0% found this document useful (0 votes)
859 views20 pages

Pre-Flop Ranges

Uploaded by

gvrnhiec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
859 views20 pages

Pre-Flop Ranges

Uploaded by

gvrnhiec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MTT 101

Pre-Flop Ranges
Opening Ranges
• Not prescriptive. Factors which can change them include:
– Multiple short stacks that can shove behind versus open.
– Aggressive players to your left.
– Extremely tight table.
• Can open wider range when ante is in play.
• Open very tight range from earlier positions.
• The closer we get to the BTN, the wider our opening range
should be.
• Be disciplined!
UTG & UTG+1 RFI

Without ante:
7.09% (94 combos)
66+,ATs+,AQo+

With ante:
11.31% (150 combos)
44+,ATs+,KJs+,ATo+,KQo
MP RFI

Without ante:
11.01% (146 combos)
44+,ATs+,KJs+,JTs,T9s,
AJo+,KQo

With ante:
13.73% (182 combos)
22+,ATs+,KTs+,QJs,JTs,T9s,
98s,AJo+,KJo+
LJ RFI

Without ante:
13.42% (178 combos)
22+,A5s+,KJs+,JTs,T9s,
AJo+,KQo

With ante:
17.35% (230 combos)
22+,A2s+,KTs+,QJs,JTs,T9s,
98s,87s,ATo+,KJo+
HJ RFI

Without ante:
14.33% (190 combos)
22+,A2s+,KJs+,JTs,T9s,
AJo+,KQo

With ante:
18.25% (242 combos)
K9s-
KTs,QTs+,98s,87s,76s,ATo,K
Jo
CO RFI

Without ante:
20.97% (278 combos)
22+,A2s+,K9s+,Q9s+,JTs,T
9s,98s,87s,A9o+,KTo+,QJo

With ante:
29.11% (386 combos)
22+,A2s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,
T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,A8o+,A
4o-A5o,K9o+,Q9o+,J9o+
BTN RFI
Without ante:
42.08% (558 combos)
22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J6s+,T6s
+,95s+,85s+,75s+,65s,54s,43s
,A2o+,K9o+,Q9o+,J9o+,T9o

With ante:
47.51% (630 combos)
22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T5s
+,95s+,85s+,75s+,64s+,53s+,
42s+,32s,A2o+,K8o+,Q8o+,J8o
+,T9o
SB RFI
Without ante:
35.44% (470 combos)
22+,A2s+,K8s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T7s
+,97s+,87s,76s,65s,A2o+,K9o
+,Q9o+,J9o+,T9o

With ante:
40.27% (534 combos)
22+,A2s+,K8s+,Q8s+,J7s+,T7s
+,97s+,86s+,75s+,65s,54s,A2o
+,K8o+,Q8o+,J8o+,T9o,98o
Calling Ranges
• Our pre-flop calling range facing an open should be tighter
than our pre-flop opening range.
– We don’t push fold equity.
– BB is the exception to this rule.
• Our calling range can usually be described as ‘capped’. This has
post-flop implications.
• We can use pot odds to calculate the equity our hand needs
versus our opponent’s opening range to profitably call.
– Call size / (pot size + call size) * 100 = equity required versus range to
call.
– Consider equity realisation given hand and position.
3-Betting
• Why 3-Bet?
– To get value.
– To push fold equity.
– To isolate weaker player(s)
• Smaller size when 3-betting in position (around 3x opening size
+ 2bb for every caller).
• Larger size when out of position (around 4x opening size + 2bb
for every caller).
• The earlier the position of the opener, the tighter our 3-betting
range should be.
3-Bet Example: SB VS UTG
UTG RFI SB 3-Bet VS UTG
3-Bet Example: BB VS SB
SB RFI BB 3-Bet VS SB RFI
Calling 3-Bets
• Understanding pot odds to calculate equity required versus
range:
– Call size / (pot size + call size) * 100 = equity required versus range to
call.
– Remember that we will likely under-realise our equity in 3-bet pots as
the caller due to a range disadvantage and lack of initiative.
• The smaller the 3-bet size is, the wider our calling range can be
(and vice versa).
• Consider post-flop playability and equity retention when
structuring 3-bet calling ranges.
Example: BB 3-Bet VS SB Open

• 9-handed table, 10% ante.


• SB opens to 3bb.
• BB 3-bets to 6.5bb.
• SB must call 3.5bb to win 10.4bb.
• Equity required versus range: (3.5 / (10.4 + 3.5) *
100) = 25.1%.
Example: BB 3-Bet VS SB Open
CONTINUED
BB 3-Bet VS SB RFI SB Call VS BB 3-Bet

SB RFI Equity VS BB 3-Bet


4-Betting

• Should be done infrequently because:


– 3-betting ranges are typically strong at micro stakes.
– We want to play a low-variance style in these early stages.
• Smaller relative size than 3-bet size (approximately
2.5x the size of the 3-bet).
• 4-betting range can expand versus later position
open/3-bets.
4-Betting Example: UTG VS SB 3-Bet
SB 3-Bet VS UTG RFI UTG 4-Bet VS SB 3-Bet
4-Betting Example: SB VS BB 3-Bet
BB 3-Bet VS SB RFI SB 4-Bet VS BB 3-Bet
Stacking Off

• In these early stages (when we are usually 50bb+


deep), we should only be calling all-ins with QQ,KK,AA
and AK.*
• If effective stacks are 100bb+, this range should be
limited to only KK and AA.*

*EXCEPT IF THERE IS A HUGE WHALE SPLASHING ABOUT!

You might also like