Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Variation in Peptide Net Production and Growth Among Strains of The Toxic Cyanobacterium Planktothrix Spp.
Variation in Peptide Net Production and Growth Among Strains of The Toxic Cyanobacterium Planktothrix Spp.
To cite this article: Simone Kosol, Johanna Schmidt & Rainer Kurmayer (2009) Variation in
peptide net production and growth among strains of the toxic cyanobacterium Planktothrix
spp., European Journal of Phycology, 44:1, 49-62, DOI: 10.1080/09670260802158659
Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Limnology, Mondseestraße 9, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria
Cyanobacteria frequently form mass developments in surface waters. Populations consist of strains that differ in the
production of bioactive peptides, e.g. microcystins (MC) inhibiting protein phosphatases 1 and 2A and anabaenopeptins
(APN) inhibiting carboxypeptidases. Forty-nine strains (18 green-pigmented (phycocyanin-rich) P. agardhii strains and 31 red-
pigmented (phycoerythrin-rich) P. rubescens strains) of the filamentous cyanobacterium Planktothrix (Anagnostidis
et Komarék) were analysed for their MC and APN net production rates. These rates were compared with (i) the pigmentation,
(ii) the proportion of extra- and intracellular peptide concentrations and (iii) the cellular growth rates under standardized
laboratory conditions. Excluding the strains lacking MC and APN, the MC and APN contents varied up to 14-fold and
12-fold, each. The variation in minimum and maximum peptide content (0.32–4.51 mg MC mg1 dry weight; 0.85–10.32 mg
APN mg1 dry weight) exceeded the variation found for chlorophyll a (4.8–16.9 mg mg1 dry weight). The extracellular
proportions of MC (0–62%) and APN (0–58%) varied among strains, however, on average, proportions of extracellular MC
and APN were low (MC: 8.8 (1 SE) 1.9%, APN: 8.4 1.8%). Among all strains cellular growth rates showed a 5-fold
variation (0.07–0.33 doublings of dry weight.day1) and were found independent of the pigmentation and the peptide net
production rate. It is concluded that the MC and APN net production rate is not causally related to the cell-division cycle and
the synthesis of highest amounts of MC and APN does not constrain cell division.
Key words: cyanobacteria, cyanotoxins, freshwater phytoplankton, harmful algal bloom, growth rate, high performance
liquid chromatography, Microcystis, water reservoir
These results are in contrast to the regulation of light climate act as factors leading to the ecological
antibiotics and sporulation factors via NRPS, divergence between both life forms (Beard et al.,
which is induced or increased as growth declines 2000; Davis et al., 2003). In some ecosystems both
(Marahiel et al., 1993). For example during the species have been reported to co-occur for years,
transition from the logarithmic to the stationary for example in Blelham Tarn, United Kingdom
phase of growth in batch culture, Bacillus (Davis et al., 2003) or in Lake Steinsfjorden,
subtilis shows increased production of the peptide Norway (Halstvedt et al., 2007).
antibiotics tyrocidine and gramicidine S and the
lipopeptide surfactin. Orr & Jones (1998) suggested
that MC production is coupled primarily to cell Material and methods
division of the organism and concluded that MC Origin and strain cultivation
– although it is clearly a secondary metabolite –
Forty-nine strains (18 P. agardhii, 31 P. rubescens) were
rather displays the attributes of essential intracel- isolated from different lakes as described previously
lular nitrogenous compounds. According to this (Kurmayer et al., 2004, see supplementary material
theory the major influence of all possible environ- available at http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/
mental factors is indirect – through their effect on uploads/downloadfile.pdf) and assigned to P. agardhii
cell division and growth, whereas the direct effects (green-pigmented) or P. rubescens (red-pigmented)
on MC biosynthesis are of minor importance. The according to Suda et al. (2002). All strains were grown
specific growth rate has been used to predict the in BG11 medium under sterile conditions (Rippka, 1988)
intracellular MC content under nitrogen-limiting at 20 C and 40–60 mmol m2 s1 (Philips LTD, 36W/965,
conditions in culture (Long et al., 2001). The Vienna, Austria). A few strains have been purified
model of Long et al. (2001) implies that MC pro- axenic prior to the growth experiments (No. 70/1a, No.
duction is constitutive and MC-producing strains 160/1a, No. 12/1a, PCC 7821, No. 14/1a, No. 90/1i, No.
