Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8.1
Suppose we have a system containing two particles, such as a Helium atom. The Hamiltonian is given by p2 p2 2e2 2e2 e2 p2 + H= N + 1 + 2 2mN 2me 2me 40 |r1 rN | 40 |r2 rN | 40 |r1 r2 | (8.1)
where the rst term is the nuclear kinetic energy, the second the kinetic energy of electron 1, the third the kinetic energy of electron 2, the fourth and fth the attraction of the electrons and the nucleus, and the last the repulsion between the two electrons. The energy of the system is unchanged when we swap the labels 1 and 2 i.e. H(1, 2) = H(2, 1). This is an expression of identical particle symmetry. We dene a particle exchange operator that swaps the two particles around P 12 (1, 2) = (2, 1) (8.2)
This operator is Hermitian, so is an observable, and commutes with the Hamiltonian operator, so exchange symmetry should be a constant of the motion. The eigenstates of this operator can be found as follows P 12 (1, 2) = (1, 2) = (1, 2) 12 P 2 (1, 2) = P 12 (2, 1) = 2 (1, 2) (8.3) (8.4)
so = 1. Wavefunctions corresponding to = 1 are symmetric under particle exchange, and those with = 1 are antisymmetric. If we have a state that is not an eigenstate of P 12 then we can make the eigenstates as follows (8.5) = [(1, 2) (2, 1)] / 2 Note that no measurement can distinguish between identical particles so we must always have this symmetry in the wavefunction. 65
66
8.2
Spin-Statistics theorem
If two particles have integer spin quantum numbers s1 = 0, 1, 2, . . . and s2 = 0, 1, 2, . . . then the wavefunction for a state containing these two particles is symmetric under exchange of particles. These particles are known as bosons. If instead we have two particles with half integer spin e.g. 3 s1 = 1 , 3 , . . . and s2 = 1 , 2 , . . ., then the wavefunction must be antisymmetric under their exchange, 2 2 2 and they are known as fermions. This is the contents of the spin-statistics theorem that links the spin of the particles to their exchange symmetry, and hence to their statistical mechanics (they either obey Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac statistics).
8.3
We now consider the case where we have two particles that do not interact. The position of particle 1 is r1 and that of particle 2 is r2 . We have two single particle wavefunctions a and b , so we could write the wavefunction of the system as (r1 , r2 ) = a (r1 )b (r2 ) If we symmetrise this state then we obtain (r1 , r2 ) = (a (r1 )b (r2 ) a (r2 )b (r1 ))/ 2 for fermions and (r1 , r2 ) = (a (r1 )b (r2 ) + a (r2 )b (r1 ))/ 2 (8.7) (8.6)
(8.8)
for bosons. Note that for the fermionic state (r1 , r2 ) = 0 i.e. we cannot have two fermions occupying the same quantum state, which is the Pauli-exclusion principle.
The wave function for the case of two distinguishable particles, indistinguishable fermions, and indistinguishable bosons respectively are Distinguishable (x1 , x2 ) Indistinguishable Fermions (x1 , x2 ) Indistinguishable Bosons (x1 , x2 ) = = = x1 2x2 2 sin sin a a a 2x2 x2 2x1 x1 2 sin sin sin sin a a a a a 2x2 x2 2x1 x1 2 sin + sin sin sin a a a a a (8.11) (8.12) (8.13)
A contour plot of the probability density in each of these cases is shown in g. 8.1.
67
Distinguishable
Fermions
Bosons
x2
x2
x2
x1
x1
x1
Figure 8.1: Contour plots of the probability density of nding particle 1 at x1 and particle 2 at x2 for wavefunctions of dierent symmetry as explained in the text. Note there is a zero line in x1 = x2 for the fermionic case.
8.4
In the last couple of examples we have ignored the spin part of the wavefunction for simplicity. However, the exchange operator applies to the whole of the wavefunction so will also swap around the 1 particle in the spin states. If we consider the whole wavefunction for spin- 2 fermions = space (r1 , r2 )spinS S,m (8.14)
when we exchange the two electrons then the whole wavefunction must change sign. This can be achieved in two ways: either the space wavefunction is symmetric and the spin wavefunction antisymmetric, or the space wavefunctionis antisymmetric and the spin wavefunction symmetric. We have met the symmetric triplet state, and the antisymmetric singlet state in the previous chapter. Here we see that the singlet state must be paired with a symmetric space wavefunction, and the triplet state with an antisymmetric space wavefunction. If the particles we are considering do not interact then there will be no dierence in the energy of the triplet and singlet spin states. However, if they interact say via coulomb repulsion as is the case for electrons then the triplet state will have higher energy than the singlet state because the electrons on average are closer together. This energy dierence between symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions is referred to as the exchange interaction, and it produces a preference for symmetric spins.
68
8.5
Slater Determinant
If we have an N -particle wavefunction then an antisymmetric wavefunction can be built up from single particle orbitals by using the slater determinant, which is dened as follows 1 (r1 ) 1 (r2 ) . . . 2 (r1 ) 2 (r2 ) . . . ... N (r1 ) ... N (r2 ) . .. . . . . . . N (rN 1 ) ... N (rN )
1 (r1 , r2 , . . . , rN ) = N!
(8.15)
This is antisymmetric under the exchange of any two particles because the determinant is antisymmetric under the exchange of any two rows. In the case of just two particles this reduces to the example we considered earlier in the chapter 1 (r1 , r2 ) = 2 a (r1 ) a (r2 ) b (r1 ) b (r2 ) 1 = (a (r1 )b (r2 ) a (r2 )b (r1 )) 2 (8.16)
8.6
1A.
Problems
What are the consequences in quantum mechanics of indistinguishability of particles? Include 1 discussion of singlet and triplet states for two spin- 2 particles. Explain why for helium (a) there is no triple state corresponding to the lowest singlet state; and (b) for excited states of given n and l the triplet level always lies below the corresponding singlet level. Consider the nuclear spin and space wavefunction of a rotating H2 molecule, and explain why the degeneracies of the two lowest states of the molecule are 1 and 9.
2B.
3B.