You are on page 1of 64

Organizations and Structures

Module 7
LIS 580: Spring 2006
Instructor- Michael Crandall

Roadmap

Organizing and organizations


Structure of organizations
Matrix organizations
Networked organizations
Learning organizations
Challenges in organizations

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

What Is Organizing?
Organizing
Arranging the
activities of the
enterprise in such
a way that they
systematically
contribute to the
enterprises goals.

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Depicting the Organization


Organization Chart
A chart that shows the
structure of the
organization including
the title of each
managers position
and, by means of
connecting lines, who
is accountable to
whom and who has
authority for each area.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Organization Chart
In f o r m a tio n S e r v ic e s G r o u p
K n o w le d g e A r c h i t e c t u r e M a n a g e r
K n o w le d g e A r c h i t e c t u r e L e a d
C u s to m e r L ia is o n
C a ta lo g e r
C a ta lo g e r

S e a r c h /S y s te m s L e a d
D e v e lo p e r

D e s ig n L e a d
A s s is ta n t D e s ig n e r

D e v e lo p e r
S y s t e m s A d m in

T a x o n o m y D e s ig n e r

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Organization Design and


Structure
Organization design
A process in which managers develop or
change their organizations structure

Work specialization
A component of organization structure that
involves having each discrete step of a job
done by a different individual rather than
having one individual do the whole job
Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Economies of Work
Specialization

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Stages of Organizational
Development
Simple structure
An organization that is low in specialization
and formalization but high in centralization

Functional structure
An organization in which similar and related
occupational specialties are grouped
together

Divisional structure
An organization made up of self-contained
units

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Stages of Organizational
Development (contd)
Matrix structure
An organization in which specialists from functional
departments are assigned to work on one or more
projects led by a project manager

Team-based structure
An organization that consists entirely of work
groups or teams

Boundaryless organization
An organization that is not defined or limited by
boundaries or categories imposed by traditional
structures

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Mechanistic and Organic


Organizations
Mechanistic organization
The bureaucracy; a structure that is high in
specialization, formalization, and
centralization

Organic organization
An adhocracy; a structure that is low in
specialization, formalization, and
centralization

Structure follows strategy


Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

10

Burns and Stalker

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

11

Structure Variables
Principles

Departmentalization

Chain of command
Span of control
Authority
Power
Responsibility

Functional
Divisional

Product
Customer
Geographic
Process

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

12

Organizational Structure: Control


Chain of command
The management principle that no person should report to
more than one boss

Span of control
The number of subordinates a manager can direct efficiently
and effectively

Authority
The rights inherent in a managerial position to give orders
and expect them to be obeyed

Responsibility
An obligation to perform assigned activities

Power
An individuals capacity to influence decisions
Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

13

Chain of Command

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

14

Tall And Flat Organizations, And


The Span Of Control
Span of Control
The number of subordinates reporting directly to a
supervisor.
Wide spans: larger number of direct reports.
Narrow spans: fewer number of direct reports.

Tall vs. Flat Organizations


Tall organizations: more management layers and
more hierarchical controls.
Flat organizations: fewer management layer and
decision making closer to the customer.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

15

Spans of Control in Country-Based


Organization

FIGURE 69
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

16

Types of Organizational Authority


Line authority
The position authority (given and defined by
the organization) that entitles a manager to
direct the work of operative employees

Staff authority
Positions that have some authority (e.g.,
organization policy enforcement) but that
are created to support, assist, and advise
the holders of line authority
Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

17

Authority Versus Power

Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

18

Types of Power
Legitimate

Power based on ones position in


the formal hierarchy

Coercive

Power based on fear

Reward

Power based on the ability to


distribute something that others
value

Expert

Power based on ones expertise,


special skill, or knowledge

Referent

Power based on identification


with a person who has resources
or traits

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

Prentice Hall, 2002

19

Checklist 7.3
Principles of Delegation
The manager can delegate authority but cannot
delegate responsibility.
Clarify the assignment.
Delegate, dont abdicate.
Know what to delegate.
Specify the subordinates range of discretion.
Authority should equal responsibility.
Make the person accountable for results.
Beware of backward delegation.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

20

Departmentalization:
Creating Departments
Departmentalization
The process through which an
organizations activities are grouped
together and assigned to managers; the
organizationwide division of work.

