You are on page 1of 35

Population Regulation

Chapter 5

Preconditions
Populations change over time Populations cannot grow indefinitely Logistic curve Logistic equation represents equilibrium view of population regulation (if perturbed, population returns to equilibrium value, K) Other views see population fluctuations as random over time, without returning to equilibrium (due to disturbance)

Background
Population regulation: fluctuations in abundance with feedback mechanisms to increase or decrease density toward K Population control: ecological mechanisms which control upper limit of density Density is a result of combination of factors In general: N = (b + i) (d + e), where N is population size, b is births, d is deaths, i is immigrants, e is emigrants

Patterns of Population Fluctuation


Small-magnitude irregular fluctuations, Large-scale irregular fluctuations, Cycles, Irruptions

Small-magnitude irregular fluctuations


Small random changes in density of one order of magnitude or less

Large-scale irregular fluctuations


Large random changes in density of several orders of magnitude

Cycles
Regular interval changes in population density

Irruptions
Occasional, unpredictable population explosions

Equilibrium Theories
Central difference among theories lies in the relative importance of density-dependent factors and density-independent factors. Density-dependent factors have an increasing effect with increasing density Density-independent factors have an effect that does not vary with density

Extrinsic Biotic School


Accepts importance of density-dependent factors Emphasizes external biotic factors

Food supply Predation Disease

Food supply
Evidence shows that food-supply is a strong determinant of density. Birds frequently die of starvation. Areas with high food supplies tend to have high bird densities. (correlation Vs. causation) Artificially supplemented food studies Naturally supplemented food studies

Predation
Difficult to establish (need to know density differences of predators with varying prey densities) Studies indicate that predator species depress prey populations Removal experiments yield ambiguous results Top-down or bottom-up controversy

Disease and parasitism


Increased densities may increase the rate of transmission Increased density frequently correlates with increased disease rate However, correlation may not indicate causation (food supply, red grouse)

The Intrinsic School


Based on mechanisms intrinsic to the population Aka the population is self-regulated Also relies on density-dependence Stress, territoriality, genetic polymorphism hypothesis, dispersal

Stress, Territoriality
Stress may regulate density by causing physiological reactions to high densities Territoriality may regulate density by excluding some individuals from reproducing

Genetic Polymorphism Hypothesis, dispersal


Genetic composition changes in response to density Saturation dispersal, presaturation dispersal (reduces inbreeding)

Nonequilibrium theories of population regulation


Abiotic Extrinsic Regulation, Metapopulations, Chaos theory

Abiotic Extrinsic Regulation


Density-independent, abiotic factors Weather, temperature, moisture, sunexposure, rainfall, etc These factors are sufficient to explain density variations. Populations do not encounter ideal conditions long enough for densitydependent factors to be of importance.

Metapopulations
Population consisting of several patches of populations linked by dispersal. Patches vary, may go extinct; not in equilibrium, but overall population survives due to dispersal among patches Metapopulations are particularly important in fragmented habitats

Chaos Theory
Unpredictable patterns of population growth Particularly interesting with r values above 2.69 Pattern depends on initial conditions Not stochastic Property of the growth itself (growth equation)

Recapitulating Population Regulation


There are equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations Density-dependent and density-independent factors affect populations (biotic and abiotic factors) It is undeniable that there is no single explanation: rather, a combination of theories applies. To what extent in each case is the relative contribution becomes the question.

Invasions
Four stages: Transport, Introduction, Establishment, Spread Invasions follow the logistic curve, usually with longer lag phase, followed by exponential growth Invasions reach high densities (e.g. zebra mussels, Opuntia cactus and cactoblastis moth) Escape from density-dependent factors? Probably not. Other possibilities.

Zebra mussel figure

Anywhere, everywhere!

Extinction and Risk Analysis


Extinction is a natural component of populations (strongly aggravated by humans) Birth rate decreases, mortality increases Very low populations suffer the Allee effect Anthropogenic habitat loss creates three risk factors: demographic accidents, habitat fragmentation, genetic risk

Demographic accidents
Habitat loss creates population decrease With smaller populations, risk of extinction increases, due to demographic accidents Chance events have a greater impact on small populations Severe winter, epidemic, predators, etc

Habitat fragmentation
Habitat loss frequently leads to habitat fragmentation This leads to a metapopulation structure Single patches may not be large enough to support a breeding population Dispersal may not be possible to support supplying of extinct patches Patches may go extinct simultaneously

Genetic risks
Smaller populations have increased inbreeding and genetic drift Both lead to increased homozygosity (bottlenecking effect leads to loss of alleles) Increased homozygosity decreases fitness, and thus places population at risk

Heath hen on Marthas Vineyard


Overhunting caused massive population decline until 1907 Population increased moderately thereafter (genetic risks?) In 1916, fire, storm, cold winter, invasion reduced population to 50 pairs (demographic accidents-more genetic risk) Subsequent years showed sex-ratio skewed toward males (demographic accident) Extinct by 1932 (any habitat fragmentation?)

The end.