Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOC 474
Term Project
Made by:
Akash Chauhan
Akash Kashyap
H. Sripath
What we intend to do:
Show the rise of Infotainment, Tabloidization
in the news media fuelled by the increasingly
consumerist behaviour of the urban society.
Look at the history of the two newspapers
and at the present ownership and how it
affects the newspaper’s current situation
Compare the two newspapers with an
emphasis on the infotainment and culture
industry perspective
A few points:
Consumerism:
• With the rise of the Culture Industry, it is argued that culture is now
dominated by the forces of market exchange and profit
Tabloidization:
Tabloidization is media trend involving a shift “away from government
and foreign affairs” to a more entertainment-style of journalism.
For example….. What is the first thing that comes to your mind when
you think about what Bill Clinton did?
• The newspaper started printing at its own press, christened 'The National Press',
established on borrowed capital.
• In the late 1980's its ownership passed into hands of the family's younger members
• The Hindu is a family-run business. It was headed by G. Kasturi from 1965 to 1991, N. Ravi
from 1991 to 2003, and by his brother, N. Ram, since June 27th 2003. Other family
members are directors of The Hindu and its parent company, Kasturi and Sons.
History of the newspapers:
The Times of India:
• The Times of India was founded on Nov 3, 1838 as The Bombay Times and Journal of Commerce,
and served the British residents of western India
• Originally British owned and controlled, its last British editor was Ivor S. Jehu, who resigned the editorship
in 1950
• The Times of India is owned by Bennet, Coleman & Company (Controlled by Indu and Vineet Jain)
popularly known as The Times Group which also publishes The Economic Times, Mumbai Mirror,
TIMES NOW, Femina & Filmfare, Planet M, Radio Mirchi and indiatimes.com web portal to name a
few.
• It has been by and large viewed as a pro-establishment paper. It tends to vary in its support between the
BJP and Congress Party, depending on who holds the reins of the Central Government. The executive
editor at present is Jaideep Bose
• It has come under attack because of tabloidization of its content and focus on infotainment rather than
“hard news” in recent times.
History of the newspapers:
Conclusion:
• TOI has placed more emphasis on an industry like setup
and has branched out into various other fields in the
news and entertainment industry
The Hindu 24 2 to 3
Hindu TOI
A Comparison of the international section
TOI
Hindu
Comparative Study of various sections of The Hindu and
The Times of India:
Hindu Ad
Comparative Study of various sections of The
Hindu and The Times of India:
Comparison on the basis of number of colored pages:
• Consumerism in the society drives the newspapers to give out things which attract their
attraction, they present things which are eye catching and flashy.
• Since the readers will not hesitate to switch to their competitors, the newspapers try to
increase their circulation by the help of eye catching pictures of celebrities and other
“hot stuff”.
• The Times of India rarely has a section without a celebrity picture whereas The Hindu is
more sedate in this regard with a greater emphasis on hard news.
The Hindu 24 4 to 6
*Kanpur Times
Comparative Study of various sections of
The Hindu and The Times of India:
Space given to infotainment based
news in different sections:
• The result of the US elections was a sweeping victory for the Democrats over
the Republicans for the first time in 12 years.
• The Times of India while giving the facts and statistics has placed a greater
emphasis on the huge win of Hillary Clinton (wife of former president Bill
Clinton) from New York and her rumored run for presidency in 2008.
• They try to make or present such news so as to people who are otherwise
uninterested in such news also take notice of it.
• Another important fact pointing out in the TOI news is the effect of these results
on Indian US nuclear deal which was started by President George Bush which is
yet another effort to raise some eyes towards this news by making it relevant to
the readers of certain mindset.
Case study :
• ‘The Hindu’ on the other hand covers the news more deeply giving an insight of
the reasons behind such a sudden change of trend in the election results which
involves the policies of the US government on Iraq war and various other foreign
and national policies. The reactions of the Republican Party and the turmoil
created within the party get more emphasis.
• The Hindu thus lays a greater emphasis on the news as it is with a tendency to
report the hard news without too much emphasis on the Hillary Clinton angle.
On the whole, the Hindu has covered the elections in a more balanced manner,
covering both the Republican side as well as the Democrats than the TOI.
We can see that the TOI has laid a greater emphasis on the infotainment
perspective and has been able to maintain its larger share of the readership
based on this approach of eye catching headlines and personal interest stories
(here Hillary Clinton) rather than the Hindu which has laid a greater emphasis on
the hardcore facts of the story.
Readership trends of the two newspapers:
Results of the National Readership survey (NRS) conducted by AC Nielson
for the year 2006:
The majority of the English dailies are sold in urban industrialized areas.
The readership consists of people living in the late industrial phase in a
consumerist society.
TOI for me bcoz its more glamourous(with pics n all) n it gives more
sports news than any other english daily
I prefer TOI. The presentation of the paper, which includes the colour
combination and fonts etc. is more amicable. News headlines are such
that they grasp your curiosity...
All Hindu editions, including the Delhi one seem to come from
some crackpot's head in Chennai.
And all TOI editions, irrespective of edition, are all the same and
come from a common place too: the TOI-let.
”