SOCIOLOGY

Introduction to Sociology Definition of Sociology Scope of Sociology Sociology as Science Group Definitions Types of Group Perspectives of Sociology Functionalist Perspective Conflict Perspective Interactionist Perspective Culture Definition Characteristics Function and Role of Culture Culture in Pakistan Socialization Definition Agencies of Socialization Personality and Culture

Introduction to Sociology
Definition of Sociology:
Sociology is the systemic study of social behaviours and human relationships. It focuses primarily on the influence of social relationships on human attitude and behaviour and how societies are established and change. The term sociology was coined by Auguste Comte in 1839. The founding father of Sociology, defines Sociology "as the science of social phenomena subject to natural and invariable laws, the discovery of which is the object of investigation."

Scope of Sociology:
Scope means the subject matter or the areas of study. Every science has its own field of inquiry. It becomes difficult to study a science systematically unless its boundary or scope is determined precisely. Sociology as a social science has its own scope or boundaries. However, there is no one opinion about the scope of Sociology. However, there are two main schools of thought regarding the scope of Sociology: (1) The Specialist or Formalistic school and (2) the Synthetic school. There is a good deal of controversy about the scope of Sociology between the two schools. The supporter of first school believe that Sociology is a specific science and the scope should be limited whereas others believe that it is a general science and its scope is very vast
(1) Specialist school: The supporters of this school of thought are George Simmel and Max Weber. The main views of the school regarding the scope of Sociology are -

Sociology is a specific, pure and independent social science. Sociology studies the various forms of social relationships. Scope of Sociology is very narrow and limited. Sociology deals with specific form of human relationship. Sociology need not study all the events connected with social science. Simmel believes that it is a specific social science and it should deal with social relationships from different angles.

(2) Synthetic school:

The supporters of synthetic school are the sociologists like Durkheim, Comte and Spencer According to this school Sociology is a general and systematic social science. Scope of Sociology is very vast. Sociology needs help from other social sciences. It is a synthesis of social science. Sociology is closely related with other social sciences.

As a subject, sociology is studied beneath the following categories 1. Historical Sociology

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

The Family Human Ecology and Demography Sociological theory The community Religions Sociology Political Sociology Sociology of Law Social Psychology Social Psychiatry

Sociology as a Science:
It is oft stated that sociology is not a science it cannot be brought into the lab. The lab of sociology is the society. It requires the research of an individual. For every effect there has to be a cause. How the society behaves is the effect sociology researches for the cause of such behaviours Control variable depends on what we add or subtract to the society. Social planning is to master physical and social forces to ensure the continuity of human race. There are five basic steps in the scientific method that sociologist and other researchers follow. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Defining the problem Reviewing the literature Formulating a hypothesis Selecting a research design and then collecting and analyzing data and Developing the conclusion Sociology in particular employs several methods of inquiry, which it shares with other sciences as well Comparative Method: studies the differences and similarities of different human groups. These differences and similarities have an influence on the social behaviour of society. Statistical Method: measures social phenomenon mathematically in order to disclose relationships and thus arrive at generalizations regarding humankind. Sampling and Control group are important techniques. Sociometry attempts to measure social phenomenon quantitatively. Case Study Method: it is employed for the study of a particular group, community institution or individual representing a defined number of individuals linked to it thus leading to generalizations. It is also called Participant Observation Method that involves investigation and studies of all the matters entering into a case. Here the observer becomes the member of the group being examined.

Historical Method: studies the civilizations of the past and their influence and role in the origins of the current social world Verstehen Approach: the Verstehen approach is of the view that the observed facts are of little value. Functionalist Perspective: refers to the study of social phenomenon from the point of views of the functions that particular social structure are made of parts which are interrelated and interdependent each performing a function necessary to the life of group.

