Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ballot Harvesting Injunction
Ballot Harvesting Injunction
Defendants.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying memorandum, declarations and exhibits, all pleadings filed, and any oral argument
or testimony to be presented to the Court, Plaintiffs Alabama State Conference of the NAACP,
League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund,
(1) Enjoin Defendants, along with their respective agents, officers, employees, and
penalty (Class C for assistors who “receive a payment” and Class B for those who
felony penalty (Class C for assistors who “receive a . . . gift” and Class B for
distribute an absentee ballot application to a voter that is prefilled with the voter’s
completed absentee ballot application to the absentee election manager other than
his or her own application,” unless that person is seeking emergency medical
“may be submitted” by personally dropping off one’s own application with the
penalty. SB 1 § 2.
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 5
(2) Enjoin Defendants, along with their respective agents, officers, employees, and
otherwise—indicating that the Challenged Provisions prohibit any form of absentee application
assistance, and order Defendants to issue corrective instructions stating that the Challenged
Provisions have been preliminary enjoined and accordingly, that those provisions are not
enforceable.
Respectfully submitted,
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 5
/s/ William Van Der Pol, Jr. 150 E. Ponce de Leon Avenue,
William Van Der Pol, Jr. Suite 340
Larry G. Canada Decatur, GA 30030
ALABAMA DISABILITIES (470) 521-6700
ADVOCACY PROGRAM bradley.heard@splcenter.org
University of Alabama sabrina.khan@splcenter.org
Box 870395 jess.unger@splcenter.org
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 ahmed.soussi@splcenter.org
(205) 348-4928
wvanderpoljr@adap.ua.edu
lcanada@adap.ua.edu
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have electronically filed a copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of
Court using the CM/ECF system which provides electronic notice of filing to all counsel of record.
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 45 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1
FACTUAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................2
I. Alabama’s Multi-Step Process for Applying to Vote Absentee ..........................................2
II. SB 1’s Enactment and the Challenged Provisions ...............................................................3
III. Proffered Justification for SB 1 ..........................................................................................5
IV. SB 1’s Impact on Alabama Voters and on Plaintiffs’ Ability to Assist Such Voters ..........6
A. SB 1’s Impact on Voters ...........................................................................................6
B. SB 1’s Impact on Plaintiffs .......................................................................................9
ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................13
I. Plaintiffs Have Standing ....................................................................................................13
II. Plaintiffs Are Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of their Constitutional
Claims ................................................................................................................................14
A. SB 1 Unconstitutionally Burdens Plaintiffs’ Core Political Speech and
Associational Activity. ...........................................................................................14
1. Absentee Application Assistance Is Core Political Speech........................15
2. Absentee Application Assistance Is Expressive Conduct. .........................16
3. Absentee Ballot Application Assistance Is Associational Activity. ...........18
4. SB 1 Restricts the Amount and Effectiveness of Plaintiffs’ Political
Speech, Expressive Conduct, and Associational Activity. .........................19
5. Defendants Cannot Meet Their Burden to Establish That SB 1 Serves a
Compelling and Narrowly Tailored Government Interest. ........................20
B. SB 1 is Unconstitutionally Vague ..........................................................................22
1. SB 1 Fails to Provide Ordinary People Reasonable Notice of What it
Prohibits. ....................................................................................................22
2. The Challenged Provisions Authorize and Encourage Arbitrary
Enforcement. ..............................................................................................25
C. SB 1 is Unconstitutionally Overbroad ...................................................................27
III. Plaintiffs Are Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Their Claim Under
Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act ...............................................................................28
A. SB 1 Infringes on Federally Protected Assistance to Disabled, Blind, and Low
Literacy Voters. ......................................................................................................29
B. Because SB 1 Conflicts with Section 208, It Is Preempted. ..................................31
IV. Plaintiff ADAP Is Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Its HAVA Claim ....31
ii
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 45
iii
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 45
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases Pages
Arkansas United v. Thurston, 626 F. Supp. 3d 1064 (W.D. Ark. 2022) .........................................28
Baughcum v. Jackson, 92 F.4th 1024 (11th Cir. 2024)...................................................................14
Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (1999).........................20
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) ...............................................................................................15
Burns v. Town of Palm Beach, 999 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2021) .....................................................17
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Fitch, No. 23 Civ. 350, 2023 WL 4748788
(S.D. Miss. July 25, 2023) ......................................................................................................29
Disability Rights North Carolina. v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, No. 21 Civ. 361,
2022 WL 2678884 (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2022) ..........................................................................29
Federal Election Commission v. Cruz, 596 U.S. 289 (2022) .........................................................27
FF Cosmetics FL, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 866 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2017) ..........................27
Florida State Conference of NAACP v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008) ......................13
Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 901 F.3d 1235
(11th Cir. 2018) ...........................................................................................................16, 17, 18
Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 11 F.4th 1266 (11th Cir. 2021) ....33
Gaston County v. United States, 395 U.S. 285 (1969) ...................................................................34
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Governor of Georgia, 691 F.3d 1250
(11th Cir. 2012) .................................................................................................................14, 34
Gonzalez v. Governor of Georgia, 978 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2020) ...............................................33
Harris v. Siegelman, 695 F. Supp. 517 (M.D. Ala. 1988) ..............................................................18
Hillsborough County, Florida v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 471 U.S. 707 (1985) ...31
Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (1941) .................................................................................31, 33
Holloman ex rel. Holloman v. Harland, 370 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2004) ......................................17
Honeyfund.com Inc. v. Governor, 94 F.4th 1272 (11th Cir. 2024)...........................................13, 16
KH Outdoor, LLC v. City of Trussville, 458 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2006)........................................35
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983) .....................................................................................25
League of Women Voters of Florida v. Browning, 863 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (N.D. Fla. 2012) ...........15
iv
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 45
League of Women Voters v. Hargett, 400 F. Supp. 3d 706 (M.D. Tenn. 2019) ..............................17
League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North Carolina, 769 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 2014)......34
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) .....................................................................13
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995) .....................................................20
Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (1988) ..........................................................................15, 19, 20, 21
Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214 (1966) ..........................................................................................15
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers, 377 U.S. 288 (1964) ............................................................18
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958) ..........................................................18
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) .............................................................................18, 22, 25
NetChoice, LLC v. Attorney General, Florida, 34 F.4th 1196 (11th Cir. 2022).............................16
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) ...................................................................15
OCA-Greater Houston v. Texas, 867 F.3d 604 (2017) .............................................................28, 30
Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, 981 F.3d 854 (11th Cir. 2020) ..............................................33
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992) ..............................................................................21
Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Ariz., 576 U.S. 155 (2015) .....................................................................21
Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984) .................................................................18
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011) ............................................................................15
Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc. v. F.C.C., 512 U.S. 622 (1994) ...............................................21
United States v. Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2012) ............................................................35
United States v. Atkins, 323 F.2d 733 (5th Cir. 1963) ....................................................................18
United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019)..............................................................................22
United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010) ...............................................................................27
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 444 U.S. 620 (1980) ................15, 16
Virginia v. American Booksellers Association, Inc., 484 U.S. 383 (1988).....................................13
VoteAmerica v. Raffensperger, No. 21 Civ. 1390, 2023 WL 6296928
(N.D. Ga. Sept. 27, 2023) .................................................................................................16, 18
VoteAmerica v. Schwab, 576 F. Supp. 3d 862 (D. Kan. 2021) .......................................................19
Voting for America, Inc. v. Steen, 732 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2013) ....................................................16
Weaver v. Bonner, 309 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2002) ........................................................................20
v
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 6 of 45
Westchester Disabled on the Move, Inc. v. County of Westchester, 346 F. Supp. 2d 473
(S.D.N.Y. 2004) ......................................................................................................................34
Wilson v. State Bar of Georgia, 132 F.3d 1422 (11th Cir. 1998) .............................................13, 14
Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida, 848 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2017) ............................13, 22, 26
Constitutional Provisions
Ala. Const. art. IV § 111.08 .............................................................................................................3
Ala. Const. art. VIII § 177 (2022) ....................................................................................................8
Statutes
29 U.S.C. § 794e ...................................................................................................................... 11, 32
29 U.S.C. §§ 3001 - 3058 ..............................................................................................................32
42 U.S.C § 300d-53 .......................................................................................................................32
42 U.S.C. §§ 1320b - 21 ................................................................................................................32
42 U.S.C. § 10801 .......................................................................................................................... 11
42 U.S.C. §§ 10801 - 10851 ..........................................................................................................32
42 U.S.C. § 15002 ..........................................................................................................................32
42 U.S.C. § 15041 .......................................................................................................................... 11
42 U.S.C. §§ 15041 - 15045 ..........................................................................................................32
52 U.S.C. §§ 20901 - 21145...........................................................................................................31
52 U.S.C. § 21061(a) ...............................................................................................................32, 33
52 U.S.C. §§ 21061 - 21062 ..........................................................................................................32
52 U.S.C. § 10310(c)(1) .................................................................................................................28
52 U.S.C. § 10508 ..........................................................................................................................28
Ala. Code § 13A-5-6 ....................................................................................................................4, 5
Ala. Code § 13A-5-7 ........................................................................................................................5
Ala. Code § 13A-5-12 ......................................................................................................................5
Ala. Code § 13A-6-2 ........................................................................................................................4
Ala. Code § 13A-6-3 ........................................................................................................................4
Ala. Code § 13A-6-90 ......................................................................................................................5
Ala. Code § 13A-6-132 ...................................................................................................................5
Ala. Code § 13A-8-43. .....................................................................................................................5
vi
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 7 of 45
vii
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 8 of 45
PREV&pnl3=Chart,false,YR6,DISSTAT,,,,,AGEADJPREV&pnl4=Chart,false,YR6,
DISSTAT,,,,,AGEADJPREV&t=1714216511663 (last accessed May 1, 2024).......................7
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Disability and Health Promotion- Alabama,
https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/impacts/alabama.html
(last accessed May 1, 2024) ......................................................................................................7
Client Assistance Program (“CAP”), Public Law 113-128............................................................32
Institute of Education Sciences - National Center for Education Statistics,
The Nation’s Report Card (2022) https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/
stt2022/pdf/2023010AL8.pdf (last access May 1, 2024) ..........................................................7
Jacob Holmes, Legislature passes bill criminalizing “ballot harvesting”, Ala. Political Reporter,
(Mar. 8, 2024) https://www.alreporter.com/2024/03/08/legislature-passes-bill-
criminalizing-ballot-harvesting/ ..........................................................................................5, 21
John Sharpe, AL.com, “Absentee ‘ballot harvesting’ bill advances in House amid questions
about proof”, (Feb. 28, 2024) https://www.al.com/news/2024/02/absentee-ballot-harvesting-
bill-advances-in-house-amid-questions-about-proof.html .......................................................26
Mike Cason, AL.com, “Sec’y of State Wes Allen says Alabama’s new absentee voting
law in effect for November election” (Mar. 23, 2024), https://www.al.com/news/2024/03/
secretary-of-state-wes-allen-says-alabamas-new-absentee-voting-law-in-effect-for-
november-election.html ............................................................................................................3
National Institute of Corrections, Alabama State Statistics Information,
https://nicic.gov/resources/nic-library/state-statistics/2020/alabama-2020
(last accessed May 1, 2024) ......................................................................................................8
Protection and Advocacy for Beneficiaries with Representative Payees (“PABRP”),
Public Law 115 – 165 ..............................................................................................................32
S. Rep. No. 97-417 (1982) .......................................................................................................28, 34
United States Census Bureau, Alabama QuickFacts,
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/AL/PST045223. (last accessed May 1, 2024) ...6
United States Census Bureau, Why We Ask Questions About Language Spoken at Home,
https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/language/
(last accessed May 1, 2024) .......................................................................................................8
United States Census Bureau, “Language Spoken at Home,” American Community Survey,
ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1601, 2022,
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2022.S1601?t=Language Spoken at
Home&g=040XX00US01&moe=false (last accessed May 1, 2024). .......................................... 8
viii
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 9 of 45
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs 1 are civil rights, faith-based, and disability rights organizations that promote civic
participation by educating and assisting Alabamians to vote, including by assisting voters with the
multi-step application process for voting absentee. Alabama Senate Bill 1 (“SB 1”) 2 is a sweeping
and vague statute that turns such civic and neighborly engagement into serious crimes. Plaintiffs
seek a preliminary injunction against four provisions of SB 1 that unconstitutionally restrict their
speech and activities regarding absentee assistance and violate federal law (the “Challenged
Provisions”). 3
As Plaintiffs prepare to undertake civic engagement activities for the November 2024
general election, the Challenged Provisions are severely restricting their ability under the First and
Fourteenth Amendments to speak and engage with each other and with voters who require absentee
application assistance. The Challenged Provisions also violate the right of disabled, blind, and low
literacy voters to assistance guaranteed by Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”). And
the Challenged Provisions appear to prohibit voter assistance that Plaintiff ADAP is federally
mandated to undertake under the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (“HAVA”). Plaintiffs
respectfully request that the Challenged Provisions be preliminarily enjoined to prevent these
1
Plaintiffs are the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP (“Alabama NAACP”), League of Women Voters of
Alabama and League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund (collectively, “LWVAL”), Greater
Birmingham Ministries (“GBM”), and Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (“ADAP”).
2
See 2024 Alabama Laws Act 2024-33 (S.B. 1),
https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I193614D0E76211EEBDB185AF89C5BCF3/View/FullText.html?VR=3.
0&RS=cblt1.0&__lrTS=20240501162006477&transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29.
Section 1 of SB 1 amends Ala. Code Section 17-11-4, which governs absentee applications. Sections 2, 3, and 4
of SB 1 contain other provisions. Hereinafter, citations to Section 1 of SB 1 will be denoted by “§ 17-11-4.”
Citations to other sections of SB 1 will be identified by section number.
3
As described below, the Challenged Provisions are: (i) the Payment Provisions (§ 17-11-4(d)(1)-(d)(2)), (ii) the
Gift Provisions (§ 17-11-4(d)(1)-(2)), (iii) the Prefilling Restriction (§ 17-11-4(b)(2)), and (iv) the Submission
Restriction (§ 17-11-4(c)(2)).
1
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 10 of 45
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
if a voter: (i) will be absent from the county of residence on Election Day; (ii) is ill or has a physical
disability that prevents a trip to the polling place; (iii) is enrolled as a student at an educational
institution located outside the county of his or her personal residence, attendance at which prevents
his or her attendance at the polls; (iv) is an appointed election officer or poll watcher at a polling
place other than their regular polling place; (v) is working a required shift of ten hours or more
that coincides with polling hours; (vi) is a caregiver for a family member (to the second degree of
kinship) and the family member is confined to their home; (vii) is currently incarcerated in prison
or jail, but has not been convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude; (viii) is a member of, or
spouse or dependent of a member of, the Armed Forces of the United States or is similarly qualified
to vote absentee pursuant to the federal Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. 4
There is no broad right to vote absentee for everyone over 65, nor for everyone with a disability.
For the subset of voters who do qualify to vote absentee, there is a multi-step process for
applying to do so. The application form is specified by the Alabama Secretary of State and, under
SB 1, Alabama no longer allows voters to request absentee ballots without using this form. 5 The
current application is two pages and includes various fields for the voter to complete, including
full name, physical and mailing addresses, e-mail address, date of birth, personal and work phone
numbers, driver’s license or social security number, and election(s) in which they are applying to
vote absentee. 6 The application also requires the voter to review and select from the list of excuses
4
Ala. Code § 17-11-3.
5
Id. § 17-11-4(a).
6
Alabama’s generic absentee application form is available on the Alabama Secretary of State’s website.
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 11 of 45
to vote absentee and lists the Alabama crimes that disqualify an individual from voting as well as
the penalties for failing to properly fill out and submit the form.
The application can be accessed in one of the following ways: (i) online, downloaded, and
printed, (ii) in hard copy from the relevant county Absentee Election Manager; or (iii) in hard copy
by mail, if a written request is first sent to the Absentee Election Manager. 7 The form then must be
completed fully and correctly, including by obtaining a witness signature if the voter signs by
mark. 8 The completed application packet also must include a printed copy of the voter’s valid
photo identification. Then, the application packet must be returned to the Absentee Election
by the Absentee Election Manager seven days prior to the relevant election if submitted by mail
(or five days prior if submitted in person). 10 Voters must submit separate applications for elections
into law the next day. In key part, SB 1 amends Ala. Code § 17-11-4, which governs absentee
applications, to add new restrictions and criminal penalties. 11 The Challenged Provisions are:
7
Ala. Sec’y of State, “Absentee Voting Information,” https://www.sos.alabama.gov/alabama-votes/voter/absentee-
voting.
8
Ala. Code § 17-11-4(b)(1).
9
Id. §§ 17-11-3(a), 17-11-4(c)(1).
10
Id. § 17-11-3(b).
11
SB 1 specifies that it goes into effect “immediately following its passage and approval by the governor, or its
otherwise becoming law.” SB 1 at Section 4. However, Defendant Secretary of State Wes Allen, who is
responsible for “provid[ing] uniform guidance for election activities,” Ala. Code § 17-1-3(a), has advised that SB
1 will go into effect for the November 5, 2024 general election. See Mike Cason, AL.com, “Sec’y of State Wes
Allen says Alabama’s new absentee voting law in effect for November election” (Mar. 23, 2024),
https://www.al.com/news/2024/03/secretary-of-state-wes-allen-says-alabamas-new-absentee-voting-law-in-
effect-for-november-election.html; see also Ala. Const. art. IV § 111.08 (providing that “the implementation date
for any bill enacted by the Legislature in a calendar year in which a general election is to be held and relating to
the conduct of the general election shall be at least six months before the general election”).
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 12 of 45
(d)(2). These provisions carry a Class B or C felony penalty (Class C for assistors who
“receive a payment” and Class B for those who “pay” such assistor). Id.
• Gift Provisions: SB 1 makes it “unlawful for a third party to knowingly receive a . . . gift,”
(d)(2). These provisions carry a Class B or C felony penalty (Class C for assistors who
“receive a . . . gift” and Class B for those who “provide a gift” to such assistor). Id.
absentee ballot application to a voter that is prefilled with the voter’s name or any other
absentee ballot application to the absentee election manager other than his or her own
application,” unless that person is seeking emergency medical treatment within five days
dropping off one’s own application with the Absentee Election Manager or returning one’s
own application in the mail/commercial carrier. Id. This provision carries a Class A
misdemeanor penalty. SB 1 § 2.
12
Ala. Code § 13A-5-6. Other Class B felonies include first-degree manslaughter and second-degree rape. Id.
§§ 13A-6-3, 13A-6-2.
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 13 of 45
sentence of up to 10 years, 13 and Class A misdemeanors carry a sentence of up to one year and a
$6,000 fine. 14 SB 1 does not define any of the statutory terms that trigger criminal liability,
SB 1 also newly requires that voters apply for absentee ballots using the Secretary of State’s
specified printed form; Alabama no longer allows handwritten absentee requests. § 17-11-4(a).
Elsewhere, SB 1 states “[a]ny applicant may receive assistance in filling out the application as he
or she desires. . . .” § 17-11-4 (b)(1). SB 1 also states that “[a]ny voter who requires assistance to
vote by reason of blindness, disability, or inability to read or write may be given assistance by an
individual of the voter’s choice, other than the voter’s employer or agent of that employer or officer
called absentee “ballot harvesting.” SB 1’s sponsor, Senator Garlan Gudger, averred that SB 1 is
intended to address “ballot harvesting” by “groups or individuals seek[ing] to profit off the
absentee voting process.” 15 For example, he testified before the Senate State Government Affairs
Upon signing SB 1, Governor Kay Ivey stated that the bill would “ban[] ballot
harvesting.” 17 Defendant Secretary of State Wes Allen commented: “[t]he passage of SB1 signals
to ballot harvesters that Alabama votes are not for sale. The Alabama Legislature and Governor
13
Id. § 13A-5-6. Other Class C felonies include third-degree robbery and first-degree stalking. Id. §§ 13A-6-90,
13A-8-43.
14
Id. §§ 13A-5-7, 13A-5-12. Other Class A misdemeanors include third-degree domestic violence and cruelty to
animals. Id. §§ 13A-6-132, 13A-11-241.
15
Jacob Holmes, Ala. Political Reporter, “Legislature passes bill criminalizing ballot harvesting” (Mar. 8, 2024),
https://www.alreporter.com/2024/03/08/legislature-passes-bill-criminalizing-ballot-harvesting/.
16
Ex. B to Decl. of Lauren Bishop (“Bishop Decl.”) at 34:9-10.
17
Ala. Office of the Governor, “Governor Ivey Signs Senate Bill 1, Bans Ballot Harvesting” (Mar. 20, 2024),
https://governor.alabama.gov/newsroom/2024/03/governor-ivey-signs-senate-bill-1-bans-ballot-harvesting/.
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 14 of 45
Ivey have made it clear that Alabama voters have the right to cast their own vote without undue
influence.” 18
Neither SB 1’s sponsor nor the Governor nor Defendant Allen has ever explained what is
meant by “taking people’s votes”; what “ballot harvesting” is; whose votes have been “for sale”;
what “undue influence” occurs; or the relationship between absentee ballot applications and any
of these purported concerns. Likewise, legislative proceedings did not include any actual evidence
of problems regarding “ballot harvesting,” either in general or with respect to absentee voting
provided extensive testimony about the lack of evidence of voter fraud or problems with “ballot
harvesting,” vagueness of the terms used in SB 1, and likelihood that SB 1’s criminal sanctions
IV. SB 1’s Impact on Alabama Voters and on Plaintiffs’ Ability to Assist Such Voters.
For those who qualify, absentee voting provides access to the franchise when in-person
voting would be challenging if not impossible. But because of the numerous steps involved in
applying to vote absentee, such voters (including senior citizen, disabled, blind, low literacy, and
incarcerated voters) often rely on assistance in the process from family, neighbors, and civic
organizations like Plaintiffs. SB 1 severely impacts voters who require such assistance, as well as
years old. 21 According to the Centers for Disease Control, more than 30% of all adults in Alabama
18
Id.
19
See Exs. A & B to Bishop Decl.
20
See id.; Doc. 1 (Compl.) ¶¶ 54-59 (quoting public testimony).
21
See United States Census Bureau, Alabama QuickFacts
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/AL/PST045223. (last accessed May 1, 2024).
