Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contoh Jurnal Reading
Contoh Jurnal Reading
Presented by:
Teguh Setiawan
Supervised by:
Dr. Sri Inakawati, Msi.Med., Sp.M (K)
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
This study was performed to evaluate the outcome after autologous dermis-fat graft
[DFG] orbital implants in a large sample.
DISCUSSION
In this large sample, DFG proved to be an effective and safe method for the reconstruction of
anophthalmic sockets.
INTRODUCTION
• postoperative complications
Alloplastic orbital implants • migration and exposure of the implant
the extraocular
The graft was
muscles were
implanted with the
sutured to the
dermal side showing
dermal part of the
up
graft
• Postoperative Evaluation of Patients
Aesthetic results were evaluated comparing symmetry of the palpebral
fissures and Hertel exophthalmometry measurements of the operated
side with prosthesis in place and the fellow-eye
Motility of the implant was assessed
Fitting of the prosthesis was evaluated
Patients and parents (in case of children) were interviewed about their
satisfaction with the cosmetic result after surgery (graded as very
good/excellent, satisfied/reasonable and not satisfied/bad)
Complications of this surgery were evaluated
Motility of Fitting of
the the
implant prosthesis Excellent
Good/excellent possibility to easily find
full motility in 4 a proper prosthesis
directions good fit of the
prosthesis
high patient comfort
with prosthesis
good lid-function
Reasonable
motility in 1 to 3
directions Reasonable
all but one of the above
criteria are fulfilled
Bad Bad
no motility more than one of the
above mentioned
criteria is not fulfilled
RESULTS
ANALYSIS OF THE
POSTOPERATIVE
RESULTS
1.3 The study indicates how many of the people asked to take Well covered
part did so, in each of the groups being studied.
1.4 The likelihood that some eligible subjects might have the Well covered
outcome at the time of enrolment is assessed and taken
into account in the analysis.
No. Selection of Subjects Criterion
1.5 What percentage of individuals or clusters recruited into DFG I : 142 over 315 = 45%
each arm of the study dropped out before the study was DFG II : 87 over 153 = 56%
completed.
1.6 Comparison is made between full participants and those Not reported
lost to follow up, by exposure status.
1.9 Where blinding was not possible, there is some Not applicable
recognition that knowledge of exposure status could have
influenced the assessment of outcome.
3.4 What criteria are used to decide who should be Patients who undergo primary
INCLUDED in the study? DFG and secondary DFG in 16
year period
3.5 What criteria are used to decide who should be Patients who undergo primary
EXCLUDED from the study? DFG and secondary DFG in 16
year period that not have
sufficient follow up
3.6 What risk factor is investigated in the study? No
No. Description of The Study Criterion
3.7 Was the inception cohort applied? Not reported
3.8 How long were patients followed-up for, during the Median follow up after DFG I
study? was 21,5 months
Median follow up after DFG II
was 14 months
THANK YOU