Environmental Impact Assessment Overview
Environmental Impact Assessment Overview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHJs3TwgsU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwPSDMUtN
Q mk
Bhopal-A prayer for Rain
https://youtu.be/9Bv6AsQ4sAU
QUESTIONS
• SHOULD UNION CARBIDE BE MADE RESPONSIBLE FOR LIVES LOST?
• WHAT IS THE ROLE OF BUSINESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION?
• WHAT MEASURES CAN THE GOVERNMENT TAKE TO PROTECT THE
STAKEHOLDER?
One of the best places for building a dam is a narrow part of a deep river valley; the valley sides can then act as natural
walls. The primary function of the dam's structure is to fill the gap in the natural reservoir line left by the stream
channel.
• HTTPS://WWW.THEHINDU.COM/NEWS/NATIONAL/OTHER-STATES/ASSAM-FLOOD-
DEVASTATION-MONSOON-BRAHMAPUTRA-REASON-CAUSE/ARTICLE65549836.ECE
NEXT BHOPAL AWAITS- PORUS LABS
• CAUSES
• Ineffective management • MEASURES THAT COULD HAVE
BEEN TAKEN
• Lack of SOP on floor
• Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
• Unclear Accountability • Clear instruction on the use of material with
• Information failure appropriate direction and signage
DownToEarth (2022), Beyond the Abyss how global warming affects the oceans.1-15July, Pg 52.
DOWNTOEARTH.IN.ORG
CASE EXAMPLE
A major example of the environmental harm caused by human activity Sociologists McCarthy and King (2009) cite several other
was the British Petroleum (BP) oil spill that began in April 2010 when an environmental accidents that stemmed from reckless decision making
oil rig leased by BP exploded in the Gulf of Mexico and eventually and natural disasters in which human decisions accelerated the harm
released almost 5 million barrels of oil (about 200 million gallons) into the that occurred. One accident occurred in Bhopal, India, in 1984, when a
ocean. Congressional investigators later concluded that BP had made a Union Carbide pesticide plant leaked forty tons of deadly gas. Between
series of decisions that “increased the danger of a catastrophic well,” 3,000 and 16,000 people died immediately and another half million
including a decision to save money by using an inferior casing for the well suffered permanent illnesses or injuries. A contributing factor for the
that made an explosion more likely. A news report paraphrased the leak was Union Carbide’s decision to save money by violating safety
investigators as concluding that “some of the decisions appeared to violate standards in the construction and management of the plant.
industry guidelines and were made despite warnings from BP’s own
employees and outside contractors” (Fountain, 2010, p. A1).
Source : https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-socialproblems/chapter/15-3-the-environment/
EVOLUTION & HISTORY OF EIA
• EIA IS TERMED AS ONE OF THE BEST POLICY INNOVATIONS IN THE 1900S.
THE MAIN AIM OF EIA IS TO CONSERVE THE ENVIRONMENT AND
BRING OUT THE BEST COMBINATION OF ECONOMIC AND
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS AND BENEFITS.
• THE BIRTH OF EIA IS DATED BACK TO THE 1970S. IN 1969, THE USA HAD
BROUGHT ITS FIRST NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT POLICY ACT (NEPA) 1969.
• The entire EIA procedure can be attributed as the outcome of the 1992 Rio declaration, which emphasized the
need for direct public participation in the decision-making process pertaining to environmental issues.
• The origin of EIA can be traced to the highly recognized and well-established ‘precautionary principle of
environmental jurisprudence in India as well as around the world. Since any harm done to the environment is
mainly irreversible, it is always better to minimize it rather than remedy it. All environment-based legislations
aim to balance sustainable development and environmental protection and recognize the importance of such
large-scale projects.
• EIA had started in India in 1976-77 when the Planning Commission directed the
Department of Science & Technology to assess the river valley projects from the
point of view of the environment. It was later extended for all those projects that
required approval from the Public Investment Board.
• EIA was first introduced in 1994 with regard to the various river valley projects all
over the country and later expanded to include various other developmental
procedures in its scope. EIA is now mandatory for over 30 classes of projects.
• The environmental protection rules, 1986 warrant for the imposition of certain
restrictions on the construction/ expansion/ modernization of specific projects
without prior approval from the central, state, or union territory level
environmental impact assessment authority (EIAA) constituted under the
environment protection act, 1986.
THE EIA PROCESS
EIA INVOLVES THE STEPS MENTIONED BELOW. HOWEVER, THE EIA PROCESS IS CYCLICAL WITH INTERACTION
BETWEEN THE VARIOUS STEPS.
• Screening: the project plan is screened for scale of investment, location and type of development and if
the project needs statutory clearance.
• Scoping: the project’s potential impacts, zone of impacts, mitigation possibilities and need for
monitoring.
• Collection of baseline data: baseline data is the environmental status of study area.
