Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015 - Rubiana Et Al - Asian Myrmecology
2015 - Rubiana Et Al - Asian Myrmecology
ISSN 1985-1944 © Ratna Rubiana, Akhmad Rizali, Lisa H. Denmead, Winda Alamsari, Purnama Hidayat,
Pudjianto, Dadan Hindayana, Yann Clough and Teja Tscharntke, Damayanti Buchori
Table 1. Ant species richness in four land-use types in Bukit Duabelas National Park (BDNP) and Harapan Forest.
The difference of ant species richness between land-use types on each site was tested using ANOVA.
Table 2. Dissimilarity of ant species (Bray-Curtis index) between different land-use types in Bukit Duabelas and
Harapan sites. The first letter indicates landscape (B: Bukit Duabelas, H: Harapan) and the second letter indicates
the land-use type (F: forest, J: jungle, O: Oil palm, R: rubber)
Land-use BF BJ BO BR HF HJ HO HR
BF 0
BJ 0.45 0
BO 0.61 0.61 0
BR 0.54 0.53 0.48 0
HF 0.36 0.36 0.51 0.49 0
HJ 0.52 0.53 0.53 0.47 0.45 0
HO 0.53 0.49 0.37 0.39 0.58 0.50 0
HR 0
0.56 0.47 0.43 0.27 0.42 0.44 0.30
Nevertheless, species accumulation curves show Technomyrmex sp. 02, Oecophylla smaragdina
differences in ant species diversity between the (Fabricius, 1775), Nylanderia sp. 02, and Cre-
different sites and land-use types (Fig. 2). matogaster sp. 01.
Sites within each land-use type had
a higher similarity of ant species composition
than sites from different land-use types (Table DISCUSSION
2). NMDS ordination analysis showed that there
were significant differences in ant community Transformation of near-primary forests to agro-
structure between land-use types in both, BDNP forests and plantations is often accompanied by
(ANOSIM, R = 0.737, P = 0.001) and Harapan drastic changes in biodiversity. Against our ex-
(ANOSIM, R = 0.652, P = 0.001) sites (Fig. 3). pectation, species richness did not differ signifi-
In both, BDNP and Harapan sites, nine cantly between the forest, jungle rubber, rubber
ant species were recorded in all habitat types, and oil palm sites. However, species composition
i.e. forest, jungle rubber, rubber plantations and differed strongly between land-use types. Ant
palm oil plantations (Fig. 4). Several ant species communities in rubber and oil palm plantations,
dominated the study plots (Fig. 5) that are mostly both in the BDNP and Harapan sites, could be
categorized by Brühl & Eltz (2010) as non-forest clearly distinguished from forest and jungle rub-
species and do not normally occur in forest habi- ber communities. Forest and jungle rubber sites
tats, i.e. Anoplolepis gracilipes (Smith, 1857), were more similar, even partly overlapping in one
Dolichoderus sp. 01 and 02, Odontoponera of the two areas studied.
denticulate (Smith, 1858), Monomorium sp. 02,
Fig. 1. Study area in two sites of Bukit Duabelas and Harapan in Jambi Province, Sumatra. Gray colour indicates forest.
Fig. 2. Species accumulation curves of ant species found four land use types within the two study sites, (a) Bukit
Duabelas National Park and (b) Harapan Forest. The dashed line indicates ant species richness from 15 sub-plots.
Fig. 3. Variation in ant community structure between study sites in the two study areas (a) BDNP and (b) Harapan,
in non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination (based on abundance data and a Bray-Curtis distance
metric). Forest sites are denoted by an F as the second letter, Jungle Rubber sites with J, Rubber sites with R and
Oil Palm sites by an O. Stress values are given for a 2 dimensional NMDS.
Fig. 4. Common ant species recorded from all land use types in (a) Bukit Duabelas and (b) Harapan area.
Fig. 5. The most abundant ant species based on number of subplots collected from Bukit Duabelas and Harapan sites.
The species of ants found in all four not forest. Brühl et al. (2003) also found that A.
land-use types can be characterized as general- gracilipes is the most common species on 70% of
ists, and are probably species that originate from all baits placed in oil palm plantations in Sabah,
primary forest and tolerate the transformation to Malaysia. A. gracilipes is one of the most inva-
plantations (Perfecto & Vandermeer 2006). Spe- sive species in the Indonesian cocoa plantations
cies in the genera Crematogaster and Pheidole and is associated with land-use systems with low
were present in all four land-use types and are tree canopy cover and a small number of forest
often generalist species. The subfamily Myrmi- ant species (Bos et al. 2008).
