Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hanson
Hanson
Group 2 :
Bahrudin Yusuf .T
Ika Sekartaji
MM UGM AP-14 YOGYA
History Timeline
Hanson was built up by James Hanson, later Lord Hanson, and Gordon White in the late 1950s.
stock market had collapsed; labor disputes; inflasion increasing rapidly there was no need to
split up. Hanson would run the British Operation and White tried to build operation in USA.
By 1974, White managed his first acquisition of J. Howard Smith Company, a New Jersey based
processor of edible oils and animal feed that was later renamed Seacoast Products.
In 1984 :
Whites first hostile takeover : the US Industries (USI). The acquisition of USI was followed by
Hanson takeover the London Brick (Britains largest brick manufacturer), Imperial Company
UK UK UK
Allders UK Lindustries Imperial foods
British Ever Ready Hanson Brick
Imperial Tobacco Crabtree
USA USA
USA USA USI furniture & Hygrade food
Carisbrook USI Lighting & industrial Durkee food
Footwear building products SCM industrial Lea & Perrins inc.
Smith corona
SCM acquisitions
SCM profile :
Diversified manufacturer of consumer and industrial products
Had 22 operating companies based in 5 industries
( chemicals; coatings & resins; paper & pulp; foods;
typewriters)
The worlds leading manufacturers for portable typewriters
The worlds third largest producer of titanium dioxide
The sixth largest paint manufacturer
A major force in th US food industry Durkee Famous Foods
Attraction to Hanson
Poor financial performance
Beginnings of a turnaround
Mature businesses
Low risk
Contd
Titanium dioxide was dominated by global oligopoly
2 favorable trends that made high returns likely :
- a worlwide demand was forecasted to exceed supply for the next
few years
- input costs were declining because of the currency weakness of
the major raw material source, Australia.
Corporate overhead
Result after SCM acquisition
Attraction to Hanson
Mature business, low technology industries
There is little prospect of radically changing fashions or
technological change in tobacco, brewing & food industries.
Low risk
high brand recognition in Britain
Contd
Tobacco cashflow
had a classic cash cow
Failure of Imperials deversification strategy
Inadequate returns in brewing & leisure
Contd
Results :
Things began to go wrong for Hanson in the 1980s, as growth
began to slow and Hanson attempted to maintain high share
dividends. In the past, the problem was easily overcome by
acquiring new businesses. But now Hanson PLC had become a
victim of its own success. The size of the necessary acquisitions
to meet the dividend requirements of shareholders was growing
ever larger. This raised the problem not only of finding large
potential acquisitions to meet the companys requirements, but
also of funding them.
Hanson was criticized to fail to add value to the companies they
acquired (Imperial Chemical Industry acquisition in 1990), even
they got profit of 45 million ($70 million) when sell its stocks in
1991.
Hanson PLCs Strategy