ae wy Awning. on gadeitrakion proceeding undey Ure Sucuant Kumaa — lgoloiur~ See. % i ge care Ql Disuws - - ---- challenging Jrcdickten, Of the ordrtwadkor . “) 4 i ink ouk ay to when such a queahn df dtondoumg es Po Nasdtebton mau Anse . QUESTION OF JuURISvICTION — When does ik anise? Tre apesbion ef junisdichion of an ankbvakot may ancot of tbo Stages; ig. ; Beore ® Cot of Law , whne tu court has an oblyzabion to vofuse PEO Waar Kine trokhor ok Fajen tk to anbitvahion Undon Sockion? hi) Ond 457 8 the Aybitvakion 4 Loncili tabton Ack, 1996 ( tre Act) Lrlens| thes Quph Sub trcrmk Veoseny fornet doing 88. Shinn may be fem k to as te Stage gf tnlowamenk of Artscbvabion DprA, ) principle Competes. competentt {Sectin 16 4th Ae, Sf Woridaning, aim application joy Lebking aide an awond -{ Sedum 24) ox He Stage erforcernen’ Gf A {Section te) Modes oF GHALLENGING SURISDICTION OF Arai TRATR AGermolly. By Gane on Wo ble ywradichien gf the anbutral Fribural in raised ak Me Beyinning. Of Ale arbitcabion. TY] Be objection by Aeemad Succetauh je erbityahion wilh — :%© be tarminaked. “Yrs fellows Hu UNCITRAL Mpdth Law ond lbrsngy ouke on ankrrorking nilakiowlip bho Nakbwal Cork, mA. Arckyakion, Fribumally brcase coy Challenge b te waselr chlor Bh Mrbidyal Artoural may be dake volt Inti oy We tribunal asa , buk dre final Atetaten ow juradechion Wb with, rlevark” Nakowal Couck (NC) - Thafore, Hue av two wip [raoclts ef Challeng Ae fwusdichion of tre anbitval Avil = O Dect Gauenae. > Bulore tne anrbitrakton brilasbal Uself @\wovacer CUNLENGE > Byfore He Nabil Courts. Hitt prot discss te dirtek challenge yukroc and the grounds tow chalhewye Ha juris diction « Fl should be noted thab ke jwuicdiction a Ya kubural ws dependent ew Un anbatbyalacia clauan Jond wok te main & toukrack whith conkainy tre arbcteabton deus Thuy he Onbitvallon Coust & de oly. Souter Jrom wher thy Kabul dintrs de Guaicdcchion, to nude Gr the Subrtarts Aisple ok hand. Grody to challenge juricdickion, one -; (Glow Qustence ce Arertaa-non Raecemeny Ths involves & question which goes to He nook 9 the oe— 10) 0) 2/20 ia eT weorenk, Lt Ow anbicerakion agresmant- Huo pirkien ak Aigpke? This Noval happens whan ont of the pacires cont ind task the Puprtement undin which te diipube Any arise, Conan M0 aobitecon clause ond At okt Hie to: show how THe anbitiradion Guu th dncorporoked, by rapes frre Qutkhun galery Agyeemank Jor te carne Subjetk-mabin project . | {Seaton +66) — tals ag abou prinuiple 4 inCorporal’on ky "hrurct] & On THe VALIDITY OF ARBITRATION AuReEMaNT SS ETLOF ARANTRATION AaREE MENT. The exkixe, Jurispridonce ef anbitvation Aipands en the validity St AM Cabitvalon ag renner deuse Ye Same ig nk vai The athitvakoy will hawt no power to erbbUCAkR Tyo bypso z ash Valu Hot Trydake to Ye form quire Qe cbibcabion agreement, ive.) whack al chowla be trots in the lene Clase 40 comiden Uk eaRAbte” complete onbitrabiny feernenk . Yh. form vequiremon ins eur deckermcred by Peeriwes “be te Jaws tte Sead Gp nbitrabion Ay fincas Telia enund, Scion t Q the Act 5 the What