Linear Transformations
Subject: ALGEBRA-III
Semester-IV
Lesson: Linear Transformations
Lesson Developer: Nikhil Khanna
College/Department: Research Scholar,
Department of Mathematics,
University of Delhi
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 1
Linear Transformations
Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................. 3
2. Definition and Examples of Linear Transformation ......................... 3
3. Rank and Nullity of Linear Transformations ...................................... 7
Dimension Theorem ....................................................................... 9
Some Solved Problems ................................................................. 14
4. The Matrix Representation of Linear Transformation ........................ 17
Some Solved Problems ................................................................. 22
5. Composition of Linear Transformations and Matrix Multiplication ....... 24
Exercises ....................................................................................... 33
References .................................................................................... 34
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 2
Linear Transformations
1. Introduction
Till now, we have studied the theory of vector spaces, subspaces and their direct
sum. Further, we have investigated the concepts of linear combination of vectors,
linearly independent and linearly dependent vectors, span of vectors, basis-the building
blocks of vector spaces and dimension of a vector spaces.
In the present chapter, we will study the functions on vector spaces which preserves
their structure in some sense. Since in order to pass from one space to another and to
compare the spaces both in term of the sets under consideration and the operations
acting on the sets, some different kind of approach is needed which gives rise to the
special class of functions known as linear transformations.
2. Definition and Examples of Linear Transformation
In this section, the formal definition of a linear transformation along with its several
fundamental properties and examples are given.
Definition 2.1 Let and be two vector spaces over the same field . A function
is called a linear transformation if, for all and , we have
i. and
ii.
For the vector spaces and over the field , the identity transformation is
defined as for all and the zero transformation is defined as
for all
Let us see some of its examples:
Example 2.2 Let be defined by then for and
, we have
Thus, is a linear transformation.
Example 2.3 Let be defined as , then for
and we have
Clearly,
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 3
Linear Transformations
Thus, is not a linear transformation.
Recall that a function is said to be additive function if
for all
Example 2.4 Consider an additive function , where and are vector spaces
over the field of rational numbers .
Let us show that is a linear transformation i.e., we need to verify only the condition (ii)
of Definition 2.1.
Let
Now, for ,
-times
So,
-times
Thus, every additive function , where and are vector spaces over the field of
rational numbers is a linear transformation.
Value Addition
Consider a vector space over a field of complex numbers and let be a
function given by .
Let , where and , then we have
is additive.
But since
So, is additive but it doesn’t form a linear transformation.
Note that an additive function does not form a linear transformation.
Thus, the statement posed in above example does not hold in general and it depends on
the field .
In the following theorem, properties of linear transformation are given.
Theorem 2.4 Let be a linear transformation. Then,
(i)
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 4
Linear Transformations
(ii)
(iii) for all
Proof. (i) We have
Since is linear,
Using cancellation law in the group we have .
(ii) We have
by (i).
Hence
(iii) Now,
as is linear.
by (ii).
The next result gives the necessary and sufficient conditions under which forms
a linear transformation.
Theorem 2.5 Let and be two vector spaces over the field , then is a linear
transformation if and only if , for all and
Proof. Let be a linear transformation, then for all and we have
Conversely, let , for all and .
If we take , then
, for all
and if we put , then we have
, for all and .
So, by Definition 2.1, is a linear transformation.
The above result is the alternate way to verify whether a function is linear
transformation or not. We generally use Theorem 2.5 to prove the linearity of the
transformation.
In general, for and , is linear if and only if
.
Example 2.6 Suppose that denotes the vector space of real-valued continuous
functions on . Let with
Define by for all
Now, for and we have
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 5
Linear Transformations
Hence is a linear transformation.
Recall that denotes the set of all matrices with entries from a field
of real numbers.
Example 2.7 Define as where is the transpose of
Then, for and we have
Hence is a linear transformation.
Definition 2.8 Suppose that is a vector space. Then, a linear operator defined on
is a linear transformation whose domain and co-domain are both
Next, we give few examples of linear operators.
Example 2.9 Define by the rule that by rotating counter clockwise by
is the vector for and Then, is called the
rotation by
Let be a non-zero vector of length such that it makes an angle of with the
positive direction of -axis and let
Then, and . Further, makes an angle of with the
positive direction of -axis.
