Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Landau - Mci Slides
Landau - Mci Slides
Susan Landau
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Disclosures
What is the relationship between longitudinal amyloid and glucose metabolism measurements?
Both negative
Normals N=90
ADAS-cog
FDG -
Florbetapir -
FDG +
ADAS-cog
0.22 pts/yr greater decline
Florbetapir +
0.50 pts/yr greater decline
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Normals N=90
ADAS-cog
FDG - / Florbetapir +
N = 14, 5 ApoE4+ 0.6 pts/yr decline
ADAS-cog
FDG + / Florbetapir +
N = 18, 7 ApoE4+ 0.2 pts/yr decline
MCI N=99
ADAS-cog
FDG -
Florbetapir -
FDG +
ADAS-cog
0.22 pts/yr greater decline
Florbetapir +
0.50 pts/yr greater decline
MCI N=99
FDG - / Florbetapir +
N = 17, 9 ApoE4+, 3 converters 0.4 pts/yr decline
FDG + / Florbetapir +
N = 44, 32 ApoE4+, 31 converters 2.5 pts/yr decline
Amyloid change
Baseline SUVR
Amyloid change
Baseline SUVR
Meta ROIs
Post Cingulate Gyrus
MetaROI
L Inf Temporal Gyrus R Angular Gyrus
L Angular Gyrus
N EMCI
Baseline Florbetapir +
N EMCI
Baseline Florbetapir +
Baseline Florbetapir -
N EMCI N
Baseline Florbetapir +
Decreasing AV45 Increasing AV45 Annual florbetapir change Increasing florbetapir memory decline Normals only, regardless of baseline florbetapir status (p = 0.03)
Summary
MCI patients who were abnormal for both abnormal florbetapir & FDG-PET had the greatest retrospective decline
Combining amyloid and FDG-PET tells us more about progression than either marker individually AD-related FDG changes may not be unidirectional, complicating interpretation of
Thank you
ADNI
ADNI participants & staff Michael Weiner Bob Koeppe Eric Reiman Kewei Chen Norman Foster Danielle Harvey Les Shaw John Trojanowski Laurel Beckett Cliff Jack Chet Mathis Andrew Saykin Ron Petersen Michael Donohue Anthony Gamst Art Toga Karen Crawford Paul Aisen
UC Berkeley
Bill Jagust Suzanne Baker Allison Fero Cindee Madison