You are on page 1of 14

Monopolistic

Competition

Submitted by: Faisal Mohd. Khan


IM-2K8-26
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• Imperfect competition
– Two definitions
• Any industry where firms are not price takers
– This includes pure monopoly
• Any industry where firms are not price takers but
face competition from other firms
– This excludes pure monopoly

– Monopolistic competition
• Free entry
– Oligopoly
• Restricted entry
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• Assumptions of monopolistic competition


– Large number of firms
– Freedom of entry
– Differentiated products
• Downward-sloping demand curve
• Each firm has some power over prices

• Equilibrium of the firm


– short run
MR = MC
Short-run equilibrium of the firm
under monopolistic competition
£ MC

AC

AR  D

MR
O Q
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• Equilibrium of the firm


– long run
• If economic (supernormal) profits are made, new
firms will be attracted into the industry

• Long-run equilibrium where:


MR = MC (profit maximisation)
AR = AC (no economic profits: just normal profit)
Long-run equilibrium of the firm
under monopolistic competition
£

LRMC

LRAC

ARS  DS

MRS
O Q
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• Assumptions of monopolistic competition

• Equilibrium of the firm


– short run
MR = MC
– long run
MR = MC; AR = AC
– under-utilisation of capacity in long run
Under-utilisation of capacity in the long run
£

LRAC

DL under monopolistic
competition

O Q
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• The public interest


– comparison with perfect competition
Long run equilibrium of the firm under perfect and
monopolistic competition
£
• Production not at minimum AC
• Price not equal to MC
• Costs of product differentiation LRAC

P1

DL under monopolistic
competition

O Q1 Q
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION
• E-Commerce: a case study
– Low entry costs
• reduced capital and marketing costs
• outsourcing
– Near perfect knowledge
• greater price transparency
• greater information on product availability
– Reduction in firms’ power over prices
• greater competition (often global)
• ease for consumers to ‘shop around’
• firms more flexible in sourcing their supplies
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• E-Commerce: a case study (cont.)

– Constant striving by firms to reduce


competition
• firms seeking to differentiate their product:
‘rent seeking’

• mergers and acquisitions

• first-mover advantage
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• The public interest


– comparison with perfect competition

– comparison with monopoly


• no long-term economic profits
– possibly lower price

– BUT lack of economies of scale and less to plough back


into investment

• choice for consumer


– competition may improve quality and/or reduce costs
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION

• Limitations of the model


– imperfect information

– difficulty in identifying industry demand curve

– entry may not be totally free

– Indivisibilities: may allow economic profits


even in long run

– importance of non-price competition

You might also like