So,
Let . Then, for we have
and
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 6
Linear Transformations
Thus,
Hence is linear.
Example 2.10 Consider a function defined by Then, is
known as reflection with respect to axis.
Further, for and we have
Hence is linear.
Example 2.11 Consider a function defined by then is
known as projection on the axis.
Further, and we have
Hence is linear.
Example 2.12 Consider a function given by .
For and we have
Thus, is linear.
Further, if then is called the dialation operator and if then the operator
is called the contraction operator.
3. Rank and Nullity of Linear Transformations
In this section, we will study two very important sets-the range and null space linked
with linear transformation . The purpose of finding these sets is to study the
essential properties of a linear transformation . We will give various results and
examples related to these sets.
Definition 3.1 Suppose that is a linear transformation. Then, the kernel (or
null space) of is given by
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 7
Linear Transformations
Definition 3.2 Suppose that is a linear transformation. Then, the image (or
range) of is given by
Example 3.3 Suppose that and are vector spaces, and let and
denote the zero and identity transformations respectively.
Then,
and
Example 3.4 Let be the transformation defined by
then find and
Solution. Let , then
This gives and .
Now,
Thus,
Also,
In the above two examples, one may note that the range and the null space of
are again subspaces. Is the above observation holds in general?
The answer to the above query is yes and the next result shows that the above
observation holds true in general.
Theorem 3.5 Suppose that be a linear transformation. Then, show that
(i) is a subspace of
(ii) is a subspace of .
Proof. (i). Let and denote the zero vectors in and respectively.
Since so we have
Let and let
Then,
Also,
Therefore, and so forms a subspace of
(ii). Since , so we have
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 8
Linear Transformations
Let and let , then there exist such that
and
So, and
Therefore and , so forms a subspace of
In the next result, a method to find a spanning set for the range of a linear
transformation is given.
Theorem 3.6 Suppose be a linear transformation, where and be two vector
spaces and let be a basis for then
Proof. Note that for each .
Recall that if is any subset of then is also a subspace of Further, is
the smallest subspace of containing
Since forms a subspace of , we can conclude that contains
Further, let then for some we have .
Now, since is a basis for , we have
for some
Also as is linear, therefore
Thus,
Hence
Note that Theorem 3.6 remains valid if is infinite, ,
Next, we define the rank and nullity of a linear transformation.
Definition 3.8 Suppose that is a linear transformation, where and are
vector spaces over a field and if and be finite-dimensional, then the nullity
of is defined as and the rank of is defined as
The following theorem gives the relationship between the dimension of a vector
space, rank and nullity of a linear transformation . Precisely, it says that given any
linear transformation , the dimension of the vector space is equal to the sum of the
dimensions of kernel of and range of
Dimension Theorem
Theorem 3.9 Let be a linear transformation, where are vector spaces such
that is finite dimensional, then
Proof. Let and and suppose be a basis for .
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 9
Linear Transformations
Then, since is finite and is a subspace of , we can extend to a
basis for .
We shall show that forms a basis for
Using Theorem 3.6, we have
Also, since for we have
where
Now, we claim that is a linearly independent subset.
Let
for
Since is linear, we have
So, clearly
Thus, there exist such that
This gives
As is a basis for , we have for all .
Therefore, is a linearly independent set.
Hence
Some authors refer above theorem as Sylvester’s Theorem.
Theorem 3.10 Suppose that is a linear transformation, where and are
vector spaces over a field . Then, is one-to-one if and only if
Proof. Let be one-to-one and let , then
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 10
Linear Transformations
So, we have
Therefore,
Conversely, let and suppose that for then we have
Then,
Thus, we have
This implies that
or
Hence is one-to-one.
Next, we summarize the equivalent conditions for which a linear transformation
where are finite-dimensional vector spaces is one-one or onto.
Theorem 3.11 Suppose that is linear, where and are finite dimensional
vector spaces with same dimension. Then, the following are equivalent:
i. is one-one.
ii. is onto.
iii.
Proof. Using Dimension theorem, we have
Now, by Theorem 3.10, we find that is one-to-one iff iff iff
iff i.e.,
Now, recall that if is a subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space and if
then .