113/1b). In order to adapt the cells to the experimental
will always contain at least a minimal intracellular
conditions pre-cultures for a minimal duration of
MC content and a maximum content determined 3 months were established and their growth was moni-
by the nutrient saturated growth rate (for a given tored by measuring optical density (OD) at 880 nm
temperature and light growth conditions). (5-cm light path). At the start of each growth experiment
In contrast to the regulation of MC synthesis pre-cultures were diluted down to OD880 ¼ 0.01
within a strain, very few studies have investigated (3 104 16 104 cells ml1) in a total volume of
the phenotypic variation in MC content between 800 ml and aliquots of 100 ml were distributed over
strains. In a few cases large differences in MC con- eight Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml) to achieve optimal
tent related to the dry weight of the strains have growth. Cultures were grown semi-continuously and
been reported (Bolch et al., 1997; Saker et al., growth was monitored by OD readings every other
2005). For Planktothrix 10-fold and 16-fold differ- day. Because not all strains could be grown simulta-
ences in MC content related to dry weight have neously one strain (P. agardhii strain No. 32) was
included as a control strain to standardize for uncon-
been reported (Kurmayer et al., 2005; Welker
trolled factors. Each strain was tested in duplicate at two
et al., 2004). While dry weight is usually considered consecutive sampling dates.
rather inaccurate to estimate the MC content it is
completely unclear how the MC production rate
relates to the differences in growth rates among Cell harvesting
strains as well as to the differences in the produc- Cells were harvested at OD ¼ 0.1–0.15 at two consecu-
tion of other peptides. tive sampling dates, usually between days 4 and 19
In this study 49 strains of Planktothrix were ana- depending on the strain-specific growth rate. Growth
lysed for their MC and APN contents and their rates (r) (day1) and peptide net production rates
specific peptide net production rates during condi- (day1) were calculated using the formula, r ¼ (ln N2
tions of maximum specific growth (mm, sensu Kohl ln N1)/t, where N1,2 were the cell concentration/pep-
& Nicklisch, 1988). The genus Planktothrix tide concentrations at consecutive sampling days and
(Oscillatoria) (Anagnostidis & Komarek, 1988) t was the interval in days (3 days). Cells were fixed
occurs frequently in lakes and reservoirs in in 2% formaldehyde and filtered onto IsoporeTM mem-
the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere. brane filters (0.2 mm GTBP Ø 25 mm, Millipore), stained
with DAPI and enumerated using epifluorescence
The species P. rubescens and P. agardhii differ in
microscopy. A minimum of 400 specimens was counted.
pigmentation and planktonic life-form: P. rubes-
As individual cells in the filaments of Planktothrix spp.
cens is typically found in deep, stratified and could not always be distinguished, the filament length
oligo- to mesotrophic waters, while P. agardhii was estimated using the boxes of the counting grid
occurs in shallow and more eutrophic waters. (at 400 magnification). For 20 randomly selected
Chromatic adaptation has not been observed filaments the cell number per box of the counting grid
within Planktothrix (Skulberg & Skulberg, 1985) was determined and the average cell number per box was
and the hydrostatic pressure and the underwater used to calculate cell numbers. Analogously biovolume
Peptide net production rates and growth in cyanobacteria 51
was determined by measuring the diameter of 20 ran- elution of APN B (16.3–17 min), APN F (18.9–
domly selected filaments at 1125 magnification 19.5 min), APN A (20.7–21.3 min), oscillamide (OSC)
and calculating biovolume by assuming a cylindrical Y (23.4–23.7 min) and those of MCs from ([Asp,
shape. Mdha]-MC-RR (25.8–26.2 min), [Asp, Dhb]-MC-RR
Samples were harvested by filtering onto pre-weighed (26.5–26.9 min), [Asp]-MC-HtyR (32.6–33.3 min),
glass fibre filters (BMC Ederol, Vienna), dried in [Asp]-MC-LR (33.2–34 min).
