0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views21 pages

2.design Claculations at Ravulapenta

The document outlines the construction of a check dam across the Palleru River near Bommakal, detailing the catchment area, discharge calculations, and slope measurements. It includes various calculations for discharge using Dicken's formula and slope determination from ground levels at different upstream and downstream points. Additionally, it provides hydraulic radius, velocity, and discharge values for multiple cross-sections of the river.

Uploaded by

prasadvardhan39
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views21 pages

2.design Claculations at Ravulapenta

The document outlines the construction of a check dam across the Palleru River near Bommakal, detailing the catchment area, discharge calculations, and slope measurements. It includes various calculations for discharge using Dicken's formula and slope determination from ground levels at different upstream and downstream points. Additionally, it provides hydraulic radius, velocity, and discharge values for multiple cross-sections of the river.

Uploaded by

prasadvardhan39
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

N.W.

:- CONSTRUCTION OF CHECK DAM ACROSS PALLERU RIVER NEAR BOMMAKAL (V)


MIRYALAGUDA(M), NALGONDA(DIST).

Scale = 1 : 250000
Free Catchment Area (M ) = 116.486 Sqkm As per Topo sheet
Intercepted Catchment Area 560.940 Sqkm
Consider 50% of ICA 280.470

Net CA 116.486 280.47 = 795.000 Sqkm


or 307.0800 sq miles

Calculation of Discharge by Catchment Area Method

Dicken's formula:
Q = C x M 3/4
where Q= Discharge in cumecs

C= Constant = 1060

M= Catchment Area in [Link]


Q = 1060 x 307.08 3/4
= 77757.898 Cusecs
= 2201.838 Cumecs
I) Slope Calculation of Drain :

1. G.L. @ 500 u/s of crossing. = + 132.470


G.L. @ 500 D/s of crossing. = + 130.400

Difference. = 2.070

Slope = 2.070 / 1000.0

= 0.00207

2 G.L. @ 400 u/s of crossing. = + 132.300


G.L. @ 400 D/s of crossing. = + 130.520

Difference. = 1.780

Slope = 1.780 / 800

= 0.00222

3 G.L. @ 300 u/s of crossing. = + 132.130


G.L. @ 300 D/s of crossing. = + 130.690

Difference. = 1.440

Slope = 1.440 / 600

= 0.00240

4 G.L. @ 200 u/s of crossing. = + 131.950


G.L. @ 200 D/s of crossing. = + 130.830

Difference. = 1.120

Slope = 1.120 / 400

= 0.00280

5 G.L. @ 100 u/s of crossing. = + 131.780


G.L. @ 100 D/s of crossing. = + 130.980

Difference. = 0.800

Slope = 0.800 / 200

= 0.00400

Average Slope of = 0.0021 + 0.0022 + 0.0040 + 0.00280 + 0.01089


U/S side 5

= 0.00302 = 1 in 331.2
Or Say 1 in 331.0
Section @100 m UP Stream
Maximum Flood Level 156.924
Bed Fall 331.00
Rugosity Coefficient 0.0300
Reduced
S. No. Ordinate Distance Area Perimeter
Level
1 156.360 0.564
7.500 13.249 7.876
2 153.955 2.969
5.000 15.520 5.007
3 153.685 3.239
5.000 16.345 5.000
4 153.625 3.299
5.000 16.770 5.001
5 153.515 3.409
5.000 17.170 5.000
6 153.465 3.459
5.000 17.333 5.000
7 153.450 3.474
5.000 17.533 5.000
8 153.385 3.539
5.000 17.783 5.000
9 153.350 3.574
5.000 17.958 5.000
10 153.315 3.609
5.000 72.295 22.269
11 131.615 25.309
5.000 72.445 22.210
12 153.255 3.669
5.000 18.283 5.000
13 153.280 3.644
5.000 17.958 5.001
14 153.385 3.539
5.000 17.520 5.000
15 153.455 3.469
5.000 17.208 5.000
16 153.510 3.414
5.000 17.020 5.000
17 153.530 3.394
5.000 16.833 5.000
18 153.585 3.339
5.000 16.633 5.000
19 153.610 3.314
5.000 16.483 5.000
20 153.645 3.279
7.500 14.336 7.983
21 156.380 0.544