This implies that i.e., is onto.
In the following two examples, let us use the above mentioned theorems to check
whether a given linear transformation is one-to-one or onto.
Example 3.12 Let be a linear transformation given by
where and is the derivative of .
Then, show that is a one-to-one linear transformation.
Solution. Using Theorem 3.6, we have
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 11
Linear Transformations
Now, since is linearly independent, so we have
Also, since , is not onto.
Using Dimension Theorem, we have
Therefore, by using Theorem 3.10, we deduce that is one-to-one.
Example 3.13 Suppose that is a linear transformation given by
Let then
This gives
Clearly, so Theorem 3.10, is one-to-one linear operator.
Also by using Theorem 3.11, is onto.
Thus, is one-to-one and onto.
The next theorem and corollary shows that how linear transformation is
determined by its action on a basis.
Theorem 3.14 Suppose that and are two vector spaces over such that
is a basis for . Then, for there exists exactly one linear
transformation such that for
Proof. Let be a vector, then
where , are scalars.
Define as …( )
We shall prove that is a linear transformation.
Let and
Since has basis ,
and
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 12
Linear Transformations
for
This gives
So,
Therefore, is a linear transformation.
Further,
Hence for
To prove the uniqueness of , let be any other linear transformation such that
For any we have
Therefore,
( is a linear transformation)
This gives
Thus, for all we have so
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 13
Linear Transformations
Therefore, we conclude that defined by ( ) is a unique linear transformation given by
for
Corollary 3.15 Suppose that are two linear transformations such that
, where and are vector spaces and let possess a finite basis
. Then, show that .
Proof. Suppose that is an arbitrary vector.
Since has a basis , so
Further, we have
Thus, for all and so
Next, we give the definition and some examples of -invariant subspaces of
Definition 3.16 Suppose that is a linear operator, where is a vector space. A
subspace of is said to be -invariant subspace if for every that is
Example 3.17 Zero subspace and are invariant subspaces of as and
Example 3.18 If be a linear operator and let , then .
So, is invariant subspace of
Also, if then for some
Therefore, is an invariant subspace of
Thus, and are invariant subspaces of
Some Solved Problems
Problem 1 Find the range, rank, null space and nullity of the linear transformation
such that .
Solution. Now,
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 14
Linear Transformations
is spanned by
Since is a subspace of which has dimension , these four vectors cannot form
basis for
One may even verify that is a set of linearly
dependent vectors.
Note that is a linearly independent set and hence form a basis for
This gives
Now,
In Matrix form , we have
We observe that the rank of the coefficient matrix is 3 ( , number of variables).
Hence , so one variable can be given arbitrary value.
Taking in and , we obtain
Thus,
So, is spanned by .
Problem 2 Give an example of a linear operator such that and
Also, if , then find the relation between and
Solution. Let be defined by , then clearly is a linear
transformation on .
Also note that , we have
But
Now, for all
for all .
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 15
Linear Transformations
Problem 3 Let be a linear transformation such that is finite and
, then prove that is even. Also, provide an example of such linear
transformation.
Solution. Since is a vector space of finite-dimension and are both
subspaces of , so
Using Dimension theorem,
Thus, is even.
Let be defined by
Then, is a linear transformation and
Hence and (even).
Problem 4 Let be a linear operator on a finite-dimensional vector space and
suppose that Show that
Solution. We have and
By Dimension theorem, we have
and
Since so
We shall prove that .
Let
as .
Now, let be arbitrary. Then, and
and for some
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 16
Linear Transformations
Problem 5 Let be linear and let and
Then, find . Is one-to-one?
Solution. Let .
For , let
Then,
This shows that is linearly independent.
Since, is a basis of
Now, suppose be arbitrary.
Then,
Thus,
Hence and so
Now, let us suppose that
Then, there exists such that and
So,
which is a contradiction. Hence
Therefore using Theorem 2.25, is one-to-one.
4. The Matrix Representation of Linear Transformation
In this section, we are going to analyse one of the most useful methods in the
study of linear transformation defined on a vector space with finite dimension. Such
method is known as the method of representing a linear transformation by a matrix.