6
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 15 of 45
have some form of disability, including many with mobility and vision impairments. 22 For
Alabamians over 65 years old, the number rises to nearly half (47.8%). 23 Approximately nine
Many of these individuals often can only access the right to vote by casting absentee ballots,
such as individuals confined to a bed, with mobility impairments or other impairments, or whose
movement is restricted (such as individuals in jail, prison, or state mental health or forensic
hospitals). Decl. of Scott Douglas (“GBM Decl”) ¶ 22; Decl. of Nicole Watkins (“ADAP Watkins
Decl.”) ¶¶ 6, 9, 14. And moreover, as discussed below, many of these individuals depend on
assistance from others, including from Plaintiffs, to exercise this right, including the absentee
application assistance that may now be criminalized under SB 1. Decl. of Benard Simelton
(“Alabama NAACP Decl.”) ¶¶ 20-21; Decl. of Kathy Jones (“LWVAL Decl.”) ¶ 24; GBM Decl.
¶¶ 22, 32; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶¶ 11-14. If denied an accessible absentee voting process, many
of these individuals would effectively be precluded from participating in what for them is the only
Illiterate and Low Literacy Voters. Per the National Center for Education Statistics,
Alabama has the 44th lowest literacy rate in the country. 25 In 2022, 56% of Black Alabamians and
46% of Latino Alabamians, compared to 28% of white Alabamians, had “below” basic literacy
22
See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Disability and Health Data System (DHDS), Alabama,
https://dhds.cdc.gov/SP?LocationId=01&CategoryId=DISEST&ShowFootnotes=true&showMode=&IndicatorI
ds=STATTYPE,AGEIND,SEXIND,RACEIND,VETIND&pnl0=Chart,false,YR6,CAT1,BO1,,,,AGEADJPREV
&pnl1=Chart,false,YR6,DISSTAT,,,,,PREV&pnl2=Chart,false,YR6,DISSTAT,,,,,AGEADJPREV&pnl3=Chart,f
alse,YR6,DISSTAT,,,,,AGEADJPREV&pnl4=Chart,false,YR6,DISSTAT,,,,,AGEADJPREV&t=1714216511663
. (last accessed May 1, 2024)
23
See id.
24
See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Disability and Health Promotion- Alabama,
https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/impacts/alabama.html (last accessed May 1, 2024).
25
Institute of Education Sciences- National Center for Education Statistics, 2022 Reading State Snapshot Report,
Alabama (2022), https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2022/pdf/2023010AL8.pdf (last
accessed May 1, 2024).
7
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 16 of 45
skills in the eighth grade. 26 Further, per U.S. Census estimates, among the state’s citizen voting-
age population, 27% of Spanish-speakers speak English “less than very well.” 27 Given the reading
comprehension and writing required to apply for an absentee ballot and the fact that Alabama does
not offer its absentee applications in languages other than English, many illiterate and low literacy
Alabamians require assistance from others, including from Plaintiffs, to complete the application
process. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 20; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 4. SB 1’s restrictions severely limit
their access to such assistance and therefore severely burden their right to vote.
Incarcerated Voters. In Alabama, voters who are incarcerated and who have not been
convicted of a crime of “moral turpitude,” including pre-trial detainees, remain eligible to vote. 28
As of February 2024, the Alabama Department of Corrections had over 27,000 inmates in its
jurisdiction (including jails and prisons). 29 According to the National Institute on Corrections, the
Incarceration is one of the state’s qualifying excuses to vote absentee. 31 Because no county
in Alabama provides jail- or prison-based voting sites, absentee voting is the only way that eligible
incarcerated voters are able to vote. GBM Decl. ¶ 22. Given the number of steps involved in
applying for an absentee ballot and the confinement restrictions to which incarcerated voters are
subject (such as limitations on access to the internet, printers/copiers, and mailing supplies) eligible
26
Id.
27
United States Census Bureau, Why We Ask Questions About Language Spoken at Home,
https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/language/ (last accessed May 1, 2024);
United States Census Bureau. "Language Spoken at Home." American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates
Subject Tables, Table S1601, 2022, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2022.S1601?t=Language Spoken
at Home&g=040XX00US01&moe=false. (last accessed May 1, 2024).
28
Ala. Const. art. VIII § 177 (2022); Ala. Code § 17-3-30.1(c).
29
Alabama Department of Corrections, Monthly Statistical Report for February 2024,
https://doc.alabama.gov/docs/MonthlyRpts/February%202024.pdf (last accessed May 1, 2024).
30
National Institute of Corrections, Alabama State Statistics Information, https://nicic.gov/resources/nic-
library/state-statistics/2020/alabama-2020 (last accessed May 1, 2024).
31
Ala. Code § 17-11-3.
8
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 17 of 45
incarcerated voters depend on assistance from others, like Plaintiffs GBM and Alabama NAACP
and prison or jail staff, to vote. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶¶ 12; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 22, 29.
paid staff and volunteers who assist voters with absentee applications, e.g., by providing the printed
applications, helping voters to read, understand, and complete applications, and providing
envelopes and postage so that applications can be returned. This includes voters who depend on
assistance with the application process, such as senior citizen, disabled, low literacy, and
incarcerated voters. Because of SB 1’s extreme vagueness and severe criminal penalties, SB 1
restricts Plaintiffs from engaging in absentee application assistance, which is a critical part of how
Alabama NAACP. Plaintiff Alabama NAACP is the state conference of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. and is a nonpartisan organization
dedicated to ensuring the political, educational, social, and economic equality of Black Americans
and all other Americans and to eliminate racial discrimination in the democratic process. Alabama
NAACP Decl. ¶¶ 2, 5. Voter assistance activities, including absentee ballot application assistance,
are a core part of the Alabama NAACP’s voter education and engagement programs and are part
of its mission to encourage participation in the democratic process. Id. ¶ 7. The Alabama NAACP’s
activities have included assistance for voters in nursing homes and jails who could not otherwise
vote without such assistance, such as by providing hard copies of the application and mailing
supplies. Id. ¶ 12. For the November 2024 election and going forward, the Alabama NAACP would
like to continue engaging in absentee ballot application assistance for its members and Alabamians
9
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 18 of 45
organizations that seek to encourage informed and active participation in government, work to
increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influence public policy through
education and advocacy. LWVAL’s voter services teams engage voters, including by assisting
with the absentee process. LWVAL Decl. ¶¶ 9-13. To that end, LWVAL provides regular training
to its local chapter leaders, their members, their volunteers, and to their nonpartisan partners to
assist voters in getting registered, applying for an absentee ballot, and voting absentee. Id. ¶ 10.
LWVAL considers its absentee application assistance to be an expression of its core values. Id.
¶ 11. As recently as the March 2024 primary election, LWVAL volunteers have assisted voters
with absentee ballot applications, including senior citizens who require assistance, and voters with
disabilities. Id. ¶ 5. LWVAL’s assistance has included providing printed applications, making
photocopies of voters’ photo IDs, working with the voter to ensure the application is accurately
filled out, and providing envelopes and postage to submit such application. Id. ¶ 18. For the year
2024 and after, LWVAL hopes to engage in absentee ballot application assistance on behalf of its
members and the communities it serves across the state of Alabama. Id. ¶ 6.
emergency services to people in need and engages people to build a strong, supportive, and
engaged community and to build a more just society for all. GBM Decl. ¶ 5. GBM is a nonpartisan,
nonprofit organization. Id. ¶ 2. To promote civic engagement in the communities it serves, GBM
engages in voter education and assistance, including discussing civics with incarcerated
individuals and assisting Alabamians to register to vote, restore their voting rights, and encourage
them to vote, including by absentee ballot. Id. ¶ 6. GBM engages in voter assistance to express a
clear message: voting is a person’s fundamental right and is the key to advancing civil and human
10
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 19 of 45
rights in Alabama. Id. ¶ 7. GBM provides printed absentee applications, pens, and mailing supplies
to eligible voters and GBM’s staff and volunteers also spend time with each voter to ensure that
their application is marked correctly and completely. Id. ¶ 12. As recently as the March 2024
primary election, GBM paid staff and volunteers assisted voters with absentee ballot applications,
including eligible incarcerated voters who are in prison or jail. Id. ¶¶ 3, 21. For the November 2024
general election and in the future, GBM would like to engage in absentee ballot application
assistance on behalf of the communities it serves in the Greater Birmingham area and across
Alabama. Id. ¶ 4.
ADAP. Plaintiff ADAP is the duly authorized Protection and Advocacy Program (“P&A”)
of Alabama, as designated under federal law. 32 Decl. of Nancy Anderson (“ADAP Anderson
Decl.”) ¶ 2. As such, ADAP provides legal services to Alabama residents with disabilities to
promote their rights and all Alabama voters with disabilities are constituents of ADAP. Id. As a
P&A, ADAP is accountable to members of the disability community and is authorized under
federal law to represent the interests of Alabamans with disabilities. Id. ADAP’s mission is to
achieve equality in opportunity for people with disabilities, including in voting. Id. Through its
work, ADAP seeks to convey the message that voting should be accessible to all, regardless of
disability status. Id. ¶ 9. ADAP has a staff member whose primary responsibility is to undertake
voter education and promote voting rights for people with disabilities, including by assisting them
with applying for absentee ballots and helping residential facility staff to do the same. Id. ¶¶ 7-8;
ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶¶ 2-10. ADAP receives a federal grant under HAVA to undertake this work.
ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶¶ 5-10; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 2. As recently as the March 2024 primary
election, ADAP assisted disabled voters with absentee applications. ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 10.
32
See 42 U.S.C. § 15041 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 10801 et seq.; 29 U.S.C. § 794e et seq.
11
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 20 of 45
ADAP would like to continue its work, and indeed its legal obligation, to assist its disabled
constituents with absentee applications for the November 2024 general election and beyond.
* * *
If not for SB 1, Plaintiffs would assist voters with absentee applications for the November
2024 general election and beyond. However, Plaintiffs and their paid staff and volunteers are
unlikely to engage in these activities given their reasonable fear of criminal prosecution if they
continue any assistance with absentee applications. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶¶ 19-21; LWVAL
Decl. ¶ 27; GBM Decl. ¶ 33; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶¶ 11, 14. As a result of SB 1, Plaintiffs are
being forced to cancel speech and expressive activities regarding absentee application assistance.
Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 17; LWVAL Decl. ¶ 26; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 24-31; ADAP Watkins Decl.
¶ 14. Plaintiff ADAP, which receives federal funding to conduct absentee application assistance
that is now possibly criminalized under SB 1, has also directed its staff not to engage in this work
notwithstanding its federal obligation to do so. ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 12; ADAP Watkins Decl.
¶ 14. Some of Plaintiffs’ members and constituents are also fearful that they could face criminal
prosecution under SB 1 for simply receiving assistance with their absentee applications. Alabama
NAACP Decl. ¶ 21; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶¶ 12-13. Accordingly, it is likely that at least some of
these voters will forego assistance even if they need it and may not even vote at all. ADAP Watkins
Decl. ¶ 14.
12
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 21 of 45
ARGUMENT
success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm absent an injunction; (3) the harm they will experience
outweighs any injury the opposing party may experience under the injunction; and (4) the
injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. Honeyfund.com Inc. v. Governor, 94 F.4th
1272, 1277 (11th Cir. 2024). Plaintiffs satisfy all four requirements.
their First and Fourteenth Amendment claims because the “credible threat” of criminal liability
chills Plaintiffs’ speech. Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Fla., 848 F.3d 1293, 1304 (11th Cir. 2017)
(en banc). When a plaintiff challenging a law is the subject of its enforcement, “there is ordinarily
little question that the [government’s] action or inaction has caused him injury[.]” Lujan v.
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561–62 (1992). Here, SB 1’s restrictions force Plaintiffs to
limit their First Amendment activities due to their “actual and well-founded fear that the law will
be enforced against them.” Virginia v. Am. Booksellers Ass’n, Inc., 484 U.S. 383, 393 (1988). This
direct First Amendment harm alone confers standing on Plaintiffs. See Wilson v. State Bar of Ga.,
132 F.3d 1422, 1428 (11th Cir. 1998) (explaining that “the injury is self-censorship”).
In addition, each Plaintiff has direct standing to bring their claims because they have
cancelled and/or restricted planned voter assistance activities and been forced to divert resources
to educate and respond to SB 1’s changes to the law. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶¶ 14-16; LWVAL
Decl. ¶¶ 26-31; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 24-31; ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 12; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶¶ 12-
14; see, e.g., Fla. State Conf. of NAACP v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1165–66 (11th Cir. 2008)
[would] have to divert personnel and time to educating volunteers and [affected individuals] on
13
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 22 of 45
compliance” with the statute’s requirements). Plaintiff ADAP also has direct standing to bring its
claim under HAVA because SB 1 harms its ability to engage in voter assistance that it is federally
Second, Plaintiffs have associational standing on behalf of their members and constituents.
See Baughcum v. Jackson, 92 F.4th 1024, 1031 (11th Cir. 2024) (explaining that associational
standing exists where (i) members “otherwise have standing to sue,” (ii) “the interests the lawsuit
seeks to protect must be germane to the [organization’s] purpose,” and (iii) “the claim can be
resolved . . . without the participation of individual members”). Not only has Plaintiffs’ speech
been chilled by a reasonable fear of enforcement of SB 1, see Wilson, 132 F.3d at 1428, but
Plaintiffs also have cancelled plans for absentee voter assistance programming because of fear of
criminal liability for themselves and their members and volunteers. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 17;
LWVAL Decl. ¶¶ 26, 31; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 30-31; ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 12; ADAP Watkins Decl.
¶ 14. Further, Plaintiffs’ blind, disabled, and/or low literacy members and constituents are suffering
injury to their right to receive assistance under Section 208. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 12; LWVAL
Decl. ¶¶ 24-25; GBM Decl. ¶ 33; ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 12; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 14.
And, because these injuries are “directly traceable to the passage of [SB 1],” they “would
be redressed by enjoining each provision.” Ga. Latino All. for Hum. Rts. v. Governor of Ga., 691
II. Plaintiffs Are Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of their Constitutional
Claims.
activities for three reasons. First, because this assistance is interactive communication about
voting, its restriction limits core political speech. Second, absentee ballot application assistance is
14
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 23 of 45
also expressive conduct conveying a message about the importance of voting. Third, providing this
assistance is one of Plaintiffs’ chosen means of associating with others in the pursuit of their shared
social and political goals. Thus, by broadly criminalizing absentee ballot application assistance
activities, the Challenged Provisions severely burden Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights to speech,
Amendment.” Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552, 570 (2011). And the First Amendment
“affords the broadest protection” to core political speech, especially to “[d]iscussion of public
issues” related to the political process. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 14 (1976). Our country has a
“profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited,
robust, and wide-open.” New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). For that reason,
“there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of [the First Amendment] was to
protect the free discussion of governmental affairs,” including “all such matters relating to political
processes.” Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214, 218–19 (1966). Consistent with these fundamental
principles, activities that “involve[] interactive communication concerning political change” are
“appropriately described as ‘core political speech’” and are subject to special First Amendment
scrutiny. See Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414, 421–22 (1988); Vill. of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a
Here, Plaintiffs’ absentee ballot assistance activities are core political speech because
Plaintiffs accomplish their assistance through interactive communications that encourage others to
vote. See League of Women Voters of Fla. v. Browning, 863 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 1158 (N.D. Fla.
2012) (“[E]ncouraging others to register to vote” is “pure speech,” and, because that speech is
political in nature, it is a “core First Amendment activity.”). As a central part of that political
15
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 24 of 45
speech, Plaintiffs regularly hold and participate in events at which they distribute absentee ballot
applications to voters, answer questions about the absentee voting process, and assist eligible
voters with completing their applications. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 8, 9, 11; LWVAL Decl. ¶ 14;
GBM Decl. ¶ 11; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 5. It would be impossible for Plaintiffs to assist voters
speaking with voters about how to fill out their applications. NetChoice, LLC v. Att’y Gen., Fla.,
34 F.4th 1196, 1210 (11th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks omitted). Because Plaintiffs’ absentee ballot
application assistance “depends on[] and cannot be separated from” Plaintiffs’ speech, the
1278; see Voting for Am., Inc. v. Steen, 732 F.3d 382, 389 (5th Cir. 2013) (recognizing that activities
including “distributing” registration forms and “helping voters to fill out their forms” involve
speech (quotation marks omitted)). Moreover, Plaintiffs’ speech is political in nature because it
facilitates and encourages voting. See VoteAmerica v. Raffensperger, No. 21 Civ. 1390, 2023 WL
6296928, at *9 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 27, 2023) (“Encouraging others to vote or engage in the political
ballot application assistance “must be undertaken with due regard for the reality” that state
regulation will affect “the flow” of Plaintiffs’ core political speech. Schaumburg, 444 U.S. at 632.
also expressive conduct. Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 901 F.3d
1235, 1240 (11th Cir. 2018) (citing Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 404 (1989)) (noting that
constitutional protection for political expression “does not end at the spoken or written word,” but
16
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 25 of 45
Conduct is sufficiently expressive to fall within the scope of the First Amendment if
(1) there was an “intent to convey a particularized message,” and (2) the “surrounding
circumstances” would lead a reasonable person to interpret the conduct as conveying “some sort
of message.” Holloman ex rel. Holloman v. Harland, 370 F.3d 1252, 1270 (11th Cir. 2004)
(emphasis in original). Several contextual factors are relevant to determining whether conduct is
likely to be understood as expressive, including: (1) whether the activity accompanies speech;
(2) whether the activity will be open to all; (3) whether the activity takes place in a traditional
public forum; (4) whether the activity addresses an issue of public concern; and (5) the history of
a particular symbol or type of conduct. See Burns v. Town of Palm Beach, 999 F.3d 1317, 1344–
Plaintiffs’ absentee assistance activities constitute expressive conduct under this standard.
Plaintiffs intend to convey the message that voting is important and accessible, and that every
eligible voter should exercise their right to vote regardless of senior citizen status, disability, or
incarceration when they engage in absentee ballot application assistance. Alabama NAACP Decl.
¶ 6; LWVAL Decl. ¶¶ 7, 10-12, 17; GBM Decl. ¶ 7; ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 9. Thus, the first
conveying some message. Plaintiffs’ absentee assistance is intertwined with direct communication
about the importance and accessibility of voting. See League of Women Voters v. Hargett, 400 F.
Supp. 3d 706, 720 (M.D. Tenn. 2019) (“As a matter of simple behavioral fact . . . the collection
and submission of the applications gathered in a voter registration drive is intertwined with speech
and association.”) (citing League of Women Voters of Fla. v. Cobb, 447 F. Supp. 2d 1314, 1334
(S.D. Fla. 2006)) (quotation marks omitted). Plaintiffs also engage in voter assistance and
17
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 26 of 45
education events that are open to everyone, and which occur in both traditional public fora and
“places ‘historically associated with the exercise of First Amendment rights,’” such as public
parks. Food Not Bombs, 901 F.3d at 1242 (quoting Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 460 (1980));
Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 11; LWVAL Decl. ¶ 14; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 11, 18. Plaintiffs’ absentee
assistance plainly addresses a matter of public concern. See Raffensperger, 2023 WL 6296928, at
*9 (noting that “discussing the right to vote and urging participation in the political process is a
matter of societal concern”). Finally, a reasonable observer would find the long history of voter
assistance efforts to counteract voting restrictions (including by Plaintiffs) and the Alabama
legislature’s history of attempting to criminalize and outlaw that same voter assistance to be
Food Not Bombs, 901 F.3d at 1243; see, e.g., Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 16; LWVAL Decl. ¶¶ 1, 5;
GBM Decl. ¶¶ 22-23; ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 2; Doc. 1 ¶¶ 36-46; see also, e.g., NAACP v.
Alabama ex rel. Flowers, 377 U.S. 288 (1964); United States v. Atkins, 323 F.2d 733, 735 (5th Cir.
Amendment’s broad protection of political expression also encompasses the “right to associate
with others in pursuit of” shared political goals. Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 622 (1984).
Indeed, “[i]t is beyond debate that freedom to engage in association for the advancement of beliefs
and ideas is an inseparable aspect of the . . . freedom of speech.” NAACP v. Alabama ex rel.
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 460 (1958). Accordingly, “state action which may have the effect of
curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny.” Id. at 460–61; see also
18
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 27 of 45
As noted, Plaintiffs engage in absentee ballot application assistance to express their mission
of ensuring equal access to the right to vote, regardless of race, age, disability, or incarceration
status. Plaintiffs also provide this assistance as a means of associating with voters, including those
who cannot vote without such assistance, as well as with other civic engagement organizations.
Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 12; LWVAL Decl. ¶ 19; GBM Decl. ¶¶ 19-20; ADAP Watkins Decl.
¶¶ 9-10. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ absentee ballot application assistance is protected by the freedom
of association. See VoteAmerica v. Schwab, 576 F. Supp. 3d 862, 875 (D. Kan. 2021) (“Public
endeavors which ‘assist people with voter registration’ . . . and which expend resources ‘to broaden
the electorate to include allegedly under-served communities,’ qualify as expressive conduct which
reduce both the amount and effectiveness of Plaintiffs’ political speech, expressive conduct, and
associational activity. In Meyer, the Supreme Court held that a law impermissibly restricts political
expression where, as under the Payment Provisions here, Plaintiffs are prohibited from using paid
staff to communicate their message because such prohibition “has the inevitable effect of reducing
the total quantum of speech on a public issue,” such as participation in our country’s democratic
The First Amendment also protects a speaker’s right “to select . . . the most effective
means” of expressing their message. Id. at 424. The Challenged Provisions prevent Plaintiffs’ most
effective means of communicating that voters can and should exercise their right to vote, including
33
The Gift Provisions further may prohibit Plaintiffs from even lessening the burden of volunteering at long events
by providing volunteers at long events with food and water.
19
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 28 of 45
by voting absentee, and assisting them to do so. There is no other way for Plaintiffs to meaningfully
assist voters with their applications. Among these, the Payment, Prefilling, and Submission
Restrictions impede Plaintiffs from engaging in speech designed to encourage senior, disabled, or
incarcerated people to vote by helping them to fill out and submit their absentee ballot applications.
