15.

0926
 JHALARO WEIR
HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF WEIR
Input Data (SI Units)
Design Flood for 50 year return period Qflood 773.00 m3/sec
Design discharge over spillway Q = 773.00 m3/sec

River Bed Elevation at Dam site EL. .= 780.00 m, amsl

The proposed Spillway crest level EL. .= 781.50 m, amsl
Stilling basin elevation EL. = 779.50 m, amsl

Total Length of Spillway including piers L .= 150.0 m

Maximum head over spillway Ho .= 2.09 m
Coefficient of Discharge Cd = 1.70
Aceleration due to Gravity g = 9.81 m/sec2

Piers and Abbutments coefficient

Pier shapes:- Abutment shapes
A1
A2 0.5H0 ≥ r ≥ 0.15H0
P3 P2 P1 A3 r ≥0.5H0
a a ≤ 450

Pier shapes Abutment shapes

Type Kp Type Ka
r ≤ 0.1T P1 0.02 A1 0.20
Selected P2 0.01 A2 0.10
0.5H0 ≥ r ≥ 0.15H0 P3 0.00 A3 0.00
Pier nosing shape: type no. P2 Kp = 0.01
Abutment shape: type no.A2 Ka = 0.10

Effective length of spillway

Number of span N .= 1.00

Number of piers No'spier .= 0.00
width of peir wp = 0.00 m
Clear water way = 150.00 m
Length of single Bay W = 150.00 m

Le  L n  2 ( N * K p  K a ) H d
Effective Length of clear water way Le = 149.581088 m
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF WEIR
Spillway Design Head
Design head for spillway
H d  0 . 75 H o Hd .= 1.89 m
1 . 26
H d  0 . 41 H e Hd .= 1.04 m
Therefore selected design head for Weir Hd = 1.89 m

Total Energy head due to effective length He = 2.10 m

Pond level due to design flood EL. = 783.60 m, amsl
Discharge intensity at the crest of weir q = 5.2 m3/sec/m
velocity of flow in Approch channel 𝑉_𝑎=𝑞/((𝑃+𝐻_𝑜 ) )
Va = 1.44 m/sec
Head due to approch velocity ℎ_𝑎=𝑞^2/(2𝑔(𝑃+𝐻_𝑜 )^2 ) 0.11 m
ha = 0.12 m
Effective head due to design discharge Hd = 1.98 m

Height of weir crest over opproach channel P = 2 m

P/Hd = 0.80
Ref: "Design of small Dams " Fig 9.23 (DOSD) 3.87 Co = 2.14
He/Hd = 1.11
Ref: "Design of Small Dams "Fig 9.24 (DOSD) C/Co = 1.02
Resulted Discharge Coefficient C = 2.17
Actual Discharge Passing over Spillway 3
Q  CLH 2

Verified QCheck = 988.4 m3/sec

Silling Basin
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF WEIR
Recommended Stilling Basins Types (USBR) Based on Flow
Type 0 Floor Lining Only. No Special Energy Dissipating Devices Not to be Used
Type I U/S Chute Blocks and Optional Terminal Sill Recommended
Type II U/S Chute Blocks, Interm. Baffle Blocks and Terminal Sill Acceptable
Type III U/S Chute Blocks and Terminal Dentated Sill Acceptable

Elevation at the end of d/s nappe EL. = 779.50 m, amsl

Distance from Spillway crest to chute channel Z1 = 4.10 m
𝑉_𝑇=√(2𝑔(𝑍−𝐻_𝑜/
Theoratical velocity at chute channel entery 2) )

Vt = 7.74 m/sec
Va/Vt = 0.97
Actual velocity at chute channel entery Va = 7.51 m/sec

Width of stilling basin cistern Wcistern = 150.00

Depth of flow at end of Chute D1 = 0.88 m
Froude No. V
Fr 
gD F = 2.56
Type of Hydraulic Jump Type = Oscillating
Max. Depth of flow at end of Chute 𝐷_2/𝐷_1 =1/2
[√(1+8𝐹^2 )−1]

D2 toe = 2.77 m

water level due to conjugate depth TWL = 782.27 m asl

Tailwater level in river using HEC-RAS Analysis TWL = 782.69 m asl

Ref : "Hydraulic design of stilling basin and energy dissipators" by Peterka

Minimum Tail water depth required at the end of stilling basin

Tmin/D1 = 3.00
Required minimum tail water depth Tmin = 2.63 m
Minimum factor of safety against jump sweep out FOS = 5 %
A minimum factor of safety of 5% is recommended for Type-II