a vacuum centrifuge, weighed and stored frozen at In addition standards have been used to identify novel
20 C. A minimum of 1.0 mg of dry weight of biomass MCs (35–36.1 min), the structure of which has been
was collected. Dissolved peptides were collected from elucidated as [Asp, Dhb]-MC-HtyY, m/z 1074 and
the filtrate using solid phase extraction (SPE) via tC18 [Asp, Dhb]-MC-HtyHty, m/z 1088 (R. Kurmayer &
cartridges [Waters, Sep-Pak Vac 1cc (100 mg)] according T. Hemscheidt, unpublished). Standards of the variants
to standard techniques. Cartridges were stored at APN 908 (m/z 909) and APN 915 (m/z 919) were used to
20 C. After acclimation to room temperature the identify the more rare variants APN J (18.4–18.9 min)
cartridges were washed with 10 ml H2O and 10 ml 20% and APN I (22.8–23.2 min), respectively (H. Okumura,
(v/v) methanol and peptides were eluted in 1 ml 90% B. Philmus & T. Hemscheidt, unpublished). The concen-
MeOH and dissolved extracts were stored at 20 C trations of MCs were determined as concentration
until HPLC analysis. During pilot experiments the spik- equivalents of [MeAsp, Mdha]-MC-LR (Calbiochem,
ing of BG11 medium (300 ml) with 1 mg MC-LR stan- Schwalbach, Germany). The linear regression was
dard revealed an average recovery rate of 85.6 12.7% y ¼ 1.9525x (R2 ¼ 1), where y was the peak area at
(95% confidence limit, n ¼ 6) as measured by HPLC. 240 nm and x was the injected concentration of micro-
For 1 mg of APN B the recovery rate was 99 0.4%. cystin-LR standard (mg). The concentrations of APNs
were determined as concentration equivalents of APN B
using a purified standard (Judith Blom, University of
Peptide extraction and HPLC analysis Zürich, Institute of Plant Biology, Limnological
Station) and quantification via the molar extinction
To extract MC and APN filters were cut into pieces and
extracted in 50% MeOH (v/v). Extracts were shaken for coefficient (max ¼ 225 nm, " ¼ 8833, Harada et al.,
30 min, centrifuged at 16,000 g and the clear supernatant 1995). The linear calibration regression was y ¼ 1.3169 x
was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge. (R2 ¼ 1), where y was the area recorded at 210 nm and x
This procedure was repeated twice. Pilot experiments was the concentration of APN injected (mg). Under the
showed 99% extraction efficiency after three repetitions conditions as described above the detection limit was
and optimal yields with extracting on ice and without 10 ng both for the MC-LR and the APN B standard.
sonification compared with extraction at room tempera- For chlorophyll a analysis, filters containing aliquots
ture with sonification (strain No. 40). of the cells that were harvested for peptide analysis, were
The extracts were analysed for MCs and APNs by extracted in 1 ml of 90% acetone (v/v) and grinded
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a mortar under dim light. Four ml of 90% acetone
coupled to diode array detection (HPLC-DAD). For were added and the extraction was performed in the
HPLC analysis the samples were re-dissolved in 600 ml refrigerator over night. Two ml of the suspension were
MeOH (50/50, v/v), centrifuged at 16,000 g (10 min) and centrifuged (10 min, 16,000 g, 4 C) and 100 ml of the
the cleared supernatant was injected. MCs and APNs clear supernatant were injected into HPLC-DAD using
were quantified at 240 nm and 210 nm, each using a linear gradient of three solvents: (A) methanol (80 : 20
a linear gradient from 20% acetonitrile (0.05% TFA) methanol: 0.5 M ammoniumacetate, v/v), (B) acetoni-
to 50% acetonitrile on a LiChrosperÕ 100, ODS, 5 mm, trile (90%) and (C) acetic acid ethyl ester, as developed
LiChroCARTÕ 250-4 cartridge system (Agilent, Vienna, by Wright et al. (1991). A SuperspherÕ 100 RP-18, 4 mm,
Austria). Structural variants of MCs and APNs were 250-4 cartridge system (Agilent, Vienna, Austria) was
assigned using the information obtained from UV spec- used. Concentrations in mg per mg dry weight were esti-
tra and retention times and identified by sensitive matrix mated for chlorophyll a with calibration curves using
assisted desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI- a standard supplied by DHI Water & Environment
TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) as described (Kurmayer (Hørsholm, Denmark). For determination of the acid
et al., 2004, 2005). In order to evaluate the reproduci- ratio A/Aa (the ratio of chlorophyll a to magnesium-
bility of the detection of MCs and APNs from aqueous- free phaeophytine) samples were acidified with 0.1 M
methanolic extracts via the HPLC-DAD technique the HCl according to standard protocols (Lorenzen, 1967).
following pilot experiment was performed (Welker & A/Aa 1.7, if only undegraded chlorophyll a is present
Erhard, 2007): the biomass of ten strains (Nos and A/Aa 1.0, if only degradation products of chlor-
40, 67, 77, 82, 83, 95, 101, 110, 173, 208, CCAP 1460/5) ophyll a are present.
