You are on page 1of 16

ROAD MAP

PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM

Commission on Higher Education

Table 1. Number of Philippine Higher Institutions and Enrollment by Type 2000-2012


Institutional Type/AY Number
2000-2001 *2011-2012

Enrollment
2000-2001 *2011-2012

Total HEIs (excluding SUCs campuses) Total HEIs (including SUCs campuses) Public State Universities and Colleges SUCs Campuses Local Universities and Colleges Others (include OGS, CSI, Special HEI) Private Sectarian

1,380 1,603 166 107 223 40 19 1,214 312

1,856 2,282 646 110 426 94 16 1,636 339

2,229,645
2,430,842 771,162 499,002 201,197 61,954 9,009 1,659,680 527,753

2,566,652
3,033,967 1,282,045 657,858 467,315 150,311 6,561 1,751,922 484,804

Non-Sectarian

902

1,297

1,131,927

1,267,118

* As of July 23, 2012

Rationale

Compared to higher education, basic educationyields greater social returns, and its provision is the more fundamental duty of the state

With K-12, current shortages (classrooms, textbooks, teachers, etc) and demand for international comparability, basic education will be prioritized in allocation of government resources
Private sector will continue to contribute significantly to higher education delivery

Objective
General: (with whatever modest resources generated) maximize public higher education's contribution towards producing competent high level professionals and generating knowledge and technologies for national development and competitiveness

Objectives
Specific: 1. To rationalize the public higher education system, improve its internal and external efficiency, optimize resource utilization and maximize resource generation; 2. To improve quality and standards of higher education, raise the level of educational outcomes and increase the social relevance of its developmental functions; and

3. To expand access to quality higher education among lower income and disadvantaged groups

Roadmap for Public Higher Education Reform


Goal: Relevant & quality public higher education accessible to all who seek and deserve it

Tangible Outputs

OBE-typology based QA framework XI RUS Bill Revised NFF for SUC MOOE Presidential Task Force for Education Report National Higher Education Research Agenda II

Typology Bills, draft CMO (SUC Leveling) XI RUS Master Plan DBM-CHED Circular re NFF IQuAME system 1,730 FDP scholars 1,500 HEI managers trained CHED bldg, LLU, MRU, IAU

Education sector development studies


Integration of 102 CSIs to SUCs PCER Report

Higher Education Development Program Rationalization of SUCs Quality assurance Faculty development, HEI management development CHED Organizational Devt

Rationalization within a moratorium period Reorienting financing of higher education

2000

Major Initiatives

3 internationally recognized SUCs 4 RUS models, 2 specialized HEIs All SUCs & LUCs classified by type & level All irrelevant & duplicative SUCs programs & satellites phased out NFF for SUC MOOE & PS 22 leadings universities with viable IGPs, raising 50% of their budget needs Socialized tuition fee adopted in 10 SUCs OBE-typology based QA applied on all SUCs & LUCs 80% of non-compliant programs phased out 50% passing in licensure exams in priority programs within SUCs mandates 2,500 faculty scholars 15 R&D centers established 195 COEs/Ds 88 developing SUCs upgraded 55,000 student scholars/grantees 2550 SUC managers trained Higher Education Academy

2016

Upgrading quality 4. Strengthening QA 5. Upgrading faculty qualification 6. Upgrading leading SUCs RDE centers COEs/CODs Enhancing access 7. Modernizing developing SUCs 8. Strengthening STUFAPs

Rationalization of Public HE system 1. Rationalizing SUCs/LUCs 2. Rationalizing program offerings 3. Rationalizing resource utilization/ generation

2011

Cross cutting initiative 9. Executive development program

Public Higher Education Reform Overall Framework

Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives 1. Rationalization of SUCs distribution and growth Milestones GIS based map of HEIs and programs completed by 2011, and continuously updated thereafter Blueprint for public HEI system developed by 2012 Three (3) RUS and two (2) specialized HEIs pilot tested from 2012 to 2016: RUS bill in process during Plan period

Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives 2. Rationalization of programs Milestones

Typology framework developed by 2011 and initially implemented in 2012, and all SUCs and LUCs classified by 2013
SUCs programs outside mandates, duplicative and inefficient identified by 2011, 30% ordered for phase out/closure by 2012 and 100% in 2013-2016* New academic programs developed and launched in critical high level professional disciplines, e.g. geology, meteorology by 2013

*Total number of SUCs programs = 12,246 higher education + 1200 preschool, elem, H.S. & TechVoc