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 17
Linear Transformations
Here, one-to-one correspondence between the matrices and the linear transformations
has been shown so that one can easily study the properties of matrices by using the
properties of linear transformation and vice versa. Let us first study the notion of an
ordered basis for a vector space.
Definition 4.1 Suppose that is a finite-dimensional vector space. A basis is said to be
an ordered basis for if it can be written in a certain specific order i.e., an ordered
basis for forms a finite sequence of vectors such that it is linearly independent and it
generates .
Example 4.2 For , and both are ordered bases. But
as ordered basis.
Value Addition
For is known as the standard ordered basis.
For the vector space we call as the standard ordered basis.
With the tool of ordered basis, one may find abstract vectors in an -dimensional
vector space with -tuples. This can be done through the notion of coordinate vectors.
Definition 4.3 Suppose that is an ordered basis for a vector space
with finite dimension and let for be the unique scalars such that
Then, the coordinate vector of relative to , represented by is defined by
Example 4.4 Let and suppose that be its standard ordered
basis. If then
In the following definition, matrix representation of a linear transformation is
given.
Definition 4.5 Let and be finite-dimensional vector spaces of dimensions and
respectively. Let and be their ordered bases
respectively.
Suppose that is a linear operator. Then, for each there exist
unique scalars such that
Then, the matrix defined by
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 18
Linear Transformations
is called the matrix representation of with respect to ordered bases written as
If and , then we write
Let us illustrate the computation of matrix representation of a linear
transformation in the following examples.
Example 4.6 Let be the linear transformation defined by
Let and be the ordered bases of and respectively.
Now, let us compute
Thus,
Also, if , then let us find .
We have
and
Hence
Next, let us study the addition and scalar multiplication operations of linear
transformations.
Definition 4.7 Suppose that be linear transformations, where and are
vector spaces over and let be any scalar.
We define the sum of and as such that
, for all
and the scalar multiplication of by is defined by such that
, for all
Using the addition and scalar multiplication operations given in the above
definition, the following theorem gives another vector space which is the collection of all
linear transformations from to over .
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 19
Linear Transformations
Definition 4.8 Suppose that and be vector spaces over . Then, the set of all
linear transformations from into over is denoted by
If then we write instead of
Theorem 4.9 Let and be vector spaces over a field and let be linear
transformations. Then,
a) is linear, for all
b) forms a vector space over
Proof.
a) Let and Then,
Hence is linear transformation.
b) and are linear transformations.
For and we have
This shows that is a linear transformation and therefore
Again, for , and we have
This shows that is a linear transformation, so
Further, for , and , we have
i.
(as addition in is commutative)
ii. .
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 20
Linear Transformations
(as addition in is associative)
iii. , where is the zero linear transformation
and is called the additive identity of
iv. So, is the additive inverse of
Thus, forms an additive abelian group with respect to operation of
addition. Also,
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
Hence, the collection comprising of all linear transformations from into
forms a vector space over .
The next theorem gives the matrix representations for addition and scalar
multiplication of linear transformations.
Theorem 4.10 Let be linear transformations, where and are two vector
spaces with finite dimensions and let and be the ordered bases of and
respectively, then
(i)
(ii) for all
Proof. Let and be the ordered bases of and
respectively, then there exist unique scalars and such that
and for
(i)
Thus,
Hence .
(ii) means that
This gives and therefore, we have
Hence
The following example illustrates the above theorem.
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 21
Linear Transformations
Example 4.11 Let and be linear transformations respectively
defined by and
Let be the ordered bases of and respectively.
Then, as we have computed in Example 4.6, .
Now,
Thus,
Also,
Then,
This gives
Now,
Hence
Some Solved Problems
Problem 6 Suppose that be a linear transformation defined by
and let and be the ordered bases of
and respectively. Then, find
Solution. We have
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 22
Linear Transformations
Hence
Problem 7 Find the matrix representation of the linear operator given by
relative to the basis
Solution. Since
therefore, we have .
Problem 8 Let be a linear operator on defined by where denotes
the standard ordered basis of Describe explicitly
Solution. The standard ordered basis of is
Then,
Now, consider
Therefore, linear operator is explicitly written as
for all
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 23
Linear Transformations
5. Composition of Linear Transformations and Matrix
Multiplication
In this section, we will find that there exists a relationship between the matrix
representations of the composite of linear transformations and that of their associated
linear transformations. The following result shows that the composite of linear
transformations is linear.