Totals = 105.000 446.7 140.350

A 446.67
Hydraulic Radius = R= =
P 140.35
= 3.183
R2/3x S1/2
Velocity = V = =
n
= 3.964
Discharge = Q = A x V = 446.67 x 3.964
= 1770.655 Cumecs
Section @100 m UP Stream
Maximum Flood Level 156.413
Bed Fall 331.00
Rugosity Coefficient 0.0300
Reduced
S. No. Ordinate Distance Area Perimeter
Level
1 156.360 0.053
7.500 9.416 7.876
2 153.955 2.458
5.000 12.965 5.007
3 153.685 2.728
5.000 13.790 5.000
4 153.625 2.788
5.000 14.215 5.001
5 153.515 2.898
5.000 14.615 5.000
6 153.465 2.948
5.000 14.778 5.000
7 153.450 2.963
5.000 14.978 5.000
8 153.385 3.028
5.000 15.228 5.000
9 153.350 3.063
5.000 15.403 5.000
10 153.315 3.098
5.000 69.740 22.269
11 131.615 24.798
5.000 69.890 22.210
12 153.255 3.158
5.000 15.728 5.000
13 153.280 3.133
5.000 15.403 5.001
14 153.385 3.028
5.000 14.965 5.000
15 153.455 2.958
5.000 14.653 5.000
16 153.510 2.903
5.000 14.465 5.000
17 153.530 2.883
5.000 14.278 5.000
18 153.585 2.828
5.000 14.078 5.000
19 153.610 2.803
5.000 13.928 5.000
20 153.645 2.768
7.500 10.504 7.983
21 156.380 0.033

Totals = 105.000 393.0 140.350

A 393.02
Hydraulic Radius = R= =
P 140.35
= 2.800
R2/3x S1/2
Velocity = V = =
n
= 3.640
Discharge = Q = A x V = 393.015 x 3.64
= 1430.555 Cumecs
Section @100 m UP Stream
Maximum Flood Level 155.782
Bed Fall 331.00
Rugosity Coefficient 0.0300
Reduced
S. No. Ordinate Distance Area Perimeter
Level
1 156.360 0.000
7.500 6.851 7.719
2 153.955 1.827
5.000 9.810 5.007
3 153.685 2.097
5.000 10.635 5.000
4 153.625 2.157
5.000 11.060 5.001
5 153.515 2.267
5.000 11.460 5.000
6 153.465 2.317
5.000 11.623 5.000
7 153.450 2.332
5.000 11.823 5.000
8 153.385 2.397
5.000 12.073 5.000
9 153.350 2.432
5.000 12.248 5.000
10 153.315 2.467
5.000 66.585 22.269
11 131.615 24.167
5.000 66.735 22.210
12 153.255 2.527
5.000 12.573 5.000
13 153.280 2.502
5.000 12.248 5.001
14 153.385 2.397
5.000 11.810 5.000
15 153.455 2.327
5.000 11.498 5.000
16 153.510 2.272
5.000 11.310 5.000
17 153.530 2.252
5.000 11.123 5.000
18 153.585 2.197
5.000 10.923 5.000
19 153.610 2.172
5.000 10.773 5.000
20 153.645 2.137
7.500 8.014 7.799
21 156.380 0.000

Totals = 105.000 331.2 140.009

A 331.17
Hydraulic Radius = R= =
P 140.01
= 2.365
R2/3x S1/2
Velocity = V = =
n
= 3.253
Discharge = Q = A x V = 331.17 x 3.253
= 1077.158 Cumecs
Section @100 m UP Stream
Maximum Flood Level 155.002
Bed Fall 331.00
Rugosity Coefficient 0.0300
Reduced
S. No. Ordinate Distance Area Perimeter
Level
1 156.360 0.000
7.500 3.926 7.573
2 153.955 1.047
5.000 5.910 5.007
3 153.685 1.317
5.000 6.735 5.000
4 153.625 1.377
5.000 7.160 5.001
5 153.515 1.487
5.000 7.560 5.000
6 153.465 1.537
5.000 7.723 5.000
7 153.450 1.552
5.000 7.923 5.000
8 153.385 1.617
5.000 8.173 5.000
9 153.350 1.652
5.000 8.348 5.000
10 153.315 1.687
5.000 62.685 22.269
11 131.615 23.387
5.000 62.835 22.210
12 153.255 1.747
5.000 8.673 5.000
13 153.280 1.722
5.000 8.348 5.001
14 153.385 1.617
5.000 7.910 5.000
15 153.455 1.547
5.000 7.598 5.000
16 153.510 1.492
5.000 7.410 5.000
17 153.530 1.472
5.000 7.223 5.000
18 153.585 1.417
5.000 7.023 5.000
19 153.610 1.392
5.000 6.873 5.000
20 153.645 1.357
7.500 5.089 7.622
21 156.380 0.000

