Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Assessing The Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data Principles and Practices Third Editon Edition Congalton Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Assessing The Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data Principles and Practices Third Editon Edition Congalton Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/assessing-the-accuracy-of-
remotely-sensed-data-principles-and-practices-third-edition-kass-
green/
https://textbookfull.com/product/classification-methods-for-
remotely-sensed-data-second-edition-brandt-tso/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computer-processing-of-remotely-
sensed-images-5th-edition-paul-m-mather-magaly-m-koch/
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-emulsions-principles-
practices-and-techniques-third-edition-mcclements/
Welding : principles and practices Bohnart
https://textbookfull.com/product/welding-principles-and-
practices-bohnart/
https://textbookfull.com/product/graphic-design-school-the-
principles-and-practices-of-graphic-design-calvert/
https://textbookfull.com/product/principles-of-data-science-
third-edition-a-beginners-guide-to-essential-math-and-coding-
skills-for-data-fluency-and-machine-learning-sinan-ozdemir/
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-allergens-best-practices-
for-assessing-managing-and-communicating-the-risks-1st-edition-
tong-jen-fu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biological-safety-principles-
and-practices-byers/
Assessing the Accuracy of
Remotely Sensed Data
Principles and Practices, Third Edition
Assessing the Accuracy of
Remotely Sensed Data
Principles and Practices, Third Edition
by
Russell G. Congalton and Kass Green
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have
been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility
for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to
trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if
permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged,
please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, with-
out written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration
for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate
system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Chapter 1 Introduction...........................................................................................1
Why Map?.............................................................................................1
Why Assess the Accuracy of a Map?....................................................1
Types of Map Accuracy Assessment.....................................................2
Critical Steps in Accuracy Assessment................................................. 3
Organization of the Book...................................................................... 4
vii
viii Contents
Foreword................................................................................................................ 254
ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data............... 255
Annex A Background and Justifications (Informative).................................... 271
Bibliography.......................................................................................................... 311
Index....................................................................................................................... 319
Preface
Our ability to map and monitor our earth using remotely sensed data has improved
rapidly over the last decade since the second edition of this book was published.
These advancements include amazing leaps forward in microelectronics, digital sen-
sor technology, object-based analysis, sensor platforms, machine learning, and cloud
computing. Therefore, the principles and especially the practices for assessing the
accuracy of these maps created from remotely sensed data have also continued to
develop and mature. The first edition of this book, published in 1999, had only eight
chapters. The second edition, published about 10 years later, expanded to 11 chap-
ters, including the very significant addition of a new chapter on positional accuracy.
This third edition contains 15 chapters, including a new chapter on better planning
for an assessment, a thoroughly revised positional accuracy chapter, a new chapter on
object-based accuracy assessment, two case studies (a polygon-based assessment of
an object-based classification map and a more classic example), and a new summary
chapter with helpful bullets emphasizing key issues. While it presents the salient
principles needed to conduct a valid accuracy assessment, the strength of this book
is the thorough presentation and discussion of the practical considerations that must
be understood for a geospatial analyst to conduct a successful assessment. These
concepts are also important for the map user to understand so as to make effective
use of any map. Not every method or approach or descriptive measure suggested
in the literature is covered here. Rather, this book is written for those who wish to
conduct a valid and successful assessment of a map to better understand the errors,
limitations, and usefulness of that map and for those who wish to be effective users
of the map. As such, this book emphasizes the practical considerations, tradeoffs,
and decisions that must be deliberated at the beginning of a mapping project and the
awareness that must be maintained throughout the project and during the accuracy
assessment. The authors have conducted many map accuracy assessments over the
last 35 years and have faced every possible situation, limitation, and difficulty imag-
inable (and some that were unimaginable). It is our hope that this book provides you
with the guidance and encouragement necessary to be successful, whether you are
assessing the accuracy of a map or using the map for a specific objective and needing
to understand its accuracy.