Theorem 5.1 Let and be linear transformations, where and be
vector spaces over the field . Then, defined by is a linear
transformation.
Proof. Let and
Then,
(since is a linear transformation)
(since is a linear transformation)
Next, some properties of the composition of linear transformations are given.
Theorem 5.2 Suppose that where is a vector space. Then,
(i) and
(ii)
(iii)
(iv) for all the scalars
Proof. (i) Let and consider
(since )
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Suppose that and be linear transformations and let
and where and are the
ordered bases of and respectively.
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 24
Linear Transformations
For , we have
where
The above discussion gives the motivation for the following definition of matrix
multiplication.
Definition 5.3 Suppose that and are matrices of order and
respectively. Then, their product, denoted by is defined as the matrix of order
such that for and , we have
One may note that represents the sum of products of corresponding entries from
the row of and column of
The next result is a direct outcome of the definition of matrix multiplication.
Theorem 5.4 Suppose that and are two linear transformations,
where and are vector spaces over the field with ordered bases and
respectively. Then,
Proof. Let and be two linear transformations and let and
where and have ordered bases and
respectively.
For we have
(Since is commutative)
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 25
Linear Transformations
It follows that the entry in is , where .
Also, the entry in is equal to
Therefore,
Corollary 5.5 Suppose that be a vector space with ordered basis and is of finite
dimension and let then
Proof. The proof can be obtained on the similar lines of the above theorem.
Let us illustrate the Theorem 5.4 by the following example.
Example 5.6 Let and denote the linear transformations
defined as
and
respectively.
Let be the ordered bases of and respectively.
Clearly, .
Now,
So,
Further,
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 26
Linear Transformations
This gives
Also,
This gives
Therefore,
Hence Theorem 5.4 is verified.
The next theorem gives the analogues of (i), (iii), and (iv) of Theorem 5.2.
Theorem 5.7 Suppose that is an matrix, and are matrices of order
and and are matrices of order .Then,
(i) and ( .
(ii) for any scalar
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 27
Linear Transformations
(iii)
(iv) If is a vector space of finite dimension and ordered basis then
Proof.
(i) Consider
So,
Similarly, we can prove that
(ii) We have
Also,
and
So, for any scalar ,
(iii) We have
,
where with denotes the identity matrix and
denotes the Kronecker delta.
(iv) We have where is the vector of .
Corollary 5.8 Suppose that is matrix of order and let be
matrices and be matrices and be scalars. Then,
and
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 28
Linear Transformations
Proof. Using Theorem 5.7, we have
and
The following result gives the relationship between the columns of matrices
and .
Theorem 5.9 Let and be matrices of order and respectively. Suppose
that for each , where , and denotes the columns of and
respectively. Then, we have
i.
ii. where denotes the standard vector of
Proof
i. We have
ii. We have
since .
In the following result, the matrix multiplication and the matrix representation of a
linear transformation have been used to evaluate the transformation at any given vector.
Theorem 5.10 Suppose that is a linear transformation, where and are
vector spaces of finite dimension and and respectively be the ordered bases of and
. Then, for each we have
Proof. Let be fixed.
Now, for all we define linear transformations given by and
given by
Let denote the standard ordered basis of
We note that
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 29
Linear Transformations
Now, if we identify the column vectors as matrices and then on using Theorem 5.4, we
have
We illustrate the above theorem by the following example.
Example 5.11 Suppose that is the linear transformation given by
and let and denote the standard ordered bases of and
respectively.
If , then by Problem 7, we have
Now, we will verify Theorem 5.10 by showing that .
Let , then and suppose that
Also,
Hence
Next, we see that with the introduction of the left-multiplication transformation
for matrix of order , the properties of transformation work analogously for matrices
and vice-versa.
Definition 5.12 Let denote a matrix of order with entries from a field . Let
be a mapping defined by for every column vector , where
denotes the matrix product of and . This mapping is known as left-
multiplication transformation.
Example 5.13 Let .
Then, and given by is a left-multiplication
transformation.