See Meyer, 486 U.S. at 424 (explaining that “direct one-on-one communication” is “the most
effective, fundamental, and perhaps economical avenue of political discourse”). SB 1 also serves
to undermine Plaintiffs’ message that every eligible person should vote, and that voting should be
accessible to all eligible voters. Likewise, the Gift Provisions impede Plaintiffs, inter alia, from
providing stamps and envelopes to be provided to voters who may need them. The Challenged
Provisions also restrict Plaintiffs from associating with voters and with one another to provide one-
on-one assistance with absentee ballot applications. Thus, by prohibiting absentee assistance, the
Challenged Provisions severely restrict the quantum and chosen method of Plaintiffs’ speech and
association.
scrutiny. See Weaver v. Bonner, 309 F.3d 1312, 1319 (11th Cir. 2002) (“The proper test to be
scrutiny.”). Strict scrutiny applies to election-related laws that, as here, directly regulate protected
speech and associational activity. See, e.g., McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334,
344–47 (1995). “When a State’s election law directly regulates core political speech, we have
always subjected the challenged restriction to strict scrutiny and required that the legislation be
narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest.” Buckley v. Am. Const. L. Found.,
20
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 29 of 45
Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 207 (1999) (Thomas, J., concurring). 34 Under strict scrutiny, Defendants bear
the burden of establishing that SB 1 is necessary to serve a compelling and narrowly tailored
government interest. See Buckley, 525 U.S. at 207. This is a “well-nigh insurmountable” burden.
Here, Defendants cannot satisfy strict scrutiny, or indeed any level of scrutiny, to justify
SB 1’s intrusion on constitutional rights. Defendants bear the burden of proving, through evidence
“that the recited harms are real, not merely conjectural, and that the regulation [of speech] will in
fact alleviate these harms in a direct and material way.” Turner Broadcasting Sys., Inc. v. F.C.C.,
512 U.S. 622, 664 (1994). Fatally, there is no interest—let alone a compelling interest—served by
SB 1. The sole purported interest for SB 1 was to target so-called “ballot harvesting” (i.e., the
collection of absentee ballots) by “groups or individuals seek[ing] to profit off of the absentee
voting process.” 35 But SB 1 does not regulate the collection of absentee ballots. It only regulates
assistance with applications to vote absentee and has no provisions about absentee ballots
themselves. Moreover, during SB 1’s consideration and passage, there was no evidence at all as to
why preventing absentee ballot collection is a compelling state interest or how any such interest is
served by SB 1. 36 There is simply no nexus—let alone a compelling and narrowly tailored one—
between any purported governmental interest and the conduct that SB 1 regulates.
Defendants also fail to meet their burden to show that the Challenged Restrictions are
narrowly tailored. There are far less restrictive means to achieve any interest regarding “ballot
34
Even if the Court determines that Plaintiffs’ absentee ballot application assistance is expressive conduct rather
than speech, strict scrutiny still applies to the Challenged Provisions. Content-based restrictions on expressive
conduct receive strict scrutiny. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 382 (1992). The Challenged Provisions
are content-based because they apply only to expressive conduct related to a particular topic: absentee ballot
applications. Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Ariz., 576 U.S. 155, 163 (2015) (“Government regulation of speech is
content based if a law applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed.”).
35
Jacob Holmes, Legislature passes bill criminalizing “ballot harvesting”, Ala. Political Reporter (Mar. 8, 2024),
https://www.alreporter.com/2024/03/08/legislature-passes-bill-criminalizing-ballot-harvesting/.
36
See Exs. A & B to Bishop Decl.
21
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 30 of 45
harvesting.” Except in rare circumstances, Alabama prohibits anyone other than a voter from
collecting and returning absentee ballots. 37 Additionally, Alabama has long criminalized conduct
such as vote buying, voter intimidation, and voter bribery. 38 Furthermore, as next discussed, the
Challenged Provisions are also unconstitutionally vague and overbroad—thus by definition, not
narrowly tailored.
B. SB 1 is Unconstitutionally Vague.
The Challenged Provisions also are void-for-vagueness in violation of the First and
Fourteenth Amendments. “Vague laws contravene the first essential of due process” that
individuals must be afforded “fair notice of what the law demands of them.” United States v. Davis,
139 S. Ct. 2319, 2326 (2019) (quotation marks omitted). Here, in the First Amendment context,
vague laws raise especial concern because they “force potential speakers to steer far wider of the
unlawful zone than if the boundaries of the forbidden areas were clearly marked, thus silencing
more speech [and expression] than intended.” Wollschlaeger, 848 F.3d at 1320 (cleaned up).
freedoms “are strict.” NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 432–33 (1963).
A law “can be impermissibly vague for either of two independent reasons.” Wollschlaeger,
848 F.3d at 1319–20. First, “if it fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable
opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits.” Id. Second, “if it authorizes or even
encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.” Id. Both conditions are plainly met here.
varying interpretations and thus give no fair warning as to what they proscribe. Under SB 1, each
37
See Ala. Code § 17-11-9.
38
See Id. §§ 17-17-33, 38, 39.
22
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 31 of 45
of the terms “payment,” “gift,” “third-party,” “pre-fill,” “distribute,” and “submit” are triggers for
thereunder. It is unclear, for example, whether it is limited to monetary payments specifically for
the assistance of a voter with their absentee application, or whether an employee’s general salary,
reimbursement for general expenses, or even a non-monetary token would be implicated. Alabama
NAACP Decl. ¶ 18; GBM Decl. ¶ 29. “Payment” could even be read to cover funding that the
federal government gives Plaintiff ADAP to assist disabled and blind voters with their absentee
applications, ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶¶ 11-12; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 14, and salaries paid by the
State of Alabama to jail and prison employees who might similarly help eligible incarcerated
voters, GBM Decl. ¶ 27. Absurdly then, agencies of the federal or state government could be held
The Gift Provisions similarly fail to provide any (let alone reasonable) notice about what
they prohibit. Plaintiffs and others are left to wonder whether even providing the very materials
required to apply to vote absentee (e.g., a postage stamp, envelope, printing supplies, or a printed
unfilled application) are considered “gifts.” Moreover, it is unclear whether the term “gift” could
be construed as encompassing Plaintiffs’ provision of items like t-shirts, pens, or gas cards to
SB 1 also does not define the term “third party,” which purports to identify who would be
regulated by the Payment and Gift Provisions. As a result, individuals who are conducting
necessary (and even mandatory) voter assistance activities are possibly liable under these
provisions. This includes potential Class C felony liability for any potential “third parties” in the
23
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 32 of 45
absentee application process such as staff in jails, prisons, and residential care facilities, as well as
employees or volunteers of organizations like Plaintiffs, who otherwise cannot obtain and/or return
an absentee ballot application and will thus be denied the right to vote. ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 11.
And similarly, due to this vagueness, the law also imposes potential Class B felony liability for
employers (like Plaintiffs and governmental entities) who employ such “third parties” to engage
A misdemeanor under the Prefilling Provision (even without any “payment” or “gift” for such
conduct), or a Class B or C felony under the Payment or Gift Provisions. There is no temporal or
other guidance as to what constitutes “prefilling,” meaning that any assistance in completing an
absentee application could be deemed criminal under SB 1. Alabama NAACP Decl. ¶ 19; ADAP
Watkins Decl. ¶ 11. This term is especially vague given that SB 1 elsewhere conflictingly states
that “[a]ny applicant may receive assistance in filling out the application as he or she desires”—
suggesting that while an applicant may receive assistance without fear of criminal sanction, any
person providing it could be subject to criminal penalties. And because “prefilling” is criminalized
under the Prefilling Provision independent of the Payment or Gift Provisions, an even broader net
of would-be assistors (including family and neighbors who are not paid staff or volunteers) face
potential liability.
SB 1 also makes it a crime to “distribut[e]” another voter’s absentee application under the
Prefilling Restriction and Payment or Gift Provisions. But the scope of the term “distribute” is
wholly unclear in both places. For example, under the Prefilling Restriction, it is unclear whether
a person could be prosecuted even where a voter requests an application from Plaintiffs, accurately
provides Plaintiffs with the required information, and Plaintiffs merely fill in that information on
24
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 33 of 45
the application before “distributing” or handing it to the voter. Under the Payment or Gift
Provisions, it is unclear whether Plaintiffs’ paid staff and volunteers can even provide blank
applications to disabled or incarcerated voters who have no way to print the form for themselves
or if doing so itself runs afoul of the ban on “distribut[ing].” ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 11.
Restriction identifies how a voter may “submit” their absentee application (i.e., in person or by
mail/commercial carrier), it provides no notice about whether a voter may consent to a third party
delivering their application on their behalf—including in situations where senior citizen, disabled,
blind, or incarcerated voters would otherwise have no way to return their application. Alabama
NAACP Decl. ¶ 21; GBM Decl. ¶ 22; ADAP Watkins Decl. ¶ 11. And because the Submission
Restriction applies to any assistor regardless of any “payment” or “gift,” it means that even a
grandchild who walks their grandparent’s application to the mailbox could face criminal liability
* * *
Rife with ambiguity, SB 1 will force Plaintiffs and others to steer “far wide of the unlawful
zone” for fear of engaging in speech and expressive activities that could risk criminal prosecution.
In the First Amendment context, the “government may regulate . . . only with narrow specificity.”
Button, 371 U.S. at 433. It fails to do so and the Challenged Provisions must be enjoined for this
reason alone.
The Challenged Provisions also must be enjoined because their ambiguity authorizes and
encourages arbitrary enforcement. See Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 358 (1983) (“Where the
legislature fails to provide” law enforcement with “such minimal guidelines,” this “may permit a
25
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 34 of 45
standardless sweep that allows policemen, prosecutors, and juries to pursue their personal
Indeed, during the legislative process, bill sponsor Senator Gudger testified that the
provision of a “stamp [or] sticker” could be considered an impermissible “gift” under the statute.39
He also acknowledged that SB 1 raised concerns about criminalizing “the grandfather giving the
grandson $5 for gas money.” 40 His testimony underscores that SB 1 is drafted so as to invite
arbitrary enforcement. SB 1 also was touted by Senator Gudger as responding to higher rates of
absentee voting in certain Black Belt counties during the 2022 primary election, 41 though he
offered no cogent argument suggesting there was any wrongdoing connected with the higher usage
rate of absentee ballots in those counties. 42 This presents serious risk that enforcement under SB 1
could be selectively focused on such areas (and on Plaintiffs and others who assist voters in these
parts of the state). Given this legislative history, and the extensive ambiguity of the statute, the
Without fair notice of what SB 1 proscribes, Plaintiffs and others who would provide voting
assistance are forced to choose between either “silence and self-censorship” or “proceed[ing] with
their speech and potentially fac[ing] punishment according to [] arbitrary whims.” Wollschlaeger,
848 F.3d at 1323. This cannot be countenanced, particularly not given the First Amendment
freedoms at stake.
39
Ex. A to Bishop Decl. at 33:17-20.
40
Id. at 28:7-9.
41
See Ex. A to Bishop Decl. at 28:11-29:12; John Sharpe, AL.com, “Absentee ‘ballot harvesting’ bill advances in
House amid questions about proof” (Feb. 28, 2024), https://www.al.com/news/2024/02/absentee-ballot-
harvesting-bill-advances-in-house-amid-questions-about-proof.html.
42
See id.
26
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 35 of 45
C. SB 1 is Unconstitutionally Overbroad.
The Challenged Provisions also must be struck down as unconstitutionally overbroad.
number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate
sweep.” United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 473 (2010) (quotations omitted); see FF Cosmetics
FL, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 866 F.3d 1290, 1304 (11th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted).
protected expressive conduct, see supra Argument Section II.A, and lacks any reasonable bounds
in doing so. As discussed, SB 1 supposedly targets “ballot harvesting” yet it relates only to absentee
applications and does not advance any governmental interest in regulating absentee ballots.
Further, the Payment or Gift Provisions so broadly criminalize voter assistance that it appears to
sweep in even those employees and volunteers who help disabled, blind, and low literacy voters
entitled to such assistance under Section 208 of the VRA or incarcerated voters who cannot vote
without such assistance. Further confirming their overbreadth, the Payment Provisions also
apparently prohibit governmental employees such as elections or prison officials from helping
voters obtain, complete, and submit their absentee applications as part of their jobs. Indeed, even
inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s repeated admonition that the First Amendment “has its
fullest and most urgent application precisely to the conduct of campaigns for political office.” Fed.
Election Commission v. Cruz, 596 U.S. 289 (2022) (quotation marks and citation omitted).
The Prefilling and Submission Restrictions are similarly untethered to any legitimate
purpose: under these restrictions, anyone (even a family member helping another family member,
or someone helping a voter entitled to such help under Section 208) might be charged with a
misdemeanor for writing the voter’s name on their application or placing their completed
27
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 36 of 45
application in the mailbox. Moreover, the Prefilling Restriction also appears to apply even where
there could be no conceivable concern because the application is requested by a voter, the voter
provides their assistor the information to include on the form, and that information is accurate.
This expansive reach blatantly exceeds any legitimate sweep and violates the First Amendment.
III. Plaintiffs Are Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Their Claim Under
Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act
Section 208 of the VRA provides: “Any voter who requires assistance to vote by reason of
blindness, disability, or inability to read or write may be given assistance by a person of the voter’s
choice,” except for “the voter’s employer or agent of that employer or officer or agent of the voter’s
union.” 52 U.S.C. § 10508; see Arkansas United v. Thurston, 626 F. Supp. 3d 1064, 1085 (W.D.
Ark. 2022) (“With the exception of the voter’s employer or union representative, Congress wrote
Section 208 “plainly contemplates more than the mechanical act of filling out the ballot
sheet” and “includes steps in the voting process before entering the ballot box.” OCA-Greater
Houston v. Texas, 867 F.3d 604, 615 (2017). Section 208’s broad protections extend to the absentee
application process. See 52 U.S.C. § 10310(c)(1) (defining “vote” and “voting” under the VRA to
encompass “all action necessary to make a vote effective . . . , including, but not limited to, . . .
action required by law prerequisite to voting, casting a ballot, and having such ballot counted
properly.”).
Congress enacted Section 208 specifically to address the “significant effect” that limiting
assistance has on those “groups of citizens [who] are unable to exercise their rights to vote without
obtaining assistance in voting” and “avoid denial or infringement on their right to vote.” S. Rep.
No. 97-417, 62 (1982). As explained, disabled, blind, and low literacy voters are especially likely
to need to vote absentee and require assistance with the absentee voting applications.
28
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 37 of 45
lawful assistors provided by Section 208 and as a result, obstructing Congress’s purposes and goals
in ensuring equal access for disabled, blind, and low literacy voters. And because SB 1 conflicts
Restrictions that preclude or limit assistors violate Section 208. See Arkansas United, 626
F. Supp. 3d at 1085 (finding Section 208 preempted state law prohibiting assistors from helping
more than six voters). In enacting Section 208, “Congress contemplated the vulnerability of
[certain] voters when it discussed providing unrestricted choice of assist[ors] and provided two
explicitly excluded groups. States are not permitted to limit the right to assistance further.”
Disability Rights N.C. v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections, No. 21 Civ. 361, 2022 WL 2678884, at *5
Here, by imposing criminal penalties on both assistors and voters, SB 1 violates Section
208 because it impermissibly narrows the right of disabled, blind, and low literacy voters to receive
assistance from a person of their choosing. Because SB 1 “provides that there shall be a criminal
outcome for violations [by assistors]; [the danger of prosecution] is not speculative or imaginary
in nature.” Disability Rights Miss. v. Fitch, No. 23 Civ. 350, 2023 WL 4748788, at *3 (S.D. Miss.
July 25, 2023) (emphasis in original). Rather, “the contents of the statute promise to chill the
enthusiasm of those affected.” Id. Among other things, SB 1’s Payment or Gift Provisions
criminalize any person who “receive[s] a payment or gift” for assisting a voter (a Class C felony)
and appears to exclude such assistors like Plaintiffs from giving assistance to voters entitled to it
under Section 208. These provisions also criminalize those paying or giving gifts to assistors (a
Class B felony)—with no distinction for Section 208-eligible voters who might offer payment or
29
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 38 of 45
gift in exchange for the assistance, like a small token of appreciation. The Prefilling and
Submission Restrictions likewise criminalize application assistance such as writing a voter’s name
on their form or placing the voter’s form in the mail for them—even assistance for Section 208-
eligible voters who are physically unable to carry out these essential steps in applying to vote
To be clear, that SB 1 recites Section 208’s language in § 17-11-4(e) does not cure this
violation. Like Section 208, SB 1 Section 17-11-4(e) states: “Any voter who requires assistance to
vote by reason of blindness, disability, or inability to read or write may be given assistance by a
person of the voter’s choice,” except for “the voter’s employer or agent of that employer or officer
or agent of the voter’s union.” But at the same time, SB 1 contains the Challenged Provisions
where assistance is being given pursuant to § 17-11-4(e) (or Section 208). Cf. OCA-Greater
Houston, 867 F.3d at 615 (“[A] state cannot restrict this federally guaranteed right [under Section
208] by enacting a statute tracking its language, then defining terms more restrictively than as
federally defined.”). SB 1 also does not define “vote” or “voting” as broadly as the VRA—it does
not define those terms at all—further compounding the ambiguity as to what conduct is permitted.
Therefore, it appears that a voter or assistor engaging in Section 208-protected conduct could still
SB 1’s separate, differently worded provision protecting military and overseas voters
confirms the failure of SB 1 to protect Section 208 assistance. Directly below Section 17-11-4(e)
and in the same section as the Challenged Provisions, Section 17-11-4(f) provides: “Voters voting
by absentee ballot through the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act are not
subject to this section” (emphasis added). Section 17-11-4(f) makes plain that the Legislature
30
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 39 of 45
understood how to exempt other federally protected voters fully and without ambiguity from the
Challenged Provisions. By contrast, Section 17-11-4(e) pointedly does not contain similar
language stating that conduct thereunder is “not subject to this section” (i.e., not subject to the
Challenged Provisions). That the Legislature did not include this “not subject to” language for
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution “invalidates state laws that
interfere with or are contrary to federal law.” Hillsborough Cty., v. Automated Med. Lab., Inc., 471
U.S. 707, 712 (1985) (internal quotation omitted). A state law conflicts with a federal law when it
“stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution” of Congress’s “full purposes and
As set forth above, SB 1 violates Section 208 because it infringes on the right of voters
who are blind, disabled, and low literacy to voting assistance from an assistor of their choice.
Further, because of its restrictions on these voters, SB 1 would criminalize conduct expressly
protected and authorized under the VRA. SB 1 thus creates an impermissible barrier to
accomplishing the full purposes and goals of Congress under the statute. Accordingly, SB 1 is
IV. Plaintiff ADAP Is Substantially Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Its HAVA Claim.
Plaintiff ADAP is also substantially likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that SB 1 is
preempted by HAVA, 43 a federal law which provides ADAP with funding to undertake absentee
In enacting HAVA, Congress created a grant called “Protection and Advocacy for Voting
43
HAVA is codified at 52 U.S.C. §§ 20901 to 21145.
31
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 40 of 45
Assistance” (“PAVA”). The PAVA program is an integrated system of federal P&A grants to states
to support legal advocacy services to protect the legal and human rights of individuals with
disabilities and gives state P&As broad rights in carrying out their work. 44 Under PAVA, the federal
government is required “to pay the protection and advocacy [(“P&A”)] 45 system of each State to
ensure full participation in the electoral process for individuals with disabilities, including
registering to vote, casting a vote, and accessing polling places.” 52 U.S.C. § 21061(a). ADAP is
the designated Alabama P&A for all the federal P&A grant programs, including PAVA. ADAP
Anderson Decl. ¶ 2.
ADAP has a full-time employee whose primary duties focus on implementing the agency’s
PAVA grant mandate: ensuring the “full participation in the electoral process for individuals with
disabilities, including registering to vote, casting a vote, and accessing polling places.” 52 U.S.C.
§ 21061(a); ADAP Anderson Decl. ¶ 7. This requires the employee to work with and assist voters
with disabilities, including with absentee voting, and to provide education to other organizations
or persons on what and how someone can assist a person with a disability to vote. ADAP Watkins
Decl. ¶ 3. This employee provides direct assistance to voters in filling out their absentee ballot
applications. Id. ¶ 5.
Under SB 1, however, ADAP’s required work under the PAVA grant subjects the
organization and its employees to potential criminal liability. Specifically, the Payment Provisions
specifically prohibit and make it a Class B felony for someone to “receive a payment” to assist a
44
Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Developmental Disabilities (“PADD”) program. 42 U.S.C. §§ 15041-
15045; Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (“PAIMI”), 42 U.S.C. § 10801-10851;
the Protection and Advocacy for Individual Rights Program of the Rehabilitation Act, (“PAIR”) 29 U.S.C. § 794e;
Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology (“PAAT”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3058; Protection and Advocacy
for Beneficiaries of Social Security (“PABSS”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1320b-21; Protection and Advocacy for Individuals
with Traumatic Brain Injury (“PATBI”), 42 U.S.C §§ 300d-53; Protection and Advocacy for Voting Access
(“PAVA”), 52 U.S.C. §§ 21061-21062; the Client Assistance Program (“CAP”), Public Law 113-128; Protection
and Advocacy for Beneficiaries with Representative Payees (“PABRP”), Public Law 115 – 165.
45
As defined in 42 U.S.C. § 15002.
32
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 41 of 45
voter, including a voter with a disability. As explained, SB 1’s recitation of Section 208’s text does
not shield assistors from liability, even where the assistor is required by federal law to provide that
assistance, as ADAP is here. SB 1 thus apparently criminalizes and prohibits conduct explicitly
authorized under HAVA as applied to ADAP. Indeed, the federal government may run afoul of the
execution” of Congress’s “full purposes and objectives,” it is preempted under the Supremacy
Clause. Hines, 312 U.S. at 67. SB 1 makes it impossible for ADAP to fulfill its duties or
congressional mandate under PAVA to ensure the “the full participation of persons with disabilities
in the voting process.” 52 U.S.C. § 21061(a). SB 1’s prohibitions are thus preempted by HAVA.
the November 2024 general election and beyond. “The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for
even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Fort Lauderdale
Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 11 F.4th 1266, 1286 (11th Cir. 2021) (quoting Elrod
v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976)). SB 1 threatens to penalize Plaintiffs’ speech and conduct,
causing Plaintiffs to dramatically reduce and fundamentally alter their communications to Alabama
voters. This “direct penalization” of First Amendment rights is “per se irreparable.” Otto v. City of
Boca Raton, Fla., 981 F.3d 854, 870 (11th Cir. 2020).