cinae, in which the majority of ants species col- Overall, the most dominant ant species
lected are included, harbours many common ant are invasive non-forest ants such as A. gracilipes
species that are widespread in warmer habitats, and Odontoponera denticulata. In oil palm and
and includes more than 900 described species rubber plantations, O. denticulata replaced a spe-
worldwide (Eguchi et al. 2006). There is often cies of the same genus found in forest and jungle
competition between these generalist species and rubber, Odontoponera transversa, These two re-
species of the Dolichoderinae subfamily (Ander- lated species can be used as bio-indicators, be-
sen 2000), represented here for example by ants cause they seem to have different adaptability and
of the genera Tapinoma and Technomyrmex, that different habit preferences, as already suggested
are also present in the four land-use types stud- by a previous study, in which O. denticulata were
ied here. Ant species that were dominant in oil only found in urban areas, while O. transversa
palm and rubber plantation are generally tramp were found only in relatively intact forests (Rizali
species, i.e. species that benefit from habitat deg- et al. 2008).
radation and human association (McGlynn 1999). Forest ant species in the genera Cataula-
These include species of the genus Pheidole and cus, Tetraponera and Polyrhachis were not com-
Tetramorium that are found in this study, which monly found in any of the plots, not even regu-
can be invasive (Schultz & McGlynn 2000). larly in the forest. This could be because it is more
One of the species that is present in three difficult to sample the complete ant fauna in a for-
types of agricultural land use (jungle rubber, oil est because of its high microhabitat heterogeneity.
palm and rubber plantations) but not the forest is Tapinoma sp. 01 is abundant and very active in
A. gracilipes. This species is well-known as in- Harapan site. When Tapinoma sp. 01 is abundant,
vasive species and thrives in disturbed areas, but other ant species were unlikely to be present, even
physically large ant species such as Camponotus Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE, Brandao CRF,
gigas and Polyrhachis spp.. In habitats where Brown.Jr WL, C. JH, Delabie and Silves-
dolichoderine species were not found, we found tre R, 2000. Field techniques for the study
many individuals of small species such as Mono- of ground-dwelling ants. In: Ants: Standard
Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Bio-
morium and large species such as Oecophylla and
diversity (Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE,
Tetraponera, suggesting that dolichoderines out- Schultz TR, eds), Smithsonian Institution
compete species from other subfamilies. Press, Washington DC (US), 122-144.
To conclude, the conversion of forested Bos MM, Tylianakis JM, Steffan-Dewenter I and
habitat results in severe changes in ant communi- Tscharntke T, 2008. The invasive Yellow
ties. While our study suggests this needs not be Crazy Ant and the decline of forest ant di-
accompanied by a decrease in species richness, versity in Indonesian cacao agroforests. Bio-
the identity of the species, the abundance of tramp logical Invasions 10: 1399-1409.
and invasive ants, and the dominance patterns are Brühl CA and Eltz T, 2010. Fuelling the biodiversity
crisis: species loss of ground-dwelling forest
different in agricultural habitats. The functional
ants in oil palm plantations in Sabah, Malay-
consequences are not clear, but in terms of large- sia (Borneo). Biodiversity and Conservation
scale biodiversity, our results suggests that any 19: 519-529.
further losses of forest habitat, including conver- Brühl CA, Eltz T and Linsenmair KE, 2003. Size does
sion to jungle rubber, would result in a decrease matter – effects of tropical rainforest frag-
in regional biological diversity, as those species mentation on the leaf litter ant community in
dependent on forested habitats cannot persist in Sabah, Malaysia. Biodiversity and Conser-
monoculture plantations. vation 12: 1371-1389.
Clarke KR, 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analy-
ses of change in community structure. Aus-
tralian Journal of Ecology 18: 117-143.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Eguchi K, Hashimoto Y and Malsch AKF, 2006. Phei-
dole schoedli sp.n. (Hymenoptera: Formi-
This research was funded by Deutsche Forsc- cidae), a subterranean species found from
hungsgemeinschaft Germany (DFG) through a North Borneo. Myrmecologische Nachrich-
Collaborative Research Centre (CRC 990 - EF- ten 8: 31-34.
ForTS) - Ecological and Socioeconomic Func- Gammans N, Bullock JM and Schönrogge K, 2005.
tions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transfor- Ant benefits in a seed dispersal mutualism.
mation Systems. We would like to thank the field Oecologia 146(1): 43-49.
Hashimoto Y, 2003. Identification Guide to The Ant
assistants and the administration staff of CRC
Genera of Borneo. In: Inventory and col-
990 Jambi Office. We are grateful David Lohman lection: total protocol for understanding of
and a further anonymous reviewer for their com- biodiversity (Hashimoto Y, Rahman H, eds),
ments on our manuscript. Research and Education Component, BBEC
Programme (Universiti Malaysia Sabah),
Kota Kinabalu (MY), 310pp.
