Official Business #_x000D_

OLA3#1
Ho: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 OR - The yield of the three treatments does not have significant differences
Ha: at least two population means ar- The yield of the three treatments have significant differences

1st solution: WITHIN GROUP VARIANCE

Control X-x mean (X-x mean)^2 Treated X-x mean (X-x mean)^2 Treated+Antagonist X-x mean (X-x mean)^2
54 9.33333333333334 87.1111111111112 87 4 16 45 -3.16666666666666 10.0277777777778
23 -21.6666666666667 469.444444444444 98 15 225 39 -9.16666666666666 84.0277777777777
45 0.333333333333336 0.111111111111113 64 -19 361 51 2.83333333333334 8.02777777777779
54 9.33333333333334 87.1111111111112 77 -6 36 49 0.833333333333336 0.694444444444448
45 0.333333333333336 0.111111111111113 89 6 36 50 1.83333333333334 3.36111111111112
47 2.33333333333334 5.44444444444446 55 6.83333333333334 46.6944444444445
SUM 649.333333333333 674 152.833333333333 1476.16666666667
MEAN 44.6666666667 83 48.1666666666667

Total
Control X-mean of means (X-mean of means)^2 Treated X-mean of means (X-mean of means)^2 Treated+Antagonist X-mean of means (X-mean of means)^2
54 -3.1764705882353 10.0899653979239 87 29.8235294117647 889.442906574394 45 -12.1764705882353 148.266435986159
23 -34.1764705882353 1168.03114186851 98 40.8235294117647 1666.56055363322 39 -18.1764705882353 330.384083044983
45 -12.1764705882353 148.266435986159 64 6.8235294117647 46.560553633218 51 -6.1764705882353 38.1487889273357
54 -3.1764705882353 10.0899653979239 77 19.8235294117647 392.9723183391 49 -8.1764705882353 66.8546712802769
45 -12.1764705882353 148.266435986159 89 31.8235294117647 1012.73702422145 50 -7.1764705882353 51.5017301038063
47 -10.1764705882353 103.560553633218 55 -2.1764705882353 4.7370242214533 SS
SUM 1588.3044982699 4008.27335640138 639.892733564014 6236.47058823529
MEAN of Means 57.1764705882

AMONG/BETWEEN GROUP VARIANCE

X MEANS X Means – Mean of Means (X Means – Mean of Means)^2 (X Means – Mean of Means)^2
Control 44.6666666667 -12.5098039215686 156.495194156094 938.971164936564
Treated 83 25.8235294117647 666.854671280277 3334.27335640138
Treated+Antagonist 48.1666666667 -9.00980392156863 81.1765667051135 487.059400230681
SUM 4760.30392156863
MEANS 57.1764705882

(X Means – Mean of Means)^2

within Groups
Total
Among Groups

Sources of Variation Degrees of Freedom (df) Mean Squares (MS) F F table

SS Among 4760.30392156863 2 2380.15196078431 22.5734181670862 3.7389 From the ANOVA table, F computed is greater than F critical which means that the yield of the three treatments have significant
SS WITHIN GROUP VARIANCE 1476.16666666667 14 105.440476190476 differences
SS Total 6236.47058823529 16 389.779411764706

4.58 3.98

alternative solution:
Control Treated Treated+Antagonist
X1 X1 2 X2 X2 2 X3 X3 2
54 2916 87 7569 45 2025
23 529 98 9604 39 1521
45 2025 64 4096 51 2601
54 2916 77 5929 49 2401
45 2025 89 7921 50 2500
47 2209 0 55 3025
SUM 268 12620 415 35119 289 14073
SUM (X)^2 71824 172225 83521
X Mean 44.6666666667 83 48.1666666666667

SS Total 6236.47058824

SS Among/Between 4760.30392157

SS Within 1476.16666667

Sources of Variation Degrees of Freedom (df) Mean Squares (MS) F F table

SS Among 4760.30392156862 2 2380.15196078431 22.5734181670861 3.7389
SS WITHIN GROUP VARIANCE 1476.16666666667 14 105.440476190477
SS Total 6236.47058823529 16