PERSPECTIVES OF SOCIOLOGY
1) Functionalist Perspective:
Structural-Functionalism is a sociological theory that originally attempted to explain social institutions as collective means to meet individual biological needs. Later it came to focus on the ways social institutions meet social needs. Functionalism draws its inspiration primarily from the ideas of Emile Durkheim. Durkheim was concerned with the question of how societies maintain internal stability and survive over time. Durkheim proposed that such societies tend to be segmentary, being composed of equivalent parts that are held together by shared values, common symbols, or systems of exchanges. In modern, complex societies members perform very different tasks, resulting in a strong interdependence between individuals. The central concern of structural-functionalism is a continuation of the Durkheimian task of explaining the apparent stability and internal cohesion of societies that are necessary to ensure their continued existence over time. Many functionalists argue that social institutions are functionally integrated to form a stable system and that a change in one institution will precipitate a change in other institutions.

Highlights:
Societies are seen as coherent, bounded and fundamentally relational constructs that function like organisms, with their various parts (social institutions) working together to maintain and reproduce them. The various parts of society are assumed to work in an unconscious, quasi-automatic fashion towards the maintenance of the overall social equilibrium. All social and cultural phenomena are therefore seen as being functional in the sense of working together to achieve this state and are effectively deemed to have a life of their own. These components are then primarily analyzed in terms of the function they play.

In other words, to understand a component of society, one can ask the question, "What is the function of this institution?" A function, in this sense, is the contribution made by a phenomenon to a larger system of which the phenomenon is a part

Structural-functionalism was the dominant perspective of sociology between World War II and the Vietnam War.

Limitations
Functionalism has been criticized for being unable to account for social change because it focuses so intently on social order and equilibrium in society. As functionalism thinks about elements of social life in relation to their present function and not their past functions, structural-functionalism has a difficult time explaining why a function of some element of society might change or how such change occurs. As one aspect of society changed - the economy and production - it required a comparable change in the educational system, bringing social life back into equilibrium. Another philosophical problem with the functional approach is the ontological argument that society does not have needs as a human being does; and even if society does have needs they need not be met. The idea that society has needs as humans do is not a tenable position because society is only alive in the sense that it is made up of living individuals. Thus, society cannot have wants and/or needs as humans do. What's more, just because a society has some element in it at the present that does not mean that it must necessarily have that element. Another criticism often leveled at functionalist theory is that it supports the status quo. According to some opponents, structural-functionalism paints conflict and challenge to the status quo as harmful to society, and therefore tends to be the prominent view among conservative thinkers

Manifest and Latent Functions:

Merton (1957) proposed a distinction between manifest and latent functions. Manifest functions: These are the intended functions of a phenomenon in a social system. An example of manifest and latent functions is education. The manifest purpose of public education is to increase the knowledge and abilities of the citizenry to prepare them to contribute in the workforce. Latent functions: They are the unintended functions of a phenomenon in a social system. A latent function of the public education system is the development of a hierarchy of the learned. The most learned are often also the most affluent. Thus, while education's manifest function is to empower all individuals to contribute to the workforce and society, it also limits some people by creating boundaries of entry into occupations.

2) Conflict Perspective:
A prominent sociological theory that is often contrasted with structural-functionalism is conflict theory. Conflict theory argues that society is not best understood as a complex system striving for equilibrium but rather as a competition. Society is made up of individuals competing for limited resources (e.g., money, leisure, sexual partners, etc.). Broader social structures and organizations (e.g. religions,

government, etc.) reflect the competition for resources in their inherent inequalities; some people and organizations have more resources (i.e., power and influence) and use those resources to maintain their positions of power in society. Conflict theory was developed in part to illustrate the limitations of structural-functionalism. The conflict approach, which argues that the society is constantly in conflict over resources. One of the primary contributions conflict theory presents over the structural-functional approach is that it is ideally suited for explaining social change, a significant problem in the structuralfunctional approach.