was (i) extracted as described above and analysed by
HPLC-DAD coupled to MALDI-TOF MS and
(ii) directly analysed by single filament MALDI-TOF Results
MS as described (Kurmayer et al., 2004). This compar- Variation of peptide contents within and among
ison revealed that all of the MCs and APNs present in a strains
specific strain were detected using the linear gradient in
HPLC-DAD as described above. Further, the retention Three methods of biovolume estimation were
time and the UV-spectra were useful to identify the compared in their ability to predict the
S. Kosol et al. 52
Fig. 2. Variability of microcystin (MC) and anabaenopeptin (APN) contents within the control strain P. agardhii No. 32 and
between strains of P. agardhii and P. rubescens (n ¼ 49). The control strain was used as a reference during all experiments
to standardize for within strain variation. MC/APN content per (A) dry weight (three outliers of APN contents not shown),
(B) cells and (C) biovolume (two outliers of APN contents not shown).
to vary between zero (nine strains) and 4.5 In general, strains contained one or two struc-
0.4 mg mg1 DW (No. 82). In contrast the tural variants of MC, in two strains of P. agardhii
APN content differed significantly between three variants were found (Table 2). Strains either
species (P. argardhii: mean SE, 2.9 contained [Asp, Mdha]-MC-RR/[Asp, Dhb]-
0.4 mg mg1 DW; P. rubescens: 5.0 0.4 mg mg1 MC-RR only or [Asp, Mdha]-MC-RR/[Asp,
DW; t-test, p < 0.001), while the APN content Dhb]-MC-RR paired with lower amounts of
ranged from zero (two strains) to 7.2 0.7 mg [Asp]-MC-LR, and [Asp]-MC-HtyR. A number
mg1 DW (No. 66) in P. agardhii and from zero of strains did not contain any MC-RR but
(CCAP 1459/14) to 10.3 1.3 mg mg1 DW (No. contained [Asp]-MC-HtyR paired with [Asp]-
64, Table 1) in P. rubescens. MC-LR. The new MCs [Asp, Dhb]-MC-HtyY
S. Kosol et al.
Table 1. Strains of P. agardhii and P. rubescens analysed for their microcystin (MC), anabaenopeptin (APN) and chlorophyll a contents (mean 1SE), estimated per dry weight (DW),
per cell and per mm3 of biovolume.
Average
filament
diameter mg mm3 Dissolved mg mm3 Dissolved mg mm3
Strain (mm) mg mg1 DW Fg cell1 biovolume MC% mg mg1 DW Fg cell1 biovolume APN% mg mg1 DW Pg cell1 biovolume nc
P. agardhii
No. 28/2 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.85 0.1 39 6 1.65 0.2 nd 16.7 1.2 0.77 33.6 0.1 4
No. 66 3.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 7.23 0.9 248 42 10.3 1.4 1.7 0.3 15.5 3 0.52 0.1 21.13 4.4 3
CCAP 1459/36b 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 2.42 0.3 99 8 3.91 0.3 0 10.7 0.2 0.51 0 20.64 0.7 4
PCC 7811 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0.8 117 27 4.41 0.9 33 15 nd nd nd 4
PCC 7805 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 2.2 0.62 0 33.12 0.3 4