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

21

Departmentalization
Functional
The grouping of activities by functions performed

Product
The grouping of activities by product produced

Customer
The grouping of activities by common customers

Geographic
The grouping of activities by territory

Process
The grouping of activities by work or customer flow
April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

22

Organizing Departments by
Function
Functional Departmentalization
A form of organization that groups a
companys activities around essential
functions such as
manufacturing,
sales, or finance.

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

23

Functional Departmentalization

FIGURE 61
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

24

Organizing Departments by SelfContained Divisions/Purposes


Product Departmentalization
Grouping departments around a firms
products or services, or each family of
products or services; also referred to as a
divisional organization.

Customer Departmentalization
Self-contained departments are organized
to serve the needs of specific groups of
customers.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

25

Divisional Organization
for a Pharmaceuticals Company

FIGURE 62
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

26

Customer Departmentalization,
Grayson Steel Company

FIGURE 63
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

27

Organizing Departments by SelfContained Divisions/Purposes (contd)


Marketing-channel Departmentalization
Departments focus on particular marketing
channels, such as drugstores or grocery
stores.

Geographic (Territorial)
Departmentalization
Separate departments are established for
each of the territories in which the
enterprise does business.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

28

Marketing Channel
Departmentalization

FIGURE 64
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

29

Divisional Organizations
Facilitate Coordination

FIGURE 65
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

30

Checklist 6.1
Functional vs. Divisional Organizations
Functional Organization Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.

It is simple, obvious, and logical.


It fosters efficiency.
It can simplify executive hiring and training.
It can facilitate the top managers control.

Functional Organization Disadvantages


1. It increases the workload on the executive to
whom the functional department heads
report.
2. It may reduce the firms sensitivity to and
service to the customer.
3. It produces fewer general managers.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

31

Checklist 6.1 (contd)


Functional vs. Divisional Organizations
Divisional Organization Advantages
1. The product or service gets the singleminded attention of its own general
manager and unit, and its customers
may get better, more responsive
service.
2. Its easier to judge performance.
3. It develops general managers.
4. It reduces the burden for the
companys CEO.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

32

Checklist 6.1 (contd)


Functional vs. Divisional Organizations
Divisional Organization
Disadvantages
1. It creates duplication of effort.
2. It may diminish top managements
control.
3. It requires more managers with
general management abilities.
4. It can breed compartmentalization.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

33

Creating Matrix Organizations


Matrix Organization
An organization structure in which
employees are permanently attached to
one department but also simultaneously
have ongoing assignments in which they
report to project, customer, product, or
geographic unit heads.

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

34

Matrix Organization
Departmentalization

FIGURE 66
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

35

Matrix Organizations
Advantages
Access to expertise.
Stability of
permanent
department
assignments for
employees.
Allows for focus on
specific projects,
products, or
customers.

Disadvantages
Confusion of
command.
Power struggles and
conflicts.
Lost time in
coordinating.
Excess overhead for
managing matrix
functions.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

36

Departmentalization in Practice:
A Hybrid
Why mix the types of departmentalization?
Hierarchical considerations
The relationship of top level departments to their
subsidiary departments.

Efficiency
Product, customer, and territorial departments tend to
result in duplicate sales, manufacturing, and other
functional departments.

Common sense
Departmentalizing is still more an art than a science.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

37

The New Summer Tour Organization

FIGURE 68
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

38

Network-based Organizations
Organizational Network
A system of interconnected or cooperating
individuals.