MS within 105.44047619
Mean X1 44.6666666667
Mean X2 83
Mean X3 48.1666666667
n1 6 0.166666666666667 5.625
n2 5 0.2 4.32954657498607
n3 6 0.166666666666667

q (a=0.05 and df within=12 and treatments=3) 3.7 (from Q Table)

X1 vs X2 8.85389097205 w/ significance The yield of controlled group has a significant difference with the yield of treated group
X2 vs X3 -8.04549223112 w/ significance The yield of treated group has a significant difference with the yield of Treated+Antagonist group
X1 vs X3 0.83491062952 no significance The yield of controlled group has no significant difference with the yield of Treated+Antagonist group
OR
HSD 16.0193223274 16.0193223274485

variance
X1 vs X2 38.3333333333 w/ significance The yield of controlled group has a significant difference with the yield of treated group
X2 vs X3 34.8333333333 w/ significance The yield of treated group has a significant difference with the yield of Treated+Antagonist group
X1 vs X3 3.5 no significance The yield of controlled group has no significant difference with the yield of Treated+Antagonist group

MS within 105.44047619
Mean X1 44.6666666667
Mean X2 83
Mean X3 48.1666666667
n1 6
n2 5
n3 6
Df=n-k 21
Se 5.92847580722

T-stat p
X1 vs X2 6.16505834601 0.0000695 w/ significance
X2 vs X3 -5.60216171441 0.0001748 w/ significance
X1 vs X3 0.59037096782 0.5983301 w/ significance

P values
mean1 mean 2 N1 N2 Sediff Difference t stat P
X1 X2 44.67 83.00 6 5 6.2178 38.3 6.1651 0.0000695 w/ significance
X2 X3 83.00 48.17 6 5 6.2178 34.8 5.6022 0.0001748 w/ significance
X1 X3 44.67 48.17 6 6 5.9285 3.5 0.5904 0.5983301 w/ significance

95% Confidence intervals

mean1 mean 2 N1 N2 Sediff Difference t* Lower limit Upper limit
X1 X2 44.67 83.00 6 5 1.80178430722192 -38.3 2.16 -42.23 -34.44
X2 X3 83.00 48.17 6 5 1.80178430722192 34.8 2.16 30.94 38.73
X1 X3 44.67 48.17 6 6 1.71793393082589 -3.5 2.16 -7.21 0.21

Page 1
 OLA3#2
FOR FACTOR B (Different Materials) INTERACTION EFFECT
Ho: µB1 = µB2 = µB3 OR - The different materials does not have significant differences Ho: µA1B1 = µA1B2 = µA1B3 = µA2B1 = µA2B2 = µA2B3 OR - The evaluation on the paints using 3 different materials in 2 different laboratories does not have significant differences
Ha: at least two population means are unequal - The different materials have significant differences Ha: at least two population means are unequal OR - The evaluation on the paints using 3 different materials in 2 different laboratories have significant differences

FOR FACTOR A (Laboratory Rooms)

Ho: µA1 = µA2 OR - The different laboratories does not have significant differences
Ha: at least two population means are unequal - The different laboratories have significant differences

Material 1 Material 2 Material 3 Material 1 Material 2 Material 3

Lab1 Lab2 Lab1 Lab2 Lab1 Lab2 Lab1 (Lab1)2 Lab2 (Lab2)2 Lab1 (Lab1)2 Lab2 (Lab2)2 Lab1 (Lab1)2 Lab2 (Lab2)2
4.1 2.7 3.1 1.9 3.5 2.7 4.1 16.81 2.7 7.29 3.1 9.61 1.9 3.61 3.5 12.25 2.7 7.29
3.9 3.1 2.8 2.2 3.2 2.3 3.9 15.21 3.1 9.61 2.8 7.84 2.2 4.84 3.2 10.24 2.3 5.29
4.3 2.6 3.3 2.3 3.6 2.5 4.3 18.49 2.6 6.76 3.3 10.89 2.3 5.29 3.6 12.96 2.5 6.25
SUM 12.3 8.4 9.2 6.4 10.3 7.5 SUM 12.3 8.4 9.2 6.4 10.3 7.5
Sum X2 50.51 23.66 28.34 13.74 35.45 18.83 Sum X2 50.51 23.66 28.34 13.74 35.45 18.83
Mean 4.1 2.8 3.06666666666667 2.133333333 3.43333 2.5 Mean 4.1 2.8 3.0666667 2.1333333333 3.4333333 2.5

