Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Production of Acetic Acid
Production of Acetic Acid
ACETIC ACID
MUHAMMAD IKMAL BIN HAMID
MUHAMMAD MUSTAQIM SAFIY BIN MUSTAFA MAAROF
MUHAMAD AL-NAZREEN BIN AKHIRUDDIN
MUHAMMAD AIZAT EDZMIR BIN KHIDZIR
MUHAMMAD ALIFF BIN MUHAMMAD SOHAIMI
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST
MUHAMMAD MUSTAQIM SAFIY BIN MUSTAFA MAAROF
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MUHAMMAD ALIFF BIN MUHAMMAD SOHAIMI
INTRODUCTION
The objective of the development of new acetic acid processes has been to reduce raw
material consumption, energy requirements, and investment costs.
Significant cost advantages resulted from the use of carbon dioxide and of low-priced
methane as feedstocks
Acetic acid is an important commodity used in chemical industries, with about 9 million tons
of world demands per year.
The demand is estimated to grow at a very high pace, next only to ester solvents, which is
the strongest growth segment of acetic acid.
METHANE
CH4 + CO2
CH3COOH
SCREENING AND SCORING
SITE LOCATION
Site selection for a plant, requires careful considerations of the numerous factors
Decisions are strategic, long-term and non-repetitive in nature.
A suitable site must be found for a new project, and the site and equipment layout planned
Provision must be made for the ancillary buildings and services needed for plant operation
and for the environmentally acceptable disposal of effluent.
GENERAL CONSIDERATION ON
THE SITE SELECTION
Location with respect to marketing area
Raw material supply
Transport facilities
Availability of labor
Availability of utilities: water, fuel, power
Availability of suitable land
Environmental impact including effluent disposal
Local community consideration
Climate
Political and strategic consideration
LIST OF SITE FOR
CONSIDERATION
From the factors that were listed, we have choose three suitable places to become the site
for our plant.
The listed sites are: Sl.
No.
Factor Factor
Weigh
Site Rating 0-5 Sliding scale
ts
1. Kerteh, Terengganu
Kerteh Gebeng Bintulu
2. Gebeng, Pahang 1. Location 5 4 3 4
2. Industrial 4 5 4 4
3. Bintulu, Sarawak Infrastructure
3. Community 4 4 3 4
Infrastructure
4. Availability of water 4 5 5 5
5. Effluent disposal 4 4 4 4
6. Availability of Power 4 4 4 4
7. Availability of Gas 2 4 4 4
8. Site size and Nature 3 5 4 5
9. Ecology and Pollution 2 3 3 3
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM (PFD)
REACTOR
Rule 8 High production rates at short residence times (sec or min).
DESIGN TEMPERATURE 709.878 K
LIQUID VOLUME 27.8 L
VESSEL DIAMETER 0.1524 m
VESSEL TANGENT TO 1.524 m
TANGENT HEIGHT
REACTOR 1
REACTOR 2
SEPARATOR
Rule 3 Vertical vessel
Rule 4 L/D between 2.5 and 5 with optimum at 3.0
Rule 5 Liquid holdup time is 5 min based on volume of vessel
Rule 9 Gas velocity u is given by
DESIGN TEMPERATURE 606.234 K
OPERATING TEMPERATURE 578.457 K
VESSEL DIAMETER 0.9144 m
VESSEL HEIGHT 3.6576 m
VOLUME OF SEPARATOR 2401.9 L
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION VERTICAL
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT 1179.34 kg
EQUIPMENTS DESIGN
HEATER COOLER
TUBE DESIGN 616.483 K TUBE DESIGN TEMPERATURE 709.878 K
TEMPERATURE TUBE OPERATING 308.15 K
TUBE OPERATING 588.706 K TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE TUBE DESIGN GAUGE 415796 N/sqm-gauge
TUBE DESIGN GAUGE 243421 N/sqm-gauge PRESSURE
PRESSURE TUBE OUTSIDE DIAMETER 0.0254 m
TUBE OUTSIDE DIAMETER 0.0254 m TUBE LENGTH EXTENDED 6.096 m
TUBE LENGTH EXTENDED 6.096 m HEAT TRANSER AREA 0.3966 m2
HEAT TRANSER AREA 0.498 m2 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Double Pipe
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Double Pipe
EQUIPMENT WEIGHT 122.47 kg EQUIPMENT WEIGHT 127 kg
COSTING
AND
PROFITABILITY
ANALYSIS
ESTIMATING DESIRED PURCHASED COST
Equipment
(2001) C2 (2016)
number
1 1 3.29 $1 807.17 $5 945.59 $8 402.3 x (2
Heater units)
needed
Air = 85724.7 L/hr
Cost per unit = $0.35/m3
$254 047/yr
Methane needed = 24822.5 L/hr
Cost per unit = $0.42/m3
From data given in Aspen , the energy consumed for total plant operation are calculated in
electricity.
From
stream 12 . Volume per hour of wastewater is 582.623 L/hr equivalent to 0.5826 m 3/hr
For primary filtration, cost is $41/1000m3
R =
= $ 5 905 872/yr
COM d 0.180 FCI 2.73COL 1.23(CUT CWT C RM )
= 0.18(292,108.24) + 2.73(811 200) + 1.23 (2 385 340)
= $5 201 124/yr
End of
Year (k)
Investment dk - d] k R COM d
(R COM -
+
dk
) x (1-t)
dk
Cash
Flow
Cumulative
Cash Flow
0 (75)* - - - - (75) (75)
1 17.52 - - - - (17.52) (92.52)
2 ( 11.68 + 4.4)= - - - - (16.08) (108.6)
16.08
CCR 3.01
End of Year Non-discounted cash flow discounted cash flow Cumulative discounted cash
(k) flow
0 (75) (75) (75)
1 (17.52) (17.52)/1.15 = (15.23) (90.23)
2 (16.08) (16.08)/1.152 = (12.16) (102.39)
3 48.19 48.19/1.153 = 31.69 (70.7)
4 48.19 48.19/1.154 = 27.55 (43.15)
5 48.19 48.19/1.155 = 23.96 (19.19)
6 48.19 48.19/1.156 = 20.83 1.64
7 48.19 48.19/1.157 = 18.12 19.76
8 46.15 46.15/1.158 = 15.09 34.85
9 46.15 46.15/1.159 = 13.12 47.97
10 46.15 46.15/1.1510 = 11.41 59.38
11 46.15 46.15/1.1511 = 9.92 69.3
12 46.15 46.15/1.1512 = 8.63 77.93
Discount rate 15%
PVR 1.76