Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. Szapudi
Outline
Linear ISW
Coldspot Analysis/Observations
I. Szapudi
Photons passing through changing gravitational potentials are becoming slightly hotter or colder TISW where d d , d
I. Szapudi
In a at, matter dominated universe D1 = 1/(1 + z), There is a linear effect if M = 1, e.g., CDM If the universe is at (e.g., from CMB), linear ISW effect signals Dark Energy Caviat: there can be a non-linear effect as well
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Potential reconstruction
First we calculate local density using a Voronoi tessalation (adaptive smoothing) Then we some the potential contributed by each galaxy (r) = Gcr,0 m (1 + zmed ) c2 V (zi ) Vi |r ri |
Survey is projected to median redshift z = 0.52 Derivative of potential is calculated by reprojecting to the appropriateredshift using linear growth function Finally. raytracing through the linear potential derivative eld We expect that our TISW = (1/bg )TISW
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB
(true)
(LRG)
I. Szapudi
(1)
with variance 2 = (YC 1 Y )1 , where C is the CMB (noise) cov. matrix is related to the bias (and any numerical factors missed in the prediction) looks like an optimal sum over a two-point quantity
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Voboz/Zobov algorithms to nd supervoids and superclusters int the LRG catalog Cutting out the highest signal-to-noise areas (simple weighting) Photometric redshift information is used Actual realization of the galaxy (DM) eld is used Linear use of the data Possibility of localizing the signal, especially if there is a non-linear component
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Detection signicance
Robust against number, radius, color.
N 30 50 70 50 50 50 50 50
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
I. Szapudi
Coldspot
Non-Gaussian area (Vielva etal 2004, Cruz etal 2005) unlikely at the 0.5% level (Cruz etal 2006) Zhang & Huterer *2009): skeptical view T 70 K 5 area Rudnick etal 2007: hint of a supervoid in the NVSS (debated by Smith & Huterer 2008) Inoue & Silk (2007): 200 h1 Mpc void with = 0.3 Many other ideas (e.g., SZ, textures, Cruz etal 2008 for review) We performed observations with CFHT Megacam to test a 100 h1 Mpc void at z < 1
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB
Spot Finding
200
36 200 36
200
200
K
36 200
Galactic latitude
Galactic latitude
56 66 76
56 66 76
Galactic latitude
46
100
46
100
46 56 66 76
100
100 200
100 200
100 200
199
Galactic longitude
204
209
214
219
199
Galactic longitude
204
209
214
219
199
Galactic longitude
204
209
214
219
I. Szapudi
Hierarchical pixelization
Polarization!
I. Szapudi
Table 4.1 Cold spot signicance centered on l = 209, b = 56.6 Temp. and polarization Temperature only R T (K) TCR (K) |T TCR |/CR TCR (K) |T TCR |/CR 6 91.4 28.0 17.8 3.6 27.1 17.8 3.6 65.1 15.6 17.0 2.9 13.8 17.0 3.0 8 10 47.6 5.9 16.5 3.2 5.9 16.5 3.2 12 31.4 31.6 16.5 3.8 35.5 16.3 4.1 8.1 34.7 16.3 2.6 40.4 16.1 3.0 15
4.3
Table 4.2 The signicance of Rudnicks Spot on the CMB Temp. and polarization Temperature only R T (K) TCR (K) |T TCR |/ TCR (K) |T TCR |/CR Corrected 6 82.3 37.3 17.9 2.5 36.5 17.9 2.6 2.1 3.0 11.3 16.9 3.1 2.7 8 63.1 13.1 16.9 10 46.8 1.2 16.5 2.9 1.2 16.5 2.9 2.5 12 31.6 14.2 16.4 2.8 18.5 16.3 3.1 2.7 32.6 16.2 2.9 38.0 16.0 3.3 3.0 15 15.2
In summary, we nd evidence at the 3 level that the NVSS underdensity located by Rudnic
is associated with the Cold Spot on the CMB. We arrive at this conclusion by xing the center o
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB
the structure and estimating the deviation of the region around it on the CMB. Although we remai
Signicance of Superstructures
no polarization yet
temperature at voids and clusters T TCR (K ) Voids 9.4 2.8 Clusters 7.3 2.8 (Clusters Voids)/2 8.4 2.0
Coldspot Area
I. Szapudi
Figure 5.11 Large structures are evident in the projected densities including two clusters at z=0.6
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB
Individual Structures
Field A, z = 0.6 a cluster, conrmed by visual Field B, z = 0.2, strong 60% drop in counts, a 2.8 uctuation Field F shows low counts overall, especially in the two low-z bins. Likely to cause the NVSS feature Oscillation in D might be enhanced by anticorrelations, but the underdensity at z=0.6 appears to be real In general, there is more variation then cosmic variance would suggest: many elds deviate more than 2 in at least one bin Caviat: the lowest and highest z bin might be the most uncertain
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB
I. Szapudi
Marginalized Likelihood
I. Szapudi
Combined Fields
a = 0.3 100 h1 Mpc void would correspond to a density drop of b = 0.45 this would show up at z = 0.6 as a drop of 15% We rule out a void of 200 h1 Mpc = 0.3 at 105 level in the high z bins at z = 0.4 it is ruled out only at 7 103 Finally the low redshift bin shows a signicant underdensity
I. Szapudi
in terms of cosmic variance a deviation of 20% is only 2.3 It is seen in A,B,D,F, but not in the adjacent E We cannot conclusively detect a supervoid The data are consistent with a 160 h1 Mpc = 0.3 void that would do the trick We will have Pan-STARRS data in the future that will decide Note that the our previous supervoid measurement appear to indicate that the signal might be higher than our LCDM estimate
I. Szapudi
Summary
www.ifa.hawaii.edu/supervoids for more
Methods: ray tracing of potential maps, stacking, and constrained realization. Over 2 detection of the linear ISW: c.f. and potentia maps Signal from superstructures over 4 very robustly and consistent with linear ISW from concordance model Our Coldspot measurements do not support the existence of a 200 h1 Mpc supervoid on redhifts 0.3 < z < 0.9 and it is unlikely that one would hide at z > 1 A hint of a large low redshift void that could be a reason for the Coldspot, however, we cannot make a robust statement with the present data Pan-STARRS 6 for linear ISW + superstructures+ Cold Spot
I. Szapudi Spots on the CMB