Highlights:
The following are three primary assumptions of modern conflict theory: Competition over scarce resources is at the heart of all social relationships. Competition rather than consensus is characteristic of human relationships. Inequalities in power and reward are built into all social structures. Individuals and groups that benefit from any particular structure strive to see it maintained. Change occurs as a result of conflict between competing interests rather than through adaptation. Change is often abrupt and revolutionary rather than evolutionary. Conflict theory was elaborated in the United Kingdom by Max Gluckman and John Rex, who were influenced by Karl Marx, Georg Simmel, and other founding fathers of European sociology.

Limitations:
Not surprisingly, the primary limitation of the social-conflict perspective is that it overlooks the stability of societies. While societies are in a constant state of change, much of the change is minor. Many of the broader elements of societies remain remarkably stable over time, indicating the structural-functional perspective has a great deal of merit. As noted above, sociological theory is often complementary. This is particularly true of structuralfunctionalism and social-conflict theories. Structural-functionalism focuses on equilibrium and solidarity; conflict-theory focuses on change and conflict. Keep in mind that neither is better than the other, when combined, the two approaches offer a broader and more comprehensive view of society.

3) Interactionist Perspective:
In contrast to the rather broad approach toward society of structural-functionalism and conflict theory, Symbolic Interactionism is a theoretical approach to understanding the relationship between humans and society. The basic notion of symbolic interactionism is that human action and interaction are understandable only through the exchange of meaningful communication or symbols. In this approach, humans are portrayed as acting as opposed to being acted upon.

Highlights:
The main principles of symbolic interactionism are: 1. Human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings that things have for them 2. These meanings arise of out of social interaction 3. Social action results from a fitting together of individual lines of action This approach stands in contrast to the strict behaviorism of psychological theories prevalent at the time it was first formulated (in the 1920s and 1930s). According to Symbolic Interactionism, humans are distinct from infrahumans because infrahumans simply respond to their environment. Additionally, infrahumans are unable to conceive of alternative responses to gestures. Humans, however, can. This understanding should not be taken to indicate that humans never behave in a strict stimulus and response fashion, but rather that humans have the capability of not responding in that fashion. According to symbolic interactionism, the objective world has no reality for humans, only subjectively defined objects have meaning. Meanings are not entities that are bestowed on humans and learned by habituation.

Limitations
The most significant limitation of the symbolic-Interactionist perspective relates to its primary contribution: it overlooks macro social structures (e.g., norms, culture) as a result of focusing on microlevel interactions. Some symbolic integrationists, however, would counter that if role theory were incorporated into symbolic interactionism - which is now commonplace - this criticism is addressed

CULTURE
Definition:
Generally speaking, the following elements of social life are considered to be representative of human culture: "stories, beliefs, media, ideas, and works of art, religious practices, fashions, rituals, specialized knowledge, and common sense" Yet, examples of culture do not, in themselves, present a clear understanding of the concept of culture; culture is more than the object or behavior. Culture also includes, norms, values, beliefs, or expressive symbols. Roughly, norms are the way people behave in a given society, values are what they hold dear, beliefs are how they think the universe operates, and expressive symbols are representations, often representations of social norms, values, and beliefs themselves. To summarize, culture encompasses

objects and symbols, the meaning given to those objects and symbols, and the norms, values, and beliefs that pervade social life. "The definition is understood to include two elements - that which differentiates one group or society from others and the concept of acquired or learned behavior" One of the more important points to understand about culture is that it is an artificial categorization of elements of social life. As Griswold puts it, there is no such thing as culture or society out there in the real world. There are only people who work, joke, raise children, love, think, worship, fight, and behave in a wide variety of ways. To speak of culture as one thing and society as another is to make an analytical distinction between two different aspects of human experience. One way to think of the distinction is that culture designates the expressive aspect of human existence, whereas society designates the relational (and often practical) aspect.

The Function of Culture

Culture can also be seen to play a specific function in social life. According to Griswold, "The sociological analysis of culture begins at the premise that culture provides orientation, wards off chaos, and directs behavior toward certain lines of action and away from others. Griswold reiterates this point by explaining that, "Groups and societies need collective representations of themselves to inspire sentiments of unity and mutual support, and culture fulfills this need." In other words, culture can have a certain utilitarian function the maintenance of order as the result of shared understandings and meanings.