No. 70/1a 2.8 0 1.17 0.1 44 29 2.42 1.5 62 23 2.05 0.2 67 34 3.75 1.7 58 22 13.0 0.5 0.64 0 36.6 0.2 2
CCAP 1459/21 5.3 0.1 1.34 0.1 124 16 1.89 0.2 19 1.9 4.07 0.3 371 43 5.68 0.6 5.8 0.6 nd nd nd 4
CCAP 1459/16 5.0 0.1 1.57 0.1 148 17 2.3 0.2 0 3.65 0.3 323 22 5.01 0.3 0 nd nd nd 4
CCAP 1460/5 4.4 0.1 1.81 0.1 123 28 2.73 0.7 2.9 1.4 4.46 0.4 325 111 7.29 2.7 0.6 0.4 nd nd nd 6
CYA 126/8 2.4 0 1.93 0.4 147 8 9.7 0.5 3.8 0.6 2.13 0.1 209 67 13.79 4.4 8.0 1.2 11.1 0.8 0.28 19.16 4
No. 70 2.9 0.1 1.96 0.2 312 127 16.7 6.4 5.2 0.1 2.97 0.1 453 129 24.32 6.3 3.7 0.2 nd nd nd 2
CCAP 1459/11A 5.5 0.2 2.0 0.3 343 73 4.8 1.1 20 3 0 0 0 0 12.0 1.6 1.62 0.4 22.4 5.2 4
No. 32a 2.9 0 2.68 0.1 67 6 3.78 0.3 5.7 1.3 3.83 0.1 96 8 5.41 0.4 0.9 0.5 12.5 1.0 0.3 0 18.22 2.2 38
No. 79 3.0 0 2.75 0.1 80 4 3.54 0.2 9.4 3.7 4.05 0.7 116 15 5.1 0.6 7.8 2.4 11.0 2.4 0.33 0.1 14.87 2.4 4
No. 79/1l 2.8 0 2.77 0.3 91 14 5.09 0.8 14 6 1.78 0.4 56 9 3.13 0.5 11.4 4.6 nd nd nd 4
No. 39 3.0 0 3.19 0.2 93 9 4.75 0.4 8.0 0.4 4.75 0.2 141 17 7.19 0.7 8.3 1.7 nd nd nd 4
SAG 6.89 3.3 0 3.79 0.9 135 8 4.96 0.3 5.3 3.6 2.73 0.8 119 36 4.38 1.3 0 11.2 0 0.33 0 12.34 4
No. 31/1 2.7 0 4.46 0.4 117 9 7.03 0.5 10.5 0.9 4.0 0.5 106 17 6.35 0.9 24 2.4 nd nd nd 4
P. rubescens
No. 10 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 9.75 1.7 613 194 27.37 8.7 2.5 1.4 10.2 2.2 0.68 0.1 29 7 4
No. 12/1a 3.6 0.1 0 0 0 0 4.48 0.3 333 63 11.82 2.2 33 6.5 6.1 0.9 0.47 0.1 16.6 2.4 4
No. 40b 4.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 3.55 0.3 701 334 15.48 7 0 8.4 0.1 2.67 1.7 57.6 37.6 4
54
No. 65 3.6 0.1 0 0 0 0 4.7 1.2 300 56 10.13 1.8 33 4.3 5.9 0.3 0.61 0.4 20.4 12.5 4
No. 67b 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 7.02 2.2 772 223 31.36 8.7 3.2 3.2 7.2 1.5 1.0 0.2 40.5 13.7 4
No. 91/1b 3.7 0.1 0 0 0 0 5.34 0.6 241 48 14.81 5 3.4 1.7 9.5 0.1 0.4 0.3 18.7 2.7 4
No. 110b 3.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 4.71 0.5 276 45 10.62 1.6 4.0 1.1 nd nd nd 4
No. 119 3.6 0.1 0 0 0 0 7.1 0.9 604 153 17.46 4.5 2.5 2.2 10.2 0 1.11 0.3 32.1 9.6 4
No. 160/1a 4.9 0.1 0 0 0 0 2.56 0.2 263 125 4.18 1.8 16 2 nd nd nd 2
PCC 7821 2.9 0.1 0.32 0.1 28 3 1.23 0.1 0 3.3 0.6 295 51 12.89 2.2 5.5 0.3 4.8 1.6 0.58 25.22 4
No. 59 5.0 0.1 0.33 0.1 34 12 0.51 0.2 7.0 4.1 3.91 0.4 472 150 7.04 2.1 5.9 1 nd nd nd 4
No. 60 4.8 0.1 0.37 0 34 5 0.65 0.1 1.7 1.7 3.96 0.2 390 82 7.41 1.7 2.0 1.3 5.6 1.2 0.45 0.1 8.24 1.3 4
No. 14/1a 3.4 0.1 0.53 0 30 6 1.18 0.3 0 4.89 0.1 262 28 10.36 1.3 2.7 1 nd nd nd 4
No. 80 3.3 0.1 0.58 0 27 6 1.11 0.3 11.1 3.2 5.85 0.3 277 83 11.48 3.7 2.2 2.2 6.0 1.3 0.3 0 12.62 1.3 2
No. 108 5.4 0.1 0.71 0 nd nd 22.7 12 2.01 0.1 nd nd 28 11 nd nd nd 2
No. 21/2 4.2 0.1 0.78 0.2 100 25 2.29 0.5 2.1 1.3 4.07 0.1 498 83 11.29 1.5 2.1 0.7 nd nd nd 4
No. 90/1i 3.2 0.1 0.84 0.2 105 26 4.85 1.2 25 1.9 5.66 0.9 728 191 33.47 8.4 27 1 nd nd nd 4
