Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hill 1965
Hill 1965
http://journals.cambridge.org/NTS
David Hill
AIKAIOI AS A QUASI-TECHNICAL
TERM
In Matthew's Gospel the terms irpo<pr|Tris and 8{KCCIOS are brought into close
association on three occasions; twice in the plural form, xiii. 17 and xxiii. 29,
once in the singular, x. 41. The purpose of this short study is to suggest the
possibility that in this Matthaean collocation the word 'righteous' possessed
a special significance as a quasi-technical term.
It is noteworthy, and in itself suggestive, that on the only other occasion in
the Gospel when 'prophets' are similarly associated with a class or group,
those mentioned are ' wise men and scribes': ' I send to you [the scribes and
Pharisees] prophets and wise men and scribes (dnroaiiAAw irpos Onas
Trpo<pr)Tas KOCI aocpouj Kcclypauiiorrsis), some of whom you will kill and crucify,
and some you will scourge.. . and persecute.. .' (xxiii. 34). These words,
which in Luke xi. 49 are attributed to 'the wisdom of God', have a forward-
looking reference: Jesus' own envoys are meant. This is confirmed by the
fact that Luke actually says that those who are being sent are 'prophets and
apostles', as well as by the fact that the fate of the emissaries is the same as that
predicted for the disciples in Matt. x. 17, 23. It is therefore likely (as most
commentators suggest) that the terms used of the emissaries reflect conditions
in the early Church. On this view, it is plausible to suggest that we have here a
reference to the two aspects of Christian missionary work, proclamation
Salomon i. 4-7; ix. 17. — Dans la Priere de Joseph, apocryphe peut-etre chr6tien, cite par Origene,
Israel est represents comme un ange qui a exist6 avant toute creature, et qui est descendu et a habits
parmi les hommes, ce qui montre qu'il 6tait identified dans cet ecrit, a la Sagesse. C'est par ce
detour, et parce que la Sagesse pouvait etre aussi l'Esprit, qu'on pourrait regarder la femme
d'Apocalypse xii comme representant aussi Israel.
1
S. Weil, La connaissance sumaturelle (Paris, 1950), p. 268.
(KT)puyna) and teaching (6ISCCXT|, SiSocaKocAicc), the former being the activity
of the TrpocpiJTai, and the latter of the aocpoi and ypocuucn-eis, i.e. the men of
understanding and the 8IS6COKOCAOI of the Jewish-Christian community.1
We now proceed to the discussion of the three Matthaean passages in which
Trpo<pf|TTis (7rpo9fiTai) is conjoined with 6(KOUOS (SIKOUOI). In the same Woe-
saying as that in which the text just discussed appears we find the declaration
that the scribes and Pharisees hypocritically 'build up the tombs of the
prophets (TOUS Tdcpous TCOV Trpoq>r|Tcov) and adorn the monuments of the
righteous (T& uvr|U£la TCOV SIKOCICOV) ', Matt, xxiii. 29. It seems certain that
ol SIKOCIOI here means more than the saintly and obedient servants of God in
old time: the 'righteous' are those who, because of their piety and obedience,
were persecuted, even to the death: they are the martyrs of the Old Testa-
ment who sealed their testimony to righteousness with their blood. Now in
the Biblical understanding of 'martyrs' and 'martyrdom' the emphasis
firmly lies on the idea of witness and witnessing: the martyrs are pre-
eminently those who have faithfully witnessed to God's truth, and the un-
favourable reception accorded to their prophetic message resulted in their
being put to death. This view has been admirably set forth by the late T. W.
Manson in his Rylands lecture 'Martyrs and Martyrdom'. 2
The prophets who are the witnesses par excellence in the Old Testament bear witness
to what they have been admitted to see and hear in the Council of Yahweh. They
are in a real sense eye-witnesses and ministers of the word. Their task is to declare
without fear or favour the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as it
has been made known to them in God's council chamber.. . . That testimony
concerns the decisions of the Almighty regarding the behaviour of Israel and her
rulers.3
Accordingly, when we interpret SIKOCIOI at Matt, xxiii. 29 to mean 'righteous
martyrs' we should acknowledge that the idea of witness, of teaching or
declaring the will and judgements of God, adheres to the term as well: the
' righteous' are those who faithfully testified and they can be reckoned among
the teachers whom Israel rejected.4
We turn now to Matt. xiii. 17 where Jesus speaks of the privilege which the
disciples have in experiencing the present reality of the Kingdom. What was
for the best men of the past only an object of faith and hope has become for
them a matter of present experience. ' Many prophets and righteous men
1
Cf. G. D. Kilpatrick, The Origins of the Gospel according to St Matthew (Oxford University Press,
1946), pp. uoff., 126; also G. Strecker, Der Weg der Gerechtigkeil (Gottingen, 1962), pp. 37-8.