provision + [Like eth Yup gb contracts , Intentional, Commoretal, Abita (WA) agctamed on aly Sulajedk 40 form Yeputrenend . Sede Tg H+ Nes York Conmetion (NYC) also Actowres dorm vequscemenk . The most griltcant ond wvivetaally —Swhowk Kumar = Vninilud Woz Orupked g Uvot i the “wovitiog " or writken fora" Yeuivemunt, Aogeklin with Werke wagpiremens Joy a." egeatunt” and/or Om “exdharge’ QL woritten Conmundcadions , b wketandhive. Nadsar tk aliena ¢ Une Capacity te Undud| Om anbityation ayremnk by requirement under all ICA COoMeuKorw and nakeval orbityakten Stohikes tor the Nobility Gj a Naubking Agrenmenk - Aw Zu) a) g, the INE pevide fos mon-veiogrttion d) Crbitval award tassch, : ow arbttvakio agrtorenls Conch by oe perky tat lacked Be vequiaike Capuckty tw conclude Suck agrecments Leckion [Be ond WS 9 the Ade adept a Similan titerta . [TR dy jewpotkank to dcckingaatth, bles wiatttior Sunitten? foun Regpiwrots opplecable te arbityabion agrammts under many Ankenokional cowenkion acd notional orvitvakion Sikasa, Stet and the operon Whithrn o farky ha» commend to Ox ankitrarion agreemuc - “Le im posatble fon applicable “ waitlen” bor Dquiyeruds te be sotingied buk for by the ee to gait Subrantively tn eskablish te acistenet of am ankitiadich Bartetrnank as a subskardkive vnodkor . for ys The : pbitration dna» dive yo. the pg haw Gh Mfoet commented to Me preposed, clouss . Gq ck i Ai oy ves to have uM Comaracly ik in aloe posable for pores bo lyuohod Kuman = igi ide 8/22 Umeqaivocah urdispated ova agrvtment), bit how Akin Ogre? fo fil to Sobidy applicable foun -vequlmmnsds, tg win Ondin “bo eptalabish a val anbiivakte. rpplicable dorm year tement, ond B Subskanktee YOLvemot wuisk be Salr'sbieh, WEJOn THe Qope of THE Araitration Aaecement : Nw anbaitrad on reamed Bb O mandate Whitval tribe Xo jen cee Ae tle onal Yecognition and Orhortement aray be Cred, 2) the euand deal with a Of Wee subrnis sion to onbitwakion ov ty ut covkains decisions on matters biyoud Ue Scope Of Khe awbmisiion to areityation. Tre Medd Low conorny Almast idenbe Uallenfes on the brats of the Scope of arbitrahion aayane on alse be Shretied 6. teen, 4 “thyee_fads ‘odovtitvablly: whettae. te Atspukey are cabable o} adjuddechion e by orbit dew) ( Subjeck— makkey adatgeicey Ais puke ng. nol {i eo Gian ie Hheiv aku , odd be nuolved bya poss rune! by, porkres . Whitty Ue disputes art covered by He arbitwahton agreument? ee whether He dispukes om enunvroded or descuibed tr Orbetvakion Agveamert as molten to bt dictded by arhibobion| 1: porkes howe xebewd ths disputes to antitsakien ? Whak ix, wheiher Ue dispute {lb umd he scope § gubrisrton AD the arbitval -vibural . — JThe otter way to challenge is byore the Nabovall Cour UNC) , Which b also kKroumn ay \ \nterlomkory Tudezal Cons denesion| Cf Ayortrockor's Junisdickion” — or in atmple terry, “ind, elerge.”, ie rmsany challenging the jwnicdtchion immalind bilore He Seak G the arbitvetion, whik te anbttyaction | proceedings one SL Unda ay 7 withepak waiting gor He Beal avon d Th wurtria Ake France ; pubis Gan vs to Ye courk a}rer Be jwusdicronal awork ds given by the arbitxabor j and Showd nek watt KU Ue firak award o passed . -|Anboe \6L2) of Ya Maal Law provide Hakan anttbral [ygaek deiburuk roy comiden ond verder dsetaion On challenges bo thu, Our uasdichion . Pyt-l6(2) abe provides waters AV RSE eres eeaoe Sushem& Kuvaos — 18010} [M1 *) India, on the okhin baud, nes nek allow a party +0 go for me ore. On innmediakt challenge, Tk mandala Ue party to wait Une finch aw ord Yo chatlonge the Gurisdicb’onal award - Seckion 16(8) of Ad mandokes Uw same - Thus, the pores Con approadk the Counk Sechiem St of He Aus aprar te di Qutond has been radi, bo thallunge He onrbitval tribunal A \wrtsdi chitown . S x x§3 ye bs) Tho Qpeskton Yous en de quskion 4 Het Aeeucation oes oF Areitrator 1s Main tamaare oR Nor? xe _ Guushawde Kunwar = go. 01a — 8/22 - An onbitrakion agement. - - -impeoprithp ---- rraintad er nok 2 The inakant fackwol maken beau ma Stonk resemblance Hthe Supreme, Court lard doum a ti0-ponk ckesk Jor lanbitrabiliby , ad on the base G Hy same, huld the Appiicakton Jor apporrtrent of anbitvadoy vfs Il Q He Arpitvabior & Lowiliakton Neb 1446 (Ake AE) we ld be [The Rashid Raza Cone has beer chseusmed om debaih, Sosaquemkly Prive to thak, TL wth baveply, disans the AReitaeginity OF KAD Whethn disputes savolatng y ef fraud are ankitvable Fhe an Oe ie lbleed uf onsen ie YS Kadir Shameuddiin Gubere v. MP Oak (1461) The Supe Cok Laid omphasts Ow He thassbold Sask Jorpldegadions of raud » Te held rok gerry hoowd ret anourk te Such serious Kenpack & Courk “to ~ Dispute orore fw porkles who wert poner in a firm, froelverg aigaltow 9 fruuh jodluion } franceral malprackter leaned Comaanyg with Ua HE, Ho Supreie lout, dexpcte : ng. doumd Mhok subjecke—rrubker 8} suit wow with the unt dickton % arbivokor, bad towk @ te aUegotion mui Appreciation By evidence, awk the Conk YO won appapriake] Novi to adjudicate mations Lrwolby Sovskiny Q oval £ Asante, Ondence . Appiccabim 3 weferrvee veay Vejecked , 2) Swiss Ting Lid. v. Organizing Cornmi tte, Comenarmdeatth ane Gores (014) Kock > Respordink comnterded that te Applicank prowursd tomtrack by Lnulgtg im tovmuptton Lense a lie aul Sols intro’. : WRuding > The Supreme Count dariued that the judgrreit” anv IN: Redhokatshnaw Cass dtd nck loydoum tre conned Law ay dr Mod te eomtdor eariies jvdgrvends dy the Count tn Hindustan Rodeoleumn loxp. v- Pinkeity Vida Rebyalown ‘and PAR Raj ve PvG Raju Cases » ©+ | Sine care wwolyed allegation, of dyarddentty. Liphentng oft 4} Wohaad Kyran VOLO lo/.2 mot being considered, 02 te Hh Nason. dev N. wis Cores tncoyrecknen, By vViriue Sle, | Be obtbcalsinn agsturnmk Ue fxented ap pnt fon He Undiig conn Yon Lhe cowrack weull nek Lad bo iwabidy 4 Ht arbitrabion ous ibsaly . Cour should gdoHr leaste conten} ounce pelecy, Mi such make , wn Light 9 $5 why Ste. tie Ack. Tr cose g voidable oe ca ay thee those twolytrg covreren Jraud ete HH woud wek be pasible gor courts bo decline veJeunce ty Arbitron vfs O ay the Ach. A. Pryyanswann ve A Resammasid