You are on page 1of 20

AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

knowledge management

KM Scorecard


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

APQCs Work in Knowledge Management


Research on KM since 1993 Research Consortia started 1995
Over 150 firms in APQCs KM Consortia 45 Best Practice firms studied in detail

knowledge management

Shared knowledge with thousands of KM practitioners


Publications Training Conferences

Helping firms implement KM using best practices


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

APQC KM Consortium Studies


knowledge management

Emerging Best Practices in KM (1996) Using Information Technology for KM (1997) Europe - The Learning Organisation & KM (1997) Expanding Knowledge Externally (1998) Creating a Knowledge Sharing Culture (1998-99) Successfully Implementing KM (1999-2000) Building and Sustaining Communities of Practice (2000) Content Management (May, 2001)


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

knowledge management


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

KM Measurement Bell Curve


Stage 1: Enter and advocate Stage 2: Develop a strategy

knowledge management

Stage 3: Stage 4: Stage 5: Design Expand and Institutionalize & Launch Support KM initiative


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Measures

knowledge management

Individual Processes

Input
Resources Applied

Process
Activities Organized

Output
Productivity Goods/Services Produced

Outcome
Revenues/Profits Customer Sat/Loyalty

Converting Inputs into


Outputs


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Typical Stage 1 Situation


Example:

knowledge management

Joe spends time writing a detailed proposal with the steps for designing and launching a CoP. Jennifer sees it after hes finished and comments, But Joe, I did that very thing last week for another client!

Result:
Redundant efforts Wasted money


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Appropriate Stage 1 Measures

knowledge management

By interviewing people in the organization, we uncover these kinds of stories. The stories can then be used to convince management that something needs to be done. We NEED a way to capture and reuse knowledge because
Were wasting money, time, and energy; Our competitors are doing things better and faster; and Were frustrated.


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Morals of Stage 1

knowledge management

Theres not a whole lot to measure yet. Use stories to get managements attention and tell them what kind of changes they should see with KM
Less frustration Decreased costs Increased revenue Better products


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Appropriate Stage 2 Measures


Measure Progress

knowledge management

How many supporters have I recruited? How much funding have I secured?

Measure the Gap


Identify KM practices already in place.

Measure Against a Benchmark


Explore what other firms are doing, particularly competitors.

Measure Cultural Readiness


Do people tend to hoard knowledge? Do we have good example stories of collaboration?

10


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Morals of Stage 2

knowledge management

Fend off the requests for financial measurements at this stage. Explore opportunities for implementing KM. Develop a business case for doing it. Continue to talk with stakeholders about potential benefits.

11


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Typical Stage 3 Situation


Example

knowledge management

Management agrees to fund some pilots, but wants to have a progress report after 90 days.

Task
You need to come up with meaningful measures that prove the value of your pilot -- particularly in meeting the business goals.

12


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Appropriate Stage 3 Measures


Measure community effectiveness

knowledge management

Activity such as visits, and submissions Measure impact on the business remember your value proposition

Measure the cost of capture and compilation


Time and cost req. to capture information

Measure project management effectiveness


Was a formal methodology used? Timeline established? Objectives established and goals met?

Capture anecdotes that prove value

13


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Morals of Stage 3

knowledge management

The measures for the KM program will be in the pilot initiatives that is, communities of practice. Once one or two communities have proven their usefulness, management will probably entertain the thought of KMs expansion into other parts of the organization.

14


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Typical Stage 4 Situation

knowledge management

Management thinks, Great job on the pilots. People are sharing information like never before and we suspect our skyrocketing sales and shrinking costs are due to this KM thing. But, we need to see some formal ROI justification before we take this enterprise-wide.

15


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Appropriate Stage 4 Measures

knowledge management

Use pilot project successes, particularly when financial impact outweighs investment to demonstrate what is possible Extrapolate time & cost savings to justify expansion Consider Balanced Scorecard Format for expansion initiatives
Financial Perspective Customer Perspective Internal Perspective Innovation and Learning

16


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

KM Balanced Scorecard
Financial Perspective
Increased Sales Improved Productivity

knowledge management

Customer Perspective
Customer Satisfaction Fewer Returns

Internal Perspective
Cycle Time Reduction Community Participation

Innovation & Learning


Faster to Competence Employee Satisfaction

17


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Morals of Stage 4

knowledge management

Management needs to have some hard numbers before it decides to make KM part of the main organizational objectives. Business units will likely have to participate in funding. ROI is often based on educated guesses.

18


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Typical Stage 5 Situation


We wish we knew. Actually, there are some signs:

knowledge management

KM is embedded in the business model. Measures used in KM initiatives may become part of corporate scorecards, but focus is on business performance. Business units budget for KM activities. Organizational structure must be realigned. Evidence of KM competency becomes part of the formal performance evaluation and new employee training.

19


AM ERI C AN PRO D U C T I V I T Y & Q U ALI T Y C EN T ER

Morals of Stage 5

knowledge management

Since KMs value has already been proved, KM activity measures are only used to check progress and monitor cultural evolution. UTOPIA Your business relies on KM.

20

You might also like