Cultural Change:
The belief that culture is symbolically coded and can thus be taught from one person to another means that cultures, although bounded, can change. Cultures are both predisposed to change and resistant to it. Resistance can come from habit, religion, and the integration and interdependence of cultural traits. For example, men and women have complementary roles in many cultures. One sex might desire changes that affect the other, as happened in the second half of the 20th century in western cultures while the other sex may be resistant to that change.

SOCIALIZATION
Definition & Elements:
Socialization is the process that prepares humans to function in social life. It should be re-iterated here that socialization is culturally relative - people in different cultures are socialized differently. This distinction does not inherently force an evaluative judgment. Socialization, because it is the adoption of culture, is going to be different in every culture. Socialization, as both process or an outcome, is not better or worse in any particular culture. Socialization is a process whereby individuals are made

aware of behaviors that are expected of them with regards to the norms, beliefs, attitudes, and values of the society in which they live. Socialization helps the individual face the realities of life, through the appreciation of their culture practices. The agencies of socialization are the social institutions that pass on to the people these norms, values, beliefs, and attitudes.
Socialization is a fundamental sociological concept, comprising a number of elements. While not every sociologist will agree which elements are the most important, or even how to define some of the elements of socialization, the elements outlined below should help clarify what is meant by socialization.

M.Haralambos and Holborn define it as the process by which individuals learn the culture of their society. For individuals to survive successfully without having any problem with others in society, culture is important.

The three goals of socialization:

1. Impulse control and the development of a conscience 2. Role preparation and performance, including occupational roles, gender roles, and roles in institutions such as marriage and parenthood 3. The cultivation of sources of meaning, or what is important, valued, and to be lived for

Primary and Secondary Socialization:

Socialization is a life process, but is generally divided into two parts: Primary socialization takes place early in life, as a child and adolescent. Secondary socialization refers to the socialization that takes place throughout one's life, both as a child and as one encounters new groups that require additional socialization. Most social scientists tend to combine the two, arguing that the basic or core identity of the individual develops during primary socialization, with more specific changes occurring later - secondary socialization - in response to the acquisition of new group memberships and roles and differently structured social situations.

Agencies Of Socialization:
The process of socialization, as it accounts for interaction with people of similar or different age groups occurs continuously in different social institutions a man is a part of. There are several agencies of

socialization which are developmental: anticipatory, resocialization, reverse, primary, and secondary socialization. However, the main agencies are those regarding primary socialization, which is the process where people learn attitudes, values, and actions appropriate to individuals as members of a particular culture. Secondary socialization agencies are important too. These agencies are responsible for the processes in where individuals learn appropriate behaviors as members of a smaller group within the larger society.
The main agencies of socialization for man are as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Religion Family Educational Institutions Peer groups Employment Settings Mass Media

1) Religion:
Religion is a major agency of socialization, because it embodies the moral principles of society. In this respect, religion has its own set of norms, values, and objectives that regulate the conduct of its members. Religion Agents of socialization differ in effects across religious traditions. Some believe religion is like an ethnic or cultural category, making it less likely for the individuals to break from religious affiliations and be more socialized in this setting. Parental religious participation is the most influential part of religious socializationmore so than religious peers or religious beliefs