• Impact prediction: positive and negative, reversible and irreversible and temporary and permanent
impacts need to be predicted which presupposes a good understanding of the project by the assessment
agency.
• Mitigation measures and EIA report: the EIA report should include the actions and steps for
preventing, minimizing or by passing the impacts or else the level of compensation for probable
environmental damage or loss.
• Public hearing: on completion of the EIA report, public and environmental groups living close to project
site may be informed and consulted.
• Decision making: impact assessment authority along with the experts consult the project-in-charge along
with consultant to take the final decision, keeping in mind eia and emp (environment management plan).
• Once alternatives have been reviewed, a mitigation plan should be drawn up for the selected option and is
supplemented with an environmental management plan (EMP) to guide the proponent towards environmental
improvements.
• Risk assessment: inventory analysis and hazard probability and index also form part of EIA procedures.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxh3MxOvD
Stakeholders in Process
•Those who propose the project
•The environmental consultant who prepare EIA on
behalf of project proponent
•Pollution Control Board (State or National)
•Public has the right to express their opinion
•The Impact Assessment Agency
•Regional centre of the Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change (MoEFCC)
CATEGORY OF EIA PROJECTS
• 3. Impact assessment - the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) identifies and evaluates the amount
and significance of the potential environmental impacts arising from the LCI. The inputs outputs are
first assigned to impact categories and their potential impacts quantified according to characterization
factors.
• 4. Interpretation :The aim of the interpretation phase is to reach conclusions and recommendations
within the defined goal and scope of the study. Results from the LCI and LCIA are combined together
and reported in order to give a complete and unbiased account of the study. [ISO, 2000b]
Source: https://dantes.info/Tools&Methods/Environmentalassessment/enviro_asse_lca_example.html
Life Cycle Assessment systems
► Cradle to Grave: includes the material and energy production
chain and all processes from the raw material extraction
through the production, transportation and use phase up to the
product’s end of life treatment.
► Cradle to Gate: includes all processes from the raw material
extraction through the production phase (gate of the factory);
used to determine the environmental impact of the production
of a product.
► Gate to Grave: includes the processes from the use and
end-of-life phases (everything post production); used to
determine the environmental impacts of a product once it
leaves the factory.
► Gate to Gate: includes the processes from the production
phase only; used to determine the environmental impacts of a
single production step or process.
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
WHAT IS SOCIAL DEGRADATION ?
• The degradation of society as a process of destruction of the individual, society and the state.
Consequences include increased poverty, overcrowding, famine, weather extremes, species loss, acute and
chronic medical illnesses, war and human rights abuses, quality of life and an increasingly unstable global
situation, chaos and disaster.
Action: The sustainable business’s social impact would include business practices and policies related to
working conditions, diversity in hiring, opportunities for advancement for women and minorities, lack of
discrimination, and the provision of affordable health care and other necessary benefits. In addition, social
impact includes wages, breaks, adherence to employment laws, safety, training, and numerous other specific
labor practices. Finally, social impact includes the impact on the local public and social services sector as a
result of the business’s activities.
HUMAN CAPITAL DEGRADATION
• Circle your confessions, leaving the center tile blank for now.
• Show your card to the group and select one tile to share a personal
experience around.
• As a group discuss
• Does social Networking Co’s presence influence community living? How
?
• As a stakeholder, should the social networking company’s be accountable
social degradation?
• Do you think social Media has the power to curb social Degradation?
• How you might take action to reduce the negative effects of these
technologies on your life & your loved one’s?
Source: https://www.thesocialdilemma.com/start-a-conversation/
Organisations are consciously investing in social capital to empower the marginalised
SOCIAL CAPITAL sections of the society and engage with the community in meaningful ways, which, in
turn, helps build customer loyalty.
https://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/the-index/social-capital
• TOMS shoes is an example of a company making a commitment to
POSITIVE maximize its social impact. In 2006, blake mycoskie founded TOMS
SOCIAL shoes with the singular mission of improving the lives of children by
providing shoes to those in need. Shoes are produced in Argentina and
IMPACT china following fair labor practices while creating minimal
environmental impact. Factories are monitored by TOMS and
third-party independent auditors. TOMS shoes are sold online and in
retail locations around the world with the promise that for each
pair purchased, TOMS will donate a second pair to a child in need
in Argentina, south Africa, and other locations around the world.
The public is invited to participate in “shoe drops” around the world
and to experience firsthand the social contribution of TOMS shoes.
Source:
https://yaleglobalhealthreview.com/2016/07/08/toms-impact-and-effectiveness-of-buy-one-give-one-model/#:~:text=
The%20niche%20the%20company%20occupies,donated%20to%20communities%20in%20need.
https://www.tatasteel.com/investors/integrated-report-2018-19/s
ocial-and-relationship-capital.html
GODREJ INDIA CULTURAL LAB
WHAT CAN COMPANIES DO TO INCREASE
THEIR SOCIAL IMPACT ?