Moreover, SB 1 severely burdens, if not entirely forecloses, the right to vote for Plaintiffs’
members and constituents and many other Alabamians—including senior, disabled, blind, low
literacy, and incarcerated voters who depend on absentee voting but cannot vote absentee without
assistance with their applications. “[M]issing the opportunity to vote [amounts to] an irreparable
[injury].” Gonzalez v. Governor of Ga., 978 F.3d 1266, 1272 (11th Cir. 2020). “[O]nce the election
33
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 42 of 45
occurs, there can be no do-over and no redress. The injury to these voters is real and completely
irreparable if nothing is done to enjoin th[ese] law[s].” League of Women Voters of N.C. v. North
Irreparable harm also exists where, as here, voting can become so burdensome for citizens
with disabilities or low literacy skills that “they may be dissuaded from attempting to vote at all.”
Westchester Disabled on the Move, Inc. v. Cnty. of Westchester, 346 F. Supp. 2d 473, 477-78
(S.D.N.Y. 2004); cf. also Gaston County v. United States, 395 U.S. 285, 295 (1969) (accepting that
some low literacy voters may “not attempt to register, knowing that they could not meet the [state’s
strict] standard”); S. Rep. 97-417, at *62 (noting that some Section 208 voters faced with casting
their vote under “adverse circumstances” will “in fact elect to forfeit their right to vote”). Beyond
the risk of complete disenfranchisement, blind, disabled, or low literacy voters face irreparable
harm even if they ultimately find a way to vote but experience additional burdens to doing so. Cf.
Westchester Disabled on the Move, 346 F. Supp. 2d at 477-78 (explaining that denying disabled
voters access to in person voting creates irreparable injury even if they are still ultimately able to
Further, Plaintiffs who would usually assist voters will lose opportunities to do so under SB
1. Those missed opportunities to help voters constitute irreparable harm not only because
unassisted voters may not be able to vote at all but also because those opportunities for voter
engagement will have been lost forever. The potential fear of prosecution under SB 1 also
constitutes irreparable harm for all Plaintiffs. See Ga. Latino All. for Human Rights v. Governor of
Ga., 691 F.3d 1250, 1269 (11th Cir. 2012). SB 1 additionally frustrates Plaintiffs’ missions by
diverting resources. Thus, Plaintiffs unequivocally face irreparable harm if SB 1 is not enjoined.
34
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 43 of 45
VI. The Balance of the Equities Weighs in Plaintiffs’ Favor and a Preliminary Injunction
Serves the Public Interest.
The ongoing injury to Plaintiffs far outweighs any interest that the Defendants may have in
enforcing SB 1, and the public will be best served by an injunction. Plaintiffs are suffering grave
violations of their constitutional and statutory rights. The State has no interest in defending
provisions that violate federal law. See United States v. Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269, 1301 (11th Cir.
2012) (“Frustration of federal statutes and prerogatives are not in the public interest.”); KH
Outdoor, LLC v. City of Trussville, 458 F.3d 1261, 1272 (11th Cir. 2006) (holding that neither city
nor public had any interest in “enforcing an unconstitutional ordinance”). And since Defendant
Allen has stated that SB 1 will first be enforced for the November 2024 general election, an
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that their Motion for Preliminary
Injunction be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
35
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 44 of 45
36
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 45 of 45
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have electronically filed a copy of the foregoing and accompanying
documents with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which provides electronic notice of
37
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 161 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
ALABAMA STATE
CONFERENCE OF THE
NAACP; LEAGUE OF WOMEN
VOTERS OF ALABAMA;
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
OF ALABAMA EDUCATION
FUND; GREATER
BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES;
and ALABAMA DISABILITIES
ADVOCACY PROGRAM, Case No. 2:24-cv-00420-RDP
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendants.
https://alabamachannel.ompnetwork.org/embed/sessions/285921/alabam
declaration.
https://alabamachannel.ompnetwork.org/embed/sessions/284244/alabam
I declare under penalty of perjury and the laws of the United States
knowledge.
LAUREN BISHOP
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 161
EXHIBITA
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 161
Planet Depos
Phone: 888-433-3767
Fax: 888-503-3767
Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
www.planetdepos.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 In re:
8 ALABAMA HOUSE CONSTITUTION
9 CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
10
11 RECORDED HEARING
12 Wednesday, February 28, 2024
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 Job No.: 528713
21 Pages: 1 - 46
22 Transcribed by: Lauren Bishop
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 7 of 161
2
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 8 of 161
3
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 9 of 161
4
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 10 of 161
5
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 11 of 161
6
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 12 of 161
7
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 13 of 161
8
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 14 of 161
9
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 15 of 161
10
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 16 of 161
11
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 17 of 161
12
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 18 of 161
13
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 19 of 161
14
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 20 of 161
15
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 21 of 161
16
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 22 of 161
17
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 23 of 161
18
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 24 of 161
19
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 25 of 161
20
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 26 of 161
21
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 27 of 161
22
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 28 of 161
23
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 29 of 161
24
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 30 of 161
25
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 31 of 161
26
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 32 of 161
27
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 33 of 161
28
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 34 of 161
29
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 35 of 161
30
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 36 of 161
31
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 37 of 161
32
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 38 of 161
33
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 39 of 161
34
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 40 of 161
35
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 41 of 161
36
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 42 of 161
37
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 43 of 161
38
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 44 of 161
39
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 45 of 161
40
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 46 of 161
41
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 47 of 161
42
1 the case.
2 JUANDALYNN GIVAN: Glad you brought that up
3 because I actually had a question about that
4 particular part of the bill. It seems to be in
5 conflict with an earlier part of the of the bill. It
6 says any applicant may receive assistance in filling
7 out the application as he or she desires and then it
8 goes on to say that the bottom of page to you it
9 shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly
10 distribute an absentee ballot application to a voter
11 that is prefilled with the voter's name. Let me give
12 you an example. Over the weekend. I have a brother
13 for whom I'm caregiver, I print -- he doesn't have a
14 printer. He's much smarter than I am. He can sit up
15 and work algebraic equations all day long. He can't
16 do some simple kind of stuff. Doesn't have a printer.
17 So I printed out the absentee ballot application, but
18 I typed in his information and printed it. His
19 handwriting is horrible. The absentee election
20 manager would have been calling him back three and
21 four times they ask him to decipher what he would
22 have written on that application. Would I be guilty -
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 48 of 161
43
1 -
2 SENATOR GUDGER: No.
3 JUANDALYNN GIVAN: -- of a violation --
4 SENATOR GUDGER: No.
5 JUANDALYNN GIVAN: -- if I put in his -- I
6 put everything if --
7 SENATOR GUDGER: You're able to help him --
8 you are able to help --
9 JUANDALYNN GIVAN: I put everything but his
10 ID number and he had to sign it when I got there.
11 SENATOR GUDGER: You are able to fill in
12 and help him.
13 JUANDALYNN GIVAN: That's not what this
14 states.
15 SENATOR GUDGER: I mean can I explain that?
16 I didn't know this was coming, but that wasn't a
17 floor amendment that was brought to us and was voted
18 on and I would -- I'm fine with this amendment coming
19 back off, but that was a floor Amendment because it
20 wasn't in the bill that I had submitted in committee,
21 which was the sub that I put end. I think corrected a
22 lot of the issues were talking about today. So this
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 49 of 161
44
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 50 of 161
45
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 51 of 161
46
1 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSCRIBER
2 I, LAUREN BISHOP, do hereby certify
3 that this transcript was prepared from the digital
4 recording of the foregoing proceedings; that the
5 recording of said proceedings was obtained from
6 https://alabamachannel.ompnetwork.org/embed/
7 sessions/285921/alabama-house-constitution-
8 campaigns-and-elections-committee; that said
9 proceedings were reduced to typewriting under
10 my supervision; that said transcript is a true and
11 accurate record of the proceedings to the best of
12 my knowledge, skills, and ability; and that I am
13 neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any
14 of the parties to the case and have no interest,
15 financial or otherwise, in its outcome.
16
17 _____________________________
18 LAUREN BISHOP, TRANSCRIPTIONIST
19 PLANET DEPOS, LLC
20 MARCH 7, 2024
21
22
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 52 of 161
47
A accountable affect alabamachannel
ability 32:13 8:11 46:6
10:9, 11:16, accurate affecting alabamian
37:1, 46:12 13:16, 46:11 10:6, 35:13 2:9
able across affirm algebraic
2:14, 8:17, 2:21, 15:11, 16:8 42:15
27:12, 35:11, 36:20 affirming all
36:8, 39:17, act 16:13 3:8, 5:7, 5:9,
40:11, 43:7, 4:18, 21:15, afraid 6:13, 7:15,
43:8, 43:11 21:16 31:11, 31:18, 7:18, 9:20,
about active 32:14, 32:17 12:2, 15:5,
9:20, 10:5, 5:17 african-americans 15:6, 15:15,
11:14, 15:19, activists 14:4 17:12, 17:21,
18:14, 20:5, 13:13 after 18:21, 20:16,
20:8, 21:4, actors 2:9, 5:7, 21:20, 21:21,
21:6, 21:7, 2:3, 33:21 14:15, 20:11, 21:22, 23:22,
21:11, 22:10, actually 23:6, 28:9, 25:20, 25:21,
24:18, 26:19, 11:10, 42:3 33:19, 33:21 25:22, 30:15,
28:7, 30:18, added again 32:20, 35:20,
31:3, 31:9, 25:5, 44:1, 21:7, 25:8, 38:1, 40:7,
31:14, 35:22, 44:15 28:19, 34:16, 41:10, 42:15,
36:15, 36:21, adding 35:12 44:2, 44:7,
42:3, 43:22 16:15 against 44:8, 44:11,
absentee address 13:18, 33:20, 44:15, 44:20
4:12, 5:19, 5:1 35:1 allen
5:21, 6:2, 6:20, addresses aging 14:15
7:6, 8:9, 8:19, 26:4 17:4 allow
8:22, 9:9, addressing agree 2:13, 17:7
12:11, 12:18, 3:16 32:9 allowed
13:21, 14:9, adline ahead 17:19
14:13, 15:16, 22:4, 22:5, 44:22 allows
17:1, 17:3, 22:9, 22:20, aiding 11:21
17:7, 19:2, 23:1, 23:3, 4:14, 4:19, alma
26:19, 28:13, 23:8, 24:13, 13:19 7:10
29:8, 30:7, 25:8, 25:15, aisle alpha
30:21, 31:1, 26:2, 26:7, 19:8, 38:13, 5:15, 8:5
32:1, 32:2, 26:12, 27:1, 40:5 already
32:3, 37:2, 27:4, 27:10, alabama 3:11, 5:2, 7:1,
37:13, 37:15, 28:21, 29:7, 1:8, 5:13, 6:9, 9:13, 9:16
38:3, 38:5, 29:17, 29:21, 7:1, 7:4, 8:14, also
41:16, 42:10, 45:3 9:13, 12:1, 5:22, 6:9,
42:17, 42:19 administrators 12:13, 12:16, 6:11, 7:4, 7:12,
accept 15:13 13:5, 13:12, 8:3, 8:4, 8:13,
39:17 adults 15:10, 17:5, 8:19, 9:7, 9:13,
accepted 5:16, 6:8, 6:10 17:20, 18:15, 10:13, 13:12,
16:5 advocacy 20:7, 20:20, 13:17, 14:7,
access 4:7 21:17, 28:16 16:6, 17:7,
36:8 advocate alabama-house-co- 19:6, 19:7,
13:15 nstitution
46:7
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 53 of 161
48
23:18, 24:19, 27:18 around B
29:13, 36:20 anything 22:4, 23:13 back
alumni 2:16, 17:15, arrested 3:3, 18:16,
7:7 35:7, 35:13, 7:6, 23:6 31:12, 31:13,
always 35:16 arresting 35:11, 36:13,
21:8, 32:15 appeared 23:14 38:1, 39:11,
amen 5:7 ashley 42:20, 43:19
29:17 applicant 7:19, 7:20, backed-up
amended 16:10, 27:21, 7:21, 9:22 9:13
45:9 42:6 asked bad
amendment applicants 16:15 2:3, 33:21
25:5, 40:22, 16:11, 34:18 asking balance
41:1, 41:13, application 39:8 39:15
43:17, 43:18, 2:19, 2:22, assist ballot
43:19, 44:8, 3:2, 3:3, 5:19, 9:6 2:15, 4:12,
44:9, 44:15 16:4, 23:21, assistance 5:19, 5:21,
america 24:10, 24:17, 4:16, 5:21, 6:20, 8:9, 8:19,
21:15 25:2, 27:13, 6:20, 14:9, 8:22, 10:18,
among 28:1, 30:12, 15:2, 27:18, 11:9, 11:10,
4:9 34:19, 35:11, 27:20, 35:12, 12:11, 13:21,
another 36:18, 41:3, 36:3, 42:6 14:13, 17:1,
12:20 41:5, 41:7, assisted 19:6, 19:16,
ans 41:17, 41:20, 12:17 23:21, 25:15,
31:17 42:7, 42:10, assisting 26:15, 26:19,
answer 42:17, 42:22 4:11, 12:10, 26:20, 28:13,
18:16, 19:5, applications 30:11 29:4, 30:8,
19:9, 19:12, 4:12, 26:19, association 30:21, 31:1,
28:3, 39:21 26:21, 27:6, 8:2, 8:3 32:2, 34:13,
any 34:14 attack 34:14, 35:18,
3:19, 5:6, applies 12:20, 14:19 37:2, 37:8,
16:4, 16:19, 41:5, 41:20 attends 37:19, 38:3,
17:13, 17:14, appreciate 5:13 38:4, 38:5,
22:2, 25:7, 3:8, 10:11, attorney 41:17, 42:10,
29:9, 32:19, 12:1, 19:9 22:18 42:17
34:12, 36:14, appreciated audit ballots
41:6, 41:8, 3:21 31:20 7:7, 9:9, 9:11,
41:12, 42:6, appropriate automatically 28:10, 28:12,
42:9, 44:6, 40:22 30:22 32:3, 36:13,
46:13 area away 37:13, 37:15,
anybody 19:2, 32:1 9:15, 9:16, 37:21, 38:17,
2:18, 24:9, aren't 15:1 39:13
24:10, 24:14, 24:2 aye barred
34:22 arguments 25:21, 44:9, 16:8
anybody's 24:7 44:10 barriers
28:9 armani aye's 12:13, 13:22
anymore 5:9, 5:12, 25:22 based
25:3 5:13, 8:5, ayes 4:6
anyone 17:20, 45:1 44:14
14:8, 24:16,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 54 of 161
49
battle beings black brought
38:10 12:22 13:13, 14:17, 8:7, 35:2,
beans believe 14:20, 21:20, 42:2, 43:17
21:11 12:14 39:1 bushes
beating benson blacks 29:1
29:1 5:10, 5:12, 8:4 butler
became 5:13, 45:1 blank 41:12
14:19 best 27:16 C
because 46:11 blind call
10:21, 12:18, between 2:18 2:2, 14:6,
16:9, 18:13, 6:12, 33:5 board 19:16, 40:20,
19:3, 23:7, big 20:15 44:7, 44:19,
23:12, 24:7, 2:20, 17:20, boats 44:21
25:2, 29:9, 17:21 11:22 calling
30:5, 30:13, biggest bob 42:20
30:19, 30:22, 20:6, 20:19 3:7, 5:5, 7:18, calls
31:2, 31:6, bill 9:22, 12:3, 34:6
31:11, 31:20, 2:5, 2:6, 2:7, 13:8, 15:5, calm
32:2, 32:3, 2:8, 2:11, 3:5, 17:11, 22:2, 14:3
35:13, 37:13, 5:1, 5:11, 5:18, 25:14, 25:17, came
39:22, 40:3, 5:19, 6:6, 8:7, 29:19, 30:1, 38:2
40:6, 42:3, 10:11, 11:14, 32:19, 37:4, campaigning
43:19 11:18, 12:8, 38:19, 40:12,
become 29:1
12:12, 12:14, 40:16, 40:18, campaigns
5:17 13:3, 13:5, 41:10, 44:5,
becoming 1:9, 31:22
13:18, 14:5, 44:11, 44:14, campaigns-and-el-
7:3 14:6, 14:7, 44:20, 45:4,
been 45:8 ections-committee
14:22, 15:4,
8:7, 14:20, 15:21, 16:6, body 46:8
14:21, 16:11, 16:19, 16:22, 10:7 campus
16:18, 20:4, 17:5, 17:9, both 8:16, 24:3
21:8, 23:4, 23:17, 24:9, 14:13, 16:5, campuses
23:5, 41:17, 24:15, 25:11, 19:8, 23:19, 6:6
42:20 25:18, 26:4, 27:22, 38:12, can't
before 26:8, 28:5, 38:13 8:17, 8:22,
12:7, 13:6, 29:15, 31:13, bottom 9:6, 18:11,
15:20, 17:14, 33:20, 35:15, 28:1, 42:8 21:1, 24:7,
17:21, 18:9, 35:17, 40:18, boxes 24:11, 27:15,
26:10, 40:19, 40:19, 42:4, 19:16 35:7, 35:14,
44:8 42:5, 43:20, breaking 35:16, 37:16,
begin 44:18, 45:9 38:2, 42:15
33:3 candidate
4:2, 18:10 bills bridge
behalf 18:14 10:19, 37:11,
21:17 37:14, 38:6,
12:5, 15:11 birmingham bring
being 4:6 38:18
36:11 candidates
7:6, 9:2, 13:1, bishop bringing
18:4, 18:8, 1:22, 46:2, 20:15, 26:18,
28:10 30:19, 31:19,
23:16, 24:2 46:18 brother
42:12
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 55 of 161
50
37:20 13:8, 13:10, 15:13 closely
cannot 15:5, 17:11, circuit 26:8
2:12, 5:18, 17:17, 21:4, 20:10, 20:14 cloth
9:17, 35:1 21:10, 22:2, cite 14:7
capital 22:5, 25:10, 18:10 code
21:17 25:14, 25:17, citizen 35:14
car 29:13, 29:19, 8:20, 9:4, colleague
27:7 29:22, 30:1, 13:12, 16:14 6:15
care 32:19, 37:4, citizens colleagues
3:11, 21:9 38:19, 39:21, 8:12, 15:20 40:4
caregiver 40:12, 40:16, civic collection
42:13 40:18, 41:10, 4:9, 5:16, 6:5, 41:19
caregivers 44:5, 44:11, 6:15, 8:10, college
15:12 44:14, 44:20, 9:11, 12:8, 5:16, 6:7,
carol 45:4, 45:8 13:4, 13:14, 6:12, 6:19, 7:8,
15:6, 15:8 chairs 30:5, 36:2 7:14, 8:12,
case 17:22 civil 8:15, 12:15,
20:7, 20:19, challenges 15:1, 21:15 18:2
21:5, 22:20, 12:15 clarification colleges
23:4, 30:18, change 34:13 7:1, 7:4
42:1, 46:14 2:16, 12:8, clarity come
cases 35:7, 35:14, 38:22, 39:5, 3:5, 5:9, 5:10,
19:13 35:16 40:1, 40:9 12:7, 17:21,
cast changes clarke 17:22, 18:9,
11:18, 28:12, 38:22, 39:6 22:5, 22:9, 38:4
29:8 changing 22:20, 23:1, comes
caucus 35:7, 35:14 23:3, 23:8, 9:20, 18:16,
39:1 character 24:13, 25:8, 36:20
caught 19:19 25:15, 26:1, coming
20:4 charge 26:2, 26:7, 20:19, 43:16,
cause 5:20, 8:8 26:12, 27:1, 43:18
7:13, 31:19 charged 27:4, 27:10, commend
causes 6:3, 6:21, 28:21, 29:7, 17:19
7:16 14:13, 16:12 29:17, 29:20, comment
causing charges 29:21, 45:3 30:18, 38:20,
13:6 4:21, 23:7, class 39:20, 44:6
certain 31:16 9:3, 30:8, comments
28:11, 32:16 checked 33:4, 34:2, 34:3 5:6, 5:11,
certificate 13:21 clear 22:3, 32:20,
46:1 chief 2:16 37:6
certify 8:1 clearly commercials
46:2 choice 41:15 40:4
chair 39:16 clerk commission
25:10, 30:3, choose 20:10, 20:14, 20:16, 38:8
33:2 3:1 44:21 commit
chairman chris cliff 2:13, 2:14
3:7, 5:5, 7:18, 37:7, 38:15 3:13, 3:14 committed
9:22, 12:3, church close 4:21
8:10, 9:1, 9:5, 21:10
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 56 of 161
51
committee constitute counting cut
1:9, 3:17, 5:6, 5:22 19:22 3:19, 6:16
13:11, 17:13, constitutes country D