xiii
Acknowledgments
Every book is the responsibility of the authors but comes from a collection of ideas,
encouragement, and suggestions of countless others. By the time a third edition of a
book is published, there are many people to thank and acknowledge. The first edi-
tion of this book was inspired by Dr. John Lyon and dedicated to Dr. Roy Mead. In
addition, we are especially thankful to Dr. John Jensen, Dr. Greg Biging, Dr. Tom
Lillesand, Dr. Jim Smith, Mr. Ross Lunetta, Mr. Mike Renslow, Dr. George Lee, and
Dr. Jim Campbell for their positive feedback and support. The second edition added
a very significant chapter on positional accuracy with the help of Drs. George Lee,
Greg Biging, and Dave Maune.
This chapter has been significantly revised in the third edition with signifi-
cant input from Dr. Qassim Abdullah. Thanks also to the American Society for
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) for allowing the publication of the
new positional accuracy standards as an appendix in this edition. We would also
like to thank Dr. Michael Kearsley of the National Park Service for allowing us to
include the Grand Canyon National Park vegetation map accuracy assessment as a
case study in this edition.
Along this 30-year adventure, many colleagues at Pacific Meridian Resources,
Space Imaging Solutions, Fugro-Earthdata, Dewberry, Tukman Geospatial, and
Sanborn Solutions, as well as numerous graduate students in the Department of
Natural Resources and the Environment at the University of New Hampshire, helped
make all the editions of this book better.
Significant contributions to this third edition were made by Mark Tukman of
Tukman Geospatial, Dr. J.B. Sharma from the University of North Georgia, and
Chad Lopez of Dewberry. Kamini Yadav, Heather Grybas, and Ben Fraser, gradu-
ate students at the University of New Hampshire, also contributed extensively to
this edition. We also gratefully acknowledge all of our friends and colleagues in the
geospatial community who inspired and encouraged us on many occasions. Finally,
we would like to thank our families for the time they managed without us while we
worked on this book.
xv
Authors
Russell G. Congalton is Professor of Remote Sensing and GIS in the Department
of Natural Resources and the Environment at the University of New Hampshire. He
is responsible for teaching courses in geospatial analysis, including The Science of
Where, Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry and Image Interpretation, Digital Image
Processing, and Geographic Information Systems. Russ has authored or coauthored
more than 200 papers and conference proceedings. He is the author of 12 book chap-
ters, co-editor of a book on spatial uncertainty in natural resource databases titled
Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty in Natural Resources: Theory and Applications for
GIS and Remote Sensing, and co-author of five books, including Imagery and GIS:
Best Practices for Extracting Information from Imagery, published by Esri in 2017.
Russ served as president of the ASPRS in 2004–2005, as the National Workshop
Director for ASPRS from 1997 to 2008, and as editor-in-chief of Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing from 2008 to 2016. He was elected a Fellow in
2007 and an Honorary Member in 2016.
Dr. Congalton received a BS (Natural Resource Management) from Rutgers
University in 1979. He earned an MS (1981) and a PhD (1984) in remote sensing
and forest biometrics from Virginia Tech. In addition to his academic position, Russ
served as chief scientist of Pacific Meridian Resources from its founding in 1988
until 2000 and then as chief scientist of Space Imaging Solutions from 2000 to
2004. From 2004 until 2015, Russ held the position of senior technical advisor with
the Solutions Group of Sanborn, the oldest mapping company in the United States.
Finally, he has been the New Hampshire View Director, part of the AmericaView
Consortium, since 2007 and has served as member, secretary, vice-chair, and chair
of the AmericaView Board of Directors.
Kass Green’s experience spans 30 years of managing and supervising GIS and
remote sensing professionals for vegetation mapping, as well as leadership in GIS
and remote sensing research and policy. In 1988, Ms. Green co-founded Pacific
Meridian Resources, a GIS/remote sensing firm, which she grew to 75 employees
in seven offices nationwide and sold to Space Imaging (now Digital Globe) in 2000.