2) Family:
The family is the most integral part of every individual's upbringing, thus one of the most important agencies of socialization. The family has the power to influence an individual's self-concepts, emotions, attitudes, and behaviors. Family is the most important and crucial institution of socializing a child. Soon after the birth, a child has to be with the mother and the child learns particular behavioral patterns from her. Of course, this is a crucial experience in his life. Subsequently he learns to interact with other members/individuals in the family. Activities such as sucking milk, smiling, carefulness and tottering are important in primary socialization. The infant gets fulfilled all physical and psychological needs within the family itself. Child rearing practices such as nutrition, sleeping and use of toilets are to be trained at home. However, all these practices keep changing from society to society. In Asian countries these practices are experienced with simplicity and relaxation on the contrary rigid practices are followed in western countries since in western countries such as Britain, France, Germany, etc, the mother does not be with

the child for a long period of time. However, Asian mother stays with the child for a long period in comparison to western mother In addition to child rearing practices, rewarding, threatening, punishing, bargaining and pleading help to socialize a particular child. Intention of all these methods is to make the child conformed to the society. As far as sociologists are concerned, early childhood experiences affect the personality development. Both love and affection of parents strongly influence the development of his personality. At the same time, lack of warmth, love and affection form an affectionless figure or personality. When a particular individual has both over-affection, he becomes an unbalanced character. The individual who has the excessive love and affection is not self confident while who is rejected can be harmful to the society.

3) Educational Institution:
The school is another important and crucial agent of socialization. The child who has been with the family for years extends his relationship with the outer society through school. The child receives his school education from six to eighteen years. The school is known as a micro system and it is an institution where learning takes place and individuals develop. The school provides the intellectual and social experiences from which individuals develop knowledge, skills, customs, beliefs, interest, and attitudes that characterize them and shape their abilities to perform adult roles. However, provision of good members to the society is the objective of education. Subject knowledge which is being taught by a set of teachers is exclusively a new experience. However, just after the admission to the school emotional bond and relationship the child had with the family and its members keeps reducing. The child is able to develop his skills through the new environment. At the same time he has the ability to identify the school as a place where his ideas and activities are appreciated and admired. The rewards he receives as appreciation, commendation, etc, may influence over the formation of his personality. Imitation affects the formation of the personality of an individual. The child has the opportunity to associates closely with the teacher in subject oriented activities and in extra curricular activities. He is motivated to imitate his teachers. The personality of the child is formed by following and imitating not only external characteristics of teachers such as accent, behavior, handwriting, etc, but also their ideas and opinions as well.

4) Peer Groups:
Peer groups are made up of people with similar ages and statuses in society. This group also sets the norms and values by which the individual must abide. In course of child's growth, he is motivated to be with the friends of his age. It is mainly prominent from teen ages to adulthood. The socialization that takes place with peers is different from those of the family and school. Similar

tastes, likes, dislikes and ideas influence of the formation of such groups. Those who like sports and music get together and form into groups is such an example. In peer groups, the child acquires a greater understanding in respect of conforming to laws and regulations. The child who does not conform to standard laws and regulations is rejected with ease from his group. Not being able to abide by the rules and regulations of the sports team and being unable to obey the order of its leader may be subjected to ejection. According to ideas and activities of the members certain controlling methods such as commending, accepting, punishing or rejecting are operative within a group. Children who are disobedient to their children may be subjected to ideas and control of such groups. Peer groups are important as a place wherein an individual could discuss certain issues, problems and matters which cannot be discussed with their adults in the family or school. Owing to movement with peers, a particular individual is able to solve certain problems. Socialization takes place by imitating the individuals who are appreciated by the peer group as well. Things such as accent, fashions, hair styles, ways of behavior, etc, are often imitated. In peer groups, there may be certain notions that are mismatched with the norms of the adults. It can be a reason for creating conflicts between the two groups. now and then there are situations in which such groups formed can be mismatched with the society and culture. A friendship group abusing intoxicants or drugs is a group which is incompatible with the culture of the society. The socialization takes place by peer groups may strongly affect the formation of the personality of an individual.

