Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigator:
Richard Christenson
Dept. of Civil & Env. Engineering University of Connecticut
Andrew Emmons
Research Assistant CSM
Brent Bass
Research Assistant UConn NEES Facility Used:
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Overview
Structural control increases the safety and performance of a traditional design by redistributing and dissipating the energy of the structure Structural control is typically designed for and applied to linear structures, however, civil structures are designed to yield during extreme dynamic events Optimal design of a controlled structure may allow damage to occur during extreme dynamic loading
Overview
Examples of semiactive control devices
ER/MR Fluid
Control Valve, u
Overview
Semiactive control devices are ideally suited for demanding applications reduce structural responses increasing performance provide controllable and inherently stable means of structural control low power requirements This project will experimentally verify semiactive structural control applied to building exhibiting nonlinear material behavior during severe seismic events
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Analytical Study
The performance and reliability of a semiactive controlled seismically excited 3-story steel-frame building is examined analytically prior to the experimental studies Results submitted for publication to: 17th A&C Special Issue of the Journal of Structural Engineering
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Ground
The building models will be controlled for seismic protection using large-scale Magneto-Rheological (MR) fluid dampers 58 length, weight 615 lbs, stroke 23, temp change <80C, max control forces approximately 200 kN (80 kips), <60ms response time Command signal 24 volts, 2 amps (Advanced Motion Controls PWM Servo-Amplifier (30A8DDE) powered by a Twinfly 24-volt power supply (P-150-24) controlled by a 0-5 volt DC signal at a rate of up to 1 kHz
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Challenges: Sliding motion of dampers at ~20 kips FHT algorithm applied to semiactive control devices
Preliminary Results
MR Damper System Identification Hyperbolic-tangent model (Gavin 2001) Dynamics defined by:
k0 c0 . f0 (x0) x0 k1 m0 c1 x1 ^ f(t)
displacement (in)
Outline
Overview Analytical Studies Fast Hybrid Test Setup Preliminary Fast Hybrid Test Results Conclusions & Continued Research
Acknowledgements
NSF - Award CMS-0612661 (Pre-NEESR) Lord Corporation NEES FHT staff at CU Boulder NEESit staff