Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RP Gap Analysis Rev02
RP Gap Analysis Rev02
Company:
Reviewer:
Does the company have dropped object prevention policies, in the form
2.1.1 of a standard or otherwise, that meet the specified minimum
requirements?
2.2.2 Who leads the risk assessments? How was this person deemed qualified?
How does the company measure the impact of potential and actual
2.3.1 dropped objects? Is this methodology applied to risk assessments?
What roles are identified as having the responsibility for specific dropped
2.5.1 object barriers? How is the responsibility communicated to those
positions?
What training has the Focal Point / Field Champion undergone and how
2.5.2 do they execute their duties?
How are the different zones barricaded and controlled? Under what
2.7.3 circumstances are personnel allowed in? What barriers are in place to
prevent accidental entry?
What levels of training exist for different roles in the company? How is
2.9.1 the training conducted? What is the refresher period?
What is the company requirement for Inspector competency? For Focal
2.9.2 Point competency?
3: DROPS Inspection
3.1.2 How did the company approve the competency of independent auditors?
What was the scope of the survey? Were OEM materials and all
3.1.3 modifications referenced? Was the company DROPS policy
implementation tested?
3.3.2 Does the inspection criteria meet the planned inspection criteria?
3.4.2 Are these inspections documented? How was the criteria determined?
Do levels of both internal and external analysis exist, and how is auditor
3.5.2 competency determined?
4.4.1 What is the company definition for "Routine" lifts? "Non-Routine" lifts?
How are individual lifts risk assessed to account for load path, landing
4.4.2 area, and deck layout?
4.4.4 Has a gap assessment been performed against requirements in IOGP 376?
Are engineered tool tethers appropriate for the weight of the tool and
4.5.1 potential shock load provided for work at height? Are tools transported in
certified carrying pouches?
Evidence/Justification Comments
Key:
Needs Improvement
Some Requiements Met
All Requirements Met
Not Applicable