Pinnels case

Pinnel’s Case (1602) is a landmark decision in English contract law that established the principle
that part payment of a debt is not legally sufficient to discharge the obligation to pay the full
amount owed, unless there is additional consideration or a change in the terms of payment
agreed upon by both parties [1] [2] [3] .

Key Facts- Hugh Pinnel sued Cole for a debt of £810s.

Cole had paid £52s2d before the due date at Pinnel’s request and argued that this partial
payment was accepted as full satisfaction for the entire debt.
Pinnel later attempted to sue for the remaining amount [1] [2] [4] .

Judgment and Legal Principle- The court ruled that a lesser sum paid on the due
date cannot legally satisfy a greater debt, as there is no new consideration for the
creditor to forgive the balance.
However, if the part payment is made earlier than the due date, in a different form (such as
goods or chattels), or under altered terms, it may be valid consideration and can discharge
the debt if both parties agree [2] [3] [5] [6] .

Exceptions and Application- Payment of a lesser sum before the due date, or
payment in goods or other benefits (e.g., a horse, hawk, or robe), can be valid
consideration and may extinguish the debt if the creditor agrees [2] [5] [6] .
The case is foundational for the doctrine of consideration in contract law, meaning that any
variation to a contract, including debt settlement, must involve new consideration to be
legally binding [5] .

Modern Relevance- The rule from Pinnel’s Case has been upheld in later cases
such as Foakes v Beer (1884), where the House of Lords reaffirmed that part
payment without additional consideration does not discharge a debt [3] [5] .
In summary, Pinnel’s Case established that part payment alone is not enough to settle a debt
unless there is additional consideration or a change in the payment terms agreed by both
parties [1] [2] [3] [5] [6] .
⁂
Harvey v. Facey
Harvey v. Facey (1893) is a landmark case in contract law that clarified the distinction between
an offer and an invitation to treat, especially in the context of price quotations [11] [12] [13] [14] .

Facts of the Case- Harvey telegraphed Facey, asking: "Will you sell us Bumper Hall
Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price—answer paid."
Facey replied: "Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen £900."
Harvey then telegraphed: "We agree to buy Bumper Hall Pen for £900 asked by you. Please
send us your title deed."
Facey refused to sell, and Harvey sued for breach of contract [11] [12] [14] .

Legal IssueThe central question was whether Facey’s telegram stating the lowest
price constituted a valid offer that could be accepted by Harvey to form a binding
contract [13] [14] .

Judgment- The Privy Council held that Facey’s response was not an offer but
merely an invitation to treat or a statement of information.
For a contract to be formed, there must be a clear offer with the intention to be legally
bound, and an unqualified acceptance.
Facey’s telegram did not indicate a willingness to sell the property at £900; it was simply
providing the lowest price he would consider if he chose to sell [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] .

Key Principle- A price quotation in response to an inquiry is not an offer capable of

acceptance, but an invitation to treat.
This case is crucial for understanding when negotiations begin and when a contract is
actually formed in contract law [11] [12] [15] .
In summary, Harvey v. Facey established that a mere statement of price in response to an
inquiry does not amount to a legally binding offer, and therefore, no contract is formed unless
there is a definite offer and acceptance with intention to create legal relations [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] .
⁂

E- Contract
An e-contract (electronic contract) is a legally binding agreement that is created, negotiated,
and executed entirely in electronic form, such as through email, online forms, or digital
platforms [19] [20] [21] . E-contracts have the same legal enforceability as traditional paper
contracts, provided they meet the essential requirements of a valid contract [19] [22] [23] [24] .
Key Legal Principles
Offer and Acceptance: Just like traditional contracts, e-contracts require a clear offer and
an unambiguous acceptance, which can be communicated electronically [22] [25] [26] .
Free Consent: Both parties must give their free and informed consent to the terms of the
contract [19] [24] [26] .
Lawful Consideration: There must be a lawful exchange of value (consideration) between
the parties [24] [26] .
Competent Parties: All parties must be legally competent to enter into a contract [24] [26] .
Legal Object: The contract must have a lawful purpose and not violate any laws or public
policy [24] [26] [27] .
Electronic Signature: The use of electronic or digital signatures is recognized as valid for
executing e-contracts under the Information Technology Act, 2000 in India [23] [21] [27] .

Legal Framework in India

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 governs the formation and enforceability of e-contracts,
requiring all standard contract essentials to be present [24] [21] [28] [26] .
The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Section 10A) specifically recognizes e-contracts
as legally enforceable, stating that a contract cannot be deemed unenforceable merely
because it is in electronic form [22] [23] [21] [29] [27] .
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 allows electronic records to be admitted as evidence in
court, further supporting the validity of e-contracts [23] [30] .

