0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views16 pages

Feasibility Study Cost Estimates: ©2002 Dr. Bradley C Paul

This document provides cost estimates for conducting a feasibility study. It breaks down estimated costs for various components of sinking a mine shaft including labor, explosives, concrete, steel, and other supplies. Cost estimates become more detailed moving from pre-feasibility to feasibility studies.

Uploaded by

Salah Ibrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
98 views16 pages

Feasibility Study Cost Estimates: ©2002 Dr. Bradley C Paul

This document provides cost estimates for conducting a feasibility study. It breaks down estimated costs for various components of sinking a mine shaft including labor, explosives, concrete, steel, and other supplies. Cost estimates become more detailed moving from pre-feasibility to feasibility studies.

Uploaded by

Salah Ibrahim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Feasibility Study Cost Estimates

©2002 Dr. Bradley C Paul


Feasibility Study
 Processes are actually worked out and
planned
– checked for technical flaws
– checked for permit flaws
 Format
– Pre-feasibility may give you a lot of factored
cost estimates
– Start Shifting big ones to itemized cost
estimates
– Itemized estimates become more detailed
Feasibility Study Overviews
 Major Cost Items are Identified
– Quotes are secured on major cost items
– Minor items tend to be listed with general
comparison cost estimates attached.
 Important error avoid - missing and double
counting.
Pre-Feasibility/ Feasibility Contrast

 Major Cost Items from Pre-Feasibility move


either to Itemized Cost format or are
expanded
 Example - Our Mine Shaft could easily be a
big cost
– Advance rate likely to be 8 feet per day using 3
eight hour shifts in solid
– Only get 2 feet day through first 200 feet of
unconsolidated
– Lets Detail the crew
Shafting Crew
 Typical Sinking Crew would be 5 people
– 4 laborers – 1 supervisor
– doing rounds, support ect. (from SERPA)
– wages $15.46/hr (1997 base from WMCS)
– 4*24*$15.46 = $1,484/day
– Time 100 days for first 200 ft
 69 days more for next 550 ft through solid rock
– 169 days at $1,484/day = $250,823
– I’ll deal with supervisor later
Support People
 Engineering/Technical Crew
– 1 person (some would use 2) (3 for 3 shifts)
SERPA
– $16.15/hr 1997 cost WMCS
– $388/day * 169 days = $65,504
 Mechanical Crew
– 2 people (6 for 3 shifts) SERPA
– $20.98/hr 1997 cost WMCS
– $1007/day*169 days = $170,190
Surface Crews
 Surface and Yard Workers 2
 Rate $11.89/hr
– 2*$11.89*24*169 = $96,452
 Sinking Hoist Operator
– $16.50/hr*24*169 = $66,924
Supervisory Crews
 1 supervisor/shift $23.94/hr
– $23.94*24*169 = $97,101
 Total Labor Cost
– $746,994 say $747,000
 Indexing Labor
– $747,000* 17.89/16.15 = $827,500
The Burden of Burden
 Workers get fringe benefits
– health, vacation time etc.
– government mandated programs
 social
security / medicare / unemployment / workers
compensation
 Often Expressed as a percentage of wage
– Quarries around 30%
– Metals commonly around 40%
– Some coal may be 60%
– WMCS estimates 36% for Shaft Sinking
Dropping the Burden on the Project

 $827,500 * 1.36 = $1,125,000


 Explosives Cost
– Rounds at 4 lbs/ton
– Need to know concrete thickness
 have about 15 inch thick (some squeeze for
horizontal stress)
 for 20 ft finished diameter - need 22.5 feet
– with some over-excavation 23 feet
– Rock density about 170 lb/ft^3
 35.3 tons per foot of Advance
Having a Blast
 35.3 tons/ft * 4 lbs/ton = 141 lbs of
explosive per foot of advance
– 106,000 lbs @ $1.54/lb = $163,000
 At about 1 round shot/day
– 110 caps/day * 169 days = 18,590 caps
– @$1.81 each = $33,650
 Chord and Supplies about 50% of caps (no
boosters here)
– $16,824
Breaking Cost
 $213,500 for explosives
 Drilling Consumables at about 25% of
explosives
– $53,400
 Breaking Cost (less labor counted
elsewhere)
– $267,000
 Index to end 2002
– $267,000 * 149.7/149.1 = $268,000
Non-Labor Mucking Costs
 At $2.50/ton (include disposal)
– 35.3 tons/ft * $2.5 = $88.30/ft
– for 750 ft $66,216 (current cost)
 Concrete Cost
– 23 ft outside diam - 20 ft inside
– 3.75 cubic yard per foot of advance
– Concrete at $80/cubic yard delivered to site
– $225,000 for concrete
Other Supplies
 Steel cost at about 1.5 times concrete
– $337,500
– includes materials to advance utilities down
shaft and put in guides for skips
 Concrete and Steel
– $562,500
 10% for misc supplies
– $56,250 total
 Supplies Subtotal $618,750
Direct Cost of Shaft
 Labor $1,125,400 + Breaking $268,000 +
Mucking $66,200 + Supplies $618,750
 $2,078,350
 10% contingency $2,286,200
 15% contractor mark-up and mobilization
– $2,629,000
 Note that we did consider some site specific problems with
large amounts unconsolidated Overburden and ground
stresses
Pre-Feasibility / Feasibility
Contrast
 At Order of Magnitude just scaled off of someone
elses approximate cost
 Pre-Feasibility was either a factored cost estimate
or a simple itemized cost estimate (ie cost per foot
of shaft)
 At Feasibility stage it became a much more
carefully itemized exercise
– we were still flakey on cost of service lines pipes
 As move to Budget Authorization likely bring in
contractors to bid specifically on the job

You might also like