Milestones
Objective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives 3. Rationalization of resources Milestones Generic socialized tuition fee scheme designed by 2013, and piloted in 10 SUCs in 2014-2016 Normative funding formula revised by 2012, revised formula applied on 100% of SUCs MOOE and simulated on PS by 2013, then fully applied on both MOOE and PS by 2016 22 Leading SUCs with viable IGPs by 2013, with 50% of their budget accounted for by internally generated income by 2016

Plan for digitization and automation formulated by 2012, fully implemented in accordance with GIFMIS in 20% of SUCs by 2014, in all SUCs by 2016

Milestones
Objective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives 4. Quality assurance of SUCs/LUCs Milestones All authorized unaccredited SUCs programs evaluated by 2012; 20% substandard and non-performing programs closed or phased out in 2012 and 80% from 2013 to 2016 Improved performance of SUCs graduates in licensure examinations in priority disciplines (within their mandates) to 50% passing by 2016* 85 SUCs programs supported for accreditation in 2012, and 340 programs from 2013 to 2016

5. Faculty development

500 SUC faculty scholars supported in 2012 and 2000 from 2013 to 2016**

*Baseline 2010 = 31% **15,566 SUCs faculty (41.9%) w/o grad deg in 2010-2011; 22,966 or 58% w/ grad deg (total 39,532); target will increase to 64.4%

Milestones
Objective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives 6. Upgrading leading SUCs to internatl standards Milestones 5 R&D Centers established in SUCs and supported in 2012, and 10 from 2013 to 2016 15 CHED-funded SUCs R&D projects implemented in 2012, and 30 during 20132016 6 SUCs extension programs conducted for the NAPC identified focus municipalities 45 COEs/Ds in SUCs identified & processed with 25 supported in 2012; 150 processed with 100 supported from 2013-2016

3 SUCs in the top leading universities in the world by 2016

Milestones
Objective 3. Enhance access
Initiatives 7. Modernizing developing SUCs 8. STUFAPs Milestones 89 developing SUCs outside highly urbanized areas supported Harmonized/integrated scheme of STUFAPs instituted through intergovernment/agency collaboration 11,360 STUFAP beneficiaries in SUCs in 2012 and 44,000 from 2013-2016, from poor and disadvantaged families, especially in NAPC focus communities

Milestones
Crosscutting
Milestones Executive Development Program 550 SUCs managers trained in 2012; 2000 in 2013-2016 Institutionalization thru establishment of Higher Education Academy and HE career system conceptualized

BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS (in Million Pesos)


In itiativ es
1

Fu n d S o u rce
HEDF (1)

2011-2012
22.00 56.00 78.00 286.00

2013
24.20 61.60 85.80 314.60

2014
26.62 67.76 94.38 346.06

2015
29.28 74.54 103.82 380.67

2016
32.21 81.99 114.20 418.73

To tal
134.31 341.89 476.20 1,746.06

For Efficiency GIA for RDE (2) subtotal HEDF (3) DAP GIA for RDE for Leading Infra and Facilities upgrading for Leading GAA CHED

504.00 2,631.00

504.00 2,631.00

For Quality

NAFES and Faculty Development Growth Areas GAA SUCs Infra and Facilities upgrading for Leading GIA for RDE for Leading subtotal HEDF (4) DAP GIA for poverty alleviation Modernizing Facilities of Developing SUCs

97.16 500.00

106.88

117.56

129.32

142.25

593.17 500.00

2,894 554 4,018.16 88.60 3,869.48 13.29

3,183.40 609.40 4,256.42 1.99

3,501.74 670.34 4,682.07 0.00

3,851.91 737.37 5,150.27 0.00

13,431.05 2,571.11 21,976.40 103.88

500.00 427.80

500.00 427.80

For Access

GAA CHED STUFAP GIA for poverty alleviation GAA SUCs Modernizing Facilities of Developing SUCs subtotal 1,076.74 165.00 165.00 5,337.90 DAP - Executive Development Program (5) subtotal TOTAL 470.58 556.28 100.00 100.00 4,611.56 517.64 1,156.53 110.00 110.00 5,617.33 569.40 1,278.68 121.00 121.00 6,185.57 626.34 1,406.55 133.10 133.10 6,804.12 2,183.96 5,474.78 629.10 629.10 28,556.48 60.34 72.41 86.90 550.00 709.28 780.21 1,709.14 550.00

Crosscutting

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

HEDF allocation for Institutional Capacity Building for SUCs Disbursement Acceleration Program Grants-In-Aid for SUCs - RDE, retained by PIDs HEDF allocation for COE/COD, Quality Assurance, Research and Faculty Development Programs (FDP) for SUCs HEDF allocation for STUFAP Released through Development Academy of the Philippines

You might also like