17:15, 22:3, 33:13 32:16 data
22:12, 25:12, constitution counts 16:18, 25:9,
29:14, 32:20, 1:8, 21:14 12:19 25:11, 28:12
43:20 constitutional county day
committing 7:12, 12:20, 10:19, 17:2, 21:20, 30:15,
37:17 13:2 17:4, 20:7, 42:15
common-sense consultant 20:16, 23:2, deaf
11:19 38:1 28:15, 28:20, 2:17
communities contacting 32:7, 37:10, deal
4:10 37:20 37:18, 38:6, 2:20, 17:20
community continuously 38:8 decipher
5:17, 15:17 7:5 couple 42:21
completed control 18:7, 27:5 decision
34:14 38:6 course 11:2, 14:16
complicated convicted 37:16 decline
10:4 16:10, 20:11, court 6:8, 7:8, 7:14
concern 23:6, 24:21 9:13, 11:1 decrease
5:4 conviction courts 7:5
concerns 16:9 11:1 define
10:5, 36:21, convinced create 29:14, 40:2
36:22 25:12 12:13 definition
conclude corporate crime 19:6, 23:17,
29:19 7:7 6:21, 12:10, 36:1
concluded correct 35:18, 37:17, deliver
45:11 23:9, 26:6, 39:18 9:9, 9:11,
conecuh 26:11 criminal 34:18, 34:21
10:19 corrected 8:4, 31:12, delivered
confirming 43:21 34:7, 34:10 39:12
16:13 could criminalize delivering
conflict 6:2, 6:4, 7:3, 4:18, 15:22 14:8
42:5 7:8, 12:14, criminalized democracy
confuse 19:4, 19:9, 26:9 6:18, 17:8 4:18, 4:20,
16:17 couldn’t criminalizes 21:22
confusing 35:9 14:8 democrat
15:16 counsel criminals 2:7, 29:10
connection 46:13 6:11 democratic
4:13 count critical 2:12, 4:22,
consecutive 20:18, 31:21 4:13, 15:14 24:19
8:6 counted cross demographics
consider 10:8, 11:6, 21:16 29:12
7:15 11:16, 32:3, current depend
considered 32:4 6:21 9:10
9:2 counties currently depos
constant 28:11, 28:18, 5:14, 8:1, 9:9, 46:19
5:22 29:12 9:10
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 57 of 161
52
deprived distribute east ending
10:20 41:16, 42:10 7:22 26:1
desires distributing edmund engagement
42:7 33:12 21:16 4:9, 4:22, 13:4
desk distribution education enough
32:11 33:12 4:8, 6:14, 31:10
details district 36:11 ensure
21:1 13:12, 20:6, effect 12:19
devices 20:8, 20:13, 6:22 entrap
3:19 20:14, 20:21, effects 15:22
diabetes 38:9 7:16 envious
35:9 document either 14:17
didn’t 37:22 18:10 equations
40:13 documents elected 42:15
difference 14:1 10:21, 20:17 era
33:5 doing election 14:4
different 2:10, 7:3, 2:13, 15:18, error-prone
33:4 17:8, 31:8, 16:12, 16:18, 15:16
digital 35:17, 36:10, 36:10, 37:21, especially
46:3 36:14, 38:11 41:5, 42:19 14:10, 19:2,
dignity dollars elections 31:19
4:17 37:12, 38:11 1:9, 2:4, 2:5, essence
disabilities done 2:9, 26:18, 4:20, 36:5
2:17, 8:13, 23:16, 26:9, 31:21, 33:22 even
12:16, 35:3, 31:1, 31:11 electrical 8:17, 8:22,
35:13 don’t 3:19 9:6, 14:18,
disability 19:18, 40:16 eligibility 14:20, 16:3,
35:8 down 16:13 16:4, 31:10,
disabled 2:2, 3:12, 33:3 eloquently 32:6
6:19, 8:15, download 17:22 ever
27:20 16:3 else 14:18
disagree drive 5:20, 33:18, every
36:15 8:20 36:20 2:8, 10:7,
discourage due else's 11:5, 11:15,
14:4 13:1, 44:2 8:9 18:13, 19:15,
discussion duly embed 20:1, 29:3,
41:12 10:21 46:6 38:10
dismantle during employed everybody
6:12, 7:11 14:3 30:6, 46:13 7:21, 8:14
dismissed E employee everyone
23:7, 23:11, each 4:5 2:20, 3:10,
37:18 3:12 employees 10:8, 36:20
disposed earlier 12:9 everyone's
23:4 42:5 encompassed 12:19
disproportionate early 2:11 everything
4:22 35:2 end 19:19, 33:18,
disqualifying easily 21:20, 35:9, 43:6, 43:9
16:9, 16:10 2:13, 2:14 43:21 evidence
31:10
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 58 of 161
53
exactly facts filed 17:18, 30:20
23:14 18:8 37:10 five
example faculties fill 19:22, 21:6,
6:18, 8:22, 7:10 2:19, 8:18, 21:7, 28:12,
14:9, 20:6, faculty 15:14, 15:17, 38:9, 38:11
20:14, 26:17, 6:4, 7:6 15:18, 16:3, floor
42:12 fair 24:8, 24:10, 40:19, 43:17,
exception 2:9, 25:4 24:17, 27:6, 43:19, 44:6,
41:18 faith 27:14, 27:19, 44:17
excuse 4:6 27:22, 35:10, follow-up
27:14 family 36:12, 41:6, 35:21
exercise 18:1 43:11 following
9:8, 9:19, far filling 12:7, 41:2
13:20 28:16, 30:11, 2:21, 30:11, foregoing
exercising 34:13 42:6 46:4
12:11 father final forget
exist 35:8 3:6 13:1, 19:11
37:9 favor finally form
exists 25:20, 44:8 7:5, 16:17 15:2, 27:16,
25:16 favorable financial 41:3
expect 44:16, 44:18, 46:15 forward
8:16, 8:21, 45:10 financially 5:10
9:7, 10:22 february 7:13 found
expense 1:12 fincher 2:10, 19:14,
39:19 federal 3:7, 5:5, 7:18, 23:15, 34:6
experiences 2:4, 35:5, 9:22, 12:3, four
31:22 35:7, 35:13, 13:8, 15:5, 29:3, 33:3,
explain 35:16 17:11, 22:2, 33:10, 42:21
33:5, 43:15 fee 25:14, 25:17, fraud
expresses 37:11 29:19, 30:1, 2:13, 2:14,
15:2 feel 32:19, 37:4, 5:2, 18:14,
extensive 2:11, 18:21, 38:19, 40:12, 18:19, 19:16,
14:1 30:22 40:16, 40:18, 20:2, 20:4,
extent felonies 41:10, 44:5, 20:7, 32:10
11:4 9:16, 24:21, 44:11, 44:14, frauds
extremely 25:1, 25:7 44:20, 45:4, 19:1
15:21 felony 45:8 freedom
F 4:21, 6:1, 6:3, fine 13:20
7:4, 8:8, 9:2, 24:6, 34:22, freedoms
fabric 43:18
14:6 9:3, 9:15, 7:11
14:14, 16:6, finish friend
faced 34:1
7:1 16:9, 16:10, 8:18, 9:5, 16:3
30:9, 33:4, finished fundamentally
facilitate 32:15
6:1, 6:5 33:5, 34:2, 34:3 5:1, 15:16
female firmly funding
facilitating 12:13
4:16 44:19 6:16, 7:8
few first funds
fact 3:21, 17:15,
33:21 19:20, 22:17 14:8
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 59 of 161
54
further gives groups happening
21:13, 21:19, 6:19, 41:18 19:4, 19:7 10:16, 11:12,
24:18 glad gudger 11:20, 20:22,
G 42:2 2:1, 3:8, 22:19, 23:16
gap go 12:12, 18:5, happens
15:14, 15:17 8:17, 8:18, 18:6, 20:3, 11:3, 38:1,
gas 8:22, 9:6, 22:6, 22:7, 38:12
6:19, 14:12, 20:12, 22:3, 22:13, 22:22, happy
16:4, 28:8, 24:17, 26:15, 23:2, 23:5, 3:5, 22:14
39:12, 39:14, 31:12, 34:2, 23:10, 24:5, harm
39:19 35:6, 38:8, 24:15, 26:6, 13:6
gave 44:22 26:10, 26:11, harmful
20:10 goes 26:21, 27:3, 15:21, 17:5
generate 42:8 27:5, 27:11, harsh
37:13 going 29:5, 29:13, 16:6
generated 3:9, 19:11, 29:16, 30:10, harshly
21:12, 24:12, 30:14, 31:5, 13:18, 14:20,
37:15 33:7, 33:15,
gentlemen 28:9, 28:18, 15:3
28:21, 29:10, 33:17, 34:16, harvest
10:2, 10:3, 34:21, 35:5,
40:17 31:8, 33:19, 37:21, 38:17
33:21, 36:22, 36:7, 38:12, harvesting
getting 39:3, 40:10,
7:9, 23:20, 37:20, 39:11, 2:15, 10:18,
40:20, 44:6 43:2, 43:4, 19:6, 19:17,
28:4, 30:14, 43:7, 43:11,
35:22 gonna 20:5, 23:21,
19:10 43:15 23:22, 25:15,
gift guess
16:2, 29:15, good 26:15, 26:20,
4:4, 7:20, 30:3, 30:17, 35:19, 37:8,
33:12, 33:14, 33:15, 39:15
34:2, 34:5, 12:5, 15:8, 37:19
17:8, 22:5, guilty hassle
39:11 16:6, 26:15,
givan 22:6, 22:7, 33:21
23:19 42:22 hear
17:15, 17:17, guys
18:7, 19:10, government 18:14
8:2, 37:22 9:19, 35:5 heard
19:21, 21:3,
24:1, 38:20, grandfather H 36:6, 37:1,
38:21, 39:4, 28:7 half 37:8, 40:13,
40:15, 40:17, grandson 28:17 40:15
42:2, 43:3, 28:8 hand hearing
43:5, 43:9, grave 17:16 1:11, 3:9,
43:13, 44:2 36:21, 36:22 handed 26:3, 39:22
give greater 16:21 held
3:6, 17:9, 4:5 handwriting 32:13
19:1, 19:5, greetings 42:19 help
20:20, 20:22, 5:12, 7:21 happen 2:18, 2:19,
22:14, 27:16, griffin 7:16, 32:7, 2:21, 2:22,
39:5, 42:11 7:19, 7:20, 32:8 5:16, 9:5,
given 7:21 happened 10:14, 11:8,
28:7, 45:9 group 20:12, 32:4 24:7, 24:8,
13:15, 26:20 24:10, 24:14,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 60 of 161
55
24:17, 27:6, human integrity itself
27:19, 31:17, 12:22, 15:2 36:9 4:20
36:12, 43:7, hundred intent J
43:8, 43:12 32:3, 37:12 28:5, 28:7, jackson
helped hurt 30:5, 31:16, 13:9, 13:10,
3:2, 27:22, 19:18, 32:16 31:17, 31:18, 13:11
35:10 hypothetical 32:15, 32:16, jail
helping 10:15, 11:2 33:20, 34:8, 9:10, 20:12,
7:6, 9:4, 11:9, I 34:10 31:15
16:2, 30:10 id intents jails
here 43:10 34:9 8:14, 9:12,
3:12, 8:5, identifies interest 9:14, 12:17
8:15, 12:19, 21:5 46:14 james
13:9, 16:16, illegal interested 40:21, 41:14,
19:3, 28:4, 26:8 45:7
28:6, 32:21, 27:15
impact interesting jar
33:3, 36:1, 14:14, 14:15, 14:2, 21:12,
36:4, 36:15, 6:7, 13:4,
36:17 14:18, 14:21 21:13
36:21, 37:9, interpretation jelly
37:18, 39:21, important
11:22 41:8, 41:21 21:11
41:6 interpreted
hereby incarcerated jellybeans
4:11, 9:10 36:19 21:13
46:2 interrupt
higher including job
17:3 3:20 1:20, 6:2, 7:3,
6:14 intimated
highest increase 30:7, 36:2
29:3, 29:5 19:3 jobs
15:2 intimidate
hired indecency 17:4, 23:11
15:3 16:16 john
7:2 invoice
history independent 10:1, 10:2,
2:8 37:16 30:18, 45:2
20:20, 31:12 involved journey
hit independents
38:13 26:13 21:16
30:7 iraq juandalynn
hold individual
5:20 13:17 17:17, 18:7,
5:6, 5:14, irreparable 19:10, 19:21,
10:20 individuals
4:19, 12:9, 13:6 21:3, 24:1,
honest issue 38:21, 39:4,
2:2, 2:9, 36:9 13:2, 21:7
information 10:5, 19:8, 40:15, 40:17,
honorable 26:5, 28:11, 42:2, 43:3,
18:3 20:10, 42:18
infringe 30:4, 32:5 43:5, 43:9,
hope issues 43:13, 44:2
9:19 21:19
innocent 6:21, 31:19, judge
horrible 41:21, 43:22 20:15
42:19 17:8
inside issuing judges
house 14:13 31:14
1:8 12:16
institution it'll judicial
https 41:15 24:22, 25:6
46:6 18:3
item
33:11
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 61 of 161
56
justice large legitimate 27:19, 42:15
8:2, 8:4, 23:8, 29:5 24:3, 39:15, longer
31:13 largely 39:16 8:20
K 29:10, 29:11 lessons look
keep last 4:8 16:21, 24:9,
3:13, 39:22 2:2, 13:21, let's 24:15, 29:7,
kenneth 19:20, 22:17 19:12, 22:3, 29:8, 30:21,
30:3, 30:13, lastly 33:7 33:10, 34:4,
30:17, 31:6, 39:19 letting 41:15
45:5 later 41:6 looked
kept 3:6 likelihood 16:20
23:11 lauren 4:15 looking
kill 1:22, 46:2, limitations 11:13, 19:13
13:5 46:18 9:8 looks
kind law limited 3:11, 21:22,
2:10, 3:4, 28:3, 34:7, 9:16 22:1
33:2, 36:17, 34:11, 35:1, line loopholes
42:16 35:5, 35:7, 24:9, 24:13, 23:13, 23:15
kings 35:16, 36:4, 24:15, 33:8, lose
38:5 36:19 33:11, 34:5, 30:20, 31:20
knocks lawmakers 34:9, 41:1 lot
2:2 14:16, 26:13 lines 18:9, 30:19,
know laws 44:3, 44:4 31:19, 38:11,
10:16, 11:3, 2:13, 32:13 list 40:3, 43:22
11:21, 22:18, lawsuit 19:17, 20:2, love
26:2, 26:3, 10:19, 30:22, 25:1, 25:7 22:11, 25:19
29:12, 31:3, 37:9, 37:17 literacy M
31:7, 31:9, league 14:1 ma'am
32:1, 32:2, 15:9, 15:12, litigated 13:8, 39:3
32:5, 32:14, 17:9 10:22, 11:1 made
34:20, 36:18, leave little 30:18, 39:1,
37:8, 37:16, 41:8 22:9 39:20, 41:11
38:20, 39:20, left lives mailed
40:6, 40:12, 45:4, 45:8 6:10, 6:18, 26:18
40:16, 43:16 leg 8:16, 13:13 mainly
knowing 2:2, 35:9 living 8:11
28:6, 33:10 legal 12:16 maintaining
knowingly 14:1, 23:13, llc 4:13
34:5, 34:9, 27:9, 27:11, 46:19 major
34:10, 42:9 27:12, 27:14, local 7:22
knowledge 41:21 2:4, 6:13, 9:1, make
15:19, 46:12 legally 9:5 12:6, 20:17,
L 7:13 locked 24:20, 25:10,
ladies legislation 31:15 36:8, 37:6,
10:3, 35:6 31:9, 31:10, lomax 38:17, 41:7
lansing 31:18, 32:17 40:20, 40:21, makes
legislature 41:14, 45:7 10:12
8:1
8:7, 13:5 long
3:1, 24:11,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 62 of 161
57
making member 37:18 13:7, 18:14,
10:7, 11:5, 5:15, 8:10 modern-day 42:14
11:14, 35:17, members 14:5, 14:22 must
38:11 6:1, 13:11, mohan 13:1
male 15:13, 17:13, 23:19 muted
14:21 22:3 moment 5:2
manager men's 29:21 myself
42:20 34:6 monetary 18:8, 22:15
manner mention 23:20, 33:15, N
10:14, 18:3 9:12 34:3 naacp
many mentioned money 5:15, 12:6,
6:10, 10:5, 19:7, 22:21, 5:22, 6:20, 12:17, 13:4
12:17, 14:2, 38:22, 39:8 14:12, 16:4, name
14:16, 17:2, met 28:5, 28:8, 4:4, 5:12,
21:1, 27:17, 19:7 38:11, 38:17 7:21, 13:11,
32:8, 36:7, 38:2 michigan montgomery 13:14, 20:1,
marbles 8:1 12:22 20:2, 20:3,
14:2, 21:11, might more 27:21, 41:18,
21:12 26:9, 28:21, 3:5, 6:21, 42:11
march 29:9, 33:8, 7:13, 14:18, names
12:21, 12:22, 34:19 14:20, 22:10, 19:17, 28:1,
46:20 millie 22:13, 26:17, 29:3
mark 14:15 32:21, 35:21, national
24:12 milligan 36:6, 38:20, 6:16, 8:3
marking 14:15 41:7 navigate
41:4, 41:19, minded morning 15:15
41:22 13:16 4:4, 7:20, nay
maters mine 12:5, 15:8, 25:21, 44:12,
7:10 20:6 22:5, 22:6, 22:7 44:13, 45:2
matter minimal moseley need
13:13 18:18, 21:8 15:9 11:11, 11:12,
maximum ministries mosely 16:19, 16:22,
3:10 4:6 15:8 19:12, 27:20,
mayoral minute mosley 29:14, 35:12,
26:17 3:14 15:6, 15:7, 44:3, 44:4
mean minutes 17:12 needed
26:16, 27:14, 3:12, 3:14, most 2:21, 15:15
29:8, 34:14, 3:15 5:3, 15:20 needs
43:15 mis motion 11:12
meaning 23:17 25:10, 25:17, negative
6:1, 6:16 misdemeanor 25:20, 25:21, 6:7, 13:3
meaningless 5:21 41:11, 44:5, neighbor
17:1 mission 44:7, 44:17 14:12
means 36:5 mount neighbors
28:17, 34:8 misunderstand 22:1 12:10
measure 4:20 move neither
11:21 mobile 25:20, 44:16 46:13
meeting 26:18, 37:10, much
1:9 3:21, 5:5,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 63 of 161
58
new 18:20, 32:12, 22:14, 32:4, 16:21, 17:4,
7:2, 16:6, 16:7 38:3 33:7, 35:17, 20:19, 21:21,
next official 38:8, 44:3 23:15, 26:13,
13:9 16:12 open 26:15, 27:17,
nobody officials 41:8, 41:20 28:12, 28:16,
31:14 15:18 operations 29:1, 29:17,
non-relative often 37:19 30:11, 34:6,
14:12 26:13, 29:2 opinion 35:22, 37:14,
nonpartisan okay 10:20 38:9, 38:16,
4:7 3:7, 3:20, 4:2, opportunity 41:6, 42:7,
nonprofit 5:10, 7:19, 5:4, 17:18, 42:17
15:11, 34:19, 15:6, 19:12, 21:18 outcome
36:1 20:8, 22:13, oppose 46:15
norm 27:3, 27:9, 15:3 outlines
28:16 28:7, 29:16, opposed 41:15
norma 30:1, 30:2, 25:21, 44:11 outside
12:4, 12:5, 30:13, 33:2, opposite 28:15
12:6 33:9, 40:16, 13:19, 40:5 over
nothing 41:12, 41:13 option 3:15, 14:16,
20:12 ompnetwork 39:16 28:13, 28:17,
nothing's 46:6 options 29:6, 30:15,
23:16 one 27:5 31:15, 32:21,
noticed 3:14, 4:10, org 38:1, 42:12
30:19 8:11, 12:8, 13:14, 46:6 overcrowding
notorious 12:12, 12:14, organization 6:9, 9:14
14:2 13:3, 13:5, 4:8, 8:10, overseas
number 13:18, 13:19, 12:9, 30:6, 35:15
19:1, 21:7, 14:6, 14:7, 37:10, 39:9, overview
29:10, 43:10 15:4, 17:16, 39:11 3:4, 20:22
numbers 19:11, 19:15, organizations own
29:8 24:18, 26:17, 5:16, 6:4, 40:8
nurses 26:18, 28:10, 6:15, 6:17, P
15:13 28:12, 29:9, 9:11, 15:12, packet
32:21, 32:22, 24:4, 36:2 34:15
O 34:4, 35:9,
obama other page
35:20, 35:21, 4:9, 20:18,
14:19 38:20, 39:22, 24:16, 33:2,
obtained 22:2, 32:19, 33:8, 33:9,
44:1, 44:18, 39:7, 41:4,
46:5 45:9 33:10, 41:2,
41:18, 44:6 41:15, 42:8
obtaining one's others
5:19 10:9
pages
10:14 1:21
obviously ones otherwise
19:17 22:14, 22:16
paid
46:15 23:20, 24:2,
offer online ought
40:21 24:3, 24:22,
19:15 22:12 28:5, 30:7,
offered only out
16:5, 38:3 30:14, 30:15,
8:13, 8:19, 2:3, 8:18, 9:4, 35:22, 39:12,
office 11:3, 17:6, 9:5, 16:3,
10:21, 18:16,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 64 of 161
59
39:13 penalized piggyback prefilled
paper 39:18 36:17, 39:7 42:11
19:22, 20:1, people place prefilling
21:6 2:17, 8:8, 11:21, 14:3 29:15
part 8:12, 9:7, 9:15, places pregnant
6:2, 20:5, 9:18, 10:5, 23:12 14:10
23:22, 27:15, 10:17, 11:8, planet prepared
42:4, 42:5 11:21, 12:15, 46:19 46:3
participation 12:16, 12:18, play present
6:6 13:16, 15:15, 36:21 5:11, 15:19
particular 17:5, 17:6, please president
23:17, 28:18, 17:8, 17:21, 3:18, 3:19, 5:15, 8:3, 8:5,
30:18, 42:4, 21:7, 27:8, 4:2, 5:10 14:19, 15:9,
44:1 31:7, 31:15, point 15:11
parties 32:9, 32:16, 3:17, 17:12 pretty
26:14, 38:13, 33:19, 35:18, pointed 3:4
46:14 36:7, 36:11, 26:13 previous
partners 36:14, 37:21, political 18:19
6:14 38:2, 38:15, 7:22 pride
partnership 38:16 politics 18:8
6:15 people's 5:17 primary
party 10:13, 20:3, poll 16:17
18:12, 24:19, 20:18 21:13 pringle
29:15 percent polls 37:5, 37:7,
paschal 28:13, 28:17, 13:14, 13:17, 38:15
30:2, 30:3, 29:6 36:8 print
30:13, 30:17, perhaps poor 42:13
31:6, 45:5 16:2 17:3 printed
pass person population 22:15, 42:17,
27:17 6:18, 11:5, 4:10, 4:11, 42:18
passed 11:9, 11:17, 17:4 printer
3:14, 5:18, 14:10, 16:13, populations 42:14, 42:16
6:3, 6:22, 7:16 16:15, 17:2, 4:10 priority
passes 18:8, 27:22, pose 10:6, 10:10,
45:9 30:8, 39:10, 12:14 11:4
passing 39:12, 40:11, positioned prison
7:11 41:16, 42:9 9:10
person's 15:18
pay positions prisons
8:17, 34:5, 10:8, 20:2 6:9, 8:14,
persons 5:14
35:18, 37:12, possibly 9:14, 12:16
37:14 16:5 probably
pettus 7:7
paying potential 19:10
27:13, 34:4 21:17 problem
phones 10:6
payment potentially 11:19, 16:7,
33:11, 34:10 3:18 32:11
pi 41:21
payments power problems
14:9 5:15, 8:5 7:13, 40:3
pick 14:17, 21:19
penalize pre-filed proceedings
6:4, 40:8 3:1 46:4, 46:5,
41:17
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 65 of 161
60
46:9, 46:11 43:5, 43:6, rate recording
process 43:9, 43:21 7:4 45:11, 46:4,
4:14, 10:18, puts raya 46:5
12:2, 15:17, 11:20 34:7 records
15:19, 16:16, putting re-elected 6:10
24:21, 24:22, 31:14 32:9 reduced
26:14, 31:1, Q re-entry 46:9
32:2, 32:6, queens 4:14 reducing
34:6, 37:2 38:4 read 4:15
professor question 2:5, 2:6, 2:7, reflection
7:2 5:8, 8:14, 24:11, 36:19, 14:5
proof 11:3, 16:15, 37:11, 44:22 reflects
16:19, 16:22, 17:13, 18:4, reading 29:11
22:11 18:15, 19:5, 15:10 refund
proper 21:5, 28:3, reaffirmation 39:14
25:9, 44:21 30:4, 34:16, 4:17 regardless
proportion 35:21, 39:10, real 21:8
16:22 39:22, 42:3 23:17, 35:3 regards
proposed questions realize 18:22
12:12 5:6, 22:3, 11:11, 11:12 register
proposes 32:20 really 9:1, 16:14
4:19 quick 29:14 registered
prosecuted 23:17, 35:3 reason 16:7
30:8, 32:10 quit 16:19, 26:3 registering
protest 3:16 reasons 16:14
13:1 quite 17:2 registrar
proves 14:14 receive 16:12
37:19, 37:22 quiz 16:1, 16:2, registration
provide 14:2 33:11, 34:2, 7:14
4:8, 15:15, quote 34:9, 35:18, reimbursement
34:5, 36:3 2:10 42:6 16:1, 39:19
provided R receiving related
5:21 8:9, 14:8, 46:13
provides race
23:20, 28:5 relates
14:12 30:20 recent
racial 18:18
public 19:15, 26:17 relationship
3:9 13:22, 14:22 recidivism
rafferty 6:12
pull 4:15 remark
22:18 30:2, 32:21, reciting
33:1, 33:13, 26:1
pulled 21:14 remarks
21:2, 22:16 33:16, 34:12,
34:17, 35:2, recommendation 3:6, 4:3, 29:20
pulling 17:10 remember
35:4, 35:20,
23:22 36:16, 37:5, reconstruction 5:8, 13:3, 21:3
put 39:8, 45:6 14:3 remind
9:14, 9:15, ran record 3:9
14:2, 24:12, 31:21 46:11 reminded
27:22, 30:22, recorded 12:21
35:3, 41:8, 1:11 remove
41:3
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 66 of 161
61
replace respect ripple sanders
41:1, 44:3, 44:3 6:22 12:4, 12:5,
44:4 respectful rise 12:6
report 10:14 11:18 saw
44:16, 44:18, responses risen 17:16
45:10 18:18 14:20 say
represent rest risk 3:14, 3:15,
24:3 41:3 41:9 8:15, 21:18,
representative restitution roland 21:20, 23:19,
18:6, 18:12, 24:18, 25:1 13:14 25:21, 33:9,
22:8, 23:18, restoration role 38:4, 38:8,
29:20, 30:1, 4:17 4:15 39:16, 40:14,
30:2, 32:21, restored roll 42:8, 44:9
33:1, 33:13, 16:11, 25:3, 44:19, 44:21, saying
33:16, 33:20, 25:6 44:22 12:8, 12:20,
34:12, 34:17, result room 19:14, 32:8,
35:1, 35:4, 7:3, 7:5 27:18 36:3
35:20, 36:16, returned roughly says
37:5, 38:20, 35:10 21:6 24:9, 24:14,
39:8, 40:20, review rule 28:6, 34:7,
41:11, 45:6 25:11 11:1, 31:14 40:1, 42:6
representatives right run sb1
6:13, 28:22 2:14, 2:17, 30:20 2:16, 4:19,
represented 3:8, 4:1, 4:16, running 5:18, 5:20, 6:3,
2:11, 18:1 5:9, 7:19, 9:8, 38:6 6:11, 6:22,
representive 9:19, 10:13, rural 7:11, 7:16, 8:6,
25:22 10:19, 10:20, 17:2, 28:14 8:8, 9:20,
republic 12:11, 15:6, S 15:20, 17:4
2:12 15:7, 16:11, scheme
republican safeguard 20:16, 32:6
17:7, 17:12, 10:13, 11:20
2:6, 18:12, 25:14, 25:22, school
29:11 safeguarded 15:13, 20:15
27:15, 28:4,
request 28:6, 30:5, 11:15 schools
15:1 30:20, 31:4, said 6:17
requested 31:5, 31:20, 18:4, 20:19, science
26:22, 27:2, 31:22, 32:20, 24:7, 26:2, 7:22
27:4, 27:9 35:20, 37:9, 27:12, 31:22, second