Safe depth after jump 𝑇_𝑠=(1+𝐹𝑂𝑆/100) 𝑑_2 Ts = 2.90 m

Margin of saftey for tail water level TWLsafe = 782.40 m asl

Required minimum tail water level TWLmin = 782.13 m asl

Provided tail water level Td = 3.19 m

Check 𝑇_𝑚𝑖𝑛<𝑇_𝑑 & 𝑇_𝑑≥ 𝑇_𝑠 = OK

Required level of stilling basin ELreq = 779.79 m asl
Proposed level of stilling basin ELPro. = 779.50 m asl
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF WEIR
Length of Stilling Basin
L/D2 = 4.80
Length of stilling basin L = 13.3 m
Alternative Length of stilling basin
1)
𝐿_𝑏=4.5
𝐷_2/(𝐹_𝑟^0.38 ) L = 8.71 m

2) 𝐿_𝑏=∝(𝐷_2−𝐷_1) L 8.50 m
=

Adoppted length of stilling basin ADOPTED L = 15.00 m

ENERGY DISSIPATION
Energy loss through hydraulic Jump
Ref: C. Nalluri 𝐸_𝐿=(𝐷_2−𝐷_1 )^3 ∆EL = 0.69 m
/(4𝐷_2 𝐷_1 )

Specific Energy before Jump 𝐸_1=𝑑_1+ 〖𝑉 _1 〗 ^2⁄2𝑔 E1 = 3.75 m

∆𝐸⁄𝐸_1
Percentage Loss of Energy in Hyd. Jump = 18.49 %

𝐸_2=𝐸_1 (1−∆𝐸⁄𝐸_1 )
Specific Energy after Jump = 3.06 m

Discharge intensity q = 5.2 m3/sec/m

Velocity at the end of basin V = 1.86 m/sec

End Sill
h4/D1 = 1.25
Height of End Sill h4 = 1.10 m
Slope of face S = 2;1
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF WEIR
Spillway discharge rating table at other than design head
1
X  H o (Y ) n
Ho *k
Head over Discharge Crest Reservoir
Discharge
crest he/Ho C/Co coefficient Length elevation

m C m m3/sec m asl

781.50 0.00 0.00 0.79 1.70 150.0 0.00 781.50 345

781.75 0.25 0.13 0.83 1.70 150.0 31.87 781.75
782.00 0.50 0.27 0.87 1.70 149.9 90.10 782.00
782.25 0.75 0.40 0.90 1.70 149.9 165.48 782.25
782.50 1.00 0.53 0.93 1.70 149.8 254.69 782.50
782.75 1.25 0.66 0.95 1.70 149.8 355.84 782.75
783.00 1.50 0.80 0.97 1.70 149.7 467.62 783.00
783.14 1.64 0.87 0.98 1.70 149.7 534.50 783.14
783.25 1.75 0.93 0.99 1.70 149.7 589.09 783.25
783.50 2.00 1.06 1.01 1.70 149.6 719.52 783.50
783.75 2.25 1.19 1.02 1.70 149.6 858.30 783.75
784.00 2.50 1.33 1.04 1.70 149.6 1004.95 784.00
784.25 2.75 1.46 1.05 1.70 149.5 1159.05 784.25
784.50 3.00 1.59 1.07 1.70 149.5 1320.25 784.50
784.75 3.25 1.72 1.08 1.70 149.4 1488.22 784.75
785.00 3.50 1.86 1.10 1.70 149.4 1662.70 785.00
785.25 3.75 1.99 1.12 1.70 149.3 1843.44 785.25
785.50 4.00 2.12 1.14 1.70 149.3 2030.21 785.50
785.75 4.25 2.25 1.16 1.70 149.2 2222.81 785.75
786.00 4.50 2.39 1.18 1.70 149.2 2421.07 786.00
786.25 4.75 2.52 1.20 1.70 149.1 2624.81 786.25
Ref (1) : Figure 12 Hydraulic design of stilling basin and Energy Dissipators by A.J. Peterka
Ref (2)Fig. 9.21 Factors for defination of nappe shaped crest profiles Book : Design of Small Dams By USBR
KARI MASHKOR HYDROPOWER PROJECT
HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
ΔH Total Energy Level