After running half of Space Imaging for 3 years, Ms. Green decided to focus her
career on challenging remote sensing mapping and policy projects for public agen-
cies, development organizations, and nongovernmental organizations. Over the last
10 years, Ms. Green has had the pleasure of using object-oriented techniques to cre-
ate detailed vegetation maps of Grand Canyon National Park, the national parks of
Hawaii, and Sonoma County, California from high-resolution optical imagery, lidar
data, Landsat imagery, and multiple other data sets. Her work also includes inter-
national market studies and strategy papers for organizations such as the Omidyar
Network, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the UK Department of
International Development (DFID).
xvii
xviii Authors
Ms. Green is a fellow and a lifetime honorary member of ASPRS and a past
president of both Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors
(MAPPS) and ASPRS. She is the principal author of a recently published text for
Esri Press titled Imagery and GIS: Best Practices for Extracting Information from
Imagery. Ms. Green chairs NASA’s Earth Science Applications Committee, co-
founded and chaired the Department of the Interior’s Landsat Advisory Group, and
participated in the Landsat Science Team from 2013 to 2017 as an ex officio member.
1 Introduction
WHY MAP?
The earth’s resources are scarce. As we continue to add more people to the earth,
the scarcity of resources increases, as does their value. From land use conversion
throughout the world, to fragmentation of tropical bird habitat, to polar bear habitat
loss in the Arctic, to the droughts in Africa, and wars worldwide, people have signifi-
cantly affected the resources and ecosystems of the world. The ever-increasing world
population and need for all types of resources continue to cause the price of these
resources to increase and to intensify conflicts over resource allocation.
As resources become more valuable, the need for timely and accurate information
about the type, quantity, and extent of resources multiplies. Allocating and managing
the earth’s resources requires accurate knowledge about the distribution of resources
across space and time. To efficiently plan emergency response, we need to know
the location of roads relative to fire and police stations, hospitals, and emergency
shelters. To improve the habitat of endangered species, we need to know what the
species habitat requirements are, where that habitat exists, where the animals exist,
and how changes to the habitat and surrounding environments will affect species
distribution, population, and viability. To plan for future developments, we need to
know where people will work, live, shop, and go to school. To grow enough food for
an ever-increasing population, we need information about the spatial distribution
and yields of our agricultural regions. Because each decision (including the decision
to do nothing) impacts (1) the status and location of resources and (2) the relative
wealth of individuals and organizations who derive value from the resources, know-
ing the location of resources and how they interact spatially is critical to effectively
managing those resources and ourselves over time.
1
2 A ssessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data
of the map, but the map is 100% accurate, you will be able to travel to your forest
lakeside location and, in fact, find yourself in a nice picnic spot. However, if the map
is not spatially accurate, you may find that your picnic location falls in the middle of
the lake rather than on the shore; and if the map is not labeled correctly (i.e., themati-
cally accurate), you may find yourself in a city next to a fountain or in an agricultural
field next to an irrigation ditch. Conversely, if you know the accuracy of the map,
you can incorporate the known expectations of accuracy into your planning and
create contingency plans in situations when the accuracy is low. This type of knowl-
edge is critical when we move from our lighthearted picnic example to more critical
decisions such as endangered species preservation, resource allocation, feeding our
growing populations, peace-keeping actions, and emergency response.
There are many reasons for performing an accuracy assessment. Perhaps the sim-
plest reason is curiosity—the desire to know how good a map you have made. In
addition to the satisfaction gained from this knowledge, we also need or want to
increase the quality of the map information by identifying and correcting the sources
of errors. Third, analysts often need to compare various techniques, algorithms, ana-
lysts, or interpreters to test which is best. Also, if the information derived from the
remotely sensed data is to be used in some decision-making process (i.e., geographic
information system [GIS] analysis), then it is critical that some measure of its qual-
ity be known. Finally, it is more and more common that some measure of accuracy
is included in the contract requirements of many mapping projects. Therefore, valid
accuracy is not only useful but may be required.
