HYPOTHESIS TESTING Consider association and relationship between:

1. HIV/AIDS knowledge level with age group 2. HIV/AIDS knowledge level and education 3. HIV/AIDS attitude with HIV/AIDS knowledge 4. HIV/AIDS attitude with religion 5. HIV/AIDS attitude with education 6. HIV/AIDS attitude with marital status Method Chi-square test: Analysis -> Descriptive statistic -> crosstab as below

1. Association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level with age group Age group was divided according to the result of research on Knowledge and exposure to the HIV/AIDS workplace program and stigma and discrimination among employee (Bongani, 2009): 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39

40-44 45-49 50-54 55+

Both HIV/AIDS knowledge level and age group are nominal variables Ho: There is no association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and age group H1: There is association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and age group age_group age group * KlGr level of knowledge Crosstabulation KlGr level of knowledge Moderate High or good Total Age group 1-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 Total Count Count Count Count Count Count 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 9.8 53 53.0 46 46.1 29 28.5 11 10.8 13 13.7 162 162.0 10 10.0 54 54.0 47 47.0 29 29.0 11 11.0 14 14.0 165 165.0 Expected Count .2 Expected Count 1.0 Expected Count .9 Expected Count .5 Expected Count .2 Expected Count .3 Count 3 Expected Count 3.0

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

Pearson Chi-Square 3.175a 5 .673 Likelihood Ratio 3.146 5 .677 Linear-by-Linear .524 1 .469 Association N of Valid Cases 165 a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18.

2. Association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level with education Both education and HIV/AIDS knowledge level are nominal variables Ho: There is no association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and education of responder H1: There is association between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and education of responder
Edu education * KlGr level of knowledge Crosstabulation KlGr level of knowledge Moderate Education 1 primary education Count Expected Count 2 secondary education Count Expected Count 3 high school level Count Expected Count 4 higher education (university) Count Expected Count Count Expected Count
Chi-Square Tests

High or good 5 4.9 40 41.4 89 88.8 82 80.9 216 216.0

Total 5 5.0 42 42.0 90 90.0 82 82.0 219 219.0

0 .1 2 .6 1 1.2 0 1.1 3 3.0

Total

Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 4.830a 4.632 3.061 219

df 3 3 1

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) .185 .201 .080

Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .07.

3. Relationship between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and HIV/AIDS attitude group Both HIV/AIDS attitude group and HIV/AIDS knowledge level are nominal variables Ho: There is no relationship between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and HIV/AIDS attitude group H1: There is relationship between HIV/AIDS knowledge level and HIV/AIDS attitude group AttGr Level of Attitude * KlGr level of knowledge Crosstabulation KlGr level of knowledge Moderate AttGr Level of Attitude 1.00 bad Count 0 2 1 Expected Count .1 2.00 moderate Count 3.00 good Total Count Expected Count .7 Expected Count 2.2 Count 3 Expected Count 3.0 High or good Total 8 7.9 49 50.3 159 157.8 216 216.0 8 8.0 51 51.0 160 160.0 219 219.0

Chi-Square Tests df Value Asymp. Sig. (2sided) Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

Pearson Chi-Square 3.226a 2 .199 Likelihood Ratio 2.682 2 .262 Linear-by-Linear 1.381 1 .240 Association N of Valid Cases 219 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .11.

4. Relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group with religion of responder Both HIV/AIDS attitude group and religion are nominal variables Ho: There is no relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and religion of responder H1: There is relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and religion of responder RG Religion * AttGr Level of Attitude Crosstabulation AttGr Level of Attitude Bad RG Religion Buddhist Count Islam Total Count 8 0 Expected Count 8.0 Expected Count .0 Count 8 Expected Count 8.0 Moderate Good Total 51 50.8 0 .2 51 51.0 159 1 218 1 159.3 218.0 .7 1.0 160 219 160.0 219.0 Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .370a 2 .831 Likelihood Ratio .629 2 .730 Linear-by-Linear .328 1 .567 Association N of Valid Cases 219 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04.

5. Relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group with education of responder Both HIV/AIDS attitude group and education are nominal variables Ho: There is no relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and education of responder H1: There is relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and education of responder

Edu education * AttGr Level of Attitude Crosstabulation AttGr Level of Attitude Bad Edu education 1 primary education Count 0 1 1 6 Expected Count .2 2 secondary education Count 3 high school level 4 higher education (university) Total Count Count Expected Count 1.5 Expected Count 3.3 Expected Count 3.0 Count 8 Expected Count 8.0 Moderate Good Total 1 1.2 10 9.8 22 21.0 18 19.1 51 51.0 4 3.7 31 30.7 67 65.8 58 5 5.0 42 42.0 90 90.0 82

59.9 82.0 160 219 160.0 219.0

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

Pearson Chi-Square 5.238a 6 .514 Likelihood Ratio 5.364 6 .498 Linear-by-Linear 1.160 1 .281 Association N of Valid Cases 219 a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18.

6. Relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group with marital status of responder Both HIV/AIDS attitude group and marital status are nominal variables Ho: There is no relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and marital status of responder H1: There is relationship between HIV/AIDS attitude group and marital status of responder MS Marital status * AttGr Level of Attitude Crosstabulation AttGr Level of Attitude Bad MS Marital status 1 single 2 married Count Count 5 3 0 0 Expected Count 4.3 Expected Count 3.7 3 divorced Count 4 widowed Count Total Expected Count .0 Expected Count .0 Count 8 Expected Count 8.0 Moderate Good Total 31 27.2 19 23.3 0 .2 1 .2 51 51.0 81 85.5 78 73.1 1 .7 0 117 117.0 100 100.0 1 1.0 1

.7 1.0 160 219 160.0 219.0 Statistical test > 0.05 the null hypothesis cant be rejected

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.778a 6 .448 Likelihood Ratio 5.687 6 .459 Linear-by-Linear .946 1 .331 Association N of Valid Cases 219 a. 8 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04.