required 37:18, 41:10, 32:2, 32:6, 14:11, 25:19,
41:2 44:7, 44:15, 33:17, 40:15, 41:11, 44:17
requiring 44:20 46:5, 46:8, seconds
rights 46:10 41:12
16:7 samaritans
research 7:12, 12:21, secretary
13:2, 13:15, 15:22 18:16, 18:20
2:10, 18:9, same
21:2, 22:16 15:1, 17:6, secure
resolve 21:15, 21:16, 26:4, 28:3, 2:1, 11:22,
24:19, 25:3, 28:20, 33:18, 36:9
6:8 34:8, 34:10,
resources 25:6 see
ripping 35:10
9:17 18:13, 18:20,
36:22
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 67 of 161
62
22:11, 22:12, senators shouldn't skills
25:9, 26:9, 14:21, 28:22 25:2, 31:2, 46:12
29:2, 29:10, send 32:12 slot
31:16, 32:4, 25:10, 25:18, sick 38:10
34:18, 35:9, 27:6, 28:1, 17:4 small
35:22, 36:13, 36:12 side 31:15, 40:21
37:22 sending 40:5 smarter
seeing 26:21 sides 42:14
11:8, 40:4 senior 19:8, 38:13 smoother
seems 5:13, 8:12, sigma 4:14
40:7, 42:4 8:20, 9:4 5:15, 8:5 social
sell seniors sign 4:7
38:3, 38:10 12:15 3:2, 24:11, society
selling sentator 27:21, 43:10 4:14
38:17 40:22 signature-d2yvl society's
selma sentence 46:16 5:3
12:22 41:4 signed solution
senate serve 3:2, 3:22 11:13, 11:19
12:8, 12:12, 8:1, 17:6 significant some
12:14, 13:3, service 12:14 2:10, 36:14,
13:5, 13:18, 10:4, 15:15 silences 37:6, 39:13,
14:6, 14:7, services 5:2 40:1, 42:16
15:4, 26:3, 4:7, 16:2 simple somebody
44:18, 45:9 sessions 3:5, 42:16 24:8, 27:6,
senator 46:7 simplistic 30:11, 40:14
2:1, 3:8, seven 17:1 somebody's
12:12, 18:4, 37:12 simply 19:19, 28:9
18:6, 20:3, several 7:3, 8:8, 9:18, someone
22:6, 22:7, 19:4 12:10, 21:18, 2:21, 5:20,
22:13, 22:21, shall 41:1 8:9, 9:3, 9:5,
22:22, 23:2, 42:9 since 11:8, 14:10,
23:5, 23:10, share 14:18, 39:20 24:20, 27:13,
24:5, 24:15, 5:4, 10:5 single 39:9, 40:1, 40:2
26:6, 26:10, sheet 11:5, 11:15, someone's
26:11, 26:12, 20:1, 20:20 11:16, 38:10 15:1
26:21, 27:3, sheets singleton something
27:5, 27:11, 19:22, 21:6, 26:12 10:16, 31:1,
29:5, 29:13, 22:14 sir 35:2, 40:7
29:16, 30:10, sheriff 12:3, 15:5, something's
30:14, 31:5, 41:13 28:18
33:7, 33:15, 20:14
shortage sit sometimes
33:17, 34:16, 31:2
34:21, 35:5, 7:1 17:21, 42:14
should situation somewhere
36:7, 37:7,
38:12, 39:3, 2:5, 2:6, 2:7, 10:15, 10:22, 34:19
40:10, 43:2, 2:8, 9:17, 10:7, 11:3, 16:1 soon
43:4, 43:7, 19:18, 32:11, situations 11:1
43:11, 43:15 32:12, 32:13, 11:7 sorry
41:22 six 15:6
3:10
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 68 of 161
63
speak 36:18 6:17, 7:5, 7:10, take
3:22, 8:6, states 8:12, 12:15, 8:18, 19:11,
17:18, 21:11 21:14, 34:11, 15:14, 17:19, 21:12, 27:7,
speaker 43:14 24:1 41:1
3:21, 44:19 statewide stuff taken
speakers 38:7 42:16 3:11
3:10, 5:7, stats sub taking
44:10, 44:13 19:1 43:21 15:1
specific stayed subcommittee talk
41:4, 41:19 20:17 25:11, 25:18 22:9, 36:11
speech steal subject talked
13:20 2:4, 33:22 36:4 2:20, 20:9
spoke step submitted talking
21:11 4:13, 21:13, 43:20 24:18, 36:15,
spoken 24:18 substitute 43:22
19:4 sticker 10:11, 10:12 tampered
sponsor 33:18 sue 10:10, 11:7
17:14 stiffing 37:16 targeted
stack 39:13 sued 26:19
34:15, 34:18 stifle 37:10, 37:13 tarnished
staff 6:5 summer 6:11
6:1, 6:5 still 14:16 taxes
stamp 9:7, 14:17, supervision 21:13
33:16, 33:18, 15:21, 23:11, 46:10 teachers
33:20 23:12, 27:9, support 15:14
stand 27:10, 27:11, 11:18, 14:22 technically
12:19, 13:18 28:2, 35:11 suppress 30:16
start stolen 17:6 tell
3:17, 3:18, 10:17 supremacist 19:12, 20:13,
4:1, 10:2, 10:3, stop 14:7 25:19, 27:13,
19:13, 33:8 2:15, 3:4, sure 38:2
started 28:19, 31:17 10:7, 10:13, tells
19:14 stranger 11:5, 11:15, 20:8
state 16:3 20:17, 24:6, term
2:4, 2:21, streamlined 24:20, 36:9, 34:6, 34:7
5:13, 7:4, 9:12, 41:7 41:14 terri
10:7, 12:1, strength survive 4:1
12:12, 13:6, 21:19 2:12 terror
15:11, 17:20, strike suspicious 14:22
18:15, 18:19, 31:14 29:9 test
19:3, 21:17, stronger system 14:1
28:22, 36:20 10:12 9:13, 23:8, testified
state's strongly 25:6 17:14
18:16, 18:20 15:3, 16:20 T thank
stated student table 3:8, 5:3, 5:5,
37:11 6:4, 6:19, 8:2, 25:20 7:17, 7:18,
statement 8:16, 24:3 tabling 9:20, 9:22,
12:7, 15:10, students 25:21 12:2, 12:3,
6:7, 6:12,
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 69 of 161
64
13:7, 13:8, three transcribed 28:3, 28:19,
13:10, 15:4, 3:12, 3:15, 1:22 30:16, 46:9
15:5, 17:10, 19:11, 28:16, transcriber undermining
17:11, 17:17, 29:6, 31:13, 46:1 36:5
19:10, 22:10, 42:20 transcript understand
29:18, 29:21, through 46:3, 46:10 36:16
30:3, 32:18, 2:14, 2:15, transcriptionist unfavorable
33:1, 37:4, 10:18, 20:4, 46:18 17:10
37:7, 38:18, 24:20, 24:22, transportation united
38:19, 45:10 25:5, 26:2, 16:5, 17:3, 21:14
thanking 33:2, 34:3, 28:14 universities
10:3, 10:4 34:6, 37:2, transporting 7:9
themselves 41:2, 44:4 13:16 university
8:21, 9:6 through-line travis 5:14
therefore 34:1 13:9, 13:10, university's
6:19, 15:3 throughout 13:11 6:14
thing 31:12 trimester unjust
12:1, 17:18, time 14:11 5:1
28:20, 30:20, 3:13, 3:15, true unlawful
33:18, 35:10, 3:16, 7:17, 19:5, 46:10 41:16, 42:9
35:17 9:21, 13:21, trust until
things 15:4, 18:13, 7:9, 7:11 5:7
4:9, 9:20, 19:12, 20:13, try upstairs
19:14, 31:3, 28:10, 40:22 26:16 24:20, 25:5,
39:7 times trying 33:17, 39:1
think 38:2, 42:21 2:3, 2:15, urge
9:2, 9:19, today 9:18, 28:19, 13:4, 16:20
10:10, 10:11, 3:22, 8:6, 29:1, 33:19, urgency
10:12, 11:4, 8:15, 12:7, 33:22, 34:17, 18:22
11:13, 11:18, 12:19, 15:21, 36:5, 40:1, use
11:20, 11:22, 40:13, 43:22 40:7, 40:8 26:16
17:15, 18:1, together turn usurped
18:11, 19:18, 23:22, 26:9 3:3, 3:18 10:17
22:11, 23:18, token two
25:4, 26:12, V
16:2 3:13, 24:16,
28:8, 29:2, top valid
33:3, 33:6, 39:6 9:3, 34:18
29:13, 30:17, 20:2, 20:17, type
31:3, 31:8, 33:8, 33:9 value
18:8, 39:13 23:20, 33:15,
31:9, 31:14, tori typed
32:5, 40:10, 3:22, 4:1, 4:4, 34:3
42:18 various
41:20, 43:21, 4:5, 17:20 typewriting
44:3 total 4:9, 29:12
third 46:9 version
13:19 typically
8:6, 14:11, touted 10:12
26:14, 29:15 29:11 versus
16:18 U
thought tracking 34:15
37:22, 41:5 26:8 under veteran
threat tragedy 6:3, 9:8, 28:2, 13:17
4:21 11:11
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 70 of 161
65
veterans voter's 40:6 4:5
2:18, 35:15 42:11 wanted willing
via voters 11:17, 21:10, 28:6
13:21 2:13, 7:12, 33:2, 35:22, winston
vice 8:13, 10:6, 37:15, 38:21 20:7, 23:2,
8:4, 15:9 13:13, 13:16, wave 32:7
violation 13:19, 14:18, 2:3 within
13:2, 16:16, 14:20, 15:10, way 5:17, 11:2,
43:3 16:17, 17:9, 9:1, 11:6, 14:11, 39:6
violence 36:6, 37:1, 18:9, 34:8, without
31:17 41:18 34:10 9:2, 10:14
voice votes we'll witnessed
4:18 10:17, 11:10, 5:8, 5:9 38:18
voices 20:18, 29:2, we're woke
5:2, 36:6, 37:1 29:8, 31:21, 2:15, 3:9, 40:2, 40:3,
volunteer 38:3, 38:7, 11:7, 11:13, 40:5, 40:13
8:11 38:18 28:2, 28:19, women
volunteers voting 33:19, 35:6, 15:9, 17:9
12:9, 13:13 2:1, 6:2, 6:5, 35:12, 35:17, word
vote 6:8, 12:13, 36:13, 41:20, 30:4, 34:5,
8:17, 8:18, 12:18, 13:15, 44:6 39:22, 40:5,
9:1, 9:6, 9:8, 13:17, 14:4, we've 40:13
9:12, 9:19, 15:17, 15:19, 26:9 words
10:8, 10:9, 16:8, 16:15, wednesday 29:14
10:13, 10:14, 17:1, 17:6, 1:12 work
11:5, 11:15, 19:2, 21:15, week 12:2, 13:4,
11:16, 12:11, 25:3, 25:6, 36:9 37:12 26:9, 28:15,
12:19, 12:21, vulnerable weekend 32:6, 42:15
13:3, 13:21, 5:3 42:12 worked
14:17, 16:11, W went 23:9, 24:19,
16:14, 17:3, walk 24:20, 24:22, 39:9
17:7, 21:20, 33:2 25:5, 37:14 working
36:8, 38:7, wall weren't 39:1
40:2, 40:3, 10:1, 10:2, 27:1 works
40:6, 40:13, 30:18, 45:2 weren’t 32:2, 39:10
44:7, 44:19, want 27:4 world
44:21, 44:22 2:19, 3:1, 3:6, whatever 27:19
voted 3:9, 3:20, 10:2, 38:5 worry
32:1, 43:17 10:3, 11:6, whatsoever 28:7
voter 12:18, 13:19, 41:22 wrapping
4:8, 5:2, 7:14, 14:5, 17:19, whether 21:4
15:2, 16:7, 19:17, 21:9, 8:9, 28:13, write
16:13, 18:14, 24:6, 24:16, 28:14, 34:13 24:11
18:19, 19:1, 27:8, 27:17, white written
19:16, 20:1, 27:19, 33:22, 14:7, 14:21 42:22
20:4, 20:7, 34:22, 36:7, whoever wrong
32:10, 34:20, 39:16, 40:2, 3:1, 3:2 21:9
42:10 williams Y
3:22, 4:2, 4:4, y'all
3:11
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama House Constitution - Campaigns and Elections Committee Meeting
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 71 of 161
66
yeah 21 88
40:21, 41:14, 7:22 13:12
45:8 25 9
year 31:15, 32:4 90
8:7, 13:22 28 31:13, 34:1
year-old 1:12 91
7:22 285921 34:3
years 46:7 92
12:17, 19:20, 3 34:5
22:17, 29:3, 300 96
31:15 38:5, 38:7 34:3
young 31
5:16, 6:8, 6:10 13:12
yourself 4
3:3, 27:7, 28:2
$ 46
1:21
$5
5
28:8, 38:7
1 50
24:9, 24:15,
1 24:16
44:19 528713
1,500 1:20
27:7, 27:8, 55
28:10, 34:22 24:9, 24:16
10 56
14:21 44:4
14 59
6:13 41:1, 44:3
1500 6
26:19
1924 60
13:22 41:2, 44:4
1964 7
21:15 75
1965 38:9
12:21, 21:15 7th
2 12:21
20 8
28:13, 28:17, 80
29:6 33:8
2022 85
16:17 33:9, 34:1
2024 86
1:12, 13:22, 33:11, 34:9
46:20
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 72 of 161
EXHIBIT B
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 73 of 161
Planet Depos
Phone: 888.433.3767
Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
www.planetdepos.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 In re:
8 ALABAMA SENATE
9 GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE HEARING
10
11 RECORDED HEARING
12 Wednesday, February 7, 2024
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 Job No.: 535809
21 Pages: 1 - 63
22 Transcribed by: Lauren Bishop
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 75 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 76 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 77 of 161
1 need to adopt --
2 MALE SPEAKER 1: Mr. Chairman, I would move
3 to adopt. So, second.
4 FEMALE SPEAKER 1: I'm three.
5 SENATOR LANCE BELL: Four.
6 SENATOR TOM BUTLER: Four owns. Moves to
7 adopt Gudger's substitute, by Senator Roberts.
8 SENATOR MERIKA COLEMAN: Mr. Chairman?
9 SENATOR TOM BUTLER: Yes, ma'am.
10 SENATOR MERIKA COLEMAN: Thank you, Mr.
11 Chair. I guess I was, as a relates to the setup and
12 even the adoption of it, the sub is six pages long.
13 The original bill is four pages long. We just kind of
14 got it right in front of us. Before the adoption can
15 he literally just give us a little bit of a synopsis
16 prior to --
17 SENATOR TOM BUTLER: Yeah. If you hadn't
18 answered in, that was the next thing is for Senator
19 Gudger to give us a overview of his bill and the
20 changes in the substitute.
21 SENATOR GUDGER: I've got some opening
22 remarks I'd like to say that's all right with the
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 78 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 79 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 80 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 81 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 82 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 83 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 84 of 161
1 ballots go and how they get there once they leave our
2 control. Prohibiting ballot harvesting eliminates
3 risks and hazards that could cost you your vote and
4 it provides confidence of knowing that your ballot
5 will end up being counted as it should. By supporting
6 SB1, we recreate an opportunity to enhance the
7 security of elections in Alabama and safeguard the
8 sanctity of the voting process. Thank you.
9 SENATOR TOM BUTLER: Tari Williams?
10 TARI WILLIAMS: Good afternoon. My name is
11 Tari Williams. I'm a full-time employee with Greater
12 Birmingham Ministries. GBM is a faith-based,
13 nonprofit, social services and advocacy organization.
14 We provide voter education and lessons in civic
15 engagement and assistance with voter registration and
16 restoration and voting, as needed, among other
17 things.
18 We predominantly work with poor and low
19 come -- low-income individuals and communities
20 including those who are homeless, senior in age,
21 formerly incarcerated and currently incarcerated in
22 jail or prison. All would be severely impacted by the
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 85 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 86 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 87 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 88 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 89 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 90 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 91 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 92 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 93 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 94 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 95 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 96 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 97 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 98 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 99 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 100 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 101 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 102 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 103 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 104 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 105 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 106 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 107 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 108 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 109 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 110 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 111 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 112 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 113 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 114 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 115 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 116 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 117 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 118 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 119 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 120 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 121 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 122 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 123 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 124 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 125 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 126 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 127 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 128 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 129 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 130 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 131 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 132 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 133 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 134 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 135 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 136 of 161
1 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSCRIBER
2 I, LAUREN BISHOP, do hereby certify
3 that this transcript was prepared from the digital
4 recording of the foregoing proceedings; that the
5 recording of said proceedings was obtained from
6 https://alabamachannel.ompnetwork.org/embed/sessions/
7 285921/alabama-house-constitution-campaigns-and-
8 elections-committee; that said
9 proceedings were reduced to typewriting under
10 my supervision; that said transcript is a true and
11 accurate record of the proceedings to the best of
12 my knowledge, skills, and ability; and that I am
13 neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any
14 of the parties to the case and have no interest,
15 financial or otherwise, in its outcome.
16
17 _____________________________
18 LAUREN BISHOP, TRANSCRIPTIONIST
19 PLANET DEPOS, LLC
20 APRIL 26, 2024
21
22
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 64
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 137 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 65
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 138 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 66
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 139 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 67
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 140 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 68
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 141 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 69
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 142 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 70
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 143 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 71
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 144 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 72
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 145 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 73
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 146 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 74
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 147 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 75
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 148 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 76
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 149 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 77
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 150 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 78
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 151 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 79
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 152 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 80
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 153 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 81
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 154 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 82
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 155 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 83
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 156 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 84
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 157 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 85
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 158 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 86
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 159 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 87
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 160 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Transcript of Alabama Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearing
Conducted on February 7, 2024 88
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-2 Filed 05/03/24 Page 161 of 161
PLANET DEPOS
888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 11 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
response to the challenges posed by the mid-twentieth century Civil Rights movement and its
effectively communicated its pro-voting message by assisting voters to apply for absentee ballot
applications and ballots, including assisting eligible incarcerated voters in applying for absentee
ballots.
