Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 3-Satyam Case
Group 3-Satyam Case
Case Study
Group 3:
Ananthakrishnan
Arun Vetrivel
Balasubramaniam
Kamalakannan
Suresh Kumar
Summary
Satyam surprised corporate world by making a fraud for 50 billion INR where
Satyam has been publicized for good corporate governances
Scandal is about fake accounting such as gap in balance sheet, fake deposits in
bank, understated liability and overstated debtors position
Even though three audit levels placed, company accounts had been made fake
PwC withdrawn from external auditing; Members involved in fraud were charged
and arrested ; Tech Mahindra took over Satyam - INR58 /share ; paid INR17.57
billion for 31% stake
Background
Revenue: US$ 2 billion in 2008
Audit committee met eight times in the year before scandal; Compensation
committee met three times in the year before scandal
Audit fees was tripled to INR 430 million during period 2003 to 2008 (which is
far below compared to peer group in IT industry)
Fake fixed deposit - grew from INR 33.2 million in 98/99 to 33.2 billion in 07/08
Family had 327 companies registered but registered in stock markets and hence
its not required to follow standard governance practices
Satyam offered bribe in Dec 2008 to World Bank for having favorable contracts
Dilution of shared from 8.65 percent to 5.13 percent through the sold out of
IL&FS trust
Charges made
Contradiction in Rajus statement on 3% net profit compared to 20% to 25%
profits seen among competitors; Charge is hard to believe no intention to make
private gains in this case of huge fraud
Raju and his brother were arrested; Law suits were made in India and USA
PwC audit head in India resigned, and two partners signed Satyams balance
sheet were suspended and prisoned