Safety Compliance Report for Viken A & B
Safety Compliance Report for Viken A & B
VIKEN A and B
Item Hazard Risk Required Action Responsibility Action Date
The first aid kit was not The ability to provide timely and Refill the first aid kit
First Aid adequately stocked with some effective first aid may be and safety dispose the William Migoya 31/07/2024
items expired compromised expired items
Need for safety boots/shoes,
safety helmets, disposable Probability of workers getting
Persinal Protective Provide the defficient
gloves and leather gloves, injured due to lack of the PPES is William Migoya 31/07/2024
Equipemnt PPES
more overalls and headgear high.
for viken A.
Workers in Viken B not Risk of a worker getting Need for SOP for
obersving the set stacking injured/struck by the poorly stacking and toolbox William Migoya
Housekeeping guidelines stacked crates talk on housekeeping 5/6/2024
No reports/minutes from the Need for a health
safety and health health and safety safety and health committee and safety William Migoya
committee committee meeting committee 31/09/2024
closed
open
closed
open
open
open
open
closed
Status
Gallery
open
open
open
open
open
closed
open
closed
Status
Gallery
open
open
open
open
closed
open
open
closed
open
closed
closed
closed
Open
open
Open
Status
Gallery
Closed
open
open
closed
closed
open
closed
closed
Open
Open
Open
Section Hazard/Finding Risk Involved & People at Risk.
Additional controls/Corrective
controls already in place Action
Trident Risk
Legislative Referenece Probability (P) Severity (R) RR
Trident Risk Register By William Migoya (HSE Officer)
Owner Action Date
Officer)
Status Photo Log
Photo Log
Risk Rating
Risk is usually defined as “The combination of the likelihood of a hazardous event occurring combined with the s
Risk estimation and evaluation will be done based on the below 5x5 matrix:
1-Extremely
1-Very minor injury
unlikely
LIKELIHOOD
2-Unlikely 2-First Aid Injury
3-Lost Time Injury
3-Possible requiring 3 or more
days off duty
4-Hospital treatment
4-Likely or major property
damage
5-Disabling Injury or
5-Very possible major property
damage
After risk estimation and evaluation, the risk rating and correc
CONSEQUENCE
Table 3: Corrective Action
Risk
Level
Low
Medium
High
Very
high
curring combined with the severity of the harm that could result”.
Likely 4 8 12 16 20
Possible 3 6 9 12 15
Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10
Very
1 2 3 4 5
unlikely
Very
Insignificant Low medium high
high
on, the risk rating and corrective action is guided by the matrix below:
CONSEQUENCE
Table 3: Corrective Action and Implication of the risk ratings
Risk
Corrective action Implication
rating
· Not reportable to
regulator
Acceptable – If simple employees or third
action can reduce further, parties, such as
≤4
then must be done within
one week.
· Isolated staff
dissatisfaction
·
National
short-term
negative
media
coverage
·
Report of
breach to
regulator
with
immediate
correction
to be
implemen
ted
Tolerable – must be
8-May reduced to below 5 · Out-
within 7 days patient
medical
treatment
required
for
employee
s or third
parties,
such as
visitors or
vendors
·
Widespre
ad staff
morale
problems
and high
turnover
·
Considera
ble
Financial
loss
·
National
long-term
negative
media
coverage;
significan
t loss of
market
share
·
Report to
regulator
requiring
Tolerable- Additional ü
controls must be Limited
introduced as soon as in-patient
12-Sep
possible and not later care
than 24hours after required
assessment for
employee
s or third
parties,
such as
visitors or
vendors
ü Some
senior
managers
leave,
· High
turnover
of
experienc
ed staff,
· not
perceived
as
employer
of choice
·
Financial
loss of
considera
ble
amount.
Kshs. 1
million or
more
·
Internatio
nal long-
term
negative
media
coverage;
game-
changing
loss of
market
share,
Significan
t
Unacceptable- Work may prosecutio
not start or proceed. n and
15-25 Additional controls must fines,
be introduced to reduce litigation
risk level to below 9 including
class
actions,
incarcerati
on of
leadership
;
·
Significan
t injuries
or
fatalities
to
employee
s or third
parties,
such as
visitors or
vendors
·
Multiple
senior
leaders
leave
OSH Objective KPI Monitor/Measures Report
Written work Tracking
procedures in place for Workplace policy report by OSH
critical activities and procedures % of written procedures rep
Written site specific Tracking
emergency response Site emergency Effectiveness or ERP when report by OSH
plan response plan the incidents occur rep
Tracking
Establishment of the Issue Committee At least holding of four report by OSH
safety committee TORs meetings in a year rep
All activities to be Tracking
subjected to quarterly % of controls measures report by OSH
risk assesment Risk Assesment implemented rep
Review progress at
the OSH committee
and site meetings
Review progress at
the OSH committee
and site meetings
Review progress at
the OSH committee
and site meetings
Item Hazard Section
Contractors and
suppliers obligation
agreement
Warehousing
Emergency response
Safe means of
acccess
Ergonomics
Machinery and
process safety
Fire Safety
Housekeeping and
hygiene
Housekeeping and
hygiene
Electrical safety
Waste Management
Water quality
Energy management
Hosekeeping
conducted
Status R
Table 1: Likelihood and severity of risks Ta
Low ≤4
Medium 5---8
Medium 5---8
High 9----14
njury Likely 4 8 12 16 20
ry Possible 3 6 9 12 15
LIKELIHOOD
ury
more Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10
ment
Very
rty 1 2 3 4 5
unlikely
ury or
Insignificant Low medium high Very high
ation and evaluation, the risk rating and corrective action is guided by the matrix below:
Acceptable – If simple
action can reduce further, · Not reportable to regulator
then must be done within
one week.
· Isolated staff dissatisfaction
16 20
12 15
8 10
4 5