HO
Crest Levation ELC α V 12 /2g

Z1
X1 Y1 ELW
P
ELB

α
.River Bed EL 26100

Input Data
Design Flood for 50 year return period Qflood 973.00
Design discharge over spillway Q = 973.00

River Bed Elevation at Dam site EL. .= 780.00

The proposed Spillway crest level EL. .= 781.50
Stilling basin elevation EL. = 779.50

Total Length of Spillway including piers L .= 150.0

Maximum head over spillway Ho .= 2.44
Coefficient of Discharge Cd = 1.70
Aceleration due to Gravity g = 9.81

Piers and Abbutments coefficient

Pier shapes:- Abutment shapes
A1
A2 0.5H0 ≥ r ≥ 0.15H0
P3 P2 P1 A3 r ≥0.5H0
a a ≤ 450

Pier shapes Abutment shapes

Type Kp Type Ka
r ≤ 0.1T P1 0.02 A1 0.20
Selected P2 0.01 A2 0.10
0.5H0 ≥ r ≥ 0.15H0 P3 0.00 A3 0.00
Pier nosing shape: type no. P2 Kp = 0.01
Abutment shape: type no.A2 Ka = 0.10
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
ΔH Total Energy Level

Effective length of spillway

HO
Crest Levation ELC α V 12 /2g
Number of span N .= 1.00
Number of piers
Z1
No'spier .= 0.00
width of peir X1 Y1 ELW
w = 0.00
P p
ELB
Clear water way = 150.00
Length of single Bay W = 150.00
α

Le  Ln  2( N * K p  K a ) H d
Effective Length of clear water way Le = 149.560471

Spillway Design Head

Design head for spillway
H d  0 . 75 H o Hd .= 2.20
1 . 26
H d  0 . 41 H e Hd .= 1.26
Therefore selected design head for spillway Hd = 2.20

Total Energy head due to effective length He = 2.45

Pond level due to design flood EL. = 783.95
Discharge intensity at the crest of spillway q = 6.5
velocity of flow in Approch channel 𝑉_𝑎=𝑞/((𝑃+𝐻_𝑜 ) )
Va = 1.65
Head due to approch velocity ℎ_𝑎=𝑞^2/(2𝑔(𝑃+𝐻_𝑜 )^2 ) 0.14
ha = 0.16
Effective head due to design discharge Hd = 2.29

Height of weir crest over opproach channel P = 2

P/Hd = 0.68
Ref: "Design of small Dams " Fig 9.23 (DOSD) 3.85 Co = 2.13
He/Hd = 1.11
Ref: "Design of Small Dams "Fig 9.24 (DOSD) C/Co = 1.02
Resulted Discharge Coefficient C = 2.16
Actual Discharge Passing over Spillway 3
Q  CLH 2

Verified QCheck = 1,237.7

Silling Basin
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
ΔH Total Energy Level

HO
Crest Levation ELC α V 12 /2g

Z1
X1 Y1 ELW
P
ELB

Recommended Stilling Basins Types (USBR) Based on Flow

Type 0 Floor Lining Only. No Special Energy Dissipating Devices Recommended
Type I U/S Chute Blocks and Optional Terminal Sill Acceptable
Type II U/S Chute Blocks, Interm. Baffle Blocks and Terminal Sill Acceptable
Type III U/S Chute Blocks and Terminal Dentated Sill Acceptable

Elevation at the end of d/s nappe EL. = 779.50

Distance from Spillway crest to chute channel Z1 = 4.45
𝑉_𝑇=√(2𝑔(𝑍−𝐻_𝑜/
Theoratical velocity at chute channel entery 2) )

Vt = 7.96
Va/Vt = 0.95
Actual velocity at chute channel entery Va = 7.56

Width of stilling basin cistern Wcistern = 150.00

Depth of flow at end of Chute D1 = 1.09
Froude No. V
Fr 
gD F = 2.31
Type of Hydraulic Jump Type = Weak
Max. Depth of flow at end of Chute 𝐷_2/𝐷_1 =1/2
[√(1+8𝐹^2 )−1]

D2 toe = 3.06

water level due to conjugate depth TWL = 782.56

Tailwater level in river using HEC-RAS Analysis TWL = 783.10
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
ΔH Total Energy Level