Totals = 105.000 255.1 139.685

A 255.12
Hydraulic Radius = R= =
P 139.69
= 1.826
R2/3x S1/2
Velocity = V = =
n
= 2.738
Discharge = Q = A x V = 255.12 x 2.738
= 698.401 Cumecs
DESIGN OF CHECK DAM ACROSS PALLERU RIVER,BOMMAKAL (V)

Discharge (Q) = 2201.838 CUMECS


U/S MWL = + 136.782 M
Crest Level = + 133.615 M
FSD (H) = 3.167

LENGTH OF WEIR :-

D/S MWL = + 134.782 M

C = 2.21

Discharge Q = CLH^3/2

Q = 1992.895

AS PER SITE CONDITIONS


Proposed Length of Weir = 160.00 M
DESIGN OF CHECK DAM ACROSS PALLERU RIVER,BOMMAKAL (V)

Discharge (Q) = 1651.378 CUMECS


U/S MWL = + 136.229 M
Crest Level = + 133.615 M
FSD (H) = 2.614

LENGTH OF WEIR :-

D/S MWL = + 134.229 M

C = 2.21

Discharge Q = CLH^3/2

Q = 1494.413

AS PER SITE CONDITIONS


Proposed Length of Weir = 160.00 M
DESIGN OF CHECK DAM ACROSS PALLERU RIVER,BOMMAKAL (V)

Discharge (Q) = 1100.919 CUMECS


U/S MWL = + 135.610 M
Crest Level = + 133.615 M
FSD (H) = 1.995

LENGTH OF WEIR :-

D/S MWL = + 133.610 M

C = 2.21

Discharge Q = CLH^3/2

Q = 996.38

AS PER SITE CONDITIONS


Proposed Length of Weir = 160.00 M
DESIGN OF CHECK DAM ACROSS PALLERU RIVER,BOMMAKAL (V)

Discharge (Q) = 550.459 CUMECS


U/S MWL = + 134.872 M
Crest Level = + 133.615 M
FSD (H) = 1.257

LENGTH OF WEIR :-

D/S MWL = + 132.872 M

C = 2.21

Discharge Q = CLH^3/2

Q = 498.3279

AS PER SITE CONDITIONS


Proposed Length of Weir = 160.00 M
CALCULATION OF CISTERN LEVEL & LENGTH (100%Q)

Discharge,Q = 2201.838 Cumecs


U/S water level = 136.995 m
D/S T.W.L = 134.782 m
Length of weir,L = 160.000 m
Assumed D1 = 1.160 m
U/S Va2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at Approach)
D/S Vt2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at D/S, tail channel)

Discharge/m, q = Q/L = 13.761 Cumec/m


V1 = q / D1 = 11.863 m/s
Fr = V1 / (g.D1)1/2 = 3.517
D2 = D1/2((1+8F2)0.5 - 1) = 5.218 m
D/S T.E.L ---> = D/S TWL + D/S Vt2/2g = 134.782 M
U/S T.E.L ---> = U/S WL + U/S Va2/2g = 136.995 M
Head loss HL = U/S TEL - D/S TEL = 2.213 m
Critical Depth Dc = (q2 / g)1/3 = 2.682 m

Head loss, HL = (D2-D1)3 / 4.D1.D2 = 2.760 m


(calculated using D1 & D2)

Basin floor level = D/S TWL - D2 = + 129.564


Cistern length = 5 ( D1~D2 ) = 20.291 m
CALCULATION OF CISTERN LEVEL & LENGTH (75%Q)

Discharge,Q = 1651.378 Cumecs


U/S water level = 136.229 m
D/S T.W.L = 134.229 m
Length of weir,L = 160.000 m
Assumed D1 = 0.911 m
U/S Va2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at Approach)
D/S Vt2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at D/S, tail channel)

Discharge/m, q = Q/L = 10.321 Cumec/m


V1 = q / D1 = 11.329 m/s
Fr = V1 / (g.D1)1/2 = 3.790
D2 = D1/2((1+8F2)0.5 - 1) = 4.448 m
D/S T.E.L ---> = D/S TWL + D/S Vt2/2g = 134.229 M
U/S T.E.L ---> = U/S WL + U/S Va2/2g = 136.229 M
Head loss HL = U/S TEL - D/S TEL = 2.000 m
Critical Depth Dc = (q2 / g)1/3 = 2.214 m

