/

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

vs.

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

2 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

80
60
40

:
p < 0.9 x

20
0
82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

3 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

80
60

40

0.9 x pset < p < pset

20
0
82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

4 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

PFFFF

80
60

p pset
( )

40
20
0

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

5 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

80

60
40

20

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

6 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

starts
to open

80
60
40
20

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

7 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

opens

totally

80
60
40
20

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

8 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

Discharg
e
slowly
Capacity
closing

80
60
40
20
0
82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

9 / 12

vs.

(%)
100

80

slowly

closes
closing

60
40
20

0.9 x pset < p < pset

0
82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

121

(%)

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

10 / 12

vs.

vs.

vs.

(%)
100

80
60

40

20

(%)

0
82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110

Testlab Standard

121

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

11 / 12

vs.

Testlab Standard

/ | LESER GmbH & Co. KG | 17.02.2011 | Rev. 01

12 / 12