1
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 2 of 11
4. In 2024 and in the future, GBM would like to continue to engage in its absentee
ballot application communication with and assistance on behalf of the communities it serves in the
provides emergency services to people in need and engages people to build a strong, supportive,
and engaged community and to build a more just society for all people. Though GBM primarily
works in Birmingham and Jefferson County, it seeks to address urgent human rights and social
justice needs across Alabama. Also central to GBM’s mission is increasing civic participation
GBM engages in voter education and assistance, including discussing civics with incarcerated
individuals and assisting Alabamians to register to vote, restore their voting rights, and encourage
fundamental right and is the key to advancing civil and human rights in Alabama. GBM considers
its voter assistance critical to effectively expressing its message that voting is a means of creating
political power among historically disenfranchised communities in Alabama. GBM sees its voter
assistance as contributing to Alabama’s movement for civil and human rights in a state that has
long oppressed communities of color. GBM also sees its voter assistance as conveying the message
8. As part of its voter assistance activities, GBM’s paid staff and volunteers
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 11
communicate with and assist senior citizens, people with disabilities, shift workers, formerly
incarcerated people, and eligible incarcerated voters apply for absentee ballots.
9. GBM has seven paid staff members and three current vacancies in staff positions.
GBM has approximately 2,780 members who make a financial contribution to the organization.
GBM also has over 100 volunteers who assist GBM in its different program areas. GBM’s Board
10. GBM staff and volunteers primarily work in the Birmingham area, but they also
communicate with and assist hopeful voters across the state, often working in Wetumpka,
Tuscaloosa, St. Clair, and Springville. GBM utilizes both paid staff and volunteers to communicate
its pro-voting message and assist individuals in applying for absentee ballots. Such individuals
include senior citizens, people with disabilities, and current and formerly incarcerated people.
11. GBM also conducts voter registration and voter education events on sidewalks,
streets, pop-up voting events, and at other public events. GBM may organize these events on its
own or table at an event organized by other civic organizations in Alabama. During election season,
GBM may hold pop-up events several times a week. During these events, GBM will encourage
eligible voters to vote by absentee ballot and provide absentee ballot application assistance to
voters who request assistance. As part of their encouragement and assistance, GBM staff and
volunteers will ensure that the voter is (1) eligible to vote absentee and (2) able to apply for an
absentee ballot. GBM ensures that a person is able to apply for an absentee ballot by providing
that voter with a copy of the application, pen, envelope, and stamp to ensure that the person can
fill out the application and send it to their county’s Absentee Election Manager. For example, GBM
held a community event to educate people on absentee voting in 2020, encourage eligible
individuals to vote by absentee ballot, and to assist attendees with absentee ballot applications.
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 11
This event was open to the public and allowed GBM to spread its message about the importance
12. GBM will inform the individual about absentee voting in Alabama, print the
absentee ballot application for the individual, provide a pen to assist the individual in filling out
the form, provide an envelope for voters to mail the application, and provide postage for the voter
to send the application. GBM staff and volunteers spend time reviewing the application to ensure
that all required boxes are marked correctly and completely. GBM pays for the envelope, pens,
and postage that it provides to individuals that it assists in applying for absentee ballots, as well as
13. GBM hands out snacks, branded pens, and sometimes t-shirts when its staff and
volunteers encourage and assist voters in applying for absentee ballots. GBM provides its
volunteers with pens, paper, t-shirts, gas stipends, and food when they participate in voter
registration and civic education drives. GBM pays for all of the supplies that it gives its volunteers
14. Senior citizens, people with disabilities, and others in need come to GBM for food,
financial assistance, and clothing assistance. GBM conducts a free clothing distribution twice per
week and organizes food distribution twice per month to assist those in need in the Greater
Birmingham area. GBM also provides financial assistance once a month, which sometimes leads
to questions about voting. GBM will discuss and encourage absentee voting in Alabama—
including by providing absentee ballot application assistance to eligible people—when they come
15. GBM also provides free materials acquired through donations that are needed by
these individuals for their health and well-being, including medical devices such as oxygen
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 11
machines and other items such as walkers, wheelchairs, and compression socks. GBM also
provides referrals to other organizations for other necessary sources. During these interactions,
GBM has discussed and encouraged voting by absentee ballot with individuals and assisted these
individuals with absentee ballot applications, which they require because of health and/or mobility
issues.
16. GBM specifically works to reach voters across the state who have past felony
convictions to register them to vote, if eligible, or to assist them in restoring their voting rights.
Once a person with a past felony conviction is registered to vote, GBM will inform them about
absentee voting in Alabama and assist that person in applying for an absentee ballot, if they request
that assistance. Assisting these voters is a critical part of GBM’s work to encourage voting among
every eligible individual; in GBM’s experience, many people mistakenly believe that any felony
17. GBM holds voter registration events around the state where they also discuss
absentee voting and assist with absentee ballot applications on behalf of formerly incarcerated
individuals. These events include second chance job fairs, expungement clinics, drug court, and
tabling on sidewalks outside of ABPP field offices. At these events, GBM provides absentee ballot
applications, as well as other provisions to help assist individuals with filling out those
applications, including a pen, envelope, and postage. At these events, GBM volunteers often wear
18. GBM also works with students from the University of Alabama on a program called
Return My Vote (“RMV”) to help register and assist voters with prior felony convictions in
applying for absentee ballots. Together, GBM and RMV encourage voting and distribute voter
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 6 of 11
to Vote (“CERV”) applications. GBM and RMV then help individuals fill out these applications
and provide postage. GBM also has a hotline where people make calls to inquire about voter
19. GBM regularly does this re-entry voting work in partnership with other civic
organizations, including the League of Women Voters of Alabama, Faith in Action Alabama, the
NAACP, and others. These partnerships are one way that GBM associates with other organizations
in order to amplify shared values of promoting equal participation in democracy and share their
pro-voting message.
incarcerated in Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women (“Tutwiler”) and St. Clair Correctional Facility
(“St. Clair”), as well as Birmingham County and City Jails. GBM assists those incarcerated
individuals in voter registration, voting rights restoration, and absentee ballot application
assistance. GBM visits Tutwiler once or twice per month to encourage democratic participation
and distribute absentee ballot applications and CERV applications. GBM successfully assisted 10
women in submitting applications for absentee ballots for the March 2024 presidential primary
election.
21. GBM seeks to expand its prison voting work across Alabama in 2024 and beyond,
fostering relationships in other prisons and expanding its voter education and assistance programs
in Tutwiler and St. Clair. For example, GBM participated in a job fair at the Bibb Correctional
Facility job fair on April 25, 2024. GBM provided information about voter restoration and
22. Without our encouragement and assistance, many voters would be unable to apply
for absentee ballots. In particular, we are often the primary people that incarcerated voters have
6
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 7 of 11
assisting them with their absentee ballot applications. Because incarcerated voters are only able to
vote by absentee ballot (Alabama does not provide jail- or prison-based voting sites), such voters
have considered our absentee ballot application assistance a lifeline to exercising their right to
vote. Likewise, many voters with disabilities cannot vote without someone assisting them in filling
out and submitting the application. Many voters with disabilities who come to GBM for full-
service assistance also choose to have GBM assist them with their absentee ballot applications.
Now in its 55th year, GBM is well-known and greatly respected by Alabamians for its voting work,
23. GBM performs this work as a part of its larger organizational mission to promote
civil rights in Alabama. GBM considers absentee ballot application assistance to be a public
expression of its core value that voting is the key to advancing civil rights.
24. As a result of SB 1, GBM does not know which of its absentee ballot application
assistance communications and activities are lawful and which are not. This has prevented GBM
from being able to effectively plan its get-out-the-vote and public education events ahead of the
November 2024 general election. GBM staff and members, including myself, feel threatened by
the risk of criminal prosecution simply for helping voters lawfully apply for absentee ballots.
25. GBM has begun diverting time to understand which communications and activities
are lawful because GBM does not want to expose its staff, interns, and volunteers to possible
criminal prosecution. This has included spending hours reviewing SB 1 and its amendments,
listening to and attending legislative hearings, spending time meeting with coalition partners to
discuss SB1, and more. GBM has been forced to spend considerable time creating alternative plans
for its voting work inside correctional facilities, which has been a major programmatic priority.
7
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 8 of 11
GBM had been planning for over two years to ramp up its work inside jails and prisons across
Alabama to encourage and assist eligible individuals with absentee voting. To this end, GBM was
awarded a grant in September 2023 to support this programming, which GBM began earlier this
year in Tutwiler. GBM can no longer proceed with plans to train volunteers on absentee ballot
assistance, including a law student whose summer externship was intended to include work inside
Tutwiler encouraging and assisting eligible voters to request absentee ballots. GBM cannot risk
exposing student volunteers to felony prosecution under SB 1. GBM wants to assist Alabamians
with applying for absentee ballot applications and with casting absentee ballots successfully in the
November 2024 general election, as well as in future elections. GBM particularly wishes to
provide this assistance for the eligible incarcerated voters it encourages to participate in the
democratic process—who can only vote via absentee mail ballot—but SB 1 threatens GBM’s
ability to do this work. GBM staff and volunteers have a bona fide fear that they will be prosecuted
26. GBM received a grant to conduct absentee voter registration at Tutwiler Prison and
encourage democratic participation, and GBM assisted incarcerated voters in applying for absentee
ballots before the 2024 presidential primary election. GBM would like to continue this work in
advance of the November 2024 general election as well. SB 1, however, threatens GBM’s ability
to achieve grant objectives (as well as the grant funder) by threatening its staff and volunteers with
felony prosecution if they assist eligible incarcerated individuals with absentee ballot applications
and voting.
27. GBM hopes to expand their work encouraging and assisting eligible incarcerated
voters to apply for absentee ballots, both by adding more staff and by expanding the project to
other correctional facilities, including St. Clair Prison, the Bibb Correctional Facility, and federal
8
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 9 of 11
prisons. As noted, for incarcerated individuals who are eligible to vote, their only option is to vote
by absentee ballot. These individuals cannot complete the absentee ballot application process
without the assistance of a third party (such as a GBM employee or volunteer) who prints the
application, provides the pen needed to fill out the application, provides the envelope required to
mail the application, and provides the postage required to mail the application. It is even possible
that prison or jail officials and chaplains could face liability from providing application assistance
for eligible incarcerated voters since they receive a salary to do their work. In the past, GBM has
filled a critical gap by ensuring that eligible incarcerated voters can vote by registering for an
absentee ballot. Now this assistance risks criminal prosecution of GBM staff and volunteers under
SB 1. And if GBM or other similar organizations do not assist incarcerated voters with absentee
ballots, those individuals will be unable to exercise their fundamental right to vote.
28. SB 1 has already impacted our ability to encourage and assist eligible voters with
applying for absentee ballots and to educate the public on voting. GBM no longer brings absentee
ballot applications into Tutwiler Prison, which means that GBM staff and volunteers are unable to
assist eligible incarcerated voters apply to vote absentee. GBM recently held a training in Mobile
in April 2024 for voting rights restoration and voter registration advocates and community
members, but could not include information on absentee ballot application assistance because SB
1 does not clearly state what communication and assistance is lawful and we do not want to risk
29. GBM creates and distributes election guides that include information on applying
for and voting by absentee ballot. Because of SB 1, GBM has held off on distributing its 2024
guides in case the information regarding absentee ballot assistance is incorrect. GBM does not,
9
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 10 of 11
itself, understand what activities are criminalized under SB1, and does not want others prosecuted
30. GBM also engages in online civic education through our Power of Participation
workshops. These modules include information on applying for and voting by absentee ballot.
Prior to SB 1, GBM partnered with the Birmingham Municipal Court to offer civic education
training online, which allowed participants to receive community service hours that counted
towards requirements from their criminal cases. Due to SB 1, GBM does not plan to restart this
program because it does not have the time, resources, or clarity on the law to amend its modules.
31. GBM has recruited new members at our voting events in the past. Members of the
public often express an interest in becoming more involved with GBM’s work and helping with
future events. GBM has many volunteers who are not members (because they did not make a
financial contribution), but instead help GBM occasionally. SB 1 will limit GBM’s ability to
recruit new volunteers and may lead current volunteers to quit because they fear felony
prosecution.
32. SB 1 has restricted GBM’s mission of registering people to vote, encouraging their
participation, and assisting them in being able to cast a ballot on Election Day. Our constituents
with disabilities, in particular, will be affected by SB 1 because they are unable to submit their
absentee ballot applications without our assistance. There is an assisted living facility across the
street from GBM’s office; in the past, GBM had spoken with staff at the facility about assisting
residents with applying for absentee ballots. Because of SB 1, GBM is unable to reach out to and
33. SB 1 is an enormous obstacle for GBM’s work and greatly reduces our ability to
effectively convey our pro-voting message. Our staff, volunteers, and board members do not
10
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-3 Filed 05/03/24 Page 11 of 11
understand whether they can continue to communicate with voters about applying for absentee
ballots and assist them to do so, and whether they will be prosecuted for their actions if they do
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
______________________________
Scott Douglas
11
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 8 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
1. My name is Benard Simelton, and I am the President of the Alabama State Conference of
the NAACP (“Alabama NAACP”). I have served in this role since October 2009. The Alabama
2. The Alabama NAACP is the state conference of the National Association for the
membership organization with nearly 5,000 members residing in the State. Members of the
Alabama NAACP pay annual dues. Approximately 95% of members identify as Black and most
are lawfully registered voters. The Alabama NAACP oversees 35 branches and approximately 10
youth and college units of the NAACP in Alabama (collectively “units”), and all members of local
3. The Alabama NAACP’s leadership includes the statewide Executive Committee as well as
the leadership of local NAACP units throughout Alabama. The Alabama NAACP’s work is led by
unpaid members, such as my role as President, who staff and carry out the Alabama NAACP’s
voter engagement and education programming across the state. Paid staff and consultants also
4. Individual members include Black registered voters who are senior citizens, disabled,
students, undereducated, and others who require assistance with the absentee voting process,
including their absentee ballot applications. Some Alabama NAACP members also serve as
assistors to such voters. The Alabama NAACP has assisted voters with absentee ballot applications
5. The Alabama NAACP is the oldest and most significant civil rights organization in
Alabama. The mission of the Alabama NAACP is to ensure the political, educational, social, and
economic equality of Black Americans and all other Americans and to eliminate racial
discrimination in the democratic process. Our objectives include seeking the enforcement of
federal laws and constitutional provisions securing civil rights, as well as educating members and
6. Voting and encouraging voting are foundational values of the Alabama NAACP. To that
end, the Alabama NAACP conducts advocacy to safeguard equal access to the vote, as well as
robust voter education and engagement programs to communicate and advance our views about
the importance of participating in the political process by voting, including by absentee voting if
eligible. The Alabama NAACP’s voter education and engagement programs seek to engage
Alabamians including those who are Black, elderly, disabled, students, undereducated,
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 8
incarcerated, or others who are less likely to be engaged in the political process and need assistance
to participate in elections.
7. Voter assistance activities, including absentee ballot application assistance, are a core part
of the Alabama NAACP’s voter education and engagement communications and programming
8. Volunteers receive training and materials before participating in voter education and
engagement events where they will be communicating the Alabama NAACP’s pro-voting message
by registering people to vote and assisting voters with their absentee ballot applications.
Volunteers may also receive branded t-shirts, buttons, or pens as well as snacks/food and water.
9. To communicate our civic engagement message through our voter education and
engagement work, the Alabama NAACP organizes in-person and virtual town hall meetings.
During these events, we communicate the importance of voting through registering eligible
Alabamians and providing information on the voting process, including by answering questions
about in-person and absentee voting. Additionally, the Alabama NAACP hosts and participates in
10. At town hall meetings or campus events, the Alabama NAACP encourages eligible
individuals to vote and has provided absentee ballot applications and assisted voters with
halls and campus events where we assist voters with their absentee ballot applications, we often
provide water and snacks/food, and provide branded materials to assistors and other attendees.
11. Local units of the Alabama NAACP also host events where volunteers express our pro-
voting message by helping to register Alabamians to vote, sharing voter education materials, and
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 8
providing absentee application assistance. For example, the Limestone County Branch of the
Alabama NAACP hosted a public Drive-Thru Voter-Registration, Voter Education, and Photo ID
event where volunteers assisted voters with registering to vote, updating voter information,
absentee applications, and voter restoration. Volunteers are usually given branded t-shirts to wear,
so that they are easily identifiable to voters who need their help. Volunteers at such events, which
can be several hours long, often are provided snacks/food and water to sustain them. The Alabama
NAACP often partners with other nonpartisan organizations, like the League of Women Voters of
Alabama, who share our goal of encouraging civic engagement through voter education and
engagement initiatives.
12. As part of our pro-voting encouragement and outreach, the Alabama NAACP assists voters
in nursing homes and jails, many of whom would not be able to vote without such assistance. To
encourage voters in these facilities to vote and vote absentee, the Alabama NAACP has obtained
copies of the application form from county election officials and brought the copies to the facilities.
We have also provided stamps and envelopes so that absentee ballot applicants can submit their
applications in the mail. Because disseminating physical voter education materials to voters is our
most effective means of communicating our pro-voting message to these voters and assisting them
to successfully apply for an absentee ballot, we also have provided branded materials for these
13. When SB 1 was being considered by the Alabama Legislature, the Alabama NAACP
expressed extreme concern about the criminal penalties imposed for providing assistance to other
members and the communities we serve. On February 28, 2024, Norma J. Sanders, a member of
the Alabama NAACP, testified before the House Constitution, Campaigns, and Elections
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 8
Committee about the critical role absentee voting assistance plays in our voter encouragement and
engagement work and our long history of providing assistance to voters. We explained our concern
that SB 1 will render criminal the assistance work the Alabama NAACP has historically provided,
14. The Alabama NAACP would like to continue our work encouraging eligible voters to vote
absentee and help them to do so, but now that it is enacted, SB 1 severely chills the Alabama
NAACP’s ability to conduct effective absentee voting campaigns and communicate the message
that voting should be accessible to all. Due to past targeting of our members in Alabama who
assisted absentee voters, the fears of criminal prosecution and liability of current Alabama NAACP
15. Indeed, SB 1 already has restricted the Alabama NAACP’s work. In the 2024 primary
elections earlier this year, the Alabama NAACP refrained from providing any absentee application
assistance, including for residents of nursing homes, because we felt threatened by the uncertainty
of SB 1’s language and did not want to put our members or anyone else at risk of prosecution.
16. The Alabama NAACP had planned to encourage eligible voters among our members and
the communities we serve to participate in the November 2024 general election by requesting an
absentee ballot. Due to SB 1, however, The Alabama NAACP has directed all local units to not
assist with the absentee application process, due to SB 1’s prohibitions. We do not plan to assist
voters with the absentee application process for the November 2024 general election, curtailing
this expression of our pro-absentee voting message. We will no longer provide absentee
applications or assistance in nursing homes, jails, and colleges and universities or at town halls.
17. Instead, as a result of SB 1, the Alabama NAACP must expend time and resources to try
to understand what conduct is and is not prohibited under the law and provide local units and
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 6 of 8
members with guidance regarding the same. Because the Alabama NAACP’s voter outreach work
is conducted by volunteers, the Alabama NAACP also will need to devote considerably more time
and resources into ensuring that our volunteers going forward receive training regarding SB 1’s
prohibitions to ensure that they do not risk committing a crime. We will need to produce new
training and materials for volunteers and produce new voter education materials. The burdens
caused by SB 1 also mean the Alabama NAACP will no longer be able to effectively engage in
our pro-absentee voting activities. We will be forced to divert resources away from absentee
application assistance and towards other forms of voter engagement communications aimed voter
education, voter registration, and getting out the vote on Election Day even though we know some
voters require absentee voting to participate. SB1 is a severe obstacle for our pro-absentee voting
message.
communications and activities. Without defining “gift,” “payment,” or “third party,” SB 1’s
criminal penalties will severely curtail our get out the vote activities around absentee application
assistance. It is unclear if any of the following routine activities would constitute payment or gifts:
distributing tokens like t-shirts, buttons, and pens to volunteers who assist with absentee ballot
applications; disseminating branded voter education materials to volunteers who provide absentee
application assistance; providing volunteers with envelopes and stamps to be given to voters for
the purposes of mailing their application; or supplying water and snacks/food for volunteers at
19. Further, it is unclear what kinds of absentee application assistance the Alabama NAACP
and our partners could provide because SB 1 does not define terms it uses like “prefill,”
“distribute,” or “submit.” The Alabama NAACP regularly assists voters who are elderly and have
6
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 7 of 8
a physical impairment or low literacy skills with completing their absentee ballot applications.
Under SB 1’s vague “prefilling” restriction, it appears we cannot input a voter’s information into
their absentee application, even when the information is copied from the state’s voter file and at
the direction of the voter. SB 1’s vague prohibition of “distributing” absentee ballot applications
suggests that the Alabama NAACP may be prohibited from sending a link to the application to our
members or voters who join our mailing list. For certain voters, especially those in nursing homes
or jails, SB 1 suggests that the Alabama NAACP may be unable to even place their application in
the mailbox, even if the voter has a physical impairment that makes it difficult or impossible for
20. SB 1 also appears to criminalize assistance from volunteers who belong to “third party”
organizations which might include organizations like the Alabama NAACP. This detrimentally
impacts voters who have relied on our volunteers for help in the absentee voting process. SB 1 will
deter our members and constituents from requesting assistance and volunteers from providing it.
For the disabled and low literacy voters who depend on our absentee application assistance, SB
1’s burdens are an extreme impediment to their ability to receive assistance with voting.
21. I fear that if voters who rely on the Alabama NAACP for assistance do not receive the
assistance they need, at least some of these voters will forego voting altogether. Voters have
expressed concern about not being able to receive the necessary assistance to vote absentee and
the deterrent effect SB 1 will have on them from voting absentee. Members and voters who depend
on our assistance have told me that they do not know how they will apply to vote absentee or vote
7
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-4 Filed 05/03/24 Page 8 of 8
22. As a result of SB 1, Alabama NAACP has been and will continue to be forced to severely
limit our absentee voting activities, including during the particularly critical period leading to the
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
______________________________
Benard Simelton
8
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 10 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
1. I am the President of the League of Women Voters of Alabama and the League of
Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund (collectively “LWVAL” or the “League”). I have
served in this role since May 2021, and have been a member of the League since May 2017.