Accuracy assessment determines the quality of a map created from remotely
sensed data. Accuracy assessment can be qualitative or quantitative, expensive or
inexpensive, quick or time-consuming, well designed and efficient, or haphazard.
The goal of quantitative accuracy assessment is the identification and measurement
of map errors so that the map can be as useful as possible to the persons using it to
make decisions.
The central purpose of this book is to present the necessary theory and principles
for conducting a quantitative accuracy assessment along with the practical consider-
ations of how to effectively and efficiently design and implement such an assessment.
Throughout the book, we emphasize that no one single recipe exists for conducting
an accuracy assessment. Just as there is no one way to produce a map; there is no one
way to assess the accuracy of a map. Instead, this book will teach you to consider
every aspect of a mapping project and to design and implement the best possible
assessment given the strengths and limitations of each mapping project you conduct,
fund, or rely on. This book is not written to be an academic review of every possible
idea or method ever published on map accuracy assessment. Instead, it is written for
the geospatial analyst who wishes to best conduct a valid and effective assessment
of their particular mapping project. As such, the considerations and limitations of
such an assessment are emphasized here to best lead the analyst through the process.
measures how far a spatial feature on a map is from its true or reference location on
the ground (Bolstad, 2005). Thematic accuracy deals with the labels or attributes
of the features of a map and measures whether the mapped feature labels are dif-
ferent from the true or reference feature label. For example, in the picnic example,
the earth’s surface was classified as forest, water, crops, urban, or barren. We are
interested in both the accuracy of the location of the features, so that we can locate
our picnic spot in a forest on the shore of a lake, and in the thematic accuracy, so
that we truly end up in a forest and not in a city, desert, or agricultural field that
was erroneously mapped as forest.
The accuracy of any map or spatial data set is a function of both positional accu-
racy and thematic accuracy, and this book considers both. However, because the-
matic accuracy is much more complex than positional accuracy, the book devotes
considerably more attention to thematic accuracy assessment.
Each step must be rigorously planned and implemented. First, the accuracy
assessment sampling procedures are designed, and the sample areas on the map are
selected. We use sampling because time and funding limitations preclude the assess-
ment of every spatial unit on the map. Next, information is collected from both the
map and the reference data for each sample site. Thus, two types of information are
collected from each sample:
• Reference accuracy assessment sample data: the position or map class label
of the accuracy assessment site, which is derived from data collected that
are assumed to be correct
• Map accuracy assessment sample data: the position or map class label of
the accuracy assessment site derived from the map or image being assessed
Third, the map and reference information are compared with one another, the
results of the comparison are analyzed for statistical significance and for reason-
ableness, and a report is prepared, which presents the methods and results of the
assessment. In summary, effective accuracy assessment requires (1) design and
implementation of unbiased sampling procedures, (2) consistent and accurate col-
lection of sample data, and (3) rigorous comparative analysis of the sample map and
reference data and reporting of the results.
4 A ssessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data
• Chapter 2 begins with a review of the history and basic assumptions of map
making and accuracy assessment.
• Chapter 3 is a new chapter in this edition and provides the reader with
frameworks for planning out accuracy assessments. An important compo-
nent of any good assessment is proper planning from the beginning of the
mapping project. This chapter aids the reader in getting started on making
an effective plan by identifying the components of the assessment neces-
sary for their project. It is expected that this chapter will be reviewed by the
analyst prior to beginning each and every accuracy assessment.
Introduction 5
* Remote sensing is defined as the collection and interpretation of information about an object from a
distant vantage point. Remote sensing systems involve the measurement of electromagnetic energy
reflected or emitted from an object and include instruments on balloons, aircraft, satellites, and
unmanned aerial systems (UAS).
7
8
FIGURE 2.1 The Cantino world map, which is a map of the known coastlines of the world, created by sixteenth-century navigators.
A ssessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data
The History of Map Accuracy Assessment
FIGURE 2.2 Map of the American Northwest created by Lewis and Clark. (From Lewis, M., et al., Maps of Lewis and Clark’ s Track across the
Western Portion of North America , Bradford and Inskeep, Philadelphia, 1814. With permission.)
9
10
A ssessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data
80.
81.
82.
“Is no remorce of lyfe, but kill, kill, kill? helasse:
Kill, kill, the English cry, and valiantly they fighte:
What hap had wee to see these mischiues com to
passe?”
“Helas, le sang de nous amis, la mort, helas:”
The maydens cry: the widowes wayle, and aged
mourne,
With wringing hands vplift, and wish them selues
vnborne.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
Iohn Higins.[1881]
[“This knight, my maisters,” quoth one, “came somwhat to late in
order.” “That is maruaile,” quoth maister Ferrers, “it seemes that hee
was forwarde enoughe in seruice.” “Yea,” quoth another, “hee came
the later home for that, and therefore wee must accept his cause.”
“How ere hee came,” quoth M. H.[1882] “hee sayes well, and like a
noble gentleman, as no doubt hee was.” “Hee should haue beene
placed,” quoth one, “after king Iames the first, king of Scots, of
whome wee spake in the yeare 1437.” “Now,” quoth I, “that you talke
of king Iames, I haue king Iames the fourth here, which was slayne
at the batayle of Brampton, or Floddon fielde, but hee is very
rude”[1883] “I like him,” quoth one, “the better: for if hee should bee
otherwise, it would not well beseeme his person, nor the place
whence he comes.” “Reade it,” quoth they, “as it is.” “Thinke then,”
quoth I, “that you see him standing all wounded, with a shafte in his
body, and, emongst other woundes, one geuen by a byll, both
deadly, to say in his rude and faithlesse maner as followeth.”]
[The lamentation of King James the
fourth, King of Scots, slayne at
Brampton, in the fiuthe yeare of King
Henry the eight, Anno Christi, 1513.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
[“King Iames,” quoth one, “wil bee misliked for his Miserere.”
“No,” quod another, “hee cryes Peccaui.” “It is to late,” quoth he,
“there is no man that will like or beleeue him.” “Than,” quod M. H. “he
is still one and the same man: for in life he was neither well liked,
beleeued, nor trusted.” “Why than,” quoth one, “if hee speake as hee
was, let him passe as hee is, and if not, let him bee mended.”
“Mended,” quoth hee, “nay, hee is paste mending, hee is to olde: for
it seemes by the copy, that it was pende aboue fifty yeares agone, or
euen shortly after the death of the sayd king: for I found therewith, in
an olde hand, the copyes of the sayd king Iames’ letters sent unto
king Henry at Turwin, and the king’s aunsweres and letters sent to
him againe, with this lamentation ensuing them: and lastly the sayd
batayle of Floddon fielde, in such verse described, with the order of
the same, and the names of the noble men, knights, and gentlemen,
which serued at the same fielde.” “That would I faine heare,” quoth
one, “it were pity that such particulers should bee lost.” “They would,”
quoth another, “pleasure not only such as write our historyes, but
also encourage our countreymen well, to the like loyall seruice of
their prince, and especially those who should finde therein of their
parents or auncestours to haue bene praysed for valure.” “I pray
you,” quoth hee, “let us haue them.” “There they are,” quoth I, “but I
haue altered the verse, which wee call Intercalaris, because the rest
else would not haue beene well liked; but of the history I haue not
chaunged one word.”]
[The Bataile of Brampton, or Floddon
fielde, faught in the yeare of our
Redeemer 1513, and in the fiuth yeare
of the raygne of that victorious prince,
King Henry the eyght.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Sir Edward Stanley in the rear warde was hee,
A noble knight both wise and hardy,
With many a noble man of the west countrey,
And the whole powre of the earle of Darby,
With a right[1935] retinue of the bishop Elye,
And of Lankeshyre men manly[1936] did fight,
By the helpe of God, and in theyr prince’s right.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
26.
2.
3.