum agricultural land was
occupied by multi-nationals or national industries in Gurugram city. If we see
the Figure 7 and 8 there is a huge concentration of built up area. It calculates
Fig. 7: Gurugram City Builtup Area 1990 Fig. 8: Gurugram City Builtup Area 2017
Area in ha
2000 2017
urban growth of the study area. The 1500 2010
average entropy of urban growth from 1000
2000
500
town center was 0.76 (Maximum is 1), 0
1990
5. CONCLUSIONS
This paper analyses the process and growth of the urban area in Gurugram from
1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017. Four land use and land cover maps were prepared
for each year and used to show land transformations. The study showed that
built-up area has increased in the form of city area and suburban area, which is
586.64 hectare and 535.45 hectare in 1990 and 4,001 hectare and 4,619 hectare
increased in 2017, respectively. The expansion of built up area in the city
increased rapidly after the economic reforms of 1991. It is moving from north to
south-west part of the study area because there is a counter magnet town i.e.
IMT Manesar, which has a large number of industries. In 2017 the built up area
increased four times as compared to 1990, unplanned and haphazard growth
characterized this spread of built-up area. This built-up growth pattern suggests
that the vegetation cover and agricultural land had very less inertia, which
is being transformed because of the growing population in the area. Relative
entropy used to measure, monitor and identify spatial-temporal patterns of
urban growth by the integration of Remote Sensing and GIS. The entropy method
can be easily implemented within the GIS to facilitate the measurement of urban
growth away from urban centers. This study shows that entropy is a good indicator
for identifying the spatial problems of land development. It can identify a town
with better spatial efficiency for land development in terms of compactness. The
method can provide useful information for government officials and planners to
monitor the land development process and to identify land use problems.
REFERENCES
Amarawickrama, S., Singhapathirana, P., and Rajapaksha, N. (2015) Defining Urban
Sprawl in the Sri Lankan Context: With Special Reference to the Colombo Metropolitan
Region. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 50 (5) 590– 614.
Bhatta, B., (2009) Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case
study of Kolkata, India, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30:18, 4733-4746.
Butt, A., Shabbir, R., Saeed, S., Ahmad and Aziz, N., (2015) Land use change mapping
and analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad,
Pakistan. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. 18, 251–259.
Chatterjee, N. D., Chatterjee, S. and Khan, A., (2016) Spatial modeling of urban sprawl
around Greater Bhubaneswar city, India. Modeling of earth system and environment.
2:14, 14-21.
Chen, J., Gong, P., He, C., Pu, R. and Shi, P., (2003) Land-use/land-cover change detection
using improved change-vector analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.
69(4), 369–379.
Coppin, P. R. and Bauer, E. M., (1996) Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with
remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews, 13: (3-4), 207-234.
Farooq, S., Ahmad, S., (2008) Urban Sprawl Development Around Aligarh City: A Study
Aided by Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing.
36:77–88.
Goetz, A., (2013) Suburban sprawl or urban centres: tensions and contradictions of smart
growth approaches in Denver, Colorado. Urban studies. 50(11) 2178–2195.
Jensen, J. R. and Lulla, K. (1987) Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing
perspective, Geocarto International, 2(1),65-65.
Lyon, J. G., Yuan, D., Lunetta, R. S. and Elvidge D.C., (1998) A change detection
experiment using vegetation indices. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,
64(2), 143-150.
Mosammam, M. H., Tavakoli Nia, J., Hadi Khani, Teymouri, A., Kazemi, M., (2017) Monitoring
land use change and measuring urban sprawl based on its spatial forms The case of Qom
city. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. 20: 103–116.
Seto, C. K., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. and Reilly, C. M., (2011) A Meta-Analysis of Global
Urban Land Expansion. Public library of Science. 6(8) 1-7.
Sokhi, B. S., Sharma, N. D., Uttarwar, P. S., (1989) Satellite remote sensing in urban
sprawl mapping & monitoring: A Case study of Delhi. Journal of the India society of
remote sensing. 17 (3) 57-69.
Sudhira, H. S. and Ramachandra, T. V., (2009) A spatial planning support system for
managing Bangalore’s urban sprawl remote sensing in urban sprawl mapping & monitoring.
In Planning Support System Best Practice and New Methods, eds., Geertman, S. and
Stillwell, J., Springer Science + Business Media Berlin Verlag.
Yeh, A. G. O. and Li, X., (2001) Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly
growing region using entropy. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing. 67(1)
83-90.