Ref : "Hydraulic design of stilling basin and energy dissipators" by Peterka

HO
Minimum Tail water depthELrequired
Crest Levation C
at the end
α V of/2gstilling basin
1
2

Tmin/D1 = 2.75
Required minimum tail water
Z
depth Tmin = 3.00
1
Minimum factor of safety against jump sweep
X1 out Y1 ELW
FOS = 5
P
A minimum factor of safety of 5% is recommended for Type-II ELB

Safe depth after jump 𝑇_𝑠=(1+𝐹𝑂𝑆/100) 𝑑_2 Ts = 3.21

α

Margin of saftey for tail water level TWLsafe = 782.71

Required minimum tail water level TWLmin = 782.50

Provided tail water level Td = 3.60

Check 𝑇_𝑚𝑖𝑛<𝑇_𝑑 & 𝑇_𝑑≥ 𝑇_𝑠 = OK

Required level of stilling basin ELreq = 779.89
Proposed level of stilling basin ELPro. = 779.50
Length of Stilling Basin
L/D2 = 4.60
Length of stilling basin L = 14.1
Alternative Length of stilling basin
1)
𝐿_𝑏=4.5
𝐷_2/(𝐹_𝑟^0.38 ) L = 10.02

2) 𝐿_𝑏=∝(𝐷_2−𝐷_1) L = 8.86

Adoppted length of stilling basin ADOPTED L = 15.00

ENERGY DISSIPATION
Energy loss through hydraulic Jump
Ref: C. Nalluri 𝐸_𝐿=(𝐷_2−𝐷_1 )^3 ∆EL = 0.57
/(4𝐷_2 𝐷_1 )

Specific Energy before Jump 𝐸_1=𝑑_1+ 〖𝑉 _1 〗 ^2⁄2𝑔 E1 = 4.00

∆𝐸⁄𝐸_1
Percentage Loss of Energy in Hyd. Jump = 14.28

𝐸_2=𝐸_1 (1−∆𝐸⁄𝐸_1 )
Specific Energy after Jump = 3.43
 HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
ΔH Total Energy Level
Discharge intensity q = 6.5
Velocity at the end of basin V = 2.12
HO
Crest Levation ELC α V 12 /2g
End Sill
Z1
h4/D1 = 1.25
Height of End Sill P X1 Y1 ELW h4 = 1.36
Slope of face
ELB
S = 2;1
Spillway discharge rating table at other than design head
α

Head over Discharge Crest Reservoir

Discharge
crest he/Ho C/Co coefficient Length elevation

m C m m3/sec m asl

1527.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 1.69 15.8 0.00 781.50

1527.25 0.25 0.11 0.83 1.76 15.8 3.47 781.75
1527.50 0.50 0.23 0.86 1.82 15.7 10.14 782.00
1527.75 0.75 0.34 0.89 1.88 15.7 19.18 782.25
1528.00 1.00 0.46 0.91 1.94 15.6 30.27 782.50
1528.25 1.25 0.57 0.93 1.98 15.6 43.22 782.75
1528.50 1.50 0.68 0.95 2.03 15.5 57.87 783.00
1528.75 1.75 0.80 0.97 2.07 15.5 74.11 783.25
1529.00 2.00 0.91 0.99 2.10 15.5 91.83 783.50
1529.25 2.25 1.02 1.00 2.13 15.4 110.95 783.75
1529.50 2.50 1.14 1.02 2.16 15.4 131.39 784.00
1529.75 2.75 1.25 1.03 2.19 15.3 153.11 784.25
1530.00 3.00 1.37 1.04 2.22 15.3 176.10 784.50
1530.25 3.25 1.48 1.06 2.25 15.2 200.35 784.75
1530.50 3.50 1.59 1.07 2.27 15.2 225.87 785.00
1530.75 3.75 1.71 1.08 2.30 15.1 252.73 785.25
1531.00 4.00 1.82 1.10 2.30 15.1 277.59 785.50
1531.25 4.25 1.93 1.11 2.30 15.0 303.11 785.75
1531.32 4.32 1.97 1.11 2.30 15.0 310.37 785.82
1531.50 4.50 2.05 1.12 2.30 15.0 329.26 786.00
1532.00 5.00 2.28 1.16 2.30 14.9 383.32 786.50

787.00

786.00
1; 785.50
785.00
charge (m asl)