No. 64 4.2 0.1 0.89 0.1 101 11 2.15 0.1 4.5 1.7 10.32 1.3 1156 129 24.66 1.7 3.5 0.2 10.1 0.1 1.12 0.0 24.1 0.8 4
CCAP 1459/24 4.7 0.1 1.36 0.4 219 33 3.88 0.6 5.5 1.3 2.33 0.3 390 58 6.9 1 0 8.2 1 1.55 0.3 28.2 5.7 2
No. 72 3.4 0.1 1.41 0.1 87 4 3.45 0.1 2.7 0.2 8.62 0.9 527 38 21.47 2.2 2.3 0.4 nd nd nd 4
No. 118 4.3 0.1 1.47 0.2 212 23 4.32 0.5 6.3 1.8 6.48 0.8 950 120 19.45 2.8 4.0 1.2 nd nd nd 3
No. 241 4.1 0.1 1.40 0.2 113 9 2.73 0.3 4.2 0.4 6.51 0.4 536 19 12.95 0.9 0 8.9 1 0.8 0.1 18.0 1.7 3
No. 240 4.5 0.1 1.69 0.1 177 31 3.53 0.6 4.2 2.4 4.56 0.5 484 118 9.68 2.2 2.8 2.8 nd nd nd 4
No. 111 3.4 0.1 2.21 0.2 225 76 8.38 3 3.1 0.5 7.23 0.5 798 335 29.83 13.2 1.8 1.1 7.5 0.4 1.07 0.6 40.3 23.6 4
No. 3 3.4 0.1 2.25 0.2 136 6 4.75 0.2 4.6 2.0 5.93 0.6 420 79 14.73 2.9 7.0 3.1 nd nd nd 4
No. 113/1b 3.8 0 2.36 0.4 105 12 3.1 0.4 2.9 1.4 6.29 1.1 322 122 9.53 3.7 4.9 1.1 nd nd nd 3
No. 247 3.6 0.1 2.41 0.3 116 17 3.78 0.5 4.2 0.3 1.97 0.2 95 14 3.09 0.4 6.2 1.1 7.2 1.5 0.36 0 12.2 0.1 4
CCAP 1459/14 4.1 0.1 2.7 0.2 212 78 5.71 2.0 6.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 9.2 0.9 0.44 0.3 12.4 7.9 4
No. 21- 4.2 0 2.92 0.4 334 25 7.18 0.6 2.8 0.6 3.74 0.5 463 109 9.86 2.3 0 10.8 1.8 1.29 0.1 27.6 2.2 2
Peptide net production rates and growth in cyanobacteria
CCAP 1459/30 3.2 0.1 3.38 0.6 185 49 7.42 2.0 4.0 0.9 6.83 2 426 180 17.3 7.2 6.5 2 nd nd nd 4
No. 82 4.0 0.1 4.51 0.4 857 399 20.6 9.2 12.3 5.1 2.82 1 442 170 10.9 4 10.5 9.2 9.0 0.3 1.05 23.56 4
Notes: Within species the strains were ordered according to the amount of MC produced (second column, mg MC per mg DW). nd: not determined.
a
Strain No. 32 was included as a control when performing the growth experiments with all the other strains.
b
Strains containing the microcystin biosynthesis gene cluster which became inactive due to mutations, for example due to the insertion of mobile elements (Christiansen et al., 2006).
c
n, number of parallels for MC/APN measurements.
55
S. Kosol et al.
Table 2. Proportion of intracellular microcystin (MC) and anabaenopeptin (APN) variants (mean 1 SE) in P. agardhii and P. rubescens strains.
P. agardhii
No. 28/2 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 66 0 0 0 0 0 63.7 5.5 0 36.3 5.5 0 0 0
CCAP 1459/36 0 0 0 0 0 22.0 2.1 0 32.5 0.6 17.0 0.9 0 28.6 2.2
PCC 7811 0 0 0 0 0 13.1 0.7 0 35.2 1.6 12.9 1.3 0 38.7 1.6
PCC 7805 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 70/1a 0 91.0 9.0 0 9.0 9.0 0 34.3 0.7 0 32.6 6.9 33.1 6.2 0 0
CCAP 1459/21 0 100 0 0 0 0 90.3 0.3 0 0 7.9 0.3 0 1.8 0.2
CCAP 1459/16 0 0 71.7 1.7 28.3 1.7 0 89.1 1.4 0 0 9.7 0.7 0 1.1 0.7
CCAP 1460/5 0 0 76.0 1.8 24.0 1.8 0 86.1 0.5 0 0.3 0.2 11.5 0.6 0 2.2 0.5
CYA 126/8 71.0 1.7 0 0 29.0 1.7 0 0 37.9 1.6 0 0 62.1 1.6 0
No. 70 0 84.2 0.6 0 15.8 0.6 0 33.3 5.0 0 35.3 8.9 31.3 3.9 0 0
CCAP 1459/11A 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 32 73.7 0.3 0 0 26.3 0.3 0 24.9 1.1 0 44.2 2.0 27.9 0.9 0 3.0 0.3