A1 A2 A3 SUM
B1 12.3 9.2 10.3 31.8
B2 8.4 6.4 7.5 22.3
SUM 20.7 15.6 17.8 54.1

Source SS df MS F calculated Fcomp

A: Material 2.1811111111111 2 1.09055555555557 21.81111111 3.8853 CF = (sum of sum)2 / n total
B: Lab 5.0138888888889 1 5.01388888888891 100.2777778 4.7472 CF = 162.6005555556
AxB 0.1344444444444 2 0.0672222222222132 1.344444444 3.8853
Within 0.6 12 0.0499999999999972
Total 7.9294444444444 17 SS Total = sum of Sum X2 - CF
SS Total = 7.929444444444
FROM ANOVA TABLE df = (ABN) – 1 17

Interaction Effec
Paints from 3 different materials processed in 2 different Laboratories does not have significant differences. (no need for tukeys)
SSA = (sum of A1) / BN + (sum of A2)2 / BN + (sum of A3)2 / BN - CF
2

SSA = 2.181111111111 2.1811111

Df = 2
FACTOR B: Outputs from 2 laboratories have significant differences (No need for tukeys since there are only 2 laboratories to compare. Lab
1 and Lab 2 outputs have significant differences) SSB = (sum of B1)2 / AN + (sum of B2)2 / AN - CF
SSB = 5.013888888889 5.0138889
FACTOR A Paints from different materials have significant differences (Proceed to tukeys to know which materials) Df = 1

SS A x B = [sum of (sum)^2 / n] – CF - SSA +SSB

SS A x B = 0.134444444444 0.1344444
Df = (A-1)(B-1) 2

SS Between
sum=of SSA, SSB and SS AxB
SS Between = 7.329444444444

SS Within = 0.6
Df = AB(N-1) 12

TUKEYS

MS within 0.0499999999999972
Mean A1 3.45
Mean A2 2.6
Mean A3 2.96666666666667
n between 2 samp 6

q (a=0.1 and df within=12 and treat 5.05

A1 vs A2 9.3112834775881 w/ significance Material 1 vs Material 2 The evaluation rating for Material 1 is significantly higher or different compared to Material 2
A2 vs A3 4.01663208837134 no significance Material 2 vs Material 3 The evaluation rating for Material 2 does not have a significant difference compared to Material 3
A1 vs A3 5.29465138921676 w/ significance Material 1 vs Material 3 The evaluation rating for Material 1 is significantly higher or different compared to Material 3

OR

HSD 0.460999819233502

variance
A1 vs A2 0.850000000000001 w/ significance Material 1 vs Material 2 The evaluation rating for Material 1 is significantly higher or different compared to Material 2
A2 vs A3 0.366666666666667 no significance Material 2 vs Material 3 The evaluation rating for Material 2 does not have a significant difference compared to Material 3
A1 vs A3 0.483333333333334 w/ significance Material 1 vs Material 3 The evaluation rating for Material 1 is significantly higher or different compared to Material 3

P values
mean1 mean 2 N1 N2 Sediff Difference t stat P A=0.1
A1 A2 3.45 2.60 6 6 0.129099445 0.9 6.584071688553 <0.0001 w/ significance
A2 A3 2.60 2.97 6 6 0.129099445 0.4 2.840187787219 0.0149000 w/ significance
A1 A3 3.45 2.97 6 6 0.129099445 0.5 3.743883901334 0.0028000 w/ significance

90% Confidence intervals

mean1 mean 2 N1 N2 Sediff Difference t* Lower limit Upper limit
A1 A2 3.45 2.60 6 6 0.129099445 0.9 1.782 0.62 1.08
A2 A3 2.60 2.97 6 6 0.129099445 0.4 1.782 0.14 0.60
A1 A3 3.45 2.97 6 6 0.129099445 0.5 1.782 0.25 0.71

Mswithin 0.05
Df within 12.00

Page 1