2. Plaintiffs League of Women Voters of Alabama and the League of Women Voters
of Alabama Education Fund, formed under Section 501(c)(4) and Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code, respectively, are nonpartisan, nonprofit, grassroots organizations that seek to
major public policy issues, and influence public policy through education and advocacy. LWVAL
is dedicated to encouraging its members and the people of Alabama to exercise their right to vote.
LWVAL was founded in 1920, created out of the Alabama Equal Suffrage Association.
3. LWVAL is a state chapter of the national League of Women Voters (“LWV”) which
1
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 2 of 10
was founded in 1920 as an outgrowth of the struggle to win voting rights for women and has more
than 500,000 members and supporters and is organized in more than 750 communities in all 50
approximately 475 members across the state of Alabama. LWVAL’s members include voters who
are over 65 years old, who are disabled, and others who are students that may need or prefer
assistance with voting, including with completing their absentee ballot application.
applying for absentee ballot applications, including senior citizens who require assistance and
6. For the year 2024 and beyond, LWVAL plans to continue encouraging eligible
assistance on behalf of its members and the communities it serves across the state of Alabama.
7. LWVAL’s mission is to protect the right to vote for Alabama voters. We believe that
every Alabama voter should be able to effectively cast their ballot. We seek to encourage the
public policy and voting. Our work builds on the history of the women’s suffrage movement, which
spurred the creation of the League of Women Voters. Since its founding, LWVAL has fought to
protect the rights of eligible voters and to expand access for those who have been left out of the
democratic process.
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 10
Alabama communities to spread LWVAL’s pro-democratic engagement message and provide voter
services. LWVAL has no paid employees or staff involved with its operation, including its voter
services. Therefore, all the time that League members devote to the League and to voter services
is entirely voluntary.
9. LWVAL has eight affiliated local Leagues across the state of Alabama that make up
about 475 members statewide. All local Leagues have a voter services team that engages,
communicates with, and educates voters. This includes assisting Alabamians with the absentee
ballot process. LWVAL offers trainings to all its members, volunteers, and state partners to better
engage and educate Alabamians on civic participation, including assistance with absentee ballot
applications.
10. LWVAL believes that voter assistance is a vital component in expressing its belief
that all eligible voters should participate in the democratic process. To that end, LWVAL provides
regular training to its local League leaders, its members, its volunteers, and to its nonpartisan
partners to assist voters in getting registered, applying for an absentee ballot, and voting absentee.
11. LWVAL does this work as a part of its mission to protect the right to vote for
Alabama voters and considers absentee ballot application assistance to be an expression of those
core values. Likewise, LWVAL uses absentee ballot application assistance as a part of a larger
dialogue about a citizen’s voting plan and the importance of voter turnout. Voter services education
and direct services events are a means to associate with its members and the larger community,
12. LWVAL members and volunteers do this work as a part of its mission to protect the
right to vote for Alabama voters, and LWVAL considers absentee ballot application assistance to
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 10
13. LWVAL hosts public civic education events to encourage civic participation and as
a central part of LWVAL’s voter services program. These events include discussion of absentee
voting and the provision of information and assistance with absentee ballot applications.
14. These events are hosted at various locations including nursing homes, college
campuses, libraries, music festivals, art festivals, food pantries, and other community events where
LWVAL members and volunteers can meet and speak with eligible Alabama voters. LWVAL’s
members and volunteers bring tents, tables, printers, printed absentee ballot applications, pens,
clipboards, papers, and any other supplies needed to further assist and educate voters to engage in
the democratic process. Specifically, LWVAL will bring printers and absentee ballot applications
to encourage and assist voters who would like to apply for an absentee ballot, and pens to help the
voter fill out the application. LWVAL members will inform voters about absentee voting in
Alabama and walk voters through the absentee ballot application section by section to ensure they
are completing the form accurately. LWVAL members and volunteers will serve as a witness for
voters submitting an absentee ballot application, if they sign with a mark. LWVAL will also make
a copy of voters’ ID to complete their absentee ballot application, if needed. LWVAL provide this
15. The League’s assistance and education includes speaking with Alabamians to help
them determine if they are eligible to register to vote, help them navigate the voter registration
form, and help them apply for an absentee ballot application if the voter is eligible to vote absentee.
16. Often at these events, as part of promoting the League’s pro-voting message, the
League will often provide “I registered to vote” or “Alabama voter” stickers or bracelets which are
branded with the LWVAL logo, and express LWVAL’s message that voters have the right to vote
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 10
and should participate in our democracy. LWVAL provides these stickers and bracelets to
participating voters when they register to vote or apply for an absentee ballot application. LWVAL
and its local Leagues often provide “Future Voter” stickers to children attending the events.
members and volunteers provide civic education and assist senior citizens who require assistance,
college students, voters with disabilities, residents in assisted living and nursing home facilities in
applying for and voting by absentee ballot. LWVAL is currently developing a strategy to better
communicate with, assist, and provide civic education to voters in rural areas, including regarding
18. Among other assistance, LWVAL members and volunteers print absentee ballot
applications for voters and provide detailed instructions on how to fill out the applications. Because
the state of Alabama does not allow voters to complete an absentee ballot application online,
LWVAL provides printed applications for voters’ respective county to convey their pro-absentee
voting message and ensure voters have the tools they need to act on the League’s message and
19. LWVAL believes that its role in providing these printed applications and detailed
instructions is critical to voters because LWVAL members and volunteers are able to provide help
and assistance to voters when the voters needs it, including when county Absentee Election
Manager offices are closed. LWVAL voter services are not limited to weekdays or business hours.
Many voters are unable to visit their county’s Absentee Election Manager’s office during their
operating hours, so LWVAL members and volunteers meet voters where they are and host voter
education events weeknights and on the weekends to better assist and educate voters on the
absentee application process. LWVAL members and volunteers also provide envelopes and
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 6 of 10
postage to submit the application, make photocopies of the voters’ photo IDs, and spend time with
20. LWVAL members and volunteers go directly to Alabama college campuses and host
voter registration drives, where its members and volunteers communicate the League’s pro-voting
message and also assist college students in completing absentee ballot applications. To do this
work, LWVAL partners with school administrators, student organizations, and other civic
organizations that share the League’s goal of encouraging democratic engagement, including
Greater Birmingham Ministries, NAACP Alabama, and ADAP to provide voter education,
including information about voter registration and absentee voting. Many Alabama college
students are eligible to vote absentee but lack the requisite information to apply for an absentee
ballot application. LWVAL partners with student organizations to provide accurate absentee voting
information to those students who otherwise would not have known they were eligible to vote
registration drives, LWVAL members and volunteers often give away stickers or pens to student
voters when assisting them in completing an absentee ballot application. The stickers include
22. LWVAL believes that having its members and volunteers go directly into nursing
homes to provide civic education and assistance is the most effective means of communicating its
pro-voting message to these voters, and in many cases is necessary where voters are unable to
come and go into the nursing homes as they please. LWVAL’s providing voter services in nursing
homes is critical to fulfilling its vision of ensuring democracy works for everyone and furthering
the League’s pro-voting message. Because these voters often cannot make it to their polling place
6
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 7 of 10
on election day, LWVAL’s work to communicate with voters who are marginalized, homebound,
incapacitated, or that otherwise require assistance and ensure they can participate in the democratic
23. To further reach voters in Alabama, LWVAL manages the Alabama section of
are informed about how to vote, including voting absentee. LWVAL will often refer voters to this
website for further information on how to apply for an absentee ballot in Alabama. This webpage
links voters to the Secretary of State’s website to direct voters to apply for an absentee ballot.
24. We believe that without our encouragement and assistance, many voters would be
unable to apply for an absentee ballot. Often, LWVAL assists voters over the age of 65 who are
hearing or vision impaired. LWVAL often serves as the main resource for these voters to turn to
for assistance with the absentee ballot application. It can also be difficult for college students to
find and complete an absentee ballot application. Because some students do not receive mail
directly at their dorm, students struggle with completing the form using their correct address.
Through partnering with student organizations and tabling at college campuses, LWVAL serves as
a critical proponent of democratic engagement by college students and resource for students
25. Through LWVAL’s registration tables in the community, members have observed
voters making mistakes on registration forms and absentee applications which could result in a
denial and ultimately in position unable to participate in the electoral process. LWVAL’s
communication with those voters can often result in those voter mistakes being corrected so that
the voter is properly registered and has their absentee application successfully processed. However,
LWVAL believes that many voters they serve, including senior citizens that require assistance,
7
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 8 of 10
voters with disabilities, and college students would be unable to submit their absentee ballot
26. LWVAL wants to continue effectively expressing its pro-absentee voting message
by assisting voters in applying for and voting absentee, especially senior citizens who require
assistance, voters with disabilities, and college students, but SB 1 threatens LWVAL’s ability to do
so. LWVAL is currently developing a voter service program targeting rural voters, but SB1 creates
much uncertainty as to what forms of absentee ballot application communication and assistance
27. As such, LWVAL has had to severely limit how the League is communicating its
pro-absentee voting message. LWVAL has informed all local Leagues that it will provide formal
guidance and training regarding absentee ballot application assistance. Because the criminal
penalties are severe, LWVAL plans to provide their members and local Leagues with guidance
before they continue communicating about and assisting voters with their absentee ballot
applications. LWVAL partner organizations are also awaiting advice from LWVAL on what types
28. LWVAL and our volunteers and members feel threatened by the uncertainty of SB
1’s provisions and fears that League members and volunteers will face felony prosecution and
conviction of a felony if they continue to help voters with their absentee ballot applications.
29. LWVAL plans to determine what communication is lawful, then conduct training
sessions solely focused on the impact of SB 1 to ensure its members and volunteers are still able
to speak with and assist voters lawfully. LWVAL plans to conduct additional training concerning
the absentee ballot process, including providing educational sessions that involve registrars and
8
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 9 of 10
circuit clerks.
30. LWVAL is an organization comprised entirely of volunteers and its resources are
finite. In order to understand what communication and assistance is lawful, LWVAL members and
volunteers are diverting time and money that they would otherwise have spent preparing for other
additional voter engagement activities that furthered the League’s pro- voting message in the
upcoming elections. LWVAL members and volunteers are having more meetings to discuss what
voter communications and services are lawful, rather than providing those voter services and
furthering the League’s pro-democracy messaging. LWVAL are also meeting with other
organizations that share the League’s goal of encouraging democratic engagement to create a
mobilization strategy for those unable to get to the polls on election day, and to ensure voters can
vote absentee in person at their absentee managers office. This mobilization strategy includes
working with other community organizations to coordinate rides to the polls for those voters that
cannot make it to their polling place on election day. LWVAL are also developing instructional
communication and assistance, LWVAL plans to divert resources traditionally used for that work
to other forms of voter engagement such as increased efforts towards encouraging in person
absentee voting, in person voting on election day, and assisting Alabamians with voter registration.
This will decrease the overall number of eligible Alabamians that LWVAL is able to communicate
with and assist, as such efforts are time and resource intensive and in person voting is not possible
32. LWVAL has had to reduce the total quantum of its speech about the importance of
voting and the availability of voting absentee as a result of SB 1. I fear LWVAL will reach fewer
9
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-5 Filed 05/03/24 Page 10 of 10
voters because of SB 1, and therefore, fewer voters will be able apply for and vote absentee, or
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
______________________________
Kathy Jones
10
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-6 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 4 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
1. My name is Nancy Anderson, and I am the Acting Executive Director of Plaintiff Alabama
Disabilities Advocacy Program (“ADAP”), Alabama’s federally funded Protection and Advocacy
(“P&A”) agency. I was admitted to the Alabama Bar in 2000. I have been employed by ADAP
since 2000 and have served in various positions at the agency in intervening years. I am currently
the Interim Executive Director of ADAP and have served in this role since February 2024 upon
2. ADAP is part of a nationwide system of P&A agencies which was created by the federal
government in 1974. The mission of the P&A system is to provide legal advocacy services to
protect and promote the civil rights, well-being, and equality of opportunity for individuals with
disabilities, including in voting. ADAP is the designated P&A for the State of Alabama. As such,
ADAP is accountable to members of the disability community and is authorized under federal law
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-6 Filed 05/03/24 Page 2 of 4
to represent the interests of Alabamans with disabilities. All individuals with disabilities in
3. ADAP’s advocacy work is funded primarily by nine federal grants, which are dedicated to
serving a particular community of persons with disabilities (e.g., persons with developmental
disabilities) or a particular issue area (e.g., access to assistive technology). ADAP also receives a
small amount of funding via private grants. In my role as Interim Executive Director, I am the
designated Principal Investigator (“PI”) for each of the grants which ADAP receives.
4. As PI, I am responsible for ensuring that ADAP complies with the terms and conditions of
each of its grants. This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that each grant’s goals and priorities
are met and that ADAP meets regular financial and grant outcome reporting obligations.
5. One of the federal grants which ADAP receives is ADAP’s Protection and Advocacy for
Voting Accessibility (“PAVA”) grant. The PAVA grant program was created under Section 291
of the Help America Vote Act (“HAVA”), which was signed into law in October 2002. The PAVA
grant is administered at the federal level by the Administration for Community Living (“ACL”).
6. ADAP receives a substantial amount of federal funding under its PAVA program to
perform its obligations under the grant. The purpose of the PAVA grant is to provide services to
individuals with disabilities within the state, and to advocate for the full participation of individuals
7. In addition to serving as the PI on the PAVA grant, I also serve as the direct supervisor of
Nicole Watkins, ADAP’s Voting Rights Advocate. Approximately 80% of Ms. Watkin’s work
involves voting rights advocacy under the PAVA grant. Other ADAP staff integrate PAVA voting
rights advocacy in the normal course of their advocacy activities though to a much lesser extent
8. Under the terms of HAVA, ADAP must use PAVA funds to promote and participate in
activities focused on ensuring the full participation in the electoral process for individuals with
disabilities, including registering to vote, casting a vote, and accessing polling places. The
activities in which ADAP engages under the PAVA grant include encouraging individuals with
disabilities to vote; providing individuals with education regarding voter registration; providing
individuals with disabilities the opportunity to register to vote; providing information to people
with disabilities about their voting rights; and providing individuals with disabilities with help in
9. As absentee voting is the only practical way for many individuals with disabilities to fully
participate in the election process – the key goal of the PAVA grant – ADAP assists individuals with
disabilities in accessing the absentee voting process. This includes informing people about and
helping them to understand absentee voting rules. A part of conveying this message and assistance
includes helping the individual to obtain and fill out an absentee ballot application, whether online
or on paper, and assisting them in delivering the absentee ballot application. Through its work,
ADAP seeks to convey the message that voting should be accessible to all, regardless of disability
status.
10. As I noted above, as PI, I am responsible for ensuring that ADAP complies with the terms
and conditions of each of its grants. This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that each grant's
goals and priorities are met and that ADAP meets regular financial and grant outcome reporting
obligations. All ACL grantees must annually report activities and outcomes in federal reports. They
are also subject to cyclical remote and onsite audits to ensure compliance with the terms of the
grants.
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-6 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 4
communication and assistance activities which ADAP undertakes to fulfill its obligations under the
PAVA grant to help individuals with disabilities participate fully in the election process.
12. SB 1 will force ADAP to forego this key pro-voting and voter access advocacy to ensure that
its staff are not subject to significant criminal penalties for simply doing their jobs. Setting aside
absentee ballot communications and assistance will gut a strategic activity ADAP undertakes to
fulfill its mandate under the PAVA grant to ensure full election participation.
13. Because HAVA precludes ADAP from using PAVA funds to engage in, initiate or
otherwise participate in any litigation related to election-related disability access, my efforts and
those of other ADAP staff related to this litigation are supported by non-PAVA funds.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
______________________________
Nancy Anderson
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-7 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 6 FILED
2024 May-03 AM 09:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Defendants.
1. My name is Nicole Watkins and I serve as the Senior Voting Rights Advocate and Outreach
2. My work at ADAP is divided into approximately 80% voting rights work (through the
mechanisms of HAVA, the Help America Vote Act), and 20% communications work. This
Declaration will focus on the voting rights aspect of my work, though there is by nature some
overlap between the two; training individuals often requires the creation of communications media
and using other tools at my disposal to create digestible and accessible content.
3. My PAVA (Protection and Advocacy for Voting Access) work includes, but is not limited
• Voter training;
• Residential and in-patient facility visits;
• Training employees of residential facilities on the voting process;
• Meeting with election officials to highlight and discuss accessibility issues;
• Attending statewide Voting Advisory Board meetings to present data and discuss
issues;
• Working with people with disabilities to assess their individual polling places for
potential access barriers;
• Training people with disabilities on available accommodations at the polls;
• Helping people with disabilities, both in facilities and in the community, to
understand the absentee ballot process; and
• Assisting voters in the application process for an absentee ballot.
4. People with disabilities who need assistance with the absentee ballot process, including
applications, require assistance for several reasons. The voter may be blind, so they would
need assistance filling out their application or ballot since Alabama does not provide these
materials in Braille. They may have mobility issues or dexterity issues and struggle to fill out
struggle to write. Many people with different varieties of intellectual disabilities need
assistance reading through the application or ballot and processing the information,
particularly since most of the information is not available in plain language format, can require
a high level of reading and writing comprehension, and can be overwhelming for people with
application either online or in hard copy, reading, understanding, and completing the fields
on the form, creating a hard copy of photo identification for inclusion with their application,
and returning the completed application back to the Absentee Election Manager either in
person or by mail. The assistance I provide with the application process, including when I
visit residents at residential facilities, can take several forms. The most basic would involve
helping a person who cannot easily read the absentee application. In these instances, I would
2
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-7 Filed 05/03/24 Page 3 of 6
read to the person what each portion of the application asks of the voter and then fill in their
responses. Other forms of assistance include walking the voter through the numerous steps
involved in applying for an absentee ballot, filling out the application, and eventually, the
receipt of the absentee ballot and the subsequent steps for sending in the ballot and affidavit
appropriately.
6. Those living in residential and in-patient facilities will also need assistance to mail
their applications and ballot and typically require help from staff to access the internet. In
most facilities, the staff would be the people mailing the resident’s application or ballot.
People in facilities often do not send their own mail or have their own mailbox. Some do not have
7. As I have alluded to above, I also provide voter education and training at these
(“ADMH”) at the Alabama Institute for Recovery (“AIR”) conference, together with ADAP’s
Voting Rights Fellow at the time, Maddy Ard. In this presentation, we trained employees on
the absentee process specifically since the residents in the facilities would be voting absentee.
Employees attending worked at various ADMH facilities, including Taylor Hardin and Bryce
Hospitals.
Mobile County in 2022 and 2023. Much of that training relates more specifically to polling
place requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act but has also included training
on the absentee process and the state laws surrounding the procedures of voting absentee.
3
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-7 Filed 05/03/24 Page 4 of 6
9. Most of my training efforts and work with voters focuses on the absentee process,
simply because most of the people we serve (individuals with disabilities) vote absentee for
10. I would estimate that around 70% of my work focuses on the absentee voting process,
including as recently as the March 2024 primary elections in the state. Evaluating data from
the past several years, I have trained hundreds of voters on the absentee voting process and
personally assisted scores of individuals with their absentee applications and ballots. I have
referred multiple people living in residential facilities or mental health hospitals to voting
rights attorneys when it appears their rights have been violated. Together with other ADAP staff
members, I have trained employees of two state hospitals (Bryce Hospital and Taylor Hardin)
on the absentee ballot process and how to assist residents with voting.
11. ADAP would very much like to continue its federally mandated work to assist disabled
voters with absentee ballot applications in Alabama for the upcoming November 2024
election and beyond. But since the passage of Alabama Senate Bill 1 (“SB 1”), my
understanding of ADAP and its employees’ (including myself) personal criminal liability
under this statute includes the fact that I may be able to assist a voter but may be subject to
the misdemeanor provisions of the statute – either for placing the ballot in the mailbox for the
voter and/or depending on what the legal definitions of “submit” and “prefilling” involves. I
4
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-7 Filed 05/03/24 Page 5 of 6
have assisted voters by printing out applications (using our office printers) for absentee ballots
and then walking voters through the process of mailing the applications. I have also used my
own internet access and/or ADAP internet access to assist voters with the absentee application
process. While I understand that the current statute is not yet being enforced, in the future,
this would also leave ADAP and its staff legally vulnerable to felony liability depending on
how “payment” and “gifts” as well as the word “distribute” are legally defined under the
statute. I understand that, as an employee of ADAP, the mere fact of receiving a salary could
subject me to criminal liability if I were to continue helping disabled voters with their absentee
applications. I am extremely fearful of these criminal penalties and they are likely to foreclose
ADAP’s ability to engage in absentee ballot assistance for disabled and blind voters who
depend on it.
12. I have received questions about SB 1 from a wide variety of groups, nonprofit
organizations, and individuals with disabilities since its passage. People have asked for
guidance specifically on voter assistance, including many parents of older children with
disabilities who are of voting age. Caregivers, both familial and professional, have asked for
guidance on how to assist a disabled client with the absentee application and ballot process.
There is significantly heightened anxiety around the bill and concern about the potential for
breaking the law and what consequences these individuals might face.
13. Also since the passage of SB 1, a large portion of my professional time has been
devoted solely to SB 1 and questions around the new law. I have been fielding emails and
calls from concerned individuals in the disability community for several weeks now. When I
have trained disabled individuals in the community since the passage of the bill, I always
5
Case 2:24-cv-00420-RDP Document 34-7 Filed 05/03/24 Page 6 of 6
receive several questions about the bill and concerns from community members about what
the law means for either themselves or their disabled loved ones.
14. Under SB 1, it appears ADAP is unable to provide voters with the kinds of assistance
in the absentee ballot process outlined elsewhere in this declaration and will not be able to do
so while the law is in place. I, as the Senior Voting Rights Advocate, will personally be
violating the terms of my professional role and the required deliverables for my federal
funding stream under the Help America Vote Act. More significantly, people with disabilities
in Alabama will lose access to secure, nonpartisan, and federally funded assistance with the
voting process. People with disabilities in Alabama (and throughout the United States)
already vote in much more limited numbers than the non-disabled population. Limiting
assistance with the voting process available to these individuals with disabilities will mean
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
______________________________