Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN CURRICULUM PROCESS
SGDC 6044 : CURRICULUM
STUDIES
LECTURER NAME:
DR. NURULWAHIDA BINTI HAJI AZID @ AZIZ
NO
PRESENTER
TOPIC
1.
An Overview
2.
Learning Process
3.
Ecological Integration
Outline
DEFINITIONS OF CURRICULUM VALUE ORIENTATIONS
Types of Learning
ECOLOGICAL INTEGRATION
Characteristics
IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
3
CONTI
What students should learn, how they should learn, how they should
engage in the learning process and how learning should be assessed.
(Ennis, C.D., 1987)
CONTI
DISCIPLINA
RY
MASTERY
ECOLOGIC
AL
INTEGRATI
ON
SELF
ACTUALIZATI
ON
VALUE
ORIENTATIO
NS
SOCIAL
RECONSTRUCTI
ON
LEARNING
PROCESS
LEARNING PROCESS
LEARNING PROCESS
According to Lorna, 2011; Highlights skill learning and
understanding of the associated learning principles.
Learning experiences emphasize learning progressions so
that students understand content relationships by adding
new knowledge to prior learning.
Teacher is released from the primary role of knowledge
provider to lend assistance, ask performance-related
questions or adjust task difficulty to student ability.
9
CONTI
10
CONTI
Teachers with a learning process value orientation
believe that learning how to learn is central to the
content.
The curriculum goal is to help students understand
learning principles so that they will be able to apply
the principles in learning new knowledge and skills.
11
TYPES OF LEARNING
1 Sensory- Motor
2 Cognitive
3 Problem Solving Learning
4 Affective
12
CONTI
1. Sensory Motor
Involves understanding the external world through the
senses and muscles.
2. Cognitive
Concerned with the development of ideas and concepts.
Includes all from associations between stimuli and
responses.
13
CONTI
3. Problem - Solving Learning
Involves of overcoming difficulties that appear to
interfere with the attainment of a goal.
4. Affective
Involves experiences within which emotions and
affect take precedence.
Assimilation of values, mental understanding and
emotional reactions
14
SUMMARY
How we learn is as important as what we learn.
Focus on helping students to understand learning
principles to enable them to apply them in learning
new knowledge and skills.
Develop individual abilities.
Develop problem-solving skills.
15
ECOLOGICAL INTEGRATION
16
DEFINITIONS
17
CONTI
Learning experiences enable students to undertake and
develop critical questioning, problem solving and decision
making to respond to changes in their own lives and to
determine their own future.
(Ennis & Chen, 1992)
18
CONTI
The curriculum goal is to encourage students to
search for personal meaning through participating in
various physical activities, mastering knowledge and
enhancing sensitivity to the environment in which
they live.
Each individual is a unique holistic being,
continuously in the process of becoming, seeking full
personal integration in a changing environment.
19
CHARACTERISTICS
The ecological integration approach has four characteristics;
4. A future orientation.
JEWETT, ENNIS (1990)
20
IMPLICATIONS
1. Teachers
Provide insight to teacher preferences and decisions relating to planning,
pedagogy, content selection and practice, as these will be based on their
particular set of beliefs and value orientation .
Encourage teachers to become actively involve in curriculum and instructional
decision making.
Providing more opportunities for diversity and responsible decision making
within teacher preparation.
To create program that are both consistent with teachers value perspectives and
sensitive to diversity inherent in school.
21
CONTI
2. Students
Foster engagement in teaching and learning process.
Providing the varieties of learning approaches that able to
meet the needs of the students.
Helps development of students higher order thinking skills.
22
23
CONCLUSION
Emphasizes the personal search for meaning.
Holistic person integrated with the total environment.
Attempt to balance the social, individual and subjectmatter emphases.
Curriculum is concerned with learning to ask and
examine critical questions.
24
REFERENCES
Ennis, C. D. (1987). Properties of purpose concepts in an operational middle school
curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 6, 287-300.
Ennis, C. D. (1992). Reconceptualizing learning as a dynamical system. Journal of
Curriculum and Supervision, 7, 115-130.
Ennis, C. D. (1992). Curriculum Theory as Practiced: Case Studies of operationalized
value orientations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 358-375.
Gillespie, L. B. (2011). Exploring the how and why of value orientations in
physical education teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,
36(9).
Jewett, A.E., Ennis, C.D. (1990). Ecological integration as a value orientation for
curricular decision making. Journal of Curriculam and Supervision, 5, 120-131.
25
Kilpatrick, W.H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19,
319-335.
Lorna B. Gillespie. (2011). Exploring the how and why of Value
Orientations in Physical Education Teacher Education. Australian Journal
of Teacher Education, 36 (9), 21 38.
Luke E. Kelly & Vincent J. Melograno. (2015). Developing The Physical
Education Curriculum. United States of America.
Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2013). Curriculum Foundations,
Issues (6th Ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Principles and
26