vain (Rois) Wreny « The HC veecked rYyerence based on N. Radhakvithian . levence to anbitrokten wiles im a ‘prima face! 2Vabwechonr| the onbitrablon agreement was ound to be twaled Reabrew, Be wag Wid by Virtue @ S16, 1 doctrine Report ond the principle a the “Titbumah velain ponies ty adjudicate upon ruli Sy cowk oak | Uoan ane SRRBL vested ity the funitichy ke covaidn age . —a W/2e TT with ow Come to at Cant ah Wendl, that de Gintlar in Macks to Rowtid Reza» “Groin Reza v Sipr nore (Aor) > |Back : The dispute ancse ok ef podrrrdy'p dosd bw ports Nin FIR was Ledged by one g He Parks alleging aiphorstrg [puts Omd ekinwr bublness Unpreprictees ee ee Ea Purtront to anbitrakion clause we be ip Aud |) the lod fobad om onbitvataion bobbin before Oh Trodchand He Ys Ig the AAC let 11446 for apprinbmenct @ Arbewakor. [The HC deeded thok the dirpucke Uwolvecl certous abegahins Bh pau vopi dh ane vet ek to be dectded vu anbitrakten proceedings « Suprenne Count Ruling > Tre Cout upheld the Ayyasu san Yulin ond cook. ik forward by conceptualiang & tuo —port tek for Akermining anbttrabitcty Q Froud caus Ta \ Whether “te plea of Lvaud permeate We evktre Conbrackar Wh oy “the onbrtrabion agement, Yerdeming ik vord ; 08} D)|Wrekher te allegaktows of fraud oueh upow-the -inkernah ayjobe Qe parkies skew 20, Iruriny va implica ion Um \publec demon ola Yee prosewh tase, Strer the ablegatnvoas a fmud ds]= L 12/92. . and puta Prot vitiake He parursbyip eed. aa a kale Ie takounal R ee 2 ae Bek Guide the HC judgmodk ot preceeded ts apport an arbitrator Ys 11 the ALC Ack, lag, hd toe ~pork test hey ben oxplainid a Laler care of — Avitel Pork Syding Lcd ¥. HSA PI Holdings Po Ua - (2036), Bulking upon Rostad Rava ) Le Count Prepeurded that : Oe fest tose ds sadbtsdied when ik can be fatd bet te iia us tay dL! bard to exigk ra Cor case bw sohter tthe Count dinds Unk the porky ogninsh ~ prow Me breach ty allaged Cannot be caid to hare paboud ats the agreement ylaking to orbitrabin, ak all. ef. gua Fest Can be Said to howe been mek ce Casta tn x _ ont made Cain the State |e og mae ef Onbitray,, prudulek oy walagec, corduck , bus : &% Meesrrtacing hearing ay a writ Couk pas quushory would Anvelve public Laws domatn, ! ln Hain rama, Honrigh Ee. Now'nam, I the, Supreme loud Cewetitded teak all oki, cas, ig: those not falling un trse| [20 cadeg vey, Oprourded atsove | sould be anbttrable Thy |. Cok Uphutd Ayy atu Aalovend by StkriT. amd CxpernedA fulton ov tie Resbid Roan. daukirg , dliveaah fey RAP. Nantman J, Weasel, atTh lgle Q tu Law Locd doum om Ayyaswary ) upheta w+ i Radih Rane and tapounded in_heh Pot ty, ard whe Ye Lack af our cant Uk Similar to the fael tn Raid Raza tore, Thaw ne Maitation to held ak Secionl) appwiabion for Appointrut Q carter, Oxtht applicakion g te two- pak kek, D_mainkatnatle Accordingly, us Acspube would be refed for arbre * Tee by He Couk, 4 welh NX X a T X X =Stporabiliby tras eur thak ap , forexanple , Ove panty claims Yur -Yurt was a Fra bread. contract lay. othe ) the Conkrack ty destroyed fev dl pinpoosen, the