784.00
 787.00

786.00
HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF OVERFLOW SPILLWAY
1; 785.50
Design flood based on 100year(1068 cumecs)
785.00 ΔH Total Energy Level
Reservoir Surcharge (m asl)

784.00 H
O
Crest Levation ELC α V 12 /2g

783.00

Z1
X1 Y1 ELW
782.00 P
ELB

781.00
α

780.00

779.00
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450
DISCHAGRE (Cumecs)

Ref (1) : Figure 12 Hydraulic design of stilling basin and Energy Dissipators by A.J. Peterka
Ref (2)Fig. 9.21 Factors for defination of nappe shaped crest profiles Book : Design of Small Dams By USBR
 Total Length 70 m

Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m

QTotal Return Period QExisting Weir QAdditional Weir

m3/Sec Year m3/Sec m3/Sec
973.00 50.00 678.32 294.68
897.64 100.00 625.78 271.86

m3/sec
m3/sec DISCHARGE SPILLWAY LENGTH
SURCHARGE
SR.NO.
m3/sec meters meters
m, amsl 1 973.00 50 5.08
m, amsl 2 973.00 60 4.50
m, amsl 3 973.00 70 4.06
4 973.00 80 3.71
m 5 973.00 90 3.43
m 6 973.00 100 3.20

m/sec2

784.46
 Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m

m
m
m

m
m
m

m
m, amsl
m3/sec/m

m/sec
m
m 3.64
m 2.01

m3/sec
 Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m

m, amsl
m

m/sec

m/sec

m asl
m asl
 Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m

m
%

m asl
m asl
782.75
m

m asl
m asl

m
 Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m
m /sec/m
3

m/sec

345
 Existing 48.8 m
Additional 21.2 m

350.00 400.00 450.00

 973

678.32 0.6971
294.68 0.3029
678.32 0.6971
294.68 0.3029
678.32 0.6971
294.68 0.3029
 JHALARO WEIR
IRRIGATION CHANNEL HEAD REGULATOR
Input Data (SI Units)

Design discharge for Channel Q = 0.16 m3/sec

Upstream Water Level EL. .= 781.50 m, amsl

Downstream Water Level EL. .= 781.15 m, amsl
Downstream Bed Level EL. = 780.80 m, amsl
Water Depth in Channel EL. = 0.35 m
Head Regulator Invert Level EL. = 780.90 m, amsl
Aceleration due to Gravity g = 9.81 m/s2
𝑄=𝐶_𝑑 𝐶_𝑤 bw√(2𝑔(𝑦_1−𝑦_(2)) )
Discharge Formula
Here
Cd .= 0.6
Cv .= 1
Width of Opening b = 0.61 m
Diff between u/s water level&HR invert Level y1 .= 0.60 m
y2 = 0.35 m
Height of Opening w = 0.20
Adopted as 0.61m Width x 0.30m Height for ease of construction
 Balochistan water resourses development
Jhalaro Weir

Existing condition
Crest Level 1706.8 m asl
Side wall top Level 1709.5 m asl
Crest Width 2 m
Length of weir 1 48.8 m
Length of weir 2 60 m
Length of weir 3 70 m

50 year flood 738.96 m³/sec 26100 532.28 605.89

100 year flood 897.51 m³/sec 31700
Discharge Cofficient 1.7

Salient Features of Jhalaro Weir

Length of Head over crest Water level Stilling Basin Length of Width of Tail Water
Scenerio Flood Discharge Cd End Sill Level
Weir (H) over crest Level Stilling Basin Stilling Basin Level

Cumecs m m m asl m asl m m m asl m asl

50 year 773.00 150.00 1.7 2.09 783.59 779.50 15.00 150.00 780.00 782.69
1
100 year 973.00 150.00 1.7 2.44 783.94 779.50 15.00 150.00 780.00 783.10

Head over
Weir Name Flood Length of Weir Cd Crest Level HFL at Crest
crest (H)
m m
50 year 135.25 1.70 2.24 790.00 792.24
Wanderi Weir
100 year 135.25 1.70 2.62 790.00 792.62
50 year 131.14 1.70 2.29 786.00 788.29
Chutta Weir
100 year 131.14 1.70 2.67 786.00 788.67
50 year 132.14 1.70 2.28 782.00 784.28
Khaderi Weir
100 year 132.14 1.70 2.66 782.00 784.66
50 year 150.00 1.70 2.09 781.50 783.59
Jhalaro Weir
100 year 150.00 1.70 2.44 781.50 783.94
Acherwand 50 year 1.70 0.00
Weir 100 year 1.70 0.00 0.00
50 year 94.50 1.70 2.85 760.65 763.50
Sinjori Weir
100 year 94.50 1.70 3.32 760.65 763.97
50 year 1.70 0.00
Nurwah Weir
100 year 1.70 0.00 0.00
 z HL
x
Depth Of Cut Off/Sheet Piles From Scour Considerations: d2 Ef2