Types of E-Contracts
Click-wrap agreements: Users accept terms by clicking a button (e.g., "I agree").
Browse-wrap agreements: Terms are posted on a website, and users are deemed to
accept by using the site.
Email contracts: Agreements formed via email exchanges [23] [25] .
In summary, e-contracts are legally valid and enforceable in India if they satisfy the requirements
of the Indian Contract Act and are executed in accordance with the Information Technology Act,
2000 [19] [22] [23] [24] [21] [26] [27] .
⁂

Lapse of Offer
The lapse of an offer refers to the situation where an offer ceases to be valid and legally binding,
meaning it can no longer be accepted by the offeree to form a contract [37] [38] [39] .
Causes of Lapse of Offer- Expiration of Time: If the offer specifies a time limit for
acceptance, it lapses once that time has passed. If no time is specified, the offer
lapses after a reasonable period, which depends on the context of the
transaction [37] [40] [39] [41] .
Revocation: The offeror can revoke (withdraw) the offer at any time before it is accepted,
making the offer lapse [37] [42] [41] .
Death or Incapacity: If the offeror dies or becomes legally incapacitated before
acceptance, the offer generally lapses, unless it relates to their estate and can be legally
accepted [37] [43] .
Destruction of Subject Matter: If the subject matter of the offer is destroyed before
acceptance, the offer lapses as it is impossible to perform [37] [43] .
Failure to Fulfill Conditions Precedent: If the offer is subject to certain conditions that must
be met before acceptance, and those conditions are not fulfilled, the offer lapses [40] .
Change in Law: If a change in law makes the contract illegal or impossible to perform, the
offer lapses [44] .

Legal Effect- Once an offer lapses, it becomes null and void, and no contract can
be formed based on that offer [37] [38] .
Any acceptance communicated after the lapse of the offer is not legally effective and does
not create a binding contract [37] [39] .
In summary, the lapse of an offer occurs due to expiration of time, revocation, death or
incapacity of the offeror, destruction of subject matter, failure to meet conditions, or a change in
law, rendering the offer incapable of acceptance [37] [40] [38] [43] [39] [44] [41] .
⁂

Carlill vs Carbolic smoke ball company

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893) is a landmark case in contract law that established
key principles regarding the nature of offers, acceptance, and consideration, especially in the
context of advertisements and unilateral contracts [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] .

Facts- The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company advertised a reward of £100 to anyone
who contracted influenza after using their smoke ball three times daily for two
weeks as per instructions [46] [48] [49] [50] .
Mrs. Louisa Carlill bought and used the smoke ball as directed but still contracted influenza
and claimed the reward [47] [50] .
The company refused to pay, arguing that the advertisement was not a binding offer and
that there was no contract [47] [50] .
Legal Issues- Was the advertisement a legally binding offer?
Could Mrs. Carlill accept the offer by performing the required act?
Was there sufficient consideration for the contract? [47] [49] [50]

Judgment- The Court of Appeal held that the advertisement was a unilateral offer
made to the entire world, not just an invitation to treat [47] [48] [49] .
By purchasing and using the smoke ball as directed, Mrs. Carlill accepted the offer through
performance, without needing to notify the company [47] [48] [49] .
The use of the smoke ball constituted valid consideration, as it provided a benefit to the
company by promoting sales [47] [51] [50] .
The company's deposit of £1,000 in a bank demonstrated their intention to be legally bound
by the offer [47] [49] .

Key Principles Established- An advertisement can constitute a binding unilateral

offer if it is clear, definite, and demonstrates an intention to be bound [48] [49] .
Acceptance of a unilateral offer can be made by performing the required act, not
necessarily by communicating acceptance [47] [49] .
Performance of the required act provides sufficient consideration for the contract [51] [50] .
In summary, Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company clarified that advertisements can be valid
offers, and acceptance can occur through performance, making the company liable to pay the
promised reward when the conditions are met [47] [48] [49] [51] [50] .
⁂

Invitation to offer
An invitation to offer (also known as an invitation to treat) is a statement or action by one party
indicating a willingness to negotiate or receive offers, but it is not a legally binding offer itself [54]
[55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] .

Key Features- An invitation to offer is a preliminary step before making an actual

offer; it invites others to make proposals or negotiate terms [55] [56] [57] [58] .
It does not create any legal obligation on the party making the invitation until a formal offer
is made and accepted [55] [56] [59] [60] .
Acceptance of an invitation to offer does not result in a contract; it only leads to the making
of an offer, which can then be accepted to form a contract [56] [59] [60] .
Common Examples- Display of goods in a shop window or on shelves-
Advertisements in newspapers or online- Auction notices- Price lists- Menu cards
in restaurants- Tender invitations [56] [57] [58] [59] [60]

Legal Distinction- An offer is a definite proposal with the intention to be legally

bound upon acceptance [55] [58] [59] [60] .
An invitation to offer is merely an expression of willingness to negotiate and does not bind
the party until a formal offer is accepted [55] [56] [59] [60] .
In summary, an invitation to offer is a communication that invites others to make offers, but it is
not an offer itself and does not create a contract until a formal offer is made and accepted [54]
[55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] .