Matt. xiii. 52 confirms the view that the Christian 'scribe' had a teaching function. Acts xiii. 1 and
Didachi xv. 1 f. link ' teachers' (6I6&JKCCAOI) with ' prophets'.
« B.J.R.L. xxxix (1956-57), 463-84.
3
Ibid. p . 469.
4
The term may have an even more direct reference to 'teachers'. M.-J. Lagrange, Jiuang. selon
St. Mt. (Paris, 1941), p. 449, observes that the only tomb which was an object of popular veneration
was that of Simeon the Just, and it is he (p'TXH ]1S7HB>) who is first named of the great teachers
of the Law in Pirke Aboth 1, 2.
3, then Matthew has drawn together into the one term SiKaioi the two ideas
of wisdom and of the work of instructing towards righteousness. Unlike the
'causes of offence and evil-doers', those to whom eternal bliss is promised
have guided others in the right way: theirs has been a righteousness of life
and also of action and service as teachers.
Further evidence in support of the suggestion that SiKaioi may refer to a
special class of people may be found in Enoch and in the Qumran documents.
The combination 'righteous and elect' (5IKOCIOI KOCI EKAEKTOI) is frequently used
in the Book of Enoch to refer to the company of those who will ultimately be
vindicated in judgement and enjoy the reward of blessing (i. i and often in
the Similitudes section, xxxviii. 2, 3, 4; xxxix. 6, 7; xlviii. 1; lviii. 1, 2;
lx. 13; lxiii. 12, 13, 15; lxx. 3). 1 Are these the oppressed Hasidim and their
successors? Again, in the Book of the Heavenly Luminaries (Enoch lxxii-
lxxxii) which upholds a solar year of 364 days, ' the righteous ones' who are
blessed and ' who sin not in the reckoning of all their days, in which the sun
traverses the heaven entering into and departing from the portals for 30 days.. .
together with the four which are intercalated' (lxxxii. 4) are probably a
sectarian group in Israel opposed to the Pharisaic use of the lunar calendar.
This party or group was identified (probably erroneously) by Leszynsky with
the Sadducees,2 but more recently it has been suggested that the followers of
this ancient calendar of Enoch (which is the same as the one described or
postulated in the Book of Jubilees) are connected in some way with the
members of the Qumran sect who persisted in the use of a calendar which is
akin to, if not identical with that of Jubilees.3 Uncertainty about the identi-
fication may remain, but we are only concerned to point out that the phrase
' the righteous ones (oi 8IKOCIOI) ' is here used to refer to a special or sectarian
group in Israel. Before leaving Enoch it is worth noting that in a passage
which R. H. Charles considered to be addressed to the Sadducees we find
(cii. 10 in the Greek text)—ISETE O5V, 01 SIKOCIOUVTES [IOCUTJOUS, OTTOIO: iytvsTO
CCOTCOV f] i«rraa[Tpo]<pf|. Here the meaning is 'ye who justify yourselves' or
'ye who call yourselves righteous' 4 and if Charles' hypothesis is correct, we
1
The likelihood that the Similitudes section is post-Christian is increased by the fact that only of
this part of Enoch have no fragments appeared at Qumran.
2
Leszynsky, Die Sadduzder (1912), pp. 253 ff.
3
For the discussion of the Jubilees (Enoch) calendar and its possible relation to the documents of
the Qumran sect, see A. Jaubert, ' Le Calendrier des Jubil6s et de la Secte de Qumran: ses origines
bibliques', V.T. HI (1953), 250-64, and 'Le Calendrier des Jubiles et les jours liturgiques de la
semaine', V.T. vn (1957), 35-61; J. Morgenstern, 'The Calendar of the Book ofJubilees: its origin
and its character', V.T. v (1955), 34-76; J. Obermann, 'Calendaric Elements in the Dead Sea
Scrolls', J.B.L. LXXV (1956), 285-97. The last-mentioned study warns against a too ready identifica-
tion of the Jubilees and Qumran calendars.
4
In his Sayings of Jesus, p. 295, T. W. Manson suggested that the group referred to as Opels Jcrre ol
6iKaio0vTES SauroOs Svcbmov &v9. at Luke xvi. 14 f. is wrongly identified by Luke as Pharisees: they are
more probably Sadducees, the people who call themselves Np'HS. More recently M. Black has put
forward the view that the presence of Siraicocraifaur6vat Luke x. 29 (the lawyer who wishes ' to justify
himself) may illuminate the historical situation assumed in the parable of the Good Samaritan, viz.
the feud between Sadducean Jew and Samaritan (see 'The Parables as Allegory', B.J.R.L. XLII
(1959-60), 273-87, esp. p. 287 and note 1).