Discharge = Q cumec 973.00

Bed Width = W m 150

Upstream
U/S Water Level m asl 783.94
Discharge Intensity = q cms/m 6.49

Silt Factor = f 1.75 Coarser sand

Depth Of Scour = R m 3.86

Adopt Max.Scour Depth (1.5R) m 5.79

RL of bottom of scour hole m asl 778.15

Downstream
m asl
D/S Water Level 783.10
Discharge Intensity = q cms/m 6.49

Silt Factor = f 1.75

Depth Of Scour = R m 3.86

Adopt Max.Scour Depth m 7.72

m asl
RL of bottom of scour hole 775.38

Total Floor Length And Exit Gradient:

Floor Dimensions Are Determined with The Help Of Exit Gradient H 1

Ge  
Full Cut off =H ft 16.54 d  
Safe Exit Gradient = 0.17

Depth of plie line Provided =d ft 2.00

λ 239.72

α 478.43

b ft 956.86

Adopt total Floor Length g 1053

Length of U/S Floor ft 351.00

Length of D/S Floor ft 702.00

Pressure Calculations:
Let the floor thickness ft 1
Depth of U/S Curtain Wall ft -458.26
b ft 1053
1/α -0.435
From Khosla's Pressure Curves
λ 1.75
фD 0.641
фC 0.455
фD - фC 0.186
Correction For Depth 0.000 (+ve)
фC corrected 0.455
Depth of D/S Curtain Wall ft -449.86

693531375.xlsx 34
 b ftHL 1053
1/α -0.427
From Khosla's Pressure Curves
λ 1.77
фE1 0.541
фD1 0.356
фE1- фD1 0.184
Correction For Depth 0.000 (-ve)
фE1 corrected 0.541
Toe Of Glacis Pressure 0.484
Floor Thickness:
Minimum Thickness of U/S Floor ft 1.00
Thickness Under the Crest B ft 1.25
Thickness Under The Toe Of Glacis C ft 6.50
Provide ft 6.50
% Pressure 0.498
ft 6.64
Provide Thickness 25% away From Glacis Toe ft 6.64
% Pressure 0.512
ft 6.83
Provide Thickness 50% away From Glacis Toe ft 6.83
% Pressure 0.527
ft 7.03

Provide Thickness 75% away From Glacis Toe ft 7.03

Summary

No.of bays 1

Width of the bay ft 70

No. of Piers 0

Width of the pier ft 0.00

Total width of the structure ft 70

Clear Waterway ft 70

Crest Level 325.52

Cistern level 323.00

Length of stilling Basin ft 13

Type of basin Basin IV

u/s floor level (same as u/s bed level) 319.89

Head over Crest, H ft 16.77

Length of Crest, 2H ft 33.75

693531375.xlsx 35
 H 1
Ge  
d  

693531375.xlsx 36
693531375.xlsx 37
 JHALARO WEIR
SCOUR DEPTH AND STONE APRON
Scour Depth
Input Data (SI Units)
Depth Of Cut Off/Sheet Piles From Scour Considerations:

Discharge = Q cumec 973.00

Bed Width = W m 150.00

Upstream
U/S Water Level m asl 783.95
Discharge Intensity = q cms/m 6.49

Silt Factor = f 1.75 Coarser Sand

Depth Of Scour = R m 3.86

Adopt Max.Scour Depth (1.5R) m 5.79

RL of bottom of scour hole m asl 778.16

Downstream
m asl
D/S Water Level 783.10
Discharge Intensity = q cms/m 6.49

Silt Factor = f 1.75 Coarser Sand

Depth Of Scour = R m 3.86

Adopt Max.Scour Depth m 7.72

m asl
RL of bottom of scour hole 775.38
Stone Apron Length
Length at U/S m 5.54
Length at D/S m 7.92

Adopted Length at U/S m 6.00

Adopted Length at D/S m 8.00

693531375.xlsx 38