AA Would surwive fore purpose d) meosurd the daima anceing Ok ob the brrac , and Lor dakewmining mode of Uneir Settemant - a Statutory Peonsions Seckten (1) la) ye Arbitration XL Cevciliokion Apt 1996 , ov anaitrabio, ogeteine” which forma peck of p vides thak on antai i , co covdrack shall br Ateaked on aw Rpt agreumesk indapondugt Of the ofa tem g We covbrack - Seceton VOW) burke stakes Krak a dvctaton by the antaibal Sbunak thar bre conbeck bs mult ad vood Shad: nok eal tpso jue tre \nvalodtty 6) the arbitvabimnSuphand Kuen = [Bolo sla 1/ae Wrst Ceckions gine nse te the dedkrine Sepanabitcy tin He Indian Low which wandates orbitradim clause te be Seporale from contract, tn hich thy ant Cmbadded . ATs Gores dia to Sevnrah logal opusrions ov to the fake y Onbttvaktew agreements Weds Anbkewdk Circuumsdawet * Fou. rexarnple 5 A] Tn Bronch Manager Mages Leaning & Financ Ltd. v-otlant | Mebbortlada Befnt (2009) , dk wan held that tevminabion origiral cowlvact dz -to breach clots nak perish. tat arbibaip Clouse . | Stentloy yim Mubheim Pi pe Cenkings y, Wellapun Findrasde Ud. (2013), ik was hath hak iy the performance pot q ovina tovdvack® wos rubsketubed by am MoU , Hon, the onbitratio ones Yernains epee, bak ip He Moy bainge the Budbnce Kyte Contract jbo an ond, Delp teem He arbetvabion apreemenk alo dogeclyes . BH) will ou cone 4p Ye Specific issue nadged cnthi, Operkion , which was dealt by the Count tn a Can an well, [The teeue nulaje #0 te Survival g the arbitrable claus Ua Cont op pull and Jinal cobtenont af claims hy issuing a Attchange youre « Thin Speed opatstton, who annuderrd by Be ipeme Courk Indeg, ta the Com § Wabioral Trmnsnce Co v- Boxhora. folyfab fuck. Lit. (200g)a b6Jou WMC v- Be Pol: > Eas Ta thi cast , the Anmmed wor gtrew a dis change Voroher by te tronrer (Naktencd Irowronet (o-), und signed by Wim as full om bral adttement anh ing the appellant (He (wourer) , opall Leabilities - The Rerportent ;hewever, conkuked, the Came and dubrnitted that dk Wan done Unde Somers Comrctond wmdue inbluence . > [Tr fac gave rite ko te following Layer : !Ssuea.? (i) Whekt A Atapube varud by am inured , ater Bhoting ow ull awd Jinal Adschange vouch te Yu inounen can bot veemed to arbitration ? ko Wihahen ov dicpadhe Yemains siren Q}ber He portion haw Comeluded thot conbvack a, tYamackten, vecodiny, by Saktslackion er by weedivt tie fool wWitleuk Dbjsokvon | . byes 2 | Sedgeoat 2 Te Count held Urak jf the uthewrer , Ge peel ewabdoe cae Aiccraged by veasow % AYirsurce! oceepting. poymnd in Jub ond apron He ginal sebtement j but He trovesd —Respn Cppstistcstns in Une inatenk cane — vebuch the come by showy ‘hak the solMenenk wuas extracted by, practicing fal Medan Wnpmentt Coercion , tle Arbi-ral Wibunal wilt hove WO decide whether Hu dtcchange o cordrok wo utbiated Pee eee eeed ceed eet ere eee cece eeeS eK ~\ R010) (ye Yoo by amy, Coreuumntance | thak vended bre dascharge vordable |. ak He twakewee Q the tnaunred- Responder + & [The Comk wed Wek a Claim Coy arbitration Cannot be ejecked. wbuly gu the Qreund