Alternate Project

Delivery
Opportunities

April 21, 2010

Master Builder

2
Early 20th Century
 Craft Talent
 Collaboration
 General Contractor

LACC Life Sciences Building LACC NE Van De Kamps

3
The 60s

 Time and the

Handshake

Aerial views of East Los Angeles College

4
 70s and 80s
 Adversarial
 Regulation
 Craft Talent
 Building Systems
 User’s Requirements

Edison Center for the Arts /ELAC auditorium (left) Mural by Roberto Chavez in 1970’s (right)
5
The 90s and Present

 Stop the Conflicts

 Design-Build
 Construction
Management

6
Technological Revolution

 Communication
 Design
 Construction

7
Technological Revolution:
Construction
Sustainability
Materials and Techniques
Code Requirements

8
Technological Revolution:
Building Information
 3D Models Modeling (BIM)
 Lines vs. Objects

 Material Lists
 Cost Estimating
 Personnel Scheduling
 Funding Schedules
 Clash Detection

9
BIM Storm

 BIM
 Brain Storming
 Design Charrettes

10
Back to the Master Builder

 Eliminate Conflicts
 Changes in Design
and Construction
Technology
 Fluid Changes in
Owners Needs

11
Project Delivery Methods
Design Bid Build Design Build

O O
CPM
CPM DB
A/E B A/E B

CPM-At Risk CPM-Advisor

O
O

A/E CPM
A/E CM

Sub-contractors
Sub-contractors
12
LACCD Project Delivery Methods

Design Bid Build Design Build

Owner Owner

CPM
DB
CPM

A/E Builder A/E Builder

13
 Owner
Design Bid Build Delivery Process
O

CPM
A/E B

A/E Team Schematic Design

Need Programming
Selection Design Development

Construction DSA
Bidding Construction Occupancy
Documents Approval

14
Design Bid Build
O

PROS: CPM
B
 Independent A/E A/E

 Low Bid Focus

 Owner: Maximum Design Control

CONS:
 Lengthy Linear Process
 No Pre-Qualification of Builder
 Extensive finger pointing
 No constructability input by Builders
 Owner: Maximum Design Risk

15
Design Build Delivery Process
O
Design Build Delivery Process
CPM
DB
A/E B

Programming
Programming Design Build
Need & RFP
A/E Team Competition
Criteria
Selection

Design/
Design Build
Construction DSA
Team Construction Occupancy
Document Approval
Selection
Completion

16
Design Build
O
CPM
DB
A/E B
PROS:
 Single Sources of Responsibility
 Pre-Qualification of ENTIRE Team
 Constructability Input by Builders

CONS:
 Independence of A/E Team

17
Current Design Build Process Results

 Schematic Design/ Design Development

 Fixed Price
–Design Fees
–Construction Costs
–Builder’s Fees
 RFP Issuance to Award: 100 – 120 Days

18
Construction Cost Comparison

WLAC Parking Structure #8 9/6/07 DBB $83.14/sq.ft.

Harbor Parking Structure 1/14/09 DB $81.50/sq.ft.

Harbor FMO 4/20/06 DBB $342.51/sq.ft.

Pierce FMO 8/6/09 DB $269.27/sq.ft.

Trade Tech South Campus 3/22/07 DBB $658.01/sq.ft.

Mission East Campus 1/14/09 DB $646.71/sq.ft.

19
Back to the Master Builder Team

20
Integrated Project Delivery

 Partnered process
 All participants
–A / E
– Contractor
– Subcontractor
– Suppliers
– Owners
 Open book
 Shared savings

21
LACC Student Union

22
Current Design Build Projects

LASC Student Services Center WLAC Athletic Campus

LAHC Science Complex

23
LAPC Facilities Maintenance & Operations
Current Design Build Projects

LASC Student Services Center LACC Student Union

LAMC East Campus

WLAC Watson Center 24

Questions ?

25