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 30
Linear Transformations
If , then
The next theorem gives some of the useful properties of left-multiplication
transformation
Theorem 5.14 Suppose that is a matrix of order with entries from . Then, the
left-multiplication transformation is linear. Also, if is any other matrix of
order with entries from and if and denotes the standard ordered bases of
and respectively. Then, the following properties holds true.
i.
ii. if and only if
iii. and , for all
iv. If be a linear transformation, then there exists a unique matrix
with order with In particular,
v. If is a matrix of order , then .
vi. If , then
Proof. Let and Then,
(by definition)
(using Theorem 5.7)
Hence is linear.
i. The column of is equal to which in turn equals to which is
nothing but the column of using Theorem 5.9 (ii).
So, clearly
ii. Let
Then, using (i), we have
Converse can be obtained by reversing back these steps.
iii. Let then
Thus,
Again, let and , then
Hence
iv. Let , then by using Theorem 5.10, we have
for all
Hence
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 31
Linear Transformations
Also, using (ii) matrix is unique.
v. For any , if we apply Theorem 5.9 numerous times, we note that
is the column of and the column of is also equal to
So, clearly
Thus,
Therefore, by using Corollary 3.15, we have
vi. For all vectors we have
Thus,
Next, left-multiplication transformations are used to set up the associativity of
matrix multiplication.
Theorem 5.15 Suppose that and are matrices such that is defined. Then,
is also defined and the matrix multiplication is associative, that is .
Proof. is clearly well defined matrix.
Now using Theorem 5.14 (v) and using the associative property of functional
composition, we have
Therefore, using Theorem 5.14 (ii),
Alternately, we can prove it as follows:
Suppose that and be and matrices respectively.
Clearly, is well defined matrix.
We will claim that
Now,
Hence .
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 32
Linear Transformations
Exercises
1. Let and be two vector spaces over the field , then
is a linear transformation if and only if for and we
have
2. Does there exists any linear transformation such that
? Justify.
3. Find the range, rank, Ker and nullity of the linear transformation such
that .
4. Let be a linear transformation such that is not onto, then show that
there exists some non-zero vector such that
5. Let be a linear transformation. Show that the following statements are
equivalent:
i.
ii. If then .
6. Let and be the linear transformations given by
and respectively. Let
denote the standard ordered bases for and respectively. Then, find
and and use them to verify Theorem 5.4.
7. Let and be linear transformations, where and are
vector spaces. Then
a) Prove that if is one-to-one, then is also one-to-one. Check whether
in this case is one-to-one or not.
b) Prove that if is onto, then is also onto. Check whether in this case
is onto or not.
c) Prove that if and are both one-to-one and onto, then is also.
8. Let denote a linear transformation given by where
denotes the transpose of matrix . Then, using Theorem 5.10, find
, where denotes the standard ordered basis for
9. Let be a linear transformation defined by
and let and denotes the standard ordered bases for and
respectively. Then find
10. Suppose that and be two vector spaces over a field and let and be non-
zero linear transformations from into . Further, if then prove
that has a linearly independent subset
11. Suppose that be a linear transformation given by
and let be the standard ordered basis for Then find
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 33
Linear Transformations
12. Let be a linear transformation defined by
Further, let be the standard ordered basis for and let
Then find Also, if , then find
13. Suppose that be vector space with dimension and let be its ordered basis.
Further, let be defined by Then, prove that is linear.
References
1. S. H. Friedberg, A. J. Insel and L. E. Spence, Linear Algebra (4 th Edition),
Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2004.
2. S. Andrilli and D. Hecker, Elementary Linear Algebra (4 th Edition), Academic
Press, 2012.
3. B. Kolman and D. R. Hill, Introductory Linear Algebra with Applications (7 th
Edition), Pearson Education, 2003.
4. S. Lang, Introduction to Linear Algebra (2nd Edition), Springer, 2005.
5. Gilbert Strang, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Thomson, 2007.
6. S. Kumaresan, Linear Algebra - A Geometric Approach, Prentice-Hall of India,
1999.
7. Kenneth Hoffman, Ray Alden Kunze, Linear Algebra (2 nd Edition), Prentice-Hall of
India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1971.
Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Delhi 34