tak a cebklenouck Rgpretrmenk ov Aischang youcha had been excackedd y Bo validity tr_dicpated by otha pardy Thucfore, whuw & covkvack’ hes bern gully, prjormed , ree br Cischange gp cenbrack by porlowmanrer ad the contrac Comes ts amd. Nolkong nemaiy wert. ony aight Lo Seak perjormance “Har aniy obligation to peyorm. Ty aloe — Hur Cannock be avy ditpuke. ——> Comsequankly , Yefeume to onbityakion of any dispute onising from ox Avichanged Cewkyock Conmet Nae rade ond whet a dictecharge has Yan effecked dn & mined quesbion of. fons awk fot ad Ahok b semthiing , whede Can be arbitrabed , Howewen, if booth panties yoduce Bea vovitiivg dak Ue Covddack has beer awl finally, duisdharverd ley Prormarct Gall ebligadrony avd tin aul Chphained the Prrace “ trecond & cali sfackten” Risdhrange by Decond ond Soktsfochon yejers Xo Centvact being discharged by nearer CL perjormoamce a contain ‘ . ie iThe agacemenk by whic original obligation ts darchanged dy Pre accord } the discharge oy the Subs titled obLyatton to Abe Sodistackion. Ow te facts g the Cam He Cowk hud trot M0 occond amGabtJactio oy discharge oy eenb/ack, Can SU poise dtipuke before te anbitvatoy , P there seoyned ty towed yy SURVIVAL OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE — DISCHARGE VoveH OR “Et Can be cmtluted hak oy He Con/isue asked a Huy i Plrtstion, the law Laid Aown hy the dymeme Courk ir dofellers: Q)Whee ow g tty panies bo the cenbast [sswes a fue 2 Liral Asschange voucher (or no due Curhficate Ose case may be) Cenfirrning tak We hos rectived te Dayrunt vn Cult £ final WGpackion a all clates pomd he hay Wo oe a7 that ameuvts to dosthanrge of at. covdrack by: Oteeptance g lpentorrnanct amd “tt panky issuing Hu vochu/ crbifccate tannde thovadin, make oy tres Clabn ov ive ce Claim, Nov ton he Seek yeprme “te onbitrabien stn repped Of omy. Clacen . @|Nonevreless , Lf the paady sho har eceated he dis opreerner [youchen radhigis Ctecukion of suchdtschange ow poco ef Srausd)coeneton/imdine Onfiene prachied by the other joanky avd Wn alote to aoy \sorontua— Strahan Kuwor Afar SHoRT_ANSWERS — SEcT ong) Ley delotalisodion 6} He orbitvodton . bas) A for cs internrabioral Commincial arbitration (164) ds covened Uk would core Covardurable bane j & ip daw Forewing anbitvadion weit Some trroyhouk tu wot — Yo Reiversal tox anbetar” The Avechmt chibi would nok have fH Coweta, omy spacial provtsions peewliar ty te Lowe a) the Seat, Tn. preckice, the universal Lex orbit? eden 2 Uurowy . pep A\lth Ne Model Lavo Olena a The BGK in fow Hoe. Skate to peda the condrral lat sok Serky do EARALIAL Owen ICA Covduichtd on ity Kunitony . hg in He prance orken by madtnr bows @ onbitralton Thise Laws Con note of Bu thimt ef Ue Modil Lao” igo dak [ose Buin loud shoud not intervene wnleos authorised pte do to. Thr nol op the Court Should lot cupporhive, nat Aynrkeny enh onist- Tre Second dwelopment info detach On \CA rom octyl tay}ky Ove point o- cevkrvel -, Hat of the place dy eo way , bee whale word Would be Ovartable Jor ICA 2 lea Urea would be * Suprmrabronst?, fo. nakional ? , ‘ drawshadh'eral)’ dvLecaliad’ or even’ exbatonake ? . More eta aud. onbitvonion would bi & ¢ Looking. Onbirtroatton? uyith a * Proctking auwwand?, + [Sudicnal Manif eskablon Qtldy Uno S Rating te Franc Cou de Corrakion, KeLA Hak “ om internabenal anbtbel autard sf wich deus vet belong to amy Stake \gal cystem i) aun inkenablenal Acecaten of \uukice pond ids Valadc tut {pe exaratnod Mcording t ta applicable le, Oy tee Counsery. whe i Meoguition K enforcement io Sought , 1b [Belowlisadion tory takes an ith starking poivch , be aronomy Of He parties — Bok Gack Hrok i dn thely agreement 6 axis “Bak bing prowhings ints being. — omdyur Upon ‘iro baste i “The ferst Abrtumos tak \As ane cuoty, wegulaked by Uy own wiles, uohidoane etl ley Mee parts Cas an expression oy -Hety aukono 5 al : ober up by Hae tribunal’ chad, The gecond assumes Wok seg peed ry : dou\es Suuhoxt Kywsoh = Igooi ya Sa SA |Negakve elects ol = -=- compenkonca— competemcs . Awd) hn prinetple)dockint sh also krown a. “Kompekenz ~ Kompatnz " —yelenning to iy grvean ovgind, oy the BS principle ef “Competence de la compotemce ” Necording -to the compenbence - Compelancer prratple ;an lanbibral bibunal has juntsduhen bo covatdlon ond decide disputes Yegording ib cum junisdichton ; sujeck bo in Gninin saaes Civcunatances , Swosauunk juda'cdal vev das. [We “positive” dofenistion ty urtdal aceapted & cpplied on ibd Commencial arbitrations . Howes Hew oa ackive Xe ik 0 well. Negawe Ereecrs of Competence - Competence 9 Wholing to the jwusdeckien Sham anbityol tyibunal ,untess ae undoyeng Og emt ef anbtirakien in Prina facta, rt 2 Yerd | Tr ankikrakor & oiven the owes to deide a care of his e P dem (UAdicaion j ushtdn satms bo Uy in the Jace gh dine : Principles of nakuroh Juabice — Nemo judix dr couse cutn - ve owt should be a judgr im hin mun case . i @]Frtrewmow. , wide porers Qrrer to te anbitval tibunal makes Me helt provess @ Langtiy ark Lime —babing Whin theSushgsak Vuscoan = \80 10) 2 22/22 Orlaityetor gtves a Sposittve jurkdtckion aword, Ue pay ” Yeas to wait uk te sed — Le. toll feral award — before tk can Challeng He jwisdickion before nabional courh - (Sows counbies including Indie, do nd allew immediate Chabonge Le. Trreroudory Judicial Comtdnakion of Apbitrakor » jusdichien) . Aes dn UMM wher Lrebiake challenge (y alreweh, De Rvettrakoy Moy refuse te bifuncate He opesrion dp duisdidton & Subs tative walter oy clcspute, theuyy reulbr Bra final oword ond no prterin junisdictimal award» TA unt & ragadcivt ‘watsdickionah awand abe, ey He! 2 J ean anbiivaker decides Lak ok dow nek hare jurisdickion the hn porry ak a Atsadvantage ond dispuke xemaing hanging. ust Wo Fenedy , Unbeay the naktend counts coma to te vescur , CD Trin nolewotfhy teak te Apbttratow an usually paid by houn cy hearings , His to enber a junidiecttorel ausard A regakrve would wet earn them A> muck o posdbr~e Kurclicktend award, since Ely wilt Len arbitrate ag veel Wh Sake con be a factor ta Such Carey Uhne Sach a method § 6 Yerungulblon is adopted , x x x x ~ % ee ee