Head loss, HL = (D2-D1)3 / 4.D1.D2 = 2.730 m


(calculated using D1 & D2)

Basin floor level = D/S TWL - D2 = + 129.781 M


Cistern length = 5 ( D1~D2 ) = 17.686 m
CALCULATION OF CISTERN LEVEL & LENGTH (50%Q)

Discharge,Q = 1100.919 Cumecs


U/S water level = 135.610 m
D/S T.W.L = 133.610 m
Length of weir,L = 160.000 m
Assumed D1 = 0.646 m
U/S Va2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at Approach)
D/S Vt2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at D/S, tail channel)

Discharge/m, q = Q/L = 6.881 Cumec/m


V1 = q / D1 = 10.651 m/s
Fr = V1 / (g.D1)1/2 = 4.231
D2 = D1/2((1+8F2)0.5 - 1) = 3.556 m
D/S T.E.L ---> = D/S TWL + D/S Vt2/2g = 133.610 M
U/S T.E.L ---> = U/S WL + U/S Va2/2g = 135.610 M
Head loss HL = U/S TEL - D/S TEL = 2.000 m
Critical Depth Dc = (q2 / g)1/3 = 1.690 m

Head loss, HL = (D2-D1)3 / 4.D1.D2 = 2.682 m


(calculated using D1 & D2)

Basin floor level = D/S TWL - D2 = + 130.054 M


Cistern length = 5 ( D1~D2 ) = 14.550 m
CALCULATION OF CISTERN LEVEL & LENGTH (25%Q)

Discharge,Q = 550.459 Cumecs


U/S water level = 134.872 m
D/S T.W.L = 132.872 m
Length of weir,L = 160.000 m
Assumed D1 = 0.354 m
U/S Va2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at Approach)
D/S Vt2 / 2g = 0.000 m (Vel. head at D/S, tail channel)

Discharge/m, q = Q/L = 3.440 Cumec/m


V1 = q / D1 = 9.719 m/s
Fr = V1 / (g.D1)1/2 = 5.215
D2 = D1/2((1+8F2)0.5 - 1) = 2.440 m
D/S T.E.L ---> = D/S TWL + D/S Vt2/2g = 132.872 M
U/S T.E.L ---> = U/S WL + U/S Va2/2g = 134.872 M
Head loss HL = U/S TEL - D/S TEL = 2.000 m
Critical Depth Dc = (q2 / g)1/3 = 1.065 m

Head loss, HL = (D2-D1)3 / 4.D1.D2 = 2.627 m


(calculated using D1 & D2)

Basin floor level = D/S TWL - D2 = + 130.432 M


Cistern length = 5 ( D1~D2 ) = 10.429 m
SUMMARY OF CISTERN LEVEL AND CISTERN LENGTH

Sl. No. % of Discharge Cistern Level Cistern Length


1 100% Discharge 129.564 20.291

2 75% Discharge 129.781 17.686

3 50% Discharge 130.054 14.550

4 25% Discharge 130.432 10.429

Hence proposed cistern lev= + 129.56 m However proposed ###


Hence proposed cistern le = 20.291 m However proposed 22.30 m
SCOUR DEPTH CALCULATIONS

Discharge (Q) = + 2201.838 Cumecs


Length of the Weir (b) = + 160.000 m
Silt factor (f) = 1.50
Maximum Water Level (MWL) = + 136.995 M
D/S TWL = + 134.782 M
Discharge per Unit length (q) = Q/b Cumecs/m
13.761
Normal Scour Depth (R) = 1.35 * (q2 / f)1/3 m
6.771 m
U/S Scour Depth:
Max. Scour level = 1.5 R
= 10.157
MWL = + 136.995 m
Scour level = 126.838
+ 126.838 m say + 128.615
D/S Scour Depth:
Max. Scour level = 1.5R
= 10.157
D/S TWL = + 134.782 m
Scour level = 124.625
= + 124.625 m say + 128.615
CALCULATION OF D/S FLOOR THICKNESS BASED ON THE "KHOSLA'S THEORY"

U/S bed level = + 131.615 m


U/S water level = + 136.995 m
U/S cutoff level = + 128.615 m
D/S bed level = + 131.615 m
D/S cutoff level = + 128.615 m
Cistern level = + 131.615 m
Total length of the floor ( b ) = 20.291 m

