Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09-DISK CHAP 9 Acc - Causation Theory
09-DISK CHAP 9 Acc - Causation Theory
Risk Avoidance
Technically, avoidance takes place when
decisions are made that prevent a risk from
even coming into existence.
Risks are avoided when the organization
refuses to accept the risk even for an instant.
An example is a firm that considers
manufacturing some product but, because of
the hazards involved elects not to do so.
9-2
Risk Avoidance
While avoidance is the only alternative for
dealing with some risks, it is a negative rather
than a positive approach.
If avoidance is used extensively, the firm may
not be able to achieve its primary objectives.
For this reason, avoidance is, in a sense, the
last resort in dealing with risk. It is used
when there is no other alternative.
9-3
Risk Avoidance
Risk avoidance should be used in those
instances in which the exposure has
catastrophic potential and the risk cannot be
reduced or transferred.
Generally, these conditions will exist in the
case of risks for which both the frequency and
the severity are high.
9-4
Risk Reduction
The term risk reduction is used to define a
broader set of efforts aimed to minimize risk.
Other terms that were formerly used, and
which have been displaced by the more
generic term "risk reduction" include "loss
prevention" and "loss control."
The term " risk reduction" is considered to
include both loss prevention and loss control
efforts.
9-5
Risk Reduction
Broadly speaking, "loss prevention" efforts are
aimed at preventing the occurrence of loss.
In addition, "loss control" efforts can be
directed toward reducing the severity of those
losses that do occur.
In other words, some risk control efforts aim at
reducing frequency, others seek to reduce the
severity of the losses that do occur.
9-6
Government Standards
The theory behind government regulations
related to safety is that businesses will not
implement the desired safety measures
unless they are compelled to do so.
In other cases, legislators have simply
concluded that the public interestdefined in
terms of injuries and deaths prevented
outweigh corporate profits in importance.
9-9
Government Standards
Once adopted, statutory standards become
mandatory for all entities covered by the law.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) regulations are perhaps the best
example of statutory loss control standards.
OSHA was a legislative recognition of the fact
that businesses must sometimes be compelled
to make loss prevention expenditures.
9-10
OSHA Standards
The law was passed to force employers to incur
loss prevention costs related to employee
safety without regard to marginal benefitmarginal cost analysis.
Voluntary Standards
In addition to government (statutory) standards,
there are also a number of voluntary or
consensual standards.
These are standards that have been adopted by
nongovernment groups to provide private
advisory guidance.
Although not legally binding, voluntary
standards can have an important influence on
the safety efforts of those to whom they are
intended to provide guidance.
9-12
Voluntary Standards
Often, voluntary standards gain significance
because they are used as performance
measures by insurance companies.
The standards promulgated by the Underwriters
Laboratories (UL) are a case in point.
9-13
9-14
9-17
Personal Injury
Accidents
Faults of Persons
Ancestry or Environment
9-21
9-24
10%
2%
Engineering Approach
The engineering approach to loss prevention
and control emphasizes the elimination of
unsafe physical conditions by such measures
as fire resistive construction, burglary resistant
safes, boiler inspections, and safer cars.
9-33
9-34
Enforcement.
9-37
Figure 9.3
Timing and Targets of Control Measures
Prior to
Event
At Time
of Event
After
Event
Individual
Machinery
Environment
9-38
Separation of Assets
Salvage
Rehabilitation
Redundancy
Noninsurance Transfers
9-39
Systems Safety
The initial stimulus for systems safety was the
creation of the intercontinental ballistic
missile (ICBM) system during the cold war.
Systems safety developed further in the U.S.
space exploration program.
9-40
9-41
9-42
Hazard Mechanism
Hazard Cause
Hazard Effect
Hazard Severity
Hazard Probability
Hazard Deterrents
Hazard Prevention
Action
Hazard Control
Resources
Fault-Tree Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a second
technique of systems safety, designed to
identify system faults by identifying the
causes of events.
It was invented in 1959 at Bell Laboratories to
address what developers of the USAF
Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile
(ICBM) system felt was an excessive risk in
the system.
9-47
Fault-Tree Analysis
FTA is a usually performed by a graphic
diagram (called a fault tree) that traces the
relationships between all minor events that
could lead to a major undesired event.
A fault tree has two major elements: (1) logic
diagramming, which connects, by means of
and and or gates the sub-events that
contribute to the ultimate undesired event at the
top of the tree and (2) the sub-events
themselves.
9-48
Fault-Tree Analysis
The tree is progressively constructed downward
by repeating the question What must happen
for the event or sub-event to occur?
The necessity and sufficiency of each sub-event
in the causality of the following event is
indicated by the type of gate; and or or.
If more than one sub-event at a given level must
occur before the event above them will result,
an and gate is used.
9-49
Sever
Fingers With
Power Saw
and
Power
turning
blade
Finger in
blade
path
or
No blade
guard
Improper
guard
9-50
9-51
9-54
Benefit to Insurers
The major benefit to the insurer is in making
accounts more profitable by reducing the
amount of losses.
An insurers loss control specialists can
sometimes devise ways to improve loss
experience to an extent that allows the insurer
to write an account that would otherwise be
unacceptable.
9-55
9-56
9-57
Disaster Planning
The objective of a disaster control plan is to
allow those responsible for the enterprise
during an emergency to focus on the solution of
major problems.
To accomplish this objective, the disaster plan
establishes an emergency organization,
designed to perform specific tasks before,
during, and after a disaster.
The purpose of a disaster plan is to provide
management with a planned course of action to
guide it in disaster or emergency situations.
9-58
Disaster Planning
An initial step in developing the disaster plan is
to establish priorities that will be followed in
resolving conflicts in developing the plan.
This advance determination of priorities will
guarantee that appropriate attention is given to
the rankings, and that decisions regarding
priorities do not have to be made under the
confusion and pressures of an actual disaster.
9-59