5) Mass Media:
The mass media, which serve as the medium of communication, is one of the agencies of socialization. Through the mass media, individuals are able to learn and adopt new lifestyles and behaviors which, at the end, become a convention in society. An example of this is fashion. In fact, there are many types of media; these include newspapers, magazines, radio, films, CDs, Internet, and television. These kinds of media, especially television, affect children's and adult's behavior in different ways. Having the mass media as one of our major agents of socialization could be very hard on our society today. When watching different TV shows seeing all those actors and actresses with these great figures hurt many people in the society today. In other ways watching TV could be a good thing when an actor or actress is on TV in different shows or music it could bring many good things like being a role model for an adolescent teenager who wants someone to looks up too. Having these agents is a great guideline for people who want to start with a great start with their children or wants to be a good communicator. However, there are also television programs that affect children negatively. For instance; on channel eleven, there is a dreadful program that is bad for the children; it is called "Jerry Springer". This program should not be shown on TV because it has a lot of fights and vulgar language. "W.W.F" is another negative program, which has too much violence, and unfortunately children love it. Children should not see these kinds of programs because children tend to imitate the fighters. In addition, there are some movies that have a lot of violence and bad words and children love these kinds of movies. Children like and learn how to use knives, guns and explosives because they see it on TV. Sometimes children take the role of their superheroes in real life because they see their favorite actors using these weapons. For

example; when children watch the actor stealing a car on TV, they learn from it and they also want to steal because they want to be like their superheroes.

The Importance of Socialization:

One of the most common methods used to illustrate the importance of socialization is to draw upon the few unfortunate cases of children who were, through neglect, misfortune, or willful abuse, not socialized by adults while they were growing up. Such children are called "feral" or wild. Some feral children have been confined by people (usually their own parents); in some cases, this child abandonment was due to the parents' rejection of a child's severe intellectual or physical impairment. Feral children may have experienced severe child abuse or trauma before being abandoned or running away. Others are alleged to have been brought up by animals; some are said to have lived in the wild on their own. When completely brought up by non-human animals, the feral child exhibits behaviors (within physical limits) almost entirely like those of the particular care-animal, such as its fear of or indifference to humans. Feral children lack the basic social skills, which are normally learned in the process of socialization. For example, they may be unable to learn to use a toilet, have trouble learning to walk upright and display a complete lack of interest in the human activity around them. They often seem mentally impaired and have almost insurmountable trouble learning a human language. The impaired ability to learn language after having been isolated for so many years is often attributed to the existence of a critical period for language learning, and taken as evidence in favor of the Critical Period Hypothesis. It is very difficult to socialize a child who became isolated at a very young age into a relatively normal member of society and such individuals often need close care throughout their lives

GROUPS
Definition:
a group is usually defined as a number of people who identify and interact with one another. This is a very broad definition, as it includes groups of all sizes, from dyads to whole societies. While an aggregate comprises merely a number of individuals, a group in sociology exhibits cohesiveness to a larger degree. Aspects that members in the group may share include: interests, values, ethnic/linguistic background, roles and kinship. One way of determining if a collection of people can be considered a group is if individuals who belong to that collection use the self-referent pronoun "we;" using "we" to refer to a collection of people often implies that the collection thinks of itself as a group. Examples of groups include: families, companies, circles of friends, clubs, local chapters of fraternities and sororities, and local religious congregations

TYPES OF GROUPS:
In sociology we distinguish between two types of groups based upon their characteristics.

PRIMARY GROUP:
A Primary group is typically a small social group whose members share close, personal, enduring relationships. These groups are marked by concern for one another, shared activities and culture, and long periods of time spent together. The goal of primary groups is actually the relationships themselves rather than achieving some other purpose. Families and close friends are examples of primary groups

SECONDARY GROUP:
Secondary groups are large groups whose relationships are impersonal and goal-oriented. Some secondary groups may last for many years, though most are short term. Such groups also begin and end with very little significance in the lives of the people involved. People in a secondary group interact on a less personal level than in a primary group. Rather than having as the goal the maintenance and development of the relationships themselves, these groups generally come together to accomplish a specific purpose. Since secondary groups are established to perform functions, peoples roles are more interchangeable. Examples of secondary groups include: classmates in a college course, athletic teams, and co-workers