Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MorayfieldStateHigh School
Year 11 Physics, Semester 2 2010
Extended Experimental Investigation (EEI)
Ayesha Berkett-Saleh
Teacher: Mr Forman
Title Page....Page 1
Contents Page..Page 2
Abstract.Page 3
Introduction...Page 4
Method..Page 5
Results...Page 6
Analysis..Page 7
Discussion...Page 8
Conclusion..Page 9
Appendix......Page 10
Acknowledgments..Page 12
Base
2 3 1 2 2
Uprights
1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Launching Arm
Miscellaneous
String Cloth Projectiles Counterweight Screws Nails Hook Wire Saw Drill
Base (picture) The base is made up of 2 (measurements) Long Rails and 4 (measurements) Short Rails. It uses (something) joints to make the base more firm.
Uprights (picture) The uprights is 2 (measurements) vertical Braces to help support the 2 sheets of plywood which makes up the side. Launching Arm (picture) The Launching arm is made up of 2 (measurement) Middle arms and 2(measurements) outer arms. Multiple holes are drilled into the launching arm to change the length of the arm, and to see what length will throw the best distance. Metal bolt to Counterweight (picture) The counterweight weighs about (weight)
FINAL PICTURE
Modifications Variable to be changed talk about changes say what stays the sames Modification and more
Results
Table of values modification 1 distance, what was changed. Values that are kept the same Distance travelled vs arm length (graph) Distance vs counterweight Distance vs trigger point (string thing) Any problems ENERGY TRANSFERRED BETWEEN WEIGHT AND OBJECT
Analysis WHAT HAD THE BIGGEST EFFECT What is the best outcome What happens when you put all the best things together
Conclusion
It was found that the trebuchet with a weight of ( ) arm length of () and lifting a (object). Possible improvements. Refer back to the data. Comment about the optimum design. WAS THERE SOMETHING ELSE
Appendix
Acknowledgments