REFERENCES Hill SL and Hoy MA, 2003. Interactions between the
red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta and
Alberti M, 2005. The effects of urban patterns on the parasitoid Lipolexis scutellaris potential-
ecosystem function. Science Review 28(2): ly affect classical biological control of the
168-192. aphid Toxoptera citricida. Biological Con-
Andersen AN, 2000. A global ecology of rainforest trol 27: 11-19.
ants: functional groups in relation to environ- Kaspari M, Yuan M and Alonso L, 2003. Spatial grain
mental stress and disturbance. In: Ants: Stan- and the causes of regional diversity gradients
dard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring in ants. The American Naturalist 161(3):
Biodiversity (Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso 459-477.
LE, Schultz TR, eds), Smithsonian Institution Koh LP and Wilcove DS, 2008. Is oil palm agriculture
Press, Washington DC (US), 25-34. really destroying tropical biodiversity? Con-
servation Letters 1(2): 60-64.
Lach L, Parr CL and Abbott KL, 2010. In: Ant Ecology R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment
1 edn, Oxford University Press Inc, New for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R
York (US), 402pp. Foundation for Statistical Computing.
McGlynn TP, 1999. The worldwide transfer of ants: Rizali A, Bos MM, Buchori D, Yamane S and Schulze
Geographichal Distribution and Ecological CH, 2008. Ants in Tropical Urban Habitats:
Invasions. Journal of Biogeography 26(3): The Myrmecofauna in a Densely Populated
535-548. Area of Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. Hayati
Morris R, 2010. Anthropogenic impacts on tropical 15: 77-84.
forest biodiversity: a network structure and Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield
ecosystem functioning perspective. Philo- J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF,
sophical Transactions of the Royal Society Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge
London B Biology Science 365: 3709-3718. DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL,
Naeem S, Chair, Chapin F, Costanza R, Ehrlich PR, T.Sykes M, H.Walker B, Walker M and Wall
Golley FB, Hooper DU, Lawton J, O’Neill DH, 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for
RV, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Symstad AJ and the year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774.
Tilman D, 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem Schultz TR and McGlynn TP, 2000. The interactions of
functioning: maintaining natural life support ants with other organisms. In: Ants: Standard
processes. Issues in Ecology 4: 1-11. Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Bio-
Nakamura A, Catterall CP, House APN, Kitching RL diversity (Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE,
and Burwell CJ, 2007. The use of ants and Schultz TR, eds), Smithsonian Institution
other soil and litter arthropods as bio-indica- Press, Washington DC (US), 122-144.
tors of the impacts of rainforest clearing and Swift M, Izac A and Noordwijk MV, 2004. Biodiver-
subsequent land use. Journal Insect Conser- sity and ecosystem services in agricultural
vation 11: 177-186. landscapes - are we asking the right ques-
Perfecto I and Vandermeer J, 2006. The effect of an tions? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environ-
ant-hemipteran mutualism on the coffee ber- ment 104: 113-134.
ry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in southern Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motz-
Mexico. Science Direct 117: 218-221. ke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J and Whitbread
Philpott SM, Perfecto I, Armbrecht I and Parr CL, A, 2012. Global food security, biodiversity
2010. Ant Diversity and Function in Dis- conservation and the future of agricultural
turbed and Changing Habitats. In: Ant Ecol- intensification. Biological Conservation
ogy (Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL, eds), 1 151: 53-59.
edn, Oxford University Press Inc, New York Wielgoss A, Tscharntke T, Rumede A, Fiala B, Seidel
(US), 137-156. H, Shahabuddin S and Clough Y, 2013. In-
Power AG, 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: teraction complexity matters: disentangling
tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Trans- services and disservices of ant communi-
actions of the Royal Society 365: 2959-2971. ties driving yield in tropical agroecosys-
Pringle A, 2007. Unit 9: Biodiversity decline. The tems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Habitable Planet a Systems Approach to En- 281(1775): 1-10.
vironmental Science; pp. 1-32. Cambridge.
Annenberg Media.
Appendix 1
Ant species sampled in different land-use regimes from Harapan Forest and Bukit Duabelas National
Park (+ means present). aF = Forest, J = Jungle Rubber, R = Rubber plantation, O = Oil palm planta-
tion.