1. https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/pinnels-case.php
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinnel's_Case
3. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/law/pinnels-case
4. https://uollb.com/blogs/uol/pinnels-case-1602
5. https://juristopedia.com/case/pinnels-case-1601/
6. https://askfilo.com/user-question-answers-smart-solutions/the-rule-in-pinnels-case-33383532363634
38
7. https://stonegatelegal.com.au/part-payment-of-a-debt-the-rule-in-pinnels-case/
8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IujDo8ZYwbQ
9. https://ipsaloquitur.com/contract-law/cases/pinnels-case/
10. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4221&context=klj
11. https://lawbhoomi.com/harvey-vs-facey/
12. https://www.dhyeyalaw.in/harvey-v-facey-a-landmark-case-on-offer-and-acceptance
13. https://lawplanet.in/harvey-vs-facey-case-summary-1893/
14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_v_Facey
15. https://legalfly.in/harvey-v-facey-case-summary-redefined-contract-law/
16. https://ipsaloquitur.com/contract-law/cases/harvey-v-facey/
17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCA3tVAjyys
18. https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/agreement-cases.php
19. https://pocketlaw.com/content-hub/electronic-contracts
20. https://blog.ipleaders.in/e-contracts/
21. https://www.defactolaw.in/post/understanding-e-contracts-types-examples-and-legal-implications-in-
cyber-law
22. https://lawbhoomi.com/e-contract/
23. https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13957
24. https://gitarattan.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Chapter-15.pdf
25. https://samistilegal.in/from-ink-to-click-understanding-electronic-contracts/
26. https://hsalegal.com/article/understanding-e-contracts/
27. https://www.internationaljournalssrg.org/IJCMS/2022/Volume9-Issue2/IJCMS-V9I2P102.pdf
28. https://blog.ipleaders.in/validity-and-enforceability-of-electronic-contracts/
29. https://www.indianbarassociation.org/e-contracts/
30. https://www.indialawoffices.com/legal-articles/e-contracts-and-validity-india
31. https://mnasserlaw.com/the-electronic-contract/
32. https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2002111.pdf
33. https://www.mondaq.com/india/contracts-and-commercial-law/1513686/digital-agreements-the-evoluti
on-and-enforceability-of-e-contracts
34. https://msbrijuniversity.ac.in/assets/uploads/newsupdate/Jurisdiction and Internet.pdf
35. https://ironcladapp.com/journal/contracts/what-is-an-electronic-contract
36. https://www.spotdraft.com/blog/are-electronic-contracts-legally-binding
37. https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/law/contract-law/lapse-of-offer/
38. https://www.complybook.com/blog/circumstances-leading-to-lapse-of-an-offer
39. https://www.taxmann.com/post/blog/law-of-offer-in-contract-formation
40. https://blog.ipleaders.in/lapse-of-offer/
41. https://lawbhoomi.com/revocation-of-an-offer/
42. https://www.scribd.com/document/525489417/Lapse-of-Offer
43. https://thelawdictionary.org/lapse-of-offer/
44. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/chapter-2-revocation-or-lapses-of-offer/272774264
45. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me2wfpxiNnY
46. https://lawlibrarycollections.umn.edu/classic-cases-contract-carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co
47. https://blog.ipleaders.in/case-analysis-carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co/
48. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_Co
49. https://www.dhyeyalaw.in/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co-1893-1-qb-256
50. https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co.php
51. https://www.australiancontractlaw.info/cases/carlill
52. https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/indian-contract-act/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co-1891-4-aii-er-127
53. https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/137.-Aakriti-Jain.pdf
54. https://testbook.com/key-differences/difference-between-offer-and-invitation-to-offer
55. https://lawbhoomi.com/invitation-to-offer/
56. https://thelegalschool.in/blog/difference-between-offer-and-invitation-to-offer
57. https://blog.ipleaders.in/offer-and-invitation-to-offer/
58. https://legal-wires.com/lex-o-pedia/offer-and-invitation-to-offer/
59. https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-offer-and-invitation-to-offer.html
60. https://www.writinglaw.com/offer-and-invitation-to-offer-in-indian-contract-act-1872/
61. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZXfoMUkMFI
62. https://www.jkshahclasses.com/announcement/IndianContractAct1872.pdf
63. https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/to-the-point/ttp-indian-contract-act/proposal?print=2