No. 79 84.8 0.6 0 0 15.2 0.6 0 16.1 1.9 0 4.3 0.4 28.3 5.3 0 51.3 5.6
No. 79/1l 82.2 0.7 0 0 17.8 0.7 0 28.8 0.9 0 2.1 2.1 69.1 1.5 0 0
No. 39 72.8 0.2 0 0 27.4 0.2 0 28.9 1.0 0 71.1 1.0 0 0 0
SAG 6.89 73.4 0.2 0 1.5 0.8 25.2 0.9 0 16.8 4.4 0 29.6 1.9 14.7 0.3 0 39.0 6.5
No. 31/1 65.5 1.1 0 3.0 0.4 31.4 1.2 0 8.3 0.7 0 30.9 1.0 16.8 1.1 0 44.0 1.9
P. rubescens
No. 10 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 1.8 0 16.1 0.9 26.7 2.1 0 17.2 0.6
No. 12/1a 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 0.7 0 23.1 2.0 20.8 1.1 0 20.6 1.2
No. 40 0 0 0 0 0 32.2 1.4 0 67.8 1.4 0 0 0
No. 65 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 1.1 0 26.2 1.3 17.3 1.7 0 21.3 1.0
No. 67 0 0 0 0 0 74.2 0.3 0 0.8 0.1 25.0 0.3 0 0
56
No. 91/1 0 0 0 0 0 29.8 0.4 0 21.6 0.6 26.1 0.8 0 22.5 0.4
No. 110 0 0 0 0 0 53.6 3.1 0 20.8 1.2 8.7 0.5 0 16.9 1.6
No. 119 0 0 0 0 0 36.0 0.6 0 19.2 1.3 24.0 1.1 0 20.8 0.8
No. 160/1a 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 0.5 0 85.4 0.5 0 0 0
PCC 7821 0 100 0 0 0 0 5.6 0.4 0 12.2 1.1 20.9 1.9 0 61.2 1.7
No. 59 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 60 0 0 0 0 100 0 99.6 0.4 0 0.4 0.4 0 0 0
No. 14/1a 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 80 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 108 0 100 0 0 0 0 47.8 2.9 0 52.2 2.9 0 0 0
No. 21/2 0 0 64.2 0.8 35.8 0.8 0 37.1 3.2 0 62.9 3.2 0 0 0
No. 90/1i 100 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 0.6 0 26.9 0.8 18.0 2.0 0 33.6 1.8
No. 64 100 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 1.1 0 36.9 1.7 29.1 2.4 0 5.5 0.3
CCAP 1459/24 0 78.4 2.1 0 21.6 2.1 0 9.6 1.0 0 52.0 1.0 2.8 0.9 0 35.6 0.7
No. 72 100 0 0 0 0 0 28.9 0.6 0 71.1 0.6 0 0 0
No. 118 0 80.5 1.7 0 19.5 1.7 0 6.2 0.4 0 20.3 0.8 19.8 2.8 0 53.7 2.7
No. 241 100 0 0 0 0 0 27.5 2.8 0 62.4 2.8 3.5 0.4 0 6.6 0.6
No. 240 100 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 0.6 0 38.0 1.0 10.5 1.1 0 17.2 0.8
No. 111 100 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 0.9 0 21.5 0.9 21.3 0.2 0 19.6 0.3
No. 3 100 0 0 0 0 0 37.8 1.9 0 22.2 1.1 19.5 1.4 0 20.5 0.8
No. 113/1b 100 0 0 0 0 0 36.5 0.9 0 26.0 3.6 24.8 1.0 0 12.7 5.0
No. 247 0 79.9 0.5 0 20.1 0.5 0 12.7 2.2 0 87.3 2.2 0 0 0
CCAP 1459/14 0 0 63.7 1.3 36.3 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. 21- 0 0 49.8 1.5 50.2 1.5 0 27.0 3.4 0 73.0 3.4 0 0 0
CCAP 1459/30 0 39.4 0.9 0 60.6 0.9 0 3.0 1.0 0 36.0 6.4 8.7 0.8 0 52.3 6.6
No. 82 0 90.0 1.1 0 9.9 1.1 0 11.1 0.5 0 22.3 3.8 16.6 3.1 0 50.0 1.5
Peptide net production rates and growth in cyanobacteria
a
[D-Asp, Mdha]-MC-RR, m/z 1024, b[D-Asp, Dhb]-MC-RR m/z 1024; cMC-HtyrR m/z 1045; dMC-LR m/z 995; e[Asp, Dhb]-MC-HtyY, m/z 1074; f[Asp, Dhb]-MC-HtyHty, m/z 1088; gAPN B m/z 836; hAPN J m/z
909; iAPN F m/z 850; jAPN A m/z 843; kAPN I m/z 916; lOSC Y m/z 858.