Bukit Duabelas
Harapan Forest
Subfamily National Park
No Land-usea Land-usea
Species F J R O F J R O
Dolichoderinae (Forel, 1878)
1 Dolichoderus sp. 01 + + +
2 Dolichoderus sp. 02 + + +
3 Iridomyrmex sp. 01 +
4 Loweriella sp. 01 + + +
5 Philidris sp. 01 + + + + + +
6 Philidris sp. 03 +
7 Philidris sp. 06 +
8 Tapinoma sp. 01 + + + + + + + +
9 Tapinoma sp. 02 + + + + + +
10 Tapinoma sp. 03 + + +
11 Tapinoma sp. 04 + +
12 Tapinoma sp. 05 +
13 Technomyrmex sp. 01 + + + + + + + +
14 Technomyrmex sp. 02 + +
15 Technomyrmex sp. 03 + +
Dorylinae (Leach, 1815)
16 Dorylus sp. 01 +
17 Dorylus sp.02 +
Formicinae (Latreille, 1809)
18 Acropyga sp. 01 + + + +
19 Anoplolepis gracilipes (Smith, 1857) + + + + + +
20 Camponotus gigas (Latreille, 1802) + + + + +
21 Camponotus sp. 02 + + + +
22 Camponotus sp. 03 + + + + + +
23 Camponotus sp. 05 + + +
24 Camponotus sp. 07 + +
25 Camponotus sp. 08 +
26 Echinopla sp. 01 + +
27 Echinopla sp. 02 +
28 Nylanderia sp. 01 + +
29 Nylanderia sp. 02
Bukit Duabelas
Harapan Forest
Subfamily National Park
No Land-usea Land-usea
Species F J R O F J R O
30 Nylanderia sp. 03 + + +
31 Nylanderia sp. 04 +
32 Nylanderia sp. 05 + +
33 Nylanderia sp. 07 + + + +
34 Nylanderia sp. 08 +
35 Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775) + +
36 Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille, 1802) +
37 Plagiolepis sp. 01 + + + + +
38 Polyrhachis sp. 01 + + +
39 Polyrhachis sp. 02 + + + + + + +
40 Polyrhachis sp. 04 + + + + +
41 Polyrhachis sp. 05 + + +
42 Polyrhachis sp. 06 +
Myrmicinae
43 Acanthomyrmex sp. 01 + +
44 Acanthomyrmex sp. 02 +
45 Acanthomyrmex sp. 03 +
46 Aphaenogaster sp. 01 + + + + + + +
47 Calyptomyrmex sp. 01 +
48 Cardiocondyla sp. 01 + + + + +
49 Cardiocondyla sp. 02 + +
50 Cataulacus sp. 01 + + +
51 Crematogaster sp. 01 +
52 Crematogaster sp. 02 + + + + + +
53 Crematogaster sp. 03 + + + + + + + +
54 Crematogaster sp. 04 + + + + + + + +
55 Crematogaster sp. 05 +
56 Crematogaster sp. 14 +
57 Lophomyrmex sp. 01 + + +
58 Lophomyrmex sp. 02 + + +
59 Lordomyrma sp. 01 +
60 Lordomyrma sp. 02 +
61 Lordomyrma sp. 03 + +
62 Meranoplus sp. 01 + +
63 Monomorium floricola (Jerdon, 1851) + + +
64 Monomorium sp. 02 + + + +
Bukit Duabelas
Harapan Forest
Subfamily National Park
No Land-usea Land-usea
Species F J R O F J R O
65 Monomorium sp. 03 + +
66 Myrmicaria sp. 01 +
67 Pheidole sp. 01 + + + + +
68 Pheidole sp. 02 + + +
69 Pheidole sp. 03 +
70 Pheidole sp. 04 + + + +
71 Pheidole sp. 05 +
72 Pheidole sp. 06 +
73 Pheidole sp. 07 +
74 Pheidole sp. 08 + +
75 Pheidole sp. 09 +
76 Pheidole sp.10 +
77 Pheidole sp. 11 + + + + + +
78 Proatta butteli (Forel, 1912) + +
79 Recurvidris sp. 01 + +
80 Recurvidris sp. 02 +
81 Solenopsis sp. 01 +
82 Solenopsis sp. 02 +
83 Strumigenys sp. 01 +
84 Tetheamyrma sp. 01 + + + + +
85 Tetramorium sp. 01 + + + + +
86 Tetramorium sp. 02 + + + +
87 Tetramorium sp. 03 +
Ponerinae
88 Anochetus sp. 01 +
89 Cryptopone sp. 01 + +
90 Diacamma rugosum (Le Guillou, 1842) + +
91 Emerypone sp. 01 +
92 Hypoponera sp. 01 + + +
93 Leptogenys sp. 01 + + + + +
94 Mesoponera sp. 01 + + + + +
95 Myopias sp. 01 +
96 Odontomachus sp. 01 + + + + + + + +
97 Odontoponera denticulata (Smith, 1858) + + + +
98 Odontoponera transversa (Smith, 1857) + +
99 Platythyrea sp. 01 +
Bukit Duabelas
Harapan Forest
Subfamily National Park
No Land-usea Land-usea
Species F J R O F J R O
100 Platythyrea sp. 02 +
101 Ponera sp. 01 + + + +
102 Ponera sp. 02 +
Pseudomyrmecinae
103 Tetraponera sp. 01 + + + + + +
104 Tetraponera sp. 03 + +
ASIAN MYRMECOLOGY
A Journal of the International Network for the Study of Asian Ants
Communicating Editor: Martin Pfeiffer