The di''erence between poor and rich countries does not reside in the a&ailable natural resources. 0ace or skin color are also not important1 immigrants labeled la-y in their countries o' origin are the producti&e power in rich European countries.
The di''erence between poor and rich countries does not reside in the a&ailable natural resources. 0ace or skin color are also not important1 immigrants labeled la-y in their countries o' origin are the producti&e power in rich European countries.
The di''erence between poor and rich countries does not reside in the a&ailable natural resources. 0ace or skin color are also not important1 immigrants labeled la-y in their countries o' origin are the producti&e power in rich European countries.
countries and the rich ones is not the age of the country.
This can be shown by countries like India & Egypt, that are more than 2000 years old and are poor.
On the other hand, Canada, ustralia & !ew "ealand, that #$0 years ago were ine%pressi&e, today are de&eloped countries and are rich.
The di''erence between poor & rich countries does not reside in the a&ailable natural resources.
(apan has a limited territory, )0* mountainous, inade+uate 'or agriculture & cattle raising, but it is the second world economy. The country is like an immense 'loating 'actory, importing raw material 'rom the whole world and e%porting manu'actured products.
nother e%ample is ,wit-erland, which does not plant cocoa but has the best chocolate o' the world. In its little territory they raise animals and plant the soil during . months per year. !ot enough, they produce dairy products o' the best +uality. It is a small country that transmits an image o' security, order & labor, which made it the world/s strong sa'e.
E%ecuti&es 'rom rich countries who communicate with their counterparts in poor countries show that there is no signi'icant intellectual di''erence.
0ace or skin color are also not important1 immigrants labeled la-y in their countries o' origin are the producti&e power in rich European countries.
2hat is the di''erence then3
The di''erence is the attitude o' the people, 'ramed along the years by the education & the culture.
On analy-ing the beha&ior o' the people in rich & de&eloped countries, we 'ind that the great ma4ority 'ollow the 'ollowing principles in their li&es1
#. Ethics, as a basic principle. 2. Integrity. 5. 0esponsibility. .. 0espect to the laws & rules. $. 0espect to the rights o' other citi-ens. 6. 2ork lo&ing. 7. ,tri&e 'or sa&ing & in&estment. ). 2ill o' super action. 8. 9unctuality.
In poor countries, only a minority 'ollow these basic principles in their daily li'e.
2e are not poor because we lack natural resources or because nature was cruel to us.
2e are poor because we lack attitude.
2e lack the will to comply with and teach these 'unctional principles o' rich & de&eloped societies.
I' you do not 'orward this message nothing will happen to you. :our pet will not die, you will not be 'ired, you will not ha&e bad luck 'or se&en years and also you will not get sick.
If you love your country, let this message circulate for a major quantity of people could reflect about this & CA!"#, ACT$$