57
S. Kosol et al. 58
Discussion
In this study an attempt was made to find
a relationship between peptide net production
and cell division rates between strains.
The growth conditions at the temperature
and light conditions used in this study (20 C,
40–60 mmol m2 s1) were not optimal for all the
strains and a significant intraspecific variation in
maximal-specific growth rates has been observed.
While such an intraspecific variation has been
found earlier (Van Liere & Mur, 1980; Davis &
Walsby, 2002) the general understanding of factors
causing this intraspecific variation in growth under
identical experimental conditions in the laboratory
is not complete. Mikkola & Kurland (1992)
explained a threefold intraspecific variation in
growth rates (0.48–1.43 doublings h1) among nat-
ural isolates of Escherichia coli by strain-specific
differences in translational efficiency. The same
authors were able to select for highest growth
rates (1.33 doublings h1) under continuous cul-
ture conditions over 280 generations implying
that selection for faster growth rates under nutrient
poor conditions in nature is of minor importance
when compared with the nutrient rich conditions in
the laboratory.
However, to accept or to reject the hypothesis
that the growth rate is related to peptide net pro-
duction not only within a strain but between
strains it is not necessary to find out the maximum
intrinsic growth rate for each strain. According to
the conclusions proposed by Orr & Jones (1998)
a slow growing strain can be expected to show an
increase in peptide net production if the real max-
imum intrinsic growth rate would have been found.
In contrast to the results observed by Orr & Jones
(1998), in this study a linear relationship between
the peptide net production rate and the cellular
growth rate obtained from all strains could not
be found. Indeed strains growing fast had both
low and high MC and APN contents and MC
and APN production rates (Fig. 5). It is known
that NRPS are large multi-enzyme complexes
synthesizing peptides by the thiotemplate-directed
mechanism, independent of the ribosomal peptide
synthesis pathway (Marahiel et al., 1997).
Typically, secondary metabolites such as antibio-
tics synthesized via NRPS are then actively
exported out of the cell and thought to enhance
the competitiveness or confer resistance to the pro-
ducer itself (see Pearson et al., 2004 for a review).
In contrast for MCs export has not been observed
(Wiedner et al., 2003; Tonk et al., 2005; Rohrlack
Fig. 4. Total microcystin and anabaenopeptin contents
(mean SE) in (A) mg mg1 dry weight, (B) fg peptide
& Hyenstrand, 2007) and higher extracellular con-
cell1 and (C) mg mm3 biovolume of Planktothrix strains, centrations have only been reported from dense
divided into five groups according to their microcystin cultures making it impossible to differentiate
contents. between passive leakage and active export of
S. Kosol et al. 60
Fig. 5. Growth rates (black triangles) and corresponding peptide production rates (microcystin, black circles and anabaeno-
peptin, white circles) for 49 Planktothrix strains measured under maximum growth rate conditions. Cell growth rates were
estimated from (A) dry weight, (B) cell numbers and (C) biovolume.
MC. Accordingly in this study the average dis- From the results of this study it follows that the
solved peptide concentrations were found to variation in the cellular growth rate is independent
make up less than 10% of the total peptide con- from the increase/decrease of the MC/APN pro-
tents. Instead cyanobacteria seem to accumulate duction. Indeed the insertional inactivation of the
MC and other peptides in certain cell regions, i.e. MC synthesis by a gene knock-out experiment in
immunogold labelling revealed preferential locali- Microcystis did not lead to a measurable difference
zation of MCs in thylakoids and in the periphery in growth rate under various light conditions
of polyphosphate bodies (Shi et al., 1995; Young (4–110 mmol m2 s1) as compared with the wild
et al., 2005). Recently a binding of MCs and cya- type (Hesse et al., 2001). Correspondingly, the
nopeptolins to phycobiliproteins situated onto the knock-out mutant lacking anabaenopeptilide in
thylakoid membranes has been reported (Jüttner & Anabaena strain 90 did not show increased
Lüthi, 2008). It is concluded that the frequently growth rates of the mutant when compared with
observed relationship between cell division and the wild type (Repka et al., 2004). In this study,
MC net production rate is rather the result of an several strains containing the total mcy gene cluster
accumulation of MCs in specific cell compartments (CCAP 1459/36, No. 40, No. 67, No. 91/1, No.
rather than due to a direct dependence of MC 110) but inactive in MC synthesis due to the inser-
synthesis on the processes involved in the cell-divi- tion of a transposable element (Christiansen et al.,
sion cycle. 2006), did not show higher growth rates when
Peptide net production rates and growth in cyanobacteria 61