Informal Networks
Communication pathways and relationships
between individuals in an organization that
do not necessarily conform to the formal
chain of command and communication
networks of an organization.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

39

Network-based Organizations
(contd)
Formal Organizational Network
A recognized group of managers or other
employees assembled by the CEO and the
other senior executive team, drawn from
across the companys functions, business
units, geography, and levels.

Electronic Organizational Networks


Networking through technology-supported
devices such as e-mail, video-conferencing,
and collaborative computing software like
Lotus Notes.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

40

Formal vs. Social Structure


Rarely do the
communication
patterns match the
formal structure

Cross, Rob. A bird's-eye view: Using social network analysis


to improve knowledge creation and sharing. IBM Executive
strategy report 04Jun2002
http://www-1.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/xs/imc/a10012
62
April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

41

Network-based Organizations
(contd)
Team-Based Organizations
Team
A group of people committed to a common purpose, set
of performance goals, and approach for which they hold
themselves mutually accountable.

Horizontal Corporations
A structure that is organized around customeroriented processes performed by multidisciplinary
cross-functional teams rather than by formal
functional departments.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

42

The Horizontal Corporation

Source: John A.
Byrne, The Horizontal
Corporation, Business
Week, 20 December
1993, p. 80.

April 18, 2006

FIGURE 611
G.Dessler, 2003

LIS580- Spring 2006

43

Checklist 6.2
Building Horizontal Organizations

Make responsibilities overlap. Design


individual jobs as broadly as possible, and
keep the number of job titles to a minimum.
Base rewards on unit performance to
emphasize the importance of working
together.
Change the physical layout to promote
collective responsibility. Let people see each
others work.
Redesign work procedures, provide computer
terminals, use the e-mail network, and make
sure managers are available.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

44

How to Create a Horizontal


Corporation

Source: Source: Reprinted from the December 20, 1993, issue of Business Week
by special permission. Copyright 1993 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

FIGURE 612
G.Dessler, 2003

45

Other Organization Types


Federal Organization
An organization in which power is distributed
between a central unit and a number of
constituents, but the central units authority is
intentionally limited.

Virtual Organization
A temporary network of independent companies
that use information technology to share skills,
reduce costs, and provide access to one anothers
markets.
Its success depends on each of the individual
firms responsibility and self-interest to accomplish
the networks purpose.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

46

Effect of Technology on Structure

G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

47

When Organizing:
Always Keep Your Goals in Mind
Business environments are in a constant state
of change.
An organizations strategy must be adapted to
changes in its competitive environment.
Structure follows strategy.
Strategic change creates the need for restructuring
the organization to acquire new and different
knowledge, skills and abilities.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

48

Checklist 7.1
What Determines Organization Structure
Environment. Fast-changing environments
require organic structures; slowly changing
environments favor mechanistic structures.
Technology. Unit and continuous production
processes favor organic structures. Mass
production processes favor mechanistic structures.
Goals. Ask, What are the main goals we want to
achieve via this organization?
Pros and cons. Each approach to
departmentalization has pros and cons.
Logic and common sense.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

49

What Are Learning


Organizations?
1. Adopt an organic, networked organizational
form.
2. Encourage their employees to learn and to
confront their assumptions
3. Have employees who share a common vision
4. Have the capacity

to adapt to unforeseen situations


to learn from their own experiences
to shift their shared mindsets
to change more quickly, broadly, and deeply than
ever before.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

50

Organizational Learning as a
Dynamic Process

Crossan, Lane, & White (1999)

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

51

Abolishing Organizational
Boundaries
Boundaryless Organization
An organization in which management
strips away the walls which typically
separate organizational functions and
hierarchical levels, through
the widespread use of
teams, networks, and
similar structural
mechanisms.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

52

The Four Organizational Boundaries


That Matter

Source: Reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Review. The Four Organizational Boundaries that Matter,
from The New Boundaries of the Boundaryless Company, by Larry Hirschorn and Thomas Gilmore, MayJune
1992. Copyright 1992 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved.