A sustainable business should consider the social impact of its business operations on employees, those employed throughout the supply chain, and on the community. So how can a business begin to maximize its social
impact? Here are some practices that will help create positive social impact:
• Follow UN global compact: review the 10 principles of the united nations global compact and abide by them, whether or not the business becomes a
signatory.
• Conduct & Buy fair trade: seek out opportunities to purchase fair trade products for your business. Fair trade products ensure that those who produced the
product in developing countries were paid a fair wage under humane working conditions. You can purchase fair trade clothing, handicrafts, coffee, cocoa,
sugar, tea, bananas, honey, cotton, wine, fresh fruit, flowers, and other products.
• Integrate Company policies and practices to sustainable goals : consider the social impact of your company’s policies and practices on employees
(such as health care coverage, educational opportunities, and worklife balance).
• Philanthropy: evaluate the impact of your corporate giving programs. Find opportunities that are strategically related to your core business, and focus your
philanthropy in those areas, benefiting both the community and the business.
• Supply chain linked to Value Chain: understand the conditions under which the products and supplies you purchase were produced; work with suppliers to
achieve transparency throughout the supply chain; check the web sites of any of the numerous watchdog organizations (e.G., Corpwatch, sweatshop watch,
international labor rights forum) to find world regions, specific companies, and industries known for human rights abuses that could be occurring within your
supply chain.
• Labor: first, make sure your business follows policies and practices that are fair to its labor force; a good place to start is SA8000 and the international labour
standards; review and understand the standards, whether or not your business seeks certification; support freedom of association, collective bargaining, and
nondiscrimination in your own place of business as well as with suppliers; in purchasing, avoid products that were produced using forced and child labor. See
green America's 9 cool ways to avoid sweatshops, http://www.Coopamerica.Org/programs/sweatshops/whatyoucando/9coolways.Cfm; look for certifications
from fair trade federation, fair labor association, social accountability international, rugmark, verite, worker rights consortium, or others that have
independently evaluated labor conditions.
An experiment in India shows how much companies have to gain by investing in
their employees
by achyuta adhvaryu, lavanya garg, namrata kala, and anant nyshadham
• For many low-wage garment workers in India, even basic education and training can make the difference between a life of dignity or a life
of extreme poverty and degradation. Common sense would suggest that managers of such low-wage workers — who focus relentlessly on
keeping costs down — would have no incentive to provide such training or personal and career development. But our research suggests a
better way to manage low-wage workers in developing economies: investing in these workers is good for society and the bottom line. In
july 2013, we implemented a randomized controlled trial in five factory units in bangalore operated by shahi exports, pvt. Ltd., India’s
biggest garment export firm. The trial covered 2,703 workers who initially expressed interest in the program and involved the application of
the personal advancement and career enhancement (P.A.CE) training program — a life skills course for female garment workers designed
by gap, inc. P.A.C.E teaches communication, time management, decision making, problem solving, and financial literacy are taught
through weekly group sessions in the workplace. But that’s not all. On the business side, trained workers were more productive by 7
percentage points post-training, and the average complexity of the sewing operations to which they were assigned rose considerably.
Moreover, more workers were retained during the program (3 percentage points higher retention during the program), as P.A.C.E. Training
was akin to an in-kind transfer from the firm to the workers. After 9 months, we calculated the net rate of return to the company’s
investment in P.A.C.E. Training for workers at nearly 250%. The high return to the program can be explained by the fact that the low
cumulative costs flat-lined after program completion, while the benefits (mostly accruing due to productivity increases) continued to rise.
Source:
https://hbr.org/2017/07/an-experiment-in-india-shows-how-much-companies-have-to-gain-by-investing-in-thei
r-employees
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL
DEGRADATION AS THE ENGINE OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH
• Abstract
• In this paper, a commonly owned resource (an environmental or social asset) and a private good are substitutes in
consumption. The households can buy the private good on the market, while the resource is available for free. The resource is
renewable, but its ability to regenerate declines with the level of aggregate production: each single firm producing the private
good has only a negligible impact on the resource, but the impact caused by the entire population of firms is considerable. In
the face of a decrease in the stock of the resource, households are induced to increase their participation in market activities in
order to raise their income and buy more private goods. Hence, each household contributes to a further increase in aggregate
production, thus causing additional damage to the resource's ability to regenerate and feeding the growth process. Given the
presence of negative externalities, multiple equilibrium paths are possible. In this situation, social conventions may guide
individuals to coordinate expectations and behavior toward a particular steady state: one can speculate that the dominance of
cultural values favorable to a lifestyle based on a mix of high consumption and hard work leads the economy to converge on a
pareto-inferior steady-state.