U/S cutoff line


Depth of U/S cut-off ( d ) = 3.000 m
1/α = d/b
= 0.1478

From Khosla's Graph 6.3 of Manual on Barrages and Weirs


ØD = 48.000 %
ØE = 75.000 %
ØD1 = 100 - ØD
= 52.000 %
ØC1 = 100 - ØE
= 25.000 %
ØD1 - ØC1 = 27.000 %

Correction for floor thickness


Assumed thickness of D/S floor ( t ) = 1.000 m
d = 131.615 - 128.615
= 3.000 m
Correction = ( ØD1 - ØC1 ) x t / d
= 9.000 %(Positive)

Interference of D/S cutoff on U/S cutoff


D = ( 131.615 - 1.000 ) - ( 128.615 )
= 2.000 m
d = ( 131.615 - 1.000 ) - ( 128.615 )
= 2.000 m
Correction = 19 x Sqrt ( D / b ) x ( d + D ) / b
= 1.176 %(Positive)
This correction is positive for the points in the rear and substractive for the points forward in the
direction of flow.

ØC1 corrected = ØC1 + Corr. for th. + Corr. for interference of D/S pile
= 35.176 %
ØD1 corrected = 52.000 %

D/S cutoff line


Depth of D/S cut-off ( d ) = 3.000 m
1/α = d/b
= 0.148

From Khosla's Graph 6.3 of Manual on Barrages and Weirs


ØD = 49.000 %
ØE = 76.000 %
ØC1 = 24.000 %
Ø E - ØD = 27.000 %

Correction for floor thickness


Assumed thickness of D/S floor ( t ) = 1.000 m
d = 131.615 - 128.615
= 3.000 m
Correction = ( ØE - ØD ) x t / d
= 9.000 %(Negitive)

Interference of D/S cutoff on U/S cutoff


D = ( 131.615 - 1.000 ) - ( 128.615 )
= 2.000 m
d = ( 131.615 - 1.000 ) - ( 128.615 )
= 2.000 m
Correction = 19 x Sqrt ( D / b ) x ( d + D ) / b
= 1.176 %(Negitive)

This correction is positive for the points in the rear and substractive for the points forward in the
direction of flow.
ØE corrected = ØC1 - Corr. for th. - Corr. for interference of D/S pile
= 65.824 %
ØD corrected = 49.000 %
20.291

35.176 46.189 47.699 53.741 59.783 65.824

A
B
4.000
C
D 8.000
12.000
13.000

% of Pressure at A = 65.824 + ( 35.176 - 65.824) x 4 / 20.291


= 59.783 %
% of Pressure at B = 65.824 + ( 35.176 - 65.824) x 8 / 20.291
= 53.741 %
% of Pressure at C = 65.824 + ( 35.176 - 65.824) x 12 / 20.291
= 47.699 %
% of Pressure at D = 65.824 + ( 35.176 - 65.824) x 13 / 20.291
= 46.189 %

[Link] head at pond level = U/S Crest level - D/S Ground level
= 133.615 - 131.615
= 2.000 m
Considering 100% of pressure head = 2.000 m

Thickness Calculation at A
Pressure head at A = 2.000 x 59.783 / 100
= 1.196 m
Thickness = 1.196 / (2.4 - 1)
= 0.854 m
However, provided apron thickness = 1.050 m

Thickness Calculation at B
Pressure head at B = 2.000 x 53.741 / 100
= 1.075 m
Thickness = 1.075 / (2.4 - 1)
= 0.768 m
However, provided apron thickness = 0.850 m
Thickness Calculation at C (At Toe of Weir)
Pressure head at C = 2.000 x 47.699 / 100
= 0.954 m
Thickness = 0.954 / (2.4 - 1)
= 0.681 m
However, provided apron thickness = 0.450 m

Thickness Calculation at D
Pressure head at D = 2.000 x 46.189 / 100
= 0.924 m
Thickness = 0.924 / (2.4 - 1)
= 0.660 m
However, provided apron thickness = 0.600 m

Calculation of Exit Gradient


Considering the D/S pile,

1/α = d/b
= 0.148
α = 6.764
λ = ( 1 + Sqrt ( 1 + α2 ) ) / 2
= 3.919
1/π√λ = 0.161
Exit gradient ( GE ) = (H/d)x(1/π√λ)
= 0.107
= 1 IN 9.332

You might also like