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

FIGURE 03
G.Dessler, 2003

53

Managing Learning Organizations


How to Streamline Organizational Decision
Making
Downsize
Reduce management layers
Establish miniunits

How to Cultivate Employees Personal


Mastery
Provide continuous learning opportunities.
Foster inquiry and dialogue.
Establish mechanisms to ensure that the
organization is continuously aware of and can
interact with its environment.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

54

Challenges in Organization
Merging separate organizations with different
structures
Changing an existing organization to meet
external or internal changes in conditions
Conflicts between departments or groups
Interdependence between organizational units
Centralization vs. decentralization

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

55

Part of the Independent Integrator Challenge


Facing the Homeland Security Director

Source: Alison Mitchell, Disputes Erupt over Ridges Needs


for His Job, New York Times, 9 November 2001, p. B7.

April 18, 2006

FIGURE 75
G.Dessler, 2003

LIS580- Spring 2006

56

Methods for Achieving


Coordination
Mutual Adjustment
Achieving coordination
through face-to-face
interpersonal
interaction.

Use Rules and


Procedures
Standardize
Exercise Direct
Supervision: Use the
Chain of Command
Divisionalize

Appoint Staff
Assistants
Appoint Liaisons
Appoint Committees
Organize Independent
Integrators
An individual or a group
that coordinates the
activities of several
interdependent
departments, but is
independent of them.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

57

Managing Organizational Conflict


LineStaff Conflict
Disagreements between a line manager
and the staff manager who is giving him or
her advice.

How to Organize to Reduce Interunit


Conflict
Appeal to power and
the chain of command
Reduce interdependence
Exchange personnel
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

58

Types of Interdependence

Source: Based on James Thompson, Organizations in Action


(New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), Chapter 2.

April 18, 2006

FIGURE 76
G.Dessler, 2003

LIS580- Spring 2006

59

Centralization and
Decentralization
Centralization
A function of how much decision-making
authority is pushed down to lower levels in
an organization; the more centralized an
organization, the higher the level at which
decisions are made

Decentralization
The pushing down of decision-making
authority to the lowest levels of an
organization
Prentice Hall, 2002

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

60

Decentralize?
Decentralized Organization
Organizational authority for most departmental
decisions is delegated to the department heads.
Control for major companywide decisions is
maintained at the headquarters office.

Decentralization Rules:
Decentralize decisions that affect only one division
or area and that would take a long time for upper
management to make.
Centralize decisions that could adversely affect the
entire firm and that upper management can fairly
quickly and easily.
G.Dessler, 2003

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

61

Problems With Size


There is a fairly common perception that large organizations tend to
behave much less intelligently than their size suggests. They often
lose the decisiveness seen in small groups and may seem "stupid" to
people within them who work with ideas and knowledge.
There appears to be a fundamental upper limit on the average per
capita decision rate that an organization can sustain, depending
inversely on the organization's entropy. If the limit is broached,
impaired productivity among knowledge managers may result and
large organizations may be disadvantaged when performing
knowledge-intensive tasks that require efficient use of intellectual
capital.
Janow, R. Shannon Entropy and Productivity: Why Big Organizations Can Seem Stupid. Analytic Solutions Group, LLC. 2/28/2004
http://physics.njit.edu/~janow/Paper20040228njit.pdf

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

62

Hammer vs. Deming


What tradeoffs did Deming and Hammer make
in their approaches to designing
organizations?
Did you notice who was given power in
Demings approach vs. Hammer?
What is driving NYNEX to make changes in
their organization structure?
What component of the organization is hardest
to change?
Do you see the same issues arising in the
War at Work article?
April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

63

Next Time

Managing People
Read Chapter 9 (not 8!!) and the articles

Discussion group questions:


How can relations be improved between Stanley
and the reference librarians?
How, without simply complaining about Stanley,
can you persuade Joanna to listen to the
reference departments perspective?
Who defines the responsibilities of each
department, and how can you, as an interested
party, help accomplish this?

April 